Re: Australian Identify & Disrupt Bill

[Angry Aussie]

I can't post this in the thread; I reckon the admins can maybe move this there.

Too late.



It has passed both Houses.



Plenty of us spoke up and signed petitions.



So many Bills have been passed.



Including one where the Fed Govt can bring in the military from other countries to enforce 'states of emergency' in Australia, but only if our own military and police have already refused to subdue their own population (which the modelling reveals is likely).

Fun times ahead eh?



PDF of bill: parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/bills/r6623_aspassed/toc_pdf/20144b01.pdf;fileType=application/pdf

[Amy]

They already passed it quietly while everyone was locked indoors afraid of the flu. This Act gives police an avenue to plant evidence on people, completely legally and in a way that a person could never dispute it. I'd say it's unbelievable our politicians passed this but it isn't. It is exactly what they do. Yet the half the country likely doesn't care.

[Angry Aussie]

(cd) the extent to which the execution of the warrant is likely to

19 cause a person to suffer a temporary loss of:

20 (i) money; or

21 (ii) digital currency; or

22 (iii) property (other than data);

23 so far as that matter is known to the eligible Judge or

24 nominated AAT member; and

25 (ce) if:

26 (i) the eligible Judge or nominated AAT member believes

27 on reasonable grounds that the data covered by the

28 warrant (within the meaning of section 27KE) is data of

29 a person who is working in a professional capacity as a

30 journalist or of an employer of such a person; and

31 (ii) each of the offences referred to in

32 paragraph 27KA(1)(c) is an offence against a secrecy

33 provision;

34 whether the public interest in issuing the warrant outweighs:

35 (iii) the public interest in protecting the confidentiality of the

36 identity of the journalist’s source; and

37 (iv) the public interest in facilitating the exchange of

38 information between journalists and members of the

public so as to facilitate reporting of matters in the

2 public interest; and

I find it interesting this was never done before to tackle crime - but is being done now - that people are resisting what is happening.

the following is interesting if you think how it could be applied to people talking internationally against emergency situation orders for example and if what you said might cause a protest which in turn might lead to them engaging in false flag ops and damage









speaking online internationally re emergency rules - could be seen as international organised crime.





(3) For the purposes of having regard to the nature and gravity of the

7 conduct constituting the offences referred to in

8 paragraph 27KA(1)(c), the eligible Judge or a nominated AAT

9 member must give weight to the following matters:

10 (a) whether that conduct amounts to:

11 (i) an activity against the security of the Commonwealth;

12 or

13 (ii) an offence against Chapter 5 of the Criminal Code;

14 (b) whether that conduct amounts to:

15 (i) an activity against the proper administration of

16 Government; or

17 (ii) an offence against Chapter 7 of the Criminal Code;

18 (c) whether that conduct:

19 (i) causes, or has the potential to cause, serious violence, or

20 serious harm, to a person; or

21 (ii) amounts to an offence against Chapter 8 of the Criminal

22 Code;

23 (d) whether that conduct:

24 (i) causes, or has the potential to cause, a danger to the

25 community; or

26 (ii) amounts to an offence against Chapter 9 of the Criminal

27 Code;

28 (e) whether that conduct:

29 (i) causes, or has the potential to cause, substantial damage

30 to, or loss of, data, property or critical infrastructure; or

31 (ii) amounts to an offence against Chapter 10 of the

32 Criminal Code;

33 (f) whether that conduct involves, or is related to, the

34 commission of:

35 (i) transnational crime; or

36 (ii) serious crime; or

37 (iii) organised crime

while it may not be immediately obvious to some - it is clear to me this has been done to prevent whistleblowing:




(6) For the purposes of this section, secrecy provision means a

9 provision of a law of the Commonwealth or of a State that

10 prohibits:

11 (a) the communication, divulging or publication of information;

12 or

13 (b) the production of, or the publication of the contents of, a

14 document.


Holy cow:


9 (3) In the case of a warrant authorising access to, or disruption of, data

10 held in the target computer on premises that are vehicles, the

11 warrant need only specify the class of vehicle in relation to which

12 the access to, and disruption of, data held in the target computer is

13 authorised.


Would that include the actual vehicle computer? i.e. disrupting the... ECM/ ECU?


If so - they could wipe the data re location - and maybe even re-write it - or access it to know your whereabouts.

The thing is - they have already been doing all this stuff - they are just making it legal now



Warrant must provide for certain matters

12 (8) A data disruption warrant must:

13 (a) authorise the use of any force against persons and things that

14 is necessary and reasonable to do the things specified in the

15 warrant; and

16 (b) if the warrant authorises entering premises—state whether

17 entry is authorised to be made at any time of the day or night

18 or during stated hours of the day or night.

19 Concealment of access etc.

20 (9) If any thing has been done in relation to a computer under:

21 (a) a data disruption warrant; or

22 (b) this subsection;

23 then, in addition to the things specified in the warrant, the warrant

24 authorises the doing of any of the following:

25 (c) any thing reasonably necessary to conceal the fact that any

26 thing has been done under the warrant or under this

27 subsection;

28 (d) entering any premises where the computer is reasonably

29 believed to be, for the purposes of doing the things

30 mentioned in paragraph (c);

31 (e) entering any other premises for the purposes of gaining entry

32 to or exiting the premises referred to in paragraph (d);

33 (f) removing the computer or another thing from any place

34 where it is situated for the purposes of doing the things


They can now blatantly or covertly enter your property and take your computer - or other thing - or mess with it.

For example - if you have evidence against them - the government - and if showing this publicly would cause a response - such as some kind of protest - which might cause some form of damage - then they can come and take the evidence against themselves covertly -


These are rules for rule-breakers.

To avoid doubt, this Division does not affect the law relating to the

32 powers, privileges and immunities of any of the following:

33 (a) each House of the Parliament;



(b) the members of each House of the Parliament;

2 (c) the committees of each House of the Parliament and joint

3 committees of both Houses of the Parliament.






Please make it stop Mommy.


They haven't left much out:





43C Extraterritorial operation of data disruption warrants

19 (1) If, before the issue of a data disruption warrant, it becomes

20 apparent to the applicant for the warrant that there will be a need

21 for access to, and disruption of, data held in a computer:

22 (a) in a foreign country; or

23 (b) on a vessel or aircraft that is registered under the law of a

24 foreign country and that is in or above waters beyond the

25 outer limits of the territorial sea of Australia;

26 the eligible Judge or nominated AAT member considering the

27 application for the warrant must not permit the warrant to authorise

28 that access and disruption unless the eligible Judge or nominated

29 AAT member is satisfied that the access and disruption has been

30 agreed to by an appropriate consenting official of the foreign

31 country







- so this doesn't just effect Australia or Australians - but anyone anywhere who may or may not be communicating with Australians - for example - if we message family or post on social media such that it can be seen - this is total censorship - if they want it to be.