|
|
Post by PrisonerOfHope on Aug 22, 2024 1:09:27 GMT -5
Daily Bible Verse, Matthew 2:20
Wednesday, August 21st, 2024
saying, “Arise, take the young Child and His mother, and go to the land of Israel, for those who sought the young Child’s life are dead.” Matthew 2:20
“saying, ‘Having arisen, take the Child and His mother, and go to the land of Israel, for they have died – those seeking the soul of the Child’” (CG).
In the previous verse, an angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph in a dream while he was in Egypt. This occurred after the death of Herod. In the appearance, he was “saying, ‘Having arisen, take the Child and His mother.’”
The words are addressed in the second person singular. Rather than, “All of you arise and go,” the angel is speaking to Joseph about what he is to do. Once he is up and about, he is to take the Child and His mother. As in verse 13, the focus is on the Child, while Mary is of secondary attention. Understanding this, the narrative continues with, “and go to the land of Israel.”
In verse 13, Joseph had been told to flee to Egypt. Now, he is told to go to the land of Israel. There is no rush or urgency in the words, something that must have been quite reassuring to Joseph. He bore a great responsibility, and he would have probably been quite happy in receiving these words. From there, the angel continues with, “for they have died – those seeking the soul of the Child.”
The words bring about a lot of curious speculation. First, note the differences between verse 13 and verse 20 –
“Having arisen, take the Child and His mother, and flee to Egypt. And you are there until if I should tell you. For Herod is about to seek the Child to destroy Him.”
“Having arisen, take the Child and His mother, and go to the land of Israel, for they have died – those seeking the soul of the Child.”
It was Herod who intended to kill the Child. But now, the angel speaks of “those” who sought to destroy Him. There are several views on what the words are saying –
“The plural is very often used where the conception of a species is to be expressed, and then denotes the subject, not according to number, but chiefly according to the category to which it belongs.” Meyers NT Commentary
That is supported by the words of Bengel, saying, “The plural concisely signifies, that Herod is dead, and that there are not any others who entertain evil designs.”
Cambridge says it is a euphemism, the reference being Herod alone. Barnes concurs and adds a second possibility. He says, “This either refers to Herod alone, as is not uncommon, using the plural number for the singular; or it may refer to Herod and his son Antipater. He was of the same cruel disposition as his father, and was put to death by his father about five days before his own death.”
Numerous others suggest it is given as a parallel to the words of the Lord to Moses in Exodus 4 –
“Now the Lord said to Moses in Midian, ‘Go, return to Egypt; for all the men who sought your life are dead.’” Exodus 4:19
Whichever option is correct, it is a notable statement that Joseph would have understood and accepted.
Life application: In Exodus 2:15, only Pharaoh was noted as seeking to kill Moses. However, the text says “all the men” later in Exodus 4:19. Only speculation can be made as to who any others may have been, and we can’t go inserting things into the Bible to form a conclusion. The same is true with this verse in Matthew.
The possibilities for what is meant have been set forth, and there may be others as well. But each of these is only a possibility and should be noted as such. As seen above, Joseph would have known what the intent was. Even if he didn’t at first, he could have asked, and that part of the conversation was simply not recorded.
The important point to remember is that the story bears all the marks of a literal historical account, and it is detailing to us information about the life of Jesus. Therefore, let us consider it as such and revel in what God has done. He is making marvelous parallels between the calling forth of Israel from the bondage of Egypt and the calling forth of Jesus as well.
Moses and those with him stopped and received the law on the way to Israel. Jesus is being drawn directly back to Israel to fulfill the law that Moses received. In doing so, He will usher in a New Covenant and a new plan and direction for the people of God. Great is the Lord who has done all these things!
Lord God, Your word is a glorious treasure trove of wonder and delight concerning the track of man back to You through the redemptive process that You have set forth. One step at a time, we are being instructed on what You have done and are doing to accomplish that. And it is all centered on Jesus. Thank You for our beautiful Savior, Jesus. Amen.
|
|
|
|
Post by PrisonerOfHope on Aug 22, 2024 21:43:52 GMT -5
Daily Bible Verse, Matthew 2:21
Thursday, August 22nd, 2024
Then he arose, took the young Child and His mother, and came into the land of Israel. Matthew 2:21
“And having arisen, he took the Child and His mother and came to the land of Israel” (CG).
In the previous verse, the messenger of the Lord spoke to Joseph in a dream. His words were, “Having arisen, take the Child and His mother, and go to the land of Israel.” Now, in exacting obedience to that word, it next says, “And having arisen, he took the Child and His mother.”
As in the previous verse, the verbs are in the singular. Joseph was given the instruction, and he followed through with it as spoken. Matthew continues to place the Child before His mother in the narrative as well.
From this point, Mary will not be mentioned again in Matthew until near the end of Chapter 12, when she is included in a general statement about “His mother and brothers.” She will not be mentioned by name until the end of Chapter 13 in another general statement, saying, “Is this not the carpenter’s son? Is not His mother called Mary?”
At the same time, Jesus will be mentioned by name over forty times by then. He will be indirectly or directly referred to many more times as well. Above all else, the entire biblical narrative, from Matthew 1:1 forward is completely focused on Jesus.
As for the minimal references to Mary, this is consistently the case throughout the four gospels. In Acts, she will be mentioned once along with other women. There is no additional importance placed on Mary. Rather the narrative is focused on Jesus. In fact, apart from the birth and infancy narratives, it may be that a comparable amount of detail is given concerning two women named Mary in the gospels other than Jesus’ mother.
With Joseph’s arising and gathering Jesus and His mother, it next says, “and came to the land of Israel.”
Just as he was instructed, so he accomplished. It can be inferred from the coming verses that he probably intended to go back to Bethlehem. However, that will not be where they will wind up.
Life application: Hebrews 12:2 has clear words for us. There, it says, “Let us fix our eyes on Jesus…” (BSB). There are many reasons for this that we could consider. Jesus is God incarnate. As such, He is our Creator (see Colossians 1:16, etc.). Jesus gave His life so that we could have restoration with God, forgiveness of sins, and so forth.
By looking to Jesus, we will not be looking elsewhere. Thus, we will avoid idolatry, immorality, etc. By looking to Jesus, we will be thinking about Jesus and all that He means to us. When actively looking, our mental attention is also actively directed at what we are looking at. Thus, we will be thinking about the Source of all goodness, righteousness, and so on.
When Scripture is rightly considered in its proper context, the admonition to keep our eyes on Jesus will keep us from theological error. For example, by considering Mary in relation to Jesus, right from Scripture, we can see the grossly exaggerated, unbiblical stand of the Roman Catholic Church, which places a high stress on Mary.
Because of this, their theology is flawed in relation to Jesus. The importance of the cross is diminished. The importance of prayer to and through Jesus is obliterated. The importance of the return of Christ is obfuscated. Even our understanding of Israel and its importance in the future is diminished.
Let us be wise and obedient to the word. Let us fix our eyes on Jesus!
Glorious Lord God, Your word has instructed us to fix our eyes on Jesus. How often has it been said that if our attention to Jesus is too great, we are not giving honor to You? And yet, if Jesus is God, how can we honor You if we do not fix our eyes on Him? Help us to think clearly and to understand that You are in the Son, and the Son is in You. There is no favoritism in the Godhead. But You are One. May we understand this and be obedient to Your word. Amen.
|
|
|
|
Post by PrisonerOfHope on Aug 24, 2024 1:44:21 GMT -5
Daily Bible Verse, Matthew 2:22
Friday, August 23rd, 2024
But when he heard that Archelaus was reigning over Judea instead of his father Herod, he was afraid to go there. And being warned by God in a dream, he turned aside into the region of Galilee. Matthew 2:22
“And having heard that Archelaus reigns over Judea instead of Herod his father, he feared to go there. And having been admonished in a dream, he withdrew to the allotments of Galilee” (CG).
In the previous verse, it noted that Joseph took the Child and His mother and came into the land of Israel. Matthew next records, “And having heard that Archelaus reigns.”
Concerning what caliber of person Archelaus was, Albert Barnes notes –
“Archelaus possessed a cruel and tyrannical disposition similar to his father. At one of the Passovers he caused 3,000 of the people to be put to death in the temple and city. For his crimes, after he had reigned 9 years, he was banished by Augustus, the Roman emperor, to Gaul, where he died.”
With this Archelaus ruling in place of his father, Matthew next records that his reign was “over Judea instead of Herod his father.”
Charles Ellicott records this concerning Archelaus’ rule –
“Strictly speaking, this prince, who, under his father’s will (made just before his death), governed Judæa, Samaria, and Idumæa, was never recognised as a king by the Roman Emperor, but received the inferior title of Ethnarch. Antipas had Galilee and Peræa, Philip the region of Trachonitis. Popularly, however, the higher title was still used of him as we find it in 14:9 of the Tetrarch Antipas.”
Because this terrible successor to his father had begun to rule over the same place that Joseph had left from, “he feared to go there.”
This only makes sense. If his father had wanted to kill the children of Bethlehem, and if even a breath of the presence of Jesus, Joseph, and Mary had been made known to him, it is possible that the same knowledge was handed to Archelaus to be mindful of. If so, then if a report came back that they had returned to Bethlehem, it could only speak of further trouble for Joseph and his family.
Thus his fear was understandable in some ways. Therefore, another divine visitation is recorded, saying, “And having been admonished in a dream.”
This is now the fourth visitation in a dream received by Joseph. The Lord is directing his steps to ensure that Jesus will be properly tended to. God had spoken of the coming of the Messiah since the fall of man. His word is filled with information concerning His coming, and those prophetic utterances were being fulfilled with each new detail that is being recorded in the gospel, which includes the next movement of the family. Matthew records the words, saying, “he withdrew to the allotments of Galilee.”
The word translated as “allotments” is meros. It has a variety of possible translations based on the context. It is derived from a word signifying “to get as a section or allotment” (Strong’s). The idea is that there is an overall area known as Galilee. Within that area, the various portions of land are allotted to be under the authority of whoever leads this greater area known as Galilee. That is then explained in Luke 23 –
“When Pilate heard of Galilee, he asked if the Man were a Galilean. 7 And as soon as he knew that He belonged to Herod’s jurisdiction, he sent Him to Herod, who was also in Jerusalem at that time. 8 Now when Herod saw Jesus, he was exceedingly glad; for he had desired for a long time to see Him, because he had heard many things about Him, and he hoped to see some miracle done by Him.” Luke 23:6-8
As Jesus will grow up in Nazareth, and as Nazareth is an allotment of Galilee, more prophecy will be fulfilled in this move. That will be seen in the next verse and in more verses ahead as Matthew unfolds.
Life application: In this verse, it said that Joseph feared to go to Judea because of the new ruler of that area. Fear is not uncommon, and it affects us all to some degree and in a wide variety of ways. However, there are things to fear – such as a baseball coming directly at your head – that are to then be avoided. For the Christian, however, there are other things that we truly should not fear, such as death.
That may sound contradictory. A baseball about to hit our head can lead to death, and yet we fear it and avoid it. This is natural, and nobody in their right mind would stand there and say, “I have no fear of this baseball hitting me in the face.”
However, some people live their lives consumed with the thought of death, as if there is some way they can think to avoid it. This is not a good mental state for anyone, but how much more for the Christian who says he truly believes Jesus prevailed over death?
Joseph’s immediate fear may have been understandable, but for the sake of the whole unfolding scenario, there was no need for it at all. God had selected him to be the human father figure for Jesus, the Messiah. He had already directed them several times, and the word assured Joseph that the Messiah would accomplish so many things. Therefore, instead of fearing, he should have been talking to the Lord, asking for direction, and understanding that God’s plan could not be thwarted.
We, too, should have this attitude. Whether we like it or not, unless Jesus comes first, we are all going to die. And we have no idea at all when or how that will occur. But God has made promises concerning our eternal destiny and that plan cannot be thwarted. And so, we can (and should) try to avoid disasters like a baseball to the head while at the same time not fearing the inevitable death that we all must face.
Let us handle our days reasonably, live our lives well for the Lord, and submit ourselves to him through life and in death. Let us not be people of fear –
“Love has been perfected among us in this: that we may have boldness in the day of judgment; because as He is, so are we in this world. 18 There is no fear in love; but perfect love casts out fear, because fear involves torment. But he who fears has not been made perfect in love. 19 We love Him because He first loved us.” 1 John 4:17-19
Lord God, we know that Your word has sure and reliable promises for Your people that extend beyond death itself. And so, we commit ourselves to You, knowing that our days are set and that when they end, You will bring us to Yourself. We stand unafraid of what lies ahead because Jesus has gone before us. Thank You for this reassurance. Amen.
|
|
|
|
Post by PrisonerOfHope on Aug 25, 2024 0:50:55 GMT -5
Daily Bible Verse, Matthew 2:23
Saturday, August 24th, 2024
And he came and dwelt in a city called Nazareth, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophets, “He shall be called a Nazarene.” Matthew 2:23
“And having come, he dwelt in a city being called Nazareth, that it should be fulfilled the ‘having been spoken’ through the prophets, that a Nazarene He will be called” (CG).
In the previous verse, Joseph was warned in a dream concerning where to live in the land of Israel, noting that he withdrew to the allotments of Galilee. Now, Matthew records, “And having come, he dwelt in a city being called Nazareth.”
Albert Barnes gives a brief description of Nazareth at the time of Jesus –
“This was a small town, situated in Galilee, west of Capernaum, and not far from Cana. It was built partly in a valley and partly on the declivity of a hill, Luke 4:29. A hill is yet pointed out, to the south of Nazareth, as the one from which the people of the place attempted to precipitate the Saviour. It was a place, at that time, proverbial for wickedness, John 4:46.”
Modern Nazareth is described in Wikipedia –
It “is the largest city in the Northern District of Israel. In 2022 its population was 78,007. Known as “the Arab capital of Israel”, Nazareth serves as a cultural, political, religious, economic and commercial center for the Arab citizens of Israel, as well as a center of Arab and Palestinian nationalism. The inhabitants are predominantly Arab citizens of Israel, of whom 69% are Muslim and 30.9% Christian. The city also commands immense religious significance, deriving from its status as the hometown of Jesus, the central figure of Christianity and a prophet in Islam.”
Next, based on where Joseph decided to settle, Matthew records, “that it should be fulfilled having been spoken through the prophets.”
Here, Matthew notes the plural, prophets. Therefore, unlike almost every translation, the following words are not a quote. In fact, citing it as a quote causes a false sense of the words in the minds of readers, and it sets up a real, seemingly insurmountable, problem. Rather, something was fulfilled concerning Jesus, but it is not a specific prophecy, which is “that a Nazarene He will be called.”
The word hoti (that) continues to show that this is not a quote. If it was a quote, he would have said something like Matthew 1:22, “which was spoken by the Lord through the prophet, saying…”
However, because it is supposed by many to be a quote, innumerable commentaries have been made trying to justify the name and specify what is being quoted. In other words, and to understand some of the attempts to justify the name as being connected to the Old Testament, the Pulpit Commentary says –
“First, it may be said Nazarene cannot = Nazarite: the word differs in form, and in no sense could Christ be called a Nazarite. Secondly, the quotation is probably not from a lost prophecy. One meaning of the word Nazoræus is an inhabitant of Nazareth, but the word either (1) recalls the Hebrew word netser a Branch, a title by which the Messiah is designated Isaiah 11:1, or (2) connects itself in thought with the Hebr. natsar, to save or protect (see above), and so has reference to the name and work of Jesus, or (3) is a synonym for “contemptible” or “lowly,” from the despised position of Nazareth. Of these (3) is perhaps the least probable explanation. The play upon words which (1) and (2) involve is quite characteristic of Hebrew phraseology. The sound of the original would be either (1) He whom the prophet called the “Netser” dwells at “Netser”—(for this form of Nazareth see Smith’s Bib. Dict.), or (2) He who is called “Notsri” (my protector) dwells at “Natsaret” (the protectress).”
Such commentaries have completely missed the point of what is being conveyed. Because this is not a quote, the place Nazareth and the name Nazarene do not need to be discovered in a prophecy from the Old Testament. Rather, one such reference to what Matthew is saying is:
“Nevertheless the gloom will not be upon her who is distressed,
As when at first He lightly esteemed
The land of Zebulun and the land of Naphtali,
And afterward more heavily oppressed her,
By the way of the sea, beyond the Jordan,
In Galilee of the Gentiles.
2 The people who walked in darkness
Have seen a great light;
Those who dwelt in the land of the shadow of death,
Upon them a light has shined.” Isaiah 9:1, 2
Nazareth is a town located within Naphtali. This is in the greater region of Galilee. In other words, Matthew wasn’t citing Scripture in a quote, as translations imply (quote marks, etc.). Rather, he was making a point about the writings of Old Testament prophets, such as Isaiah 9:2. Isaiah is saying the light is Christ, being called a Nazarene is a fulfillment of this prophecy.
One can think of it this way. If a prophecy noted someone would be a noted surfer in Sarasota, and he was actually living on Siesta Key, they may say, “He will be called a Siesta Surfer.” As Siesta Key is a part of Sarasota, the prophecy would make complete sense to those who understood it.
This explains why the word hoti, that, is included in Matthew’s words. If he was citing a prophecy, the word would not be needed. But it is an explanatory preposition. If Joseph had moved to Tiberius instead of Nazareth, the words of Matthew would still speak of the fulfillment of the words of the prophets. For example –
“…that it should be fulfilled having been spoken through the prophets, that a Tiberian He will be called.”
As for the other prophets that Matthew was referring to, there are enough references to the area of greater Galilee to form many pictures of the coming Christ. For example, the selection of Hiram, the son of a widow from Naphtali, to accomplish the building of the temple for Solomon provides pictures of the coming Christ (see 1 Kings 7).
Specificity is not necessary in pinpointing a single reference to the name Nazareth, and all of the unnecessary attempts to find a suitable Hebrew word to justify this inclusion by Matthew have proven meritless.
Life application: Speaking of Nazareth and Nazarenes, there is a modern couple, Nazarenes, who have helped bring the land of Israel to the attention of innumerable people. If you enjoy travel and life videos concerning Israel, including modern Nazareth, you can go to YouTube and search for Sergio and Rhoda in Israel.
These two intrepid trekkers have traveled throughout the country, meeting with archaeologists, travelers, and common folk to highlight the great variety of all types of life in the land. Take time to visit their channel and learn to experience Israel in unique and interesting ways that will inform you about this land selected by God to reveal to us the Messiah of the world, Jesus Christ.
Lord God, thank You for Your precious word that tells us about Your interactions with humanity in and around the land of Israel. Thank You for the innumerable examples of life, rebellion, restoration, intimate fellowship, and so much more that teach us how we can fully understand and appreciate who You are and what You have done for us. Thank You for Your wonderful word. Amen.
The Matthew 2 translation can be found at this link:
Matthew 2
2 And Jesus, having been born in Bethlehem Judea, in days Herod the king: Behold, magicians from sunrisings – they came unto Jerusalem. 2 Saying, “Where is He having been born King of the Jews? For we saw His star in the sunrising, and we came to worship Him.”
3 And Herod the king, having heard, he was agitated, and all Jerusalem with him. 4 And having convened all the chief priests and scribes of the people, he inquired of them where the Christ is born. 5 And they said to him, “In Bethlehem of Judea, for thus has it been written through the prophet:
6 ‘And you, Bethlehem, land of Judah,
Are not-at-all least in the governors of Judah.
For out of you will come forth – ruling,
Who will shepherd My people Israel.’”
7 Then Herod, having called the magicians secretly, exacted of them the time of the appearing star. And having sent them to Bethlehem, he said, 8 “Having gone, exactingly inquire about the Child. And when you should find, report to me so I also, having come, may worship Him.”
9 And they, having heard the king, departed. And behold! The star that they saw in the sunrising, preceded them, until, having arrived, it stood above where the Child was. 10 And having seen the star, they rejoiced – joy exceedingly great. 11 And having come into the house, they found the Child with Mary His mother. And having fallen, they worshipped Him. And having opened their treasures, they offered Him gifts: gold, and frankincense, and myrrh.
12 “And having been admonished in a dream not to return to Herod, through another way, they withdrew into their country.”
13 “And they having withdrawn, behold, a messenger of the Lord – he appears in a dream of Joseph, saying, ‘Having arisen, take the Child and His mother, and flee to Egypt. And you are there until if I should tell you. For Herod is about to seek the Child to destroy Him.’”
14 And having arisen, he took the Child and His mother – night, and withdrew to Egypt. 15 And he was there until the death of Herod: that it might be fulfilled, having been spoken by the Lord through the prophet, saying, “Out of Egypt, I called my Son.”
16 Then Herod, having seen that he was mocked by the magicians, was exceedingly en raged and, having sent, he killed all the boys in Bethlehem and in all her borders, from two years and under, according to the time which he exacted from the magicians. 17 Then it was fulfilled that having been spoken through Jeremiah the prophet, saying:
18 “A voice – it was heard in Ramah,
Lamentation, and a wailing, and a mourning – great.
Rachel sobbing – her children.
And she would not be comforted,
For they are not”
19 And Herod having died, behold, a messenger of the Lord in a dream appears to Joseph in Egypt, 20 saying, “Having arisen, take the Child and His mother, and go to the land of Israel, for they have died – those seeking the soul of the Child.” 21 And having arisen, he took the Child and His mother and came to the land of Israel.
22 And having heard that Archelaus reigns over Judea instead of Herod his father, he feared to go there. And having been admonished in a dream, he withdrew to the allotments of Galilee. 23 And having come, he dwelt in a city being called Nazareth, that it should be fulfilled having been spoken through the prophets, that a Nazarene He will be called.
|
|
|
|
Post by PrisonerOfHope on Aug 26, 2024 1:56:07 GMT -5
Daily Bible Verse, Matthew 3:1
Sunday, August 25th, 2024
In those days John the Baptist came preaching in the wilderness of Judea, Matthew 3:1
“And in those days, comes John the Baptist, proclaiming in the desolate of Judea,” (CG).
The previous verse ended Chapter 2, noting that Jesus was settled in Nazareth, thus He would be called a Nazarene. Now the narrative changes direction and introduces a new figure.
Chronologically, this figure has already been introduced in Luke’s gospel, but Matthew begins his arrival on the scene many years later, beginning with, “And in those days.”
The meaning is “in the days when Jesus dwelt in Nazareth.” Even though this is quite some years later, it is during that time. This is evidenced by Matthew 3:13 which says, “Then Jesus came from Galilee to John.” He will leave the area of Nazareth to begin His ministry at this time, a point which begins with the ministry of John the Baptist.
The exact time of this appearance by John is noted in Luke 3:1, 2 –
“Now in the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar, Pontius Pilate being governor of Judea, Herod being tetrarch of Galilee, his brother Philip tetrarch of Iturea and the region of Trachonitis, and Lysanias tetrarch of Abilene, 2 while Annas and Caiaphas were high priests, the word of God came to John the son of Zacharias in the wilderness.”
The name John is from the Hebrew name Yokhanan. That is derived from Yah, a shortened form of the divine name, and khanan, a verb meaning to be gracious. Thus, the name means Yah is Gracious or Yah Has Been Gracious. Of those days when Jesus still dwelt in Nazareth, it next says, “comes John the Baptist.”
The title is a transliteration. It literally means “John the Immerser.” However, as “Baptist” is the common usage in English, that will be retained in the translation.
As for the verb, it is present tense, thus aligning the two thoughts as occurring together. Jesus is living in the area of the Galilee and John comes forth at that time. This type of writing is known as a historical present. It brings the narrative alive in the mind of the reader. The purpose of such literary tools is obliterated when translators ignore them. At the time he comes, it next says that he is “proclaiming in the desolate of Judea.”
The Greek word is kérussó, to proclaim, preach, or herald. In this case, John is making his proclamation that the Messiah is about to be revealed. It was his job to be the forerunner of the Messiah, preparing the way. As for the word “desolate,” this does not necessarily mean a barren wasteland devoid of any life.
Despite being translated as a noun, wilderness, by almost every translation, the Greek word is an adjective. Thus, “desolate” fits in meaning and intent. It is a place that is uncultivated and unpopulated, thus a deserted area.
Shepherds feeding their flocks would occur in such a place. In the Bible, it is a place of God’s grace and of closeness to God, but it is also typical of a place of testing. The Hebrew word is a noun, midbar, coming from davar, to speak. The sense is speaking as in driving a flock.
In the Song of Solomon 4:3, using the word midbar, it says this –
Your lips are like a strand of scarlet,
And your mouth [midbar] is lovely.
Your temples behind your veil
Are like a piece of pomegranate.
Solomon is poetically taking the mouth and calling it a wilderness. This shows the closeness in thought between the words.
This gives us an idea of what John has come to do. He has come to speak in the open to the pasture of God’s people, driving them to be prepared for the coming of the ministry of Jesus.
Life application: When the books of the Bible were written, there were no chapter and verse divisions. These were simply scrolls that were written and maintained as complete books. Even if the beginning of Chapter 3 seems disconnected from what was said in Chapter 2, it is not. Rather, it is a new direction built upon what was just said.
Thus, it is a logical point to make a chapter break, but it is still good to see the ongoing connection between the two. At times, what is helpful in considering the narrative is to stop and pretend there is no chapter division in what you are reading. Imagine that you are simply reading a continuous scroll. That can help eliminate confusion in what is being said.
For example, you may read a scholar who says that the words of Matthew 3:1 cannot be connected to the words of Matthew 2:23 because Matthew 2:23 referred to a time when Jesus was just a young child. This thinking is actually bolstered by the chapter division. Our minds can make a full stop and then start again. But this is not Matthew’s intent.
By imagining there is no chapter division, that type of thinking can often be cleared up. From there, going forward and seeing that Jesus departed Galilee to meet up with John then solidifies the notion that the narrative did not break. It simply redirected.
Consider what you are reading as you go. The Bible is a marvelous book that will keep instructing you and informing you as long as you continue to ask it questions as you go.
Glorious God, it is a joy and a delight to read the word that You have given to us. The stories of times past come alive as if they are happening before our eyes as we read. And all the while, we are communing with You through Your word. What a treasure and what a pleasure. Thank You for Your precious word that tells us of Jesus. Amen.
|
|
|
|
Post by PrisonerOfHope on Aug 27, 2024 1:41:12 GMT -5
Daily Bible Verse, Matthew 3:2
Monday, August 26th, 2024
and saying, “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand!” Matthew 3:2
“and saying, ‘Reconsider! For it has neared – the kingdom of the heavens’” (CG).
In the previous verse, John the Baptist was introduced, noting that he came proclaiming in the wilderness of Judea. The words now continue with his message. He was proclaiming “and saying, ‘Reconsider!’”
The Greek verb metanoeó is introduced here. It is almost always translated as “repent,” a word that has such a different meaning in today’s society that it is no longer acceptable as a translation. The word comes from meta, with, and noeó, to exercise the mind, such as in observing or comprehending. Thus, the word signifies “‘think differently after,’ ‘after a change of mind’” (HELPS Word Studies).
It thus signifies a mental assertion that the thought process has been incorrect and needs to be adjusted. To get the sense, imagine being a Democrat who supports abortion, thinking that a woman’s right to choose trumps the right to life that was generated in her womb. One day this person realizes that her stand is completely immoral and perverse. She then changes her mind about her stand.
It deals with the mind, not the actions. Any actions would follow from the change of mind but are not necessarily a required condition of that change. A person who mentally supports abortion but who never participated in an abortion, and who will never face such a decision, would not have any actions to back up the change of mind.
Ellicott says, “Etymologically, the word ‘repent,’ which has as its root-meaning the sense of pain, is hardly adequate as a rendering for the Greek word, which implies change of mind and purpose. In the Greek version of the Old Testament, the word is used of divine rather than human repentance, i.e., of a change of purpose implying pity and regret.”
Cambridge says, “The original implies more than ‘feel sorrow or regret for sin,’ it is rather ‘change the life, the heart, the motive for action.’ It was a call to self-examination and reality of life.” Note: as long as “change the life” means a change in the inner disposition, this analysis is correct.
Bengel says, “A lovely word (see verses 8, 11), implying change your disposition, put on a disposition royal, heavenly, worthy the kingdom of heaven.”
Vincent’s Word Studies says, “A word compounded of the preposition μετά [meta], after, with; and the verb νοέω [noeó], to perceive, and to think, as the result of perceiving or observing. In this compound the preposition combines the two meanings of time and change, which may be denoted by after and different; so that the whole compound means to think differently after. Μετάνοια (repentance [reconsideration]) is therefore, primarily, an after-thought, different from the former thought; then, a change of mind which issues in regret and in change of conduct. These latter ideas, however, have been imported into the word by scriptural usage, and do not lie in it etymologically nor by primary usage. Repentance, then, has been rightly defined as ‘Such a virtuous alteration of the mind and purpose as begets a like virtuous change in the life and practice.’ Sorrow is not, as is popularly conceived, the primary nor the prominent notion of the word. Paul distinguishes between sorrow (λύπη) and repentance (μετάνοια), and puts the one as the outcome of the other. ‘Godly sorrow worketh repentance [reconsidering]’ (2 Corinthians 7:10).” Note: Vincent’s is careful to distinguish the actual meaning and its common use. Any change that takes place in a person is the result of the mental reconsideration, not a part of it.
Each of these explanations shows that a change in life follows, not precedes or is necessarily in conjunction with, a change of mind. Logically, it must be this way. Of this reconsideration, John the Baptist next says, “For it has neared – the kingdom of the heavens.”
The word “heavens” is plural, following the Hebrew word shamayim, heavens. This phrase is used many times by Matthew and is unique to his gospel. He is expressing the Hebrew thought, demonstrating that his epistle is particularly directed toward the Hebrew or Semitic mindset. Vincent’s Word Studies does an excellent job of explaining the phrase –
“It is a kingdom of heaven because its origin, its end, its king, the character and destiny of its subjects, its laws, institutions, and privileges – all are heavenly. In the teaching of Christ and in the apostolic writings the kingdom of the Messiah is the actual consummation of the prophetic idea of the rule of God, without any national limitation, so that participation therein rests only on faith in Jesus Christ, and on the moral renewal which is conditioned by the same. It is the combination of all rights of Christian citizenship in this world, and eternal blessedness in the next. All its senses are only different sides of the same great idea – the subjection of all things to God in Christ.”
This is correct. His words “without any national limitation” mean exactly what Paul explains in Galatians –
“For you are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus. 27 For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ. 28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus. 29 And if you are Christ’s, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise” Galatians 3:26-29
In this kingdom, such distinctions – even if there are these differences – are eliminated. This new economy in the redemptive scenario was coming. John the Baptist was the one to prepare the nation of Israel for the Messiah who would establish it.
Life application: Today, people use the word repentance in a manner that is synonymous with, “remove the sin from your life.” In other words, “You must do this before your salvation is realized.” This is an incorrect and harmful addition to the gospel based on a misinterpretation and misapplication of the word “repent,” which is now different from what it once meant.
The meaning of words often changes over time. For example, the words awesome and awful used to be essentially synonymous. However, this began to change. Now, awesome signifies something marvelous or wonderful while awful signifies something very bad, bordering on terrible.
This is what has happened to the word “repent” in the church today. It has been so misapplied that it no longer means to reconsider but to repair through action. The problem with this is that it makes the idea of repentance one of “fixing your life of sin before God will accept you.” That is not the biblical understanding of salvation. Though a descriptive passage, the account in Acts 10 reveals this –
“While Peter was still speaking these words, the Holy Spirit fell upon all those who heard the word. 45 And those of the circumcision who believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because the gift of the Holy Spirit had been poured out on the Gentiles also. 46 For they heard them speak with tongues and magnify God.” Acts 10:44-46
Likewise, Paul says –
“And you also were included in Christ when you heard the message of truth, the gospel of your salvation. When you believed, you were marked in him with a seal, the promised Holy Spirit, 14 who is a deposit guaranteeing our inheritance until the redemption of those who are God’s possession—to the praise of his glory.” Ephesians 1:13, 14
The process of salvation is to hear the word, believe it is so through reconsideration of who Jesus is and what He has done, or reconsideration of who God is and what He has done. The reconsideration is based upon past understanding and a new faith, not on a change in lifestyle. And change in lifestyle is after this change in mental thought.
Think it through – how many things are Christians to do or not to do as detailed in the epistles? The answer is “a lot.” However, there are those who have been in Christ for many years and who have never learned the Bible. They have not had a change in action even though they are saved.
Logically, one must know what pleases God before he can do it. Thus, to expect a change in action, without even knowing what that change is, cannot be a condition for salvation. Belief (faith alone) must be the only condition for salvation. To say otherwise is to present a false gospel. If you are presenting a false gospel, you must reconsider!
Lord God, may we be careful to never add to the gospel of our salvation as we proclaim it to others. What we are asked for is faith in what Christ has done, not in what we must do. Once we believe, we can spend whatever time it takes to then be obedient to the things laid out in Your word. Help us, Lord, to not assume we can merit our salvation through our own deeds. Amen.
|
|
|
|
Post by PrisonerOfHope on Aug 28, 2024 0:48:57 GMT -5
Daily Bible Verse, Matthew 3:3
Tuesday, August 27th, 2024
For this is he who was spoken of by the prophet Isaiah, saying:
“The voice of one crying in the wilderness:
‘Prepare the way of the Lord;
Make His paths straight.’” Matthew 3:3
“For this is he, having been spoken by Isaiah the prophet, saying, ‘A voice hollering in the desolate, “Prepare the Lord’s way. Make straight His paths.”’” (CG).
In the previous verse, it was noted that John the Baptist had proclaimed that people were to reconsider because the kingdom of the heavens was at hand. Now, the narrative continues, telling us how John’s ministry was prophesied in advance, saying, “For this is he, having been spoken by Isaiah the prophet.”
The words are those of Matthew, not John the Baptist. However, in John 1, John the Baptist uses similar words when referring to himself –
“Then they said to him, ‘Who are you, that we may give an answer to those who sent us? What do you say about yourself?’
23 He said: ‘I am
“The voice of one crying in the wilderness:
‘Make straight the way of the Lord.’”
as the prophet Isaiah said.’” John 1:22, 23
John knew that he was the fulfillment of the prophecy spoken by Isaiah. Matthew clearly understood this as well. There was to be a forerunner to the Messiah and John the Baptist was that person. Understanding that, Matthew next writes, “saying, ‘A voice hollering in the desolate.’”
The citation being given is from the Greek translation of the Old Testament with a minor exception noted below. In this clause, the Greek word is boaó. Strong’s suggests it is a prolonged form of a primary verb signifying to halloo.
In other words, to shout for help or in a tumultuous way. The Hebrew uses the word qara, to call or proclaim, but this word gives a stronger force. John bellowed out his enunciations. As such, the word holler fits well. As for his proclamation, the words of Isaiah continue, saying, “Prepare the Lord’s way. Make straight His paths.”
The difference between the Greek Old Testament and Matthew’s words is found here. In the Septuagint, it says, “Make straight the roads of our God.” Here Matthew’s words are condensed. It is probably how John the Baptist said it because he was already proclaiming the coming of the Lord.
As for the meaning, the words of Matthew do not include everything from Isaiah as cited by Luke. The reason is probably because Matthew is addressing a Jewish audience. They would understand the shorter sense of the words without a need for the additional explanation. However, the rest of the citation says –
“Every valley shall be exalted
And every mountain and hill brought low;
The crooked places shall be made straight
And the rough places smooth;
5 The glory of the Lord shall be revealed,
And all flesh shall see it together;
For the mouth of the Lord has spoken.” Isaiah 40:4, 5
Albert Barnes gives the explanation of the words –
“The custom here referred to is continued in the East at the present time. ‘When Ibrahim Pasha proposed to visit certain places on Lebanon, the emeers and sheiks sent forth a general proclamation, somewhat in the style of Isaiah’s exhortation, to all the inhabitants, to assemble along the proposed route and prepare the way before him. The same was done in 1845, on a grand scale, when the present sultan visited Brousa. The stones were gathered out, the crooked places straightened, and the rough ones made level and smooth.’ – The Land and the Book, Vol i. pp. 105, 106.”
As these things were customary in the Middle East, and as the question addressed to John the Baptist in John 1:23 contains a response from John the Baptist, there is no reason to assume that there is anything contradictory in any of the accounts. When everything is considered, each account provides a bit of detail necessary for the intended audience to know exactly what is being referred to.
Life application: Isaiah 40 hints at the returnees from Babylon as the immediate subject of what is being referred to. However, like the prophecy concerning the virgin from Isaiah Chapter 7, which was cited in Matthew 1:23, it is certain that a future fulfillment of the words of Isaiah was intended. If this were not the case, John could not have claimed he was that fulfillment.
And more, as the account from Isaiah is referred to in all four gospels, it would be highly unlikely that there would not be a challenge to what is recorded concerning this matter. And yet, the gospels bear witness to the fact that a greater fulfillment of Isaiah’s words was anticipated.
John was sent to prepare the way for the coming of the Lord. He eventually proclaimed that Jesus was the One who he was sent to herald. Taken together with the almost innumerable references to the coming of the Messiah and the fact that Jesus perfectly fulfilled them all, it is certain He is Israel’s true Messiah.
Even the fact that Israel would reject Him was prophesied in advance. And more, the fact that the Gentiles would openly receive Him was as well. In the end, whether Jew or Gentile, there is no excuse for those who willingly reject Jesus. For us, there is no excuse that we are not a part of telling others who haven’t heard of Him.
Not everyone is an evangelist or missionary, but everyone can help support such people. And there is no reason for anyone to not at least be willing to leave tracts for those they encounter. If you haven’t been given the gift of expressing yourself, you can at least give the gift of a tract in which someone else has. Tell! People need Jesus.
Lord God, Jesus has come. May we not fail to be a part of getting this word out to others. Each of us has been given some ability to do so. And so, Lord, give us the wisdom to follow through with this. The gospel of Jesus Christ – it is what the world so desperately needs. Amen.
|
|
|
|
Post by PrisonerOfHope on Aug 29, 2024 0:23:50 GMT -5
Daily Bible Verse, Matthew 3:4
Wednesday, August 28th, 2024
Now John himself was clothed in camel’s hair, with a leather belt around his waist; and his food was locusts and wild honey. Matthew 3:4
“And he, John, had his apparel from camel’s hair, and a leathery girdle around his waist, and his food was locusts and wild honey” (CG).
In the previous verse, Matthew cited words from Isaiah 40 and stated that John the Baptist was the fulfillment of that particular prophecy. Now, he continues the narrative by describing John, saying, “And he, John, had his apparel from camel’s hair.”
On the surface, the words seem superfluous. However, the words have several important significations. The first is that John is being contrasted to the leaders of Israel –
“When the messengers of John had departed, He began to speak to the multitudes concerning John: ‘What did you go out into the wilderness to see? A reed shaken by the wind? 25 But what did you go out to see? A man clothed in soft garments? Indeed those who are gorgeously appareled and live in luxury are in kings’ courts. 26 But what did you go out to see? A prophet? Yes, I say to you, and more than a prophet. 27 This is he of whom it is written:
“Behold, I send My messenger before Your face,
Who will prepare Your way before You.”’” Luke 7:24-27
But there is more to the description than this. Matthew’s words note his clothes were from the hair of the camel. This wasn’t a garment cut from a camel’s hide made of its skin and hair, but is rather a coarse, hairy garment.
The words of Matthew rely heavily on an understanding of the Old Testament, both in actual narratives and in typology. For example, the word camel in Hebrew comes from the verb gamal, to deal fully or adequately with. Thus, it can mean to wean, repay, require, reward, ripen, and so forth. As such, it refers to the treatment, either well or ill, that a person will receive.
Hair signifies an awareness, especially of sin. Taken together, the two thoughts tell us that the very appearance of John the Baptist was given as a tangible, visible marker of making people aware of sin and that it would be dealt with fully and adequately. As he was a herald of the Messiah, his appearance pointed to this ultimately being accomplished in the ministry of the Messiah.
Next, Matthew records, “and a leathery girdle around his waist.” The word dermatinos, translated as “leathery” is an adjective, not a noun. One can see the word derma, or skin, in it. As such, it is a belt or girdle of skin. This word will only be seen here and in Mark 1:6 where Mark also describes John. It is a leathery girdle that John pulled his garments tight with.
The skin is what surrounds what is inside. A girdle is used for pulling in and holding. The symbolism here is restraint of the inner man, keeping sin from controlling a person.
Taken together, these two descriptions which focus on the hair of the garment and the leathery nature of the girdle, and which provide such detailed symbolism, are purposefully included to equate John to Elijah –
“Then he said to them, ‘What kind of man was it who came up to meet you and told you these words?’
8 So they answered him, ‘A hairy man wearing a leather belt around his waist.’
And he said, ‘It is Elijah the Tishbite.’” 2 Kings 1:7, 8
The reason this is important is because of what Jesus will later say to His disciples –
“Now as they came down from the mountain, Jesus commanded them, saying, ‘Tell the vision to no one until the Son of Man is risen from the dead.’
10 And His disciples asked Him, saying, ‘Why then do the scribes say that Elijah must come first?’
11 Jesus answered and said to them, ‘Indeed, Elijah is coming first and will restore all things. 12 But I say to you that Elijah has come already, and they did not know him but did to him whatever they wished. Likewise the Son of Man is also about to suffer at their hands.’ 13 Then the disciples understood that He spoke to them of John the Baptist.” Matthew 17:9-13
In Malachi 4:5, Elijah was prophesied to be sent in an attempt to bring restoration to the people of Israel. It would be out of place for such a person to come in a manner unlike Elijah. And so, John came in the form of Elijah, hairy and with a leathery girdle. The people, however, “did not know him” even though he came in such an obvious parallel to how Elijah was described in their own writings. Of John, Matthew’s words continue with,
“and his food was locusts and wild honey.”
The locust was something eaten by the poor. It can be prepared in various ways, but even if it was accompanied with spices, it is not the kind of thing people of any means at all would prepare for a regular meal. Likewise, the honey is described as “wild.” The word signifies “pertaining to the country” and, as in English, it can mean both wild as in nature or wild as in fierce or raging.
Thayer’s Greek lexicon says it is “used of animals in a state of nature which grows without culture.” It is not unlike the description of Elijah as he was tended to during the time of drought in the land –
“So he went and did according to the word of the Lord, for he went and stayed by the Brook Cherith, which flows into the Jordan. 6 The ravens brought him bread and meat in the morning, and bread and meat in the evening; and he drank from the brook. 7 And it happened after a while that the brook dried up, because there had been no rain in the land.” 1 Kings 17:5-7
Though different food is described, it is the reliance on what the Lord provides through nature that forms the parallel. Elijah was living in a time of drought, being sustained by the Lord. John was living in a time of spiritual drought, likewise, being sustained by the Lord.
The locust signifies judgment. This is seen from the plagues on Exodus (Exodus 10) through to the plagues of the end times (Revelation 9). Honey comes from bees which pollinate flowers and so it implies all sorts of fruit trees, herbs, and flowers – abundance.
In the Bible, honey is equated to the word of God. In the account of Samson, honey in a wild state was found in the carcass of a lion that he had earlier killed. The symbolism there was that of the sustaining power of the word of God.
Understanding these things, John’s appearance and his food are being equated with his ministry. He came in the form of Elijah as a forerunner of Jesus, preparing the way for the messianic ministry of the Lord. His words were words of coming judgment or a reliance on God’s word.
Life application: Everything about how John is described is given to show us hints of what has already been learned from a full study of the Old Testament. It is true that one can know about Jesus and His salvation without ever reading a word of the Old Testament, but Scripture in the New really comes alive by knowing the Old.
Be sure to read the whole word of God. Read it in the morning, read it at night, and read it throughout the day as time permits. Think about what is being said, contemplate each thing that is presented, and consider why God chose certain words – animals, locations, etc. – to describe each account. Information from the Creator is being transmitted to us to understand what He is doing in redemptive history.
In understanding these things, a much richer and fuller understanding of Jesus is then available to us. Let us learn about our Lord, contemplating every facet of His being, by reading and understanding the word that tells us of Him!
Lord God, thank You for the treasure which You have given us in the pages of Scripture. Praises to You for how it is laid out, telling us of JESUS! Yes, thank You for this marvelous superior word. Amen.
|
|
|
|
Post by PrisonerOfHope on Aug 30, 2024 1:27:09 GMT -5
Daily Bible Verse, Matthew 3:5
Thursday, August 29th, 2024
Then Jerusalem, all Judea, and all the region around the Jordan went out to him Matthew 3:5
“Then went out to him Jerusalem, and all Judea, and all the surrounding of the Jordan” (CG).
The previous verse noted John the Baptist’s attire and his food. Despite what would seem a person who was completely out of touch with reality in today’s world, the people of Israel realized they were dealing with a great man of God. Therefore, it next says, “Then went out to him Jerusalem.”
In this case, it is referring to the inhabitants of Jerusalem. It is making a point that the people of the capitol city, despite having all of the religious leaders in that area, were spiritually hungry and wanted to know what God was doing through John. It was evident to them that his message carried the weight and authority of the Lord, just as with the Old Testament prophets. Next, the list mentions, “and all Judea.”
It is the general area where the Jews lived. Samaria is not included in this list because it was not a place where the Jewish people greatly inhabited, although there was a Jewish presence. In fact, in John 4, this division of the Jews and the Samaritans is particularly highlighted.
The words here include another comparative that is not to be taken literally. The word “all” does not literally mean “all.” It refers to the overall scope of the area. People from all over Judea came to hear John the Baptist. This will be evident from other verses in the gospels concerning the thoughts being presented by Matthew now. Along with Jerusalem and Judea, it next says, “and all the surrounding of the Jordan.”
The adjective perichóros is used. It is derived from peri which means about, around, or concerning (as in concerning a matter), and chóra, a country, district, region, and so forth. Thus, it signifies that which is around a region. Being an adjective, “surrounding” gives the proper sense.
This would be Jewish inhabitants living along the Jordan, such as in the area of Galilee and so forth. It would include people living on both sides of the Jordan as well. A good summary of these words is found later in Matthew 4:25 –
“Great multitudes followed Him—from Galilee, and from Decapolis, Jerusalem, Judea, and beyond the Jordan.”
Life application: As was stated in Matthew 1:19, there are words that must be considered carefully and in line with other uses of the word in the Bible, as well as the greater context of the Bible. Not every “every” means “every” and not all “all’s” mean all.
This does not mean, as some might then claim, that the Bible has errors. Rather, it means that the Bible uses the common terminology of the day to make a point. If someone were having a political rally in Washington, DC, depending on the size of the crowd that came, it would be common to hear it said, “It was amazing! All of DC came to hear him speak.”
The fact is that not all of DC came to hear him speak. Those opposed to his message would not come. Those at work would not come. Those in the hospital would not come. And so forth. An example of this is that in the next verse (Matthew 3:6), it will be noted that all of these people who came to John were baptized by him. However, in Luke 7, it says –
“And when all the people heard Him, even the tax collectors justified God, having been baptized with the baptism of John. 30 But the Pharisees and lawyers rejected the will of God for themselves, not having been baptized by him.” Luke 7:29, 30
As is evident, not everyone was baptized by John the Baptist. Remember to have care when considering the words of Scripture. Think about what is being conveyed and understand that human terminology, including cultural expressions which may include exaggerations for effect, is employed at times to make a point or to note a superlative.
Remembering these things will help you to avoid confusion in what you are reading.
Lord God, thank You for Your word which gives us so much information relative to our own lives. We can see that the people recorded in the Bible are like us today. We are all living out our lives in Your presence, and we all need to learn the lessons of Scripture to determine how to live properly in Your eyes. May we use this wonderful blueprint to do just that. Thank You for Your precious word that leads us to Jesus, the perfect example of what is right and good. Amen.
|
|
|
|
Post by PrisonerOfHope on Aug 30, 2024 23:27:58 GMT -5
Daily Bible Verse, Matthew 3:6
Friday, August 30th, 2024
and were baptized by him in the Jordan, confessing their sins. Matthew 3:6
“and they were immersed in the Jordan by him, acknowledging their sins” (CG).
The previous verse noted that Jerusalem, all Judea, and the region around the Jordan went out to John the Baptist. With that remembered, the thought now continues with “and they were immersed.”
The word baptizó, to baptize, is now used for the first time in the New Testament. It is a transliteration of the Greek word. Its English meaning is “to submerge.” It is unfortunate that the word was transliterated and not translated because a lot of very poor theology could have been avoided.
However, that is the reason the word was not translated. Nobody at the time wanted to get stuck in a theological argument about sprinkling vs. immersion, or whether child baptism is acceptable. Wars could have started over such a thing. As for the meaning, a few commentaries will be given –
HELPS Word Studies says, “properly, ‘submerge’ (Souter); hence, baptize, to immerse (literally, ‘dip under’). 907 (baptízō) implies submersion (‘immersion’), in contrast to 472 /antéxomai (‘sprinkle’).” So, no sprinkling. Got it.
Thayer’s Greek Lexicon says, “properly, to dip repeatedly, to immerge, submerge (of vessels sunk, Polybius 1, 51, 6; 8, 8, 4; of animals, Diodorus 1, 36).” So, when a ship sinks, it gets baptizo’d. Got it.
Strong’s says, “From a derivative of bapto; to immerse, submerge; to make whelmed (i.e. Fully wet); used only (in the New Testament) of ceremonial ablution, especially (technically) of the ordinance of Christian baptism — Baptist, baptize, wash.” Whelmed… I see. Fully wet. Got it.
This issue of John’s immersion was that of completely submerging those who came to him. A sign was thus being made that the people were wholly devoting themselves to return to the Lord, reconsidering their ways. If they came out and John sprinkled a little water on them, it would have signified something entirely different.
Further, John’s baptism, being a baptism of reconsideration of one’s ways, would not apply to little children because they had nothing to reconsider. Until they were old enough to know what was right and reject what was wrong, they were under the care and direction of their parents.
When Jesus initiated the New Covenant, the same truths would exist, but the immersion He directed now has a different purpose –
“And it happened, while Apollos was at Corinth, that Paul, having passed through the upper regions, came to Ephesus. And finding some disciples 2 he said to them, ‘Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed?’
So they said to him, ‘We have not so much as heard whether there is a Holy Spirit.’
3 And he said to them, ‘Into what then were you baptized?’
So they said, ‘Into John’s baptism.’
4 Then Paul said, ‘John indeed baptized with a baptism of repentance, saying to the people that they should believe on Him who would come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus.’
5 When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. 6 And when Paul had laid hands on them, the Holy Spirit came upon them, and they spoke with tongues and prophesied.” Acts 19:1-6
In Acts 2, like John’s immersion, the immersion directed by Peter was one of reconsideration (Acts 2:38), but it was for a different reason. They had just rejected Jesus and crucified Him. They had to reconsider their actions first, believing on the name of Jesus.
So, each account in Acts needs to be considered carefully to understand what is happening. The main point for now is that baptism signifies full immersion. Got it? Got it! John was immersing them “in the Jordan by him.”
The Jordan was first mentioned in the previous verse. It means The Descender. Everything about the Jordan forms a picture of Jesus. John was symbolically preparing them for the coming of their Messiah by submerging them in the waters of the Descender. This was because they were “acknowledging their sins.”
Sin comes about through law. Where there is no law, sin is not imputed (Romans 5:13). The law is not something that is given for righteous people. Rather, Paul explains the purpose of the law in 1 Timothy –
“But we know that the law is good if one uses it lawfully, 9 knowing this: that the law is not made for a righteous person, but for the lawless and insubordinate, for the ungodly and for sinners, for the unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, 10 for fornicators, for sodomites, for kidnappers, for liars, for perjurers, and if there is any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine, 11 according to the glorious gospel of the blessed God which was committed to my trust.” 1 Timothy 1:8-11
These are the type of people that were coming forward, acknowledging their state and reconsidering it before the Lord.
It is hard to figure out why people today would want to return to the law that Jesus fulfilled. By doing so, they are admitting that they are not righteous. Instead, they are reflected in the words of Paul above.
Rather, those who have come to Christ today are now deemed as righteous before God, not because of what they have done, but because of what He has done.
Life application: It was noted above that the Jordan, the Descender, pictures Christ. A portion of that will be explained so that you can understand how God has taken even the natural layout of the land of Israel to tell us about the coming of Christ Jesus.
The Descender starts at Mount Hermon, which means “Sacred.” It is a three-peak mountain, each peak of which is essentially the same size and height. That is a reference to the Trinity. Hermon is capped in snow all year, signifying purity. It is emblematic of heaven, the Sacred place.
The water descends from Mount Hermon springing up in the very northern areas of Israel, just as Jesus sprang up from the land in His incarnation. The waters first pass to and through the area of Dan, or Judge. Christ descended from heaven to the world to be the Judge of sin and to have sin judged in Him.
The waters flow south into the Galilee, where they linger before passing south, again into the Jordan. Christ’s life and ministry were centered on this area where He lingered, spending most of His recorded time there. The Jordan then travels in a very long zigzagging path along the border of Canaan. Christ, the Descender, went through all Israel, traveling and preaching.
The Jordan terminates in the Salt Sea, the Sea of the Arabah (Sea of the Pledge). It is the Dead Sea. Christ, the Descender, went to His death. But there was no corruption found in Him, typified by the salt of the Salt Sea – the salt being a picture of incorruption. In His death, the pledge, typified by the “Sea of the Pledge,” is given. It refers to the Spirit, the pledge (arrabon – from the Hebrew eravon) of Ephesians 1:13, 14 –
“In Him you also trusted, after you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation; in whom also, having believed, you were sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise, 14 who is the guarantee [arrabon] of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, to the praise of His glory.” Ephesians 1:13, 14
From this sea, the waters do not continue on. Rather, they evaporate – a picture of the resurrection and ascension. As for the fulfillment of the typology, Jesus Himself expressly tells us that He is the fulfillment of what the Jordan pictures –
“For I have come down from heaven, not to do My own will, but the will of Him who sent Me.” John 6:38
Though modern New Testament Hebrew is different from biblical Hebrew, there are overlapping words. In the Sar Shalom Hebrew translation of Jesus’ words, v’yaradti, “and I have come down,” is used. The name Jordan is from the same word, yarad. Jesus is the Descender.
These are but a few of the many pictures that can be drawn from a study on the Jordan. For example, Joshua 3 and 4 tell of the time when Israel passed through the Jordan on dry ground. Both passages give amazing insights into the future redemption of Israel when they come to God through acknowledgment of Jesus Christ. To understand these pictures, the sermons from the Superior Word are available in a variety of different formats for you to read, watch, or listen to.
Each time the Jordan is mentioned in Scripture, information about the Person of Jesus is seen. Be sure to consider what you are reading as you go through the Bible. It is all telling us of Jesus.
How precious is Your word, O God! It is telling us wonderful stories about what has been, what is currently going on, and what is coming in the history of the redemption of man, and it is all centered on the giving of Your Son for us. Thank You, O God, for Jesus Christ our Lord. Hallelujah and Amen.
|
|
|
|
Post by PrisonerOfHope on Aug 31, 2024 23:37:26 GMT -5
Daily Bible Verse, Matthew 3:7
Saturday, August 31st, 2024
But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees coming to his baptism, he said to them, “Brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the wrath to come? Matthew 3:7
“And having seen many of the Pharisees and Sadducees coming about his immersion, he said to them, ‘Vipers’ offspring! Who disclosed to you to flee from the coming wrath?’” (CG).
In the previous verse, it noted that those who went out to John the Baptist were baptized by him in the Jordan, confessing their sins. Now Matthew, while speaking of John, says, “And having seen many of the Pharisees and Sadducees.”
These are the main two groups addressed in the gospel narratives in relation to spiritual matters. However, there are other groups that are mentioned at times in leadership positions, such as the Herodians. As for these two groups, there are many extensive commentaries on them. One of the most detailed is that of Albert Barnes. For brevity, the commentary of Cambridge is provided –
Pharisees] The name signifies “Separatists;” the party dates from the revival of the National life, and observances of the Mosaic Law under the Maccabees. Their ruling principle was a literal obedience to the written law and to an unwritten tradition. Originally they were leaders of a genuine reform. But in the hands of less spiritual successors their system had become little else than a formal observance of carefully prescribed rules. “The real virtues of one age become the spurious ones of the next.” Prof. Mozley, Sermon on Pharisees. The “hypocrisy” of the Pharisees, which stifled conscience and made them “incapable of repentance,” is the special sin of the day rebuked more than any other by the Saviour.
Politically they were the popular party, supporters of an isolating policy, who would make no terms with Rome or any other foreign power. The Zealots may be regarded as the extreme section of the Pharisees.
The Sadducees were the aristocratic and priestly party, they acquiesced in foreign rule, and foreign civilization. They refused to give the same weight as the Pharisees to unwritten tradition, but adhered strictly to the written law of Moses. Their religious creed excluded belief in a future life, or in angels and spirits (Acts 23:8). The name is probably derived from Zadok the priest in David’s time. Others with less probability connect it with Zadok, a disciple of Antigonus of Socho, who lived in the second century b. c. The derivation from tsaddik (righteous) is untenable.
Of these two groups, Matthew notes that they were “coming about his immersion.”
They probably had questions about his authority, purpose, doctrine, intent, and so forth. If so many people were coming to him, was he a threat to their authority and teaching? And if this was the case, how could they trap him in his own words, etc.?
We can assume that the questions these groups will ask of Jesus, as recorded in the gospels, were similar to those they would have asked John about now. Therefore, knowing their lives and form of religion, “he said to them, ‘Vipers’ offspring!’”
The word is echidna, a poisonous snake. The identification of this snake should not be pressed too far because the same word is used when referring to a snake on the island of Malta in Acts 28.
The serpent was introduced at the fall of man in Genesis 3. This is probably a reference to that. Serpents continue to be noted in Scripture after that. One instance is especially highlighted in the account of the time during the wilderness wanderings in Numbers 21. There, the people were bit by serpents, and many died. In this, the people acknowledged their sins, and a remedy was given by the Lord to heal the people.
As such, the main thought of John is probably that of these men being the spawn of Satan who cause the people to sin, separating them from God. They were the evil offspring of their evil parent acting in crafty and malevolent ways. After so addressing them, John next says, “Who disclosed to you to flee from the coming wrath?’”
He uses the word hupodeiknumi. It is a compound word signifying “to exhibit under the eyes.” It is only used six times in the New Testament, and it is variously translated. Many translations say something like “warned,” or “forewarned.” Contextually, that may be the idea, but it is more of a paraphrase. For example, the word is used in Acts 20 when speaking about what one should do –
“I have shown [hupodeiknumi] you in every way, by laboring like this, that you must support the weak. And remember the words of the Lord Jesus, that He said, ‘It is more blessed to give than to receive.’” Acts 20:35
For a word that gives the underlying sense of the meaning, disclose is sufficient. John questioned these men, asking who had disclosed to them to flee from the coming wrath. It would be difficult to think that John meant this literally as if they truly were coming to hear his message and reconsider their ways.
Whether John knew their true intent or not, or whether he merely suspected it, Jesus knew exactly what these men were thinking. Their words were often duplicitous toward Him. Two examples of this are found in Matthew 22:15-33 where first the Pharisees and then the Sadducees tried to trip Him up.
Understanding this, John may have been speaking to them in a tongue-in-cheek manner with a sarcastic emphasis in his question to them. In other words, “Wrath is coming, it will come on all offenders, but you don’t think you even lie in that category, so what are you doing here inquiring about my immersion for repentance?”
As for the wrath that lay ahead, it had been prophesied in the Scriptures that Israel would be exiled twice. Exile implies war, famine, and death. It implies the destruction of their land. But there is also the final wrath of judgment when all men stand before God. These men probably felt secure that they would escape both.
Paul, however, addresses the issue of coming wrath several times (Ephesians 5:6, 1 Thessalonians 1:10, etc.). One main time, specifically speaking of these particular Jews, he writes –
“For you, brethren, became imitators of the churches of God which are in Judea in Christ Jesus. For you also suffered the same things from your own countrymen, just as they did from the Judeans, 15 who killed both the Lord Jesus and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they do not please God and are contrary to all men, 16 forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles that they may be saved, so as always to fill up the measure of their sins; but wrath has come upon them to the uttermost.” 1 Thessalonians 2:14-16
Life application: The wrath of God is something that cannot be dismissed when the Bible is read and accepted at face value. To sin is to miss the mark with God. In this, judgment must come. The very nature of God demands it. To not accept His provision for forgiveness and atonement of sin means that His wrath, by default, remains upon that person.
The religious leaders of Israel were under God’s judgment for sin. They were offered forgiveness through the atoning work of Jesus Christ, but most of them never accepted God’s offer. They remained under His wrath because of this. We must remember that no person is good enough or can do enough good to be pleasing to God. That belongs to the Lord alone who fully pleased His Father. Therefore, only by coming to God through Jesus can one be saved. Be wise and accept the offer that God has made in the giving of Jesus!
“And the grace of our Lord was exceedingly abundant, with faith and love which are in Christ Jesus. 15 This is a faithful saying and worthy of all acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, of whom I am chief. 16 However, for this reason I obtained mercy, that in me first Jesus Christ might show all longsuffering, as a pattern to those who are going to believe on Him for everlasting life. 17 Now to the King eternal, immortal, invisible, to God who alone is wise, be honor and glory forever and ever. Amen.” 1 Timothy 1:14-17
Heavenly Father, You have sent Jesus! Thank You, O God, for having done for us what we could never do. You alone are to be praised for Your goodness to us in reconciling us through the precious blood of Jesus our Lord. Hallelujah to You. Amen.
|
|
|
|
Post by PrisonerOfHope on Sept 1, 2024 22:20:03 GMT -5
Daily Bible Verse, Matthew 3:8
Sunday, September 1st, 2024
Therefore bear fruits worthy of repentance, Matthew 3:8
“Produce, you, therefore, fruits worthy of reconsideration” (CG).
The previous verse cited John the Baptist’s words to the Pharisees and Sadducees who were coming to him as he was immersing people. He called out to them, “Vipers’ offspring! Who disclosed to you to flee from the coming wrath?” With that stated, he now continues his chiding of them, saying, “Produce, you, therefore, fruits.”
The word is karpos, fruit. It is that which is plucked and used for food. It is to be taken figuratively in passages such as this to indicate that which comes from an individual or an entity based on effort, faith, etc.
Both testaments use the fruit symbolism. In the New Testament, Jesus used the metaphor, helping to explain the meaning for us when He said –
“Either make the tree good and its fruit good, or else make the tree bad and its fruit bad; for a tree is known by its fruit. 34 Brood of vipers! How can you, being evil, speak good things? For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks. 35 A good man out of the good treasure of his heart brings forth good things, and an evil man out of the evil treasure brings forth evil things.” Matthew 12:33-35
The state of a tree will determine the state of the fruit the tree bears. The state of a tree will be based on its location, soil, amount of sun, and so forth. As for John’s word, some texts say the singular karpon, fruit. Others say the plural karpous, fruits.
In English the word fruit can be singular or plural depending on the reference. A banana is a fruit, many bananas are still fruit. However, bananas, apples, and oranges are fruits. As such, when one is speaking in an uncountable form, he will say, “I eat fruit.” But when referring to a countable amount, the word fruits is used, such as, “The basket is filled with amazing fruits like pomegranates and durian.”
In this case, John is speaking to a group of people, “Produce you (plural), fruits.” This may make more sense than the singular because he certainly isn’t expecting each person he is addressing to produce the same type of fruit (“You all need to bear fruits, each according to the type of tree you are”) unless he is referring individually to all of them (“Each of you is to bear his own fruit in a worthy manner”). Then it may be that he is speaking in an uncountable manner.
This may be hair-splitting, but each possibility is worth considering. As for the fruits John refers to, he continues saying that they should be “worthy of reconsideration.”
The point of John’s baptism was for people to reconsider their state before God, “We have been acting in this manner and it is not worthy of our calling as the people of Israel, we need to reconsider our ways and then turn to the path of what is right.” This is the immersion that John heralded. He was preparing the people for the coming of the Messiah by turning their hearts back to the Lord.
The KJV blows this translation when it says, “Bring forth therefore fruits meet for repentance.” The archaic word “meet” signifies that which is suitable or fitting. In this, there is an ambiguity that can destroy the intent because it can mean, “When you come to be baptized by me, you are professing reconsideration,” as if the external act defines the reconsideration.
That is somewhat like the idea of infant baptism which essentially says, “This rite sanctifies this child for salvation.” Even later in life, Catholics will often say, “I am in a good place! I got baptized when I was young.” They treat the baptism as if it is something that produced good in them. This is not the intent of John’s words.
Rather, one reconsiders and then is baptized in John’s baptism. In Christ, one believes in His completed work and then as a symbol of that belief, he is then baptized. The believer’s reconsideration is about who God is and what He has done in Christ. Only after that comes a change in life based on the knowledge that is obtained as he grows in his faith.
Life application: In Galatians 5:22, Paul says, “But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, 23 gentleness, self-control. Against such there is no law.” The word fruit there is singular. Though there are many types of fruit, they are all of the Spirit. As you can see, the use of the singular and plural takes consideration.
In the parallel passage to Matthew 3:8 which is found in Luke 3:8, the word is again plural, “Produce, therefore, fruits worthy of reconsideration…”
As you go through the Bible, don’t hesitate to hesitate! Stop, think about what is being said, and consider what you are reading. Of course, various source texts may be different, and even translations will divert from what the source text says. As such, it is good to read multiple translations.
If you have the patience, get a parallel Bible and read two or more translations side by side. It can open your eyes to variations in translation. From there, you can then seek out why there is a difference in them. You can also weed out incorrect or ambiguous translations, such as the KJV referenced above.
These things will help you to get a better understanding of Scripture. But don’t just read the word. Be sure to bear fruit in your mind as you take in what is being presented to you from the mind of God.
Glorious God, what a treasure it is to be in Your word daily, tasting its delights and rejoicing in its truths. Our days are better when we start there, and our lives are so much better off as we continue to search it out and apply its precepts to our lives. Yes, Lord God, thank You for Your word. And thank You above all for Jesus our Lord, the One who is so beautifully presented to us in it. Amen.
|
|
|
|
Post by PrisonerOfHope on Sept 3, 2024 0:33:42 GMT -5
Daily Bible Verse, Matthew 3:9
Monday, September 2nd, 2024
and do not think to say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father.’ For I say to you that God is able to raise up children to Abraham from these stones. Matthew 3:9
“and think not to say in yourselves, ‘A father, we have – Abraham.’ For I say to you that God can from these stones rouse children to Abraham” (CG).
In the previous verse, John warned the Pharisees and Sadducees to produce fruits worthy of reconsideration. Now, he continues his thought, saying, “and think not to say in yourselves.”
By saying this, he knows this is exactly what they say to themselves. What they were thinking was probably one of the most common thoughts in Israel at the time, which is “A father, we have – Abraham.”
This is just what the Pharisees later said to Jesus in John 8 –
“I know that you are Abraham’s descendants, but you seek to kill Me, because My word has no place in you. 38 I speak what I have seen with My Father, and you do what you have seen with your father.”
39 They answered and said to Him, “Abraham is our father.” John 8: 37-39
In John 7:36, the Pharisees were told by Jesus that “if the Son makes you free, you shall be free indeed.” He was making a point about their state before God because of sin. Despite being Abraham’s descendants, he was not really their father. But they didn’t understand His logic. Their default setting was, “If we descended from Abraham, then Abraham is our father.” It is exactly what John is warning against now.
Jesus, however, next directly tells them their state –
“Jesus said to them, ‘If you were Abraham’s children, you would do the works of Abraham. 40 But now you seek to kill Me, a Man who has told you the truth which I heard from God. Abraham did not do this. 41 You do the deeds of your father.’
Then they said to Him, ‘We were not born of fornication; we have one Father—God.’” John 8:39-41
These people claimed to be children of Abraham, but they did not do what Abraham did. Rather, they were children of Satan, doing what their father, the devil, did (John 8:44). When confronted with the fact that they did not act as Abraham, they then defaulted to being sons of God. That is when Jesus corrected them about their true father.
In this case, the argument of sonship is one based not on natural genealogies, but characteristic. To be a “son” of something in the Bible often signifies a descriptor, meaning a trait or characteristic. For example, to be a “son of death” means to be someone worthy of being put to death.
John knew the thinking of these people because it permeated their culture and society. However, he attempted to correct their thoughts even before the revealing of the Messiah by saying, “For I say to you that God can from these stones rouse children to Abraham.”
Here, he uses the word egeiró. It has already been seen five times in relation to Joseph arising and doing as he was instructed. Strong’s defines it as “to waken (transitively or intransitively), i.e. Rouse (literally, from sleep, from sitting or lying, from disease, from death; or figuratively, from obscurity, inactivity, ruins, nonexistence).”
The idea of John’s words here is one of making a complete change in someone as if he were a stone that could be raised to life, arousing him to life. What seems impossible is something that God can, in fact, do. But what is John referring to? The symbolism goes back to Joshua 4 where stones are set up in memorial to the cutting off of the Jordan for the sons of Israel to pass through on dry ground.
Not one (as some translations imply) but two sets of stones were set up. And those events occurred at the same location that John the Baptist is now immersing people. The significance of the stone memorials is exactly what John is now speaking of in the coming of the Messiah.
Jesus, the Descender, like the Jordan, would be cut off. In His being cut off, life would be given to any who passed through His death. To fully understand the symbolism (and it would be a sad loss for you if you don’t), going to the Superior Word sermons on Joshua 3 and 4 is a must. Everything is pointing to the coming of Christ and what He was to do for His people.
Note: As Joshua 3 and 4 are right at the beginning of the book of Joshua, wouldn’t it be better to start with the first sermons of the book and go through them? That way, when you come to Joshua 3 and 4, you will have the appropriate background information to more fully understand what is being seen. The Bible is revealing an amazing journey through redemptive history in types and pictures. You may be amazed.
Life application: As previously noted, to be a son of someone or something means to bear the characteristics or traits of that person or thing. The main theme of the book of Galatians is that of law versus grace. The Galatians had started well. They had believed the gospel of Jesus and they had been saved and given God’s Spirit.
But then, along came Judaizers who attempted to put these believers back under the law of Moses, a time before the coming of Christ and His fulfillment of the law. If they did this, they would be sons of Moses, not Jesus. And because by the law is the knowledge of sin, they would not be free from sin. Rather, they would be bound by it.
In being bound to sin, they would be sons of the devil. But in coming to Christ, one is freed from sin. He is not under law but under grace. In this state, sin is no longer imputed (2 Corinthians 5:19). Law, by its very nature, causes the imputation of sin. It is a trap that too many have fallen into in the church today.
Modern Judaizers are everywhere, reinserting precepts of the law into their theology and bringing people back into bondage. Where they once stood free in Christ, they now stand at enmity to Him. There will be no salvation for those who never came to Christ and who believe this nonsense, and there will be no rewards for those who were once saved but have placed themselves back under the law.
Be free in Christ by living in faith that He has accomplished all things necessary for salvation. This is what grace means. It tells us that what we have gotten is what we do not deserve. We must simply accept it and forever rejoice in it.
“Therefore He who supplies the Spirit to you and works miracles among you, does He do it by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?— 6 just as Abraham “believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness.” 7 Therefore know that only those who are of faith are sons of Abraham. 8 And the Scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, preached the gospel to Abraham beforehand, saying, ‘In you all the nations shall be blessed.’ 9 So then those who are of faith are blessed with believing Abraham.” Galatians 3:5-9
O God, thank You for the freedom from sin and bondage that we have received through the coming of Jesus Christ. Yes, thank You for the grace You have lavished upon us! Hallelujah and Amen.
|
|
|
|
Post by PrisonerOfHope on Sept 3, 2024 21:19:52 GMT -5
Daily Bible Verse, Matthew 3:10
Tuesday, September 3rd, 2024
And even now the ax is laid to the root of the trees. Therefore every tree which does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Matthew 3:10
“And already also, the ax, toward the root of the trees it lies. Therefore, every tree not producing good fruit, it is hewn, and into fire, it is thrown” (CG).
In the previous verse, John warned the Pharisees and the Sadducees not to trust in the fact that they were physical descendants of Abraham. In fact, he noted that God could raise children for Abraham from the stones. Now to further wake them up to their spiritual plight, he next says, “And already also.”
The word translated as already is édé. It gives the sense of “already” or even “now after all this waiting.” HELPS Word Studies says, “(a temporal adverb) – already now, even now, referring to what is not yet strictly present but already (now) impacts the present (= ‘already now’). (a temporal adverb) – already now, even now, referring to what is not yet strictly present but already (now) impacts the present (= ‘already now’).”
His words are words of warning. What he is going to tell them is right now. What was prophesied concerning Israel’s future and the coming Messiah has met with the present, which is that “the ax, toward the root of the trees it lies.”
The word translated as ax is axiné. One can see the etymological root of our modern word. It will be seen only here and in the comparable passage found in Luke 3:9. John’s words are in the present tense, indicating that what is to be chopped down is in deadly peril of having it happen at any moment. The words signify impending judgment.
In Scripture, trees bear various spiritual meanings depending on the context, the type of tree, and so forth. In this case, John is equating them to people. This can be deduced from the fact that he just said in verse 8 that those before him were to produce fruit worthy of reconsideration. Now, in accord with that, he next says, “Therefore, every tree not producing good fruit.”
John ties the two thoughts together. If people are to bear fruit and some produce bad fruit, then he is speaking of people, namely those before him. However, his words extend to all in Israel because he is the herald of Israel’s coming Messiah.
Therefore, those who bear good fruit will reconsider their ways, turn to Jesus, and follow Him. Those who do not will have borne bad fruit. That is what the ax being laid at the root is for. To remove such people from Israel, as he next says, “it is hewn, and into fire, it is thrown.”
Jesus is the dividing line. Those who follow Him will be saved. Those who do not will be sent to Gehenna, a subject Jesus will speak of first in Matthew 5.
Life application: As noted above, trees carry various meanings in Scripture. In fact, pretty much every object used in the Bible is giving us information about other things. Directions convey meaning. The seasons of the year give us information about other things. Types of metal, various words for rock, water, clouds, etc. Along with its surface meaning, whatever is being conveyed, each thing also tells us about something else.
Each number carries a special meaning. To understand how numbers consistently mean the same thing, go online and search for Number in Scripture by E.W. Bullinger. It is public domain and can be read online or downloaded from the internet. What is the significance of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 40, or 200? Bullinger will explain that to you, along with all other biblical numbers.
What significance does the fig, olive, or acacia tree convey? Every type of tree provides information in a relevant way. God created the trees. He understands their properties and He uses them to provide us with information.
The fig, for example, consistently speaks of a connection to God. The olive tells us of religious privilege. The acacia tree is considered an incorruptible wood, and so its wood was used in the making of the tabernacle implements to picture the incorruptible Man, Jesus Christ. However, the tree itself carries its own typological meaning, as do all the other trees.
Mountains, rivers, valleys (and there are various types of valleys), and so forth – they all convey information that is used to tell us deeper spiritual truths than one gets from only the surface reading.
Understanding this, be careful not to just accept what someone says about a spiritual or typological meaning of something. Quite often, people will insert their meaning into what is being presented. Thus, anything can mean anything. For example, it is popular to hear someone say, “The fig tree pictures Israel.” It is incorrect, but by shoving Israel into the fig, a point of doctrine is intended.
Rather, than inserting meaning, it must be drawn out from the context. or from the meaning of the root word of whatever is being looked at, or from some other valid means of biblical interpretation. Further, the meaning must be consistently seen in every use of that particular object, thing, or concept. If it is not, then the interpretation is not correct. God is consistent in His use of such things.
Never stop pondering the word. It is an almost limitless source of wisdom and knowledge. Enjoy your daily time interacting with God through His precious word!
Lord God, how amazingly detailed is Your word. It is a treasure trove of wisdom, instruction, and joy for the heart. May we seek You through it all our days. In it, we find Jesus, and through Jesus, we can find words of salvation based on what He has done for us. Hallelujah for Your precious word. Amen.
|
|
|
|
Post by PrisonerOfHope on Sept 5, 2024 1:22:57 GMT -5
Daily Bible Verse, Matthew 3:11
Wednesday, September 4th, 2024
I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance, but He who is coming after me is mightier than I, whose sandals I am not worthy to carry. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire. Matthew 3:11
“Indeed, I, I immerse you in water to reconsideration, but He coming after me is mightier than I. He is whom I am not adequate to lift His sandals. He, he will immerse you in the Holy Spirit and fire” (CG).
John had just told the Pharisees and Sadducees that any tree that did not bear fruit would be cut down and thrown into the fire. Now he steps back and tells them about his ministry in comparison to that which is coming, beginning with, “Indeed, I, I immerse you in water to reconsideration.”
John was a prophet under the Old Covenant. Like other prophets, his calling was to get the people to wake up from their spiritual slumber and reconsider their ways. They were to return to the Lord, living for Him and not for idolatry, perversion, and self-indulgence.
His call went out, and for those who accepted it, he immersed them as a sign of their reconsideration. This was confirmed long after his ministry in the Book of Acts –
“Then Paul said, ‘John indeed baptized with a baptism of repentance, saying to the people that they should believe on Him who would come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus.’” Acts 19:4
As for Paul’s words which noted that John directed the people to another, that is confirmed in John’s continued words, saying, “but He coming after me.”
John understood that his role was to direct the people to the Lord through reconsideration of their ways. And yet, he speaks of One coming after him, meaning in the timing of his ministry. John came first and only then did Jesus make Himself manifest as the Messiah, even if the two ministries overlapped. Of this coming One, John next says He “is mightier than I.”
The word generally speaks of physical strength. In the case of John’s words, it must extend beyond that because John’s ministry was not one of physical prowess, but of spiritual strengthening. What he says about the coming One speaks of spiritual matters, even if they include the idea of physical strength through metaphor. What Jesus will say will be matters of judgment and salvation or condemnation. Next, John continues his description, saying, “He is whom I am not adequate.”
He uses a word, hikanos, that speaks of sufficiency, the root of which means to arrive at or come to. Thus, it is that which is adequate. John signifies that there is never a time he will be adequate “to lift His sandals.”
It was a metaphor that all would understand. If a man had slaves, the lowliest job for the lowliest slave would be to wait for the master to come through the door into the house. When he arrived, this slave would take off the shoes of his master and then proceed to wash his feet.
The meaning, when taken in light of Jesus’ words, is astonishing –
“For I say to you, among those born of women there is not a greater prophet than John the Baptist; but he who is least in the kingdom of God is greater than he.” Luke 7:28
Of all of the prophets, John was the greatest, and yet he was unworthy to lift the sandals of Jesus. John rebuked Israel’s leaders and even Herod the king with authority, and yet he was unworthy to take on the lowliest of duties of the least servant in the presence of the Messiah. And instead of immersing people in water, John next notes that “He, He will immerse you in the Holy Spirit.”
The necessary connection to God, for man to be restored to Him, was available through the immersion of the coming Messiah. In this thought, the ideas of infant baptism and sprinkling are completely eliminated. Infants are not prepared for immersion. Sprinkling a person with the Holy Spirit does not come close to the intended meaning.
Rather, it signifies a complete and absolute change in status for the person. He goes from one position before God to a completely new one. This coming baptism is next described with the words “and fire.”
Fire speaks of purification. Fire burns up, removing that which is temporary or unneeded. At the same time, it also purifies that which can withstand the fire. This fire is not referring to the vengeance of God against unbelievers. They will not be immersed in the process. They remain outside of what the Messiah will do for His people. There is another type of fire awaiting them.
The symbolism of the fire is seen in Acts 2 –
“When the Day of Pentecost had fully come, they were all with one accord in one place. 2 And suddenly there came a sound from heaven, as of a rushing mighty wind, and it filled the whole house where they were sitting. 3 Then there appeared to them divided tongues, as of fire, and one sat upon each of them. 4 And they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance.” Acts 2:1-4
This was a one-time outward demonstration for the sake of the people. It was a visible manifestation of the inward change that results from the purification of the person, making him acceptable to God.
Life application: The effects of accepting Jesus as the Savior through faith in what He has done are absolute and total. Even if we are still living in corruptible bodies that continue to sin, the purification that has come through believing the gospel is once and forever.
The immersion is complete. That which is impure and which separates us from God is removed, and we enter into new life. To say that this can be lost is to say that what God has done was in error, was insufficient, and that the salvation provided by Him remains up to us to maintain. In other words, it was not actually of faith, nor was it sufficient to save at all. Instead, the cross of Christ – though a nice attempt at salvation for the people of the world – was a failure.
This is what teaching the loss of salvation means. It points to a “god” who developed a plan that cannot overcome the frailty of humanity. In other words, it defaults back to the power of human endurance and self-sufficiency. If that is where you have put your hope, good luck with that. For those who understand the true and eternal effects of the ministry of Jesus Christ, we will rest wholly and entirely in His merits alone. In the end, guess whose merit will stand?
Lord God, may we never presume to rely on ourselves or our own goodness before You. Rather, may we remember the feelings we felt when we heard of what Jesus did? We were weak and stood at the abyss, ready to plunge in, knowing we had no hope. But when we heard the gospel, we trusted and were saved. How can we turn from that back to self? We will not! We will forever trust in Jesus alone. Amen.
|
|
|
|
Post by PrisonerOfHope on Sept 5, 2024 22:12:16 GMT -5
Daily Bible Verse, Matthew 3:12
Thursday, September 5th, 2024
His winnowing fan is in His hand, and He will thoroughly clean out His threshing floor, and gather His wheat into the barn; but He will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire.” Matthew 3:12
“Whose winnower – in His hand, and He will thoroughly cleanse His threshing-floor. And He will gather His wheat into the granary, but the chaff He will consume – fire unquenchable.” (CG).
In the previous verse, John spoke of the authority and power of the coming Christ, noting that He will immerse His people in the Holy Spirit and fire. John next says of Him, “Whose winnower – in His hand.”
The lack of verbs shows intent and purpose. John is carefully and precisely stating what the state of things is, demonstrating that things are set, and they are firmly fixed.
In this case, the word is ptuon. It will only be seen here and in Luke 3:17. It signifies a pitchfork, a winnowing shovel, or a winnowing fan. A single word to get the point across is winnower. The sheaves are taken to the threshing floor where they are threshed according to the type of product. Some things were run over with a cart or trod on by animals. Some were beaten with rods, etc.
Once the threshing was accomplished, the grains that are threshed out of the husks need to be separated from the rest of the stalks. This is accomplished through the winnowing process. One way this is done is by taking a pitchfork and throwing it all up into the air. The grains would fall back down while the blowing wind would carry the lighter chaff away. Thus, everything was separated, leaving only the grain in a pile below.
The word ptuon comes from ptuo, to spit. One can see the onomatopoetic nature of the word. Even today, we will make the p’tooh or p’tooey sound when describing someone spitting. The connection is when someone spits, there is a scattering of the spit into the air or on the ground. Likewise, the ptuon causes the chaff to scatter away in a similar manner.
John is saying that the Messiah is there, and He already has the winnower in His hand, “and He will thoroughly cleanse His threshing-floor.”
The word diakatharizo is used. Like ptuon, it is also only found again in Luke 3:17. It is an intensified form of the Greek word meaning to cleanse. Thus, it is to thoroughly cleanse. The halón, threshing floor, is now a third word found only again in Luke 3:17. It is the basis for the Greek word heilisso, to roll together. One can sense the wheel of a cart as it rolls over the stalks to break the kernels free.
John’s words equate people to the harvest that comes during the appropriate season in Israel. There is a harvest that the Messiah will collect, He will then process His sheaves, His people. There will be a separating of the people through a process of threshing. From there, a winnowing will take place.
When that occurs, there will be a pile of good grain, suitable for consumption. There will also be chaff all around the outskirts that has blown away from the grain. The whole threshing-floor will then be cleaned. John next describes this thorough cleansing, saying, “And He will gather His wheat into the granary.”
The word sitos, wheat, is a generic word for any edible grain, but it is typically wheat. Sometimes it will refer to barley. In this case, this good grain is the purpose of the entire harvest season. There is planting, growth, full development, and then the reaping. Jesus describes this in Mark 4 –
“And He said, ‘The kingdom of God is as if a man should scatter seed on the ground, 27 and should sleep by night and rise by day, and the seed should sprout and grow, he himself does not know how. 28 For the earth yields crops by itself: first the blade, then the head, after that the full grain in the head. 29 But when the grain ripens, immediately he puts in the sickle, because the harvest has come.’” Mark 4:26-29
Once the grain is gathered, it is taken to the apothéké, granary. One can see the etymological root of our modern word apothecary, which is an archaic term for a pharmacy or pharmacist. In this case, the word is used to mean a place for storage John is describing what God intends to do with His people. It shows purpose and intent. It is not a willy-nilly process, but one which is methodically conducted to achieve an intended result. With the grain stored securely, John next says, “but the chaff He will consume.”
In contrast to the wheat, there is the achuron, chaff. This is the part of the stalk that has no further use. Its purpose was to bear the grain until the harvest. With the grain now safely separated and stored, the chaff is to be consumed, but not like grain which is made into something delightful. Rather, the chaff will be burned up in “fire unquenchable.”
The word is asbestos, the exact word now used to describe a product that, although now banned because it causes cancer, was developed as a heat-resistant material. In the case of the word in Scripture, saying unquenchable is an exact description. Nothing can put it out. It is perpetual and all-consuming. This is the destiny of those who are not a part of what is stored in the granary.
In Scripture, that final place of burning is known as the Lake of Fire. It is a place that refers to eternal torment.
Life application: There are various views on what really happens when people who are not saved die. Most agree that there will be a final judgment. However, from there the dispute tends to increase. Some hold to the doctrine of annihilationism, that people are simply annihilated and that is the end of them. They cannot see how God could torture someone forever.
But man was created to be eternal. It is we who have turned from Him. Without a remedy for our sin, an eternal separation from God in a very bad place is actually logical and in accord with His nature. We bear His image. To destroy His image bearers entirely would be contrary to His nature. However, even a single sin eternally separates us from an infinitely pure Creator.
Thus, the Lake of Fire, as described, is where those who bear sin will go. It is eternal, and it will not be pleasing. These metaphors being used by John come from God as advanced warnings that we have choices to make. God sent Jesus to take the punishment we deserve. How can we stand guiltless if we reject that?
God Himself was willing to pull us out of the mess we are already in. Let us not turn from so great a salvation. Instead, have faith in what He has done and be eternally reconciled to God. Praise the name! Jesus! He has prevailed, and we can be spared from what we otherwise deserve.
Lord God, You are carefully and methodically working out a plan that can include us if we will just believe. You have done it all! Jesus has come and has given us restoration if we will just receive it. Thank You, now and forever, thank You for Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.
|
|
|
|
Post by PrisonerOfHope on Sept 7, 2024 1:40:11 GMT -5
Daily Bible Verse, Matthew 3:13
Friday, September 6th, 2024
Then Jesus came from Galilee to John at the Jordan to be baptized by him. Matthew 3:13
“Then Jesus, He comes from the Galilee upon the Jordan unto John to be immersed by him.” (CG)
The previous verse completed John’s words of warning and impending doom spoken to the Pharisees and Sadducees. However, during his speech to them, he had said, “Indeed, I, I immerse you in water to reconsideration, but He coming after me is mightier than I. He is whom I am not adequate to lift His sandals. He, he will immerse you in the Holy Spirit and fire” (Matthew 3:11).
Having said that, the next words become a point of confusion to him. They begin with, “Then Jesus, He comes from the Galilee.”
Luke 3:23 says concerning this same time, “Now Jesus Himself began His ministry at about thirty years of age.” This was at the time that many people were coming to John to be baptized. Thus, what occurs would have been a public event for anyone there to see. This is hinted at in the word translated as “comes,” paraginomai. It signifies to become near. Strong’s adds in the thought “to appear publicly.”
Jesus voluntarily departed from the area He had been raised in and went with purposeful intent to begin His ministry, which was “upon the Jordan.” Rather than “to” as most translations say, the word is epi, upon. The word gives the idea of the superimposition of time, place, order, etc. One can think of the epidermis, which fits over a person.
Jesus has purposefully left the Galilee and has gone to the Jordan. Galilee comes from the Hebrew Galil. It signifies a circular district, it is identical to galil, to pivot or turn. That, in turn, comes from galal, to roll away. The meaning is thus Liberty. In the Hebrew, it is normally preceded by the definite article, ha’galil, the Galilee.
As seen in a previous commentary, the Descender pictures Christ in His incarnation, coming from heaven to earth. The time for this to be made manifest to the world has arrived. Everything about the narrative is purposeful.
One can get a hint of what is being presented. The people need liberty from the bondage of the law. Jesus’ ministry is now about to commence, and so He symbolically leaves Liberty to place Himself under the law in His descending from heaven.
As a Jew, He was born under the law, but the pictures here are being symbolically used at the initiation of His ministry. Thus, He has gone upon the Jordan, the Descender, “unto John,” or Yah is Gracious.
John is being used as the introduction of the ministry of Christ to Israel. The graciousness of the Lord is what is intended to be seen. All of this is reflected in the words of John 1 –
“And of His fullness we have all received, and grace for grace. 17 For the law was given through Moses, but grace and truth came through Jesus Christ. 18 No one has seen God at any time. The only begotten Son, who is in the bosom of the Father, He has declared Him.” John 1:16-18
Jesus came to John “to be immersed by him.” In other words, the event is purposeful. John, and John alone, was to be the immerser of Jesus. It was he who was selected before birth to be the herald of the coming Messiah. It is he who came as the prophesied Elijah recorded in Malachi 4:5. He is he who was to be the final prophet of the Law of Moses, and thus the one whose work would close it out in the sense of messianic anticipation.
From this point on, the Messiah would become the central point of focus for all of Israel’s religious life. The law was to end, and a new economy was at hand. John is the one to initiate this transfer, immersing Jesus in preparation for His glorious ministry.
Life application: The words of the New Testament are understandable, and the ministry of Jesus is readily discerned from them. In reality, however, there is so much in the New Testament that is derived from the Old Testament that an entirely different level of understanding can only be derived from what is presented in the Old.
The two merge together harmoniously because they are both given to explain the intents, purposes, and actions of God as He works through His plan of redemption for humanity. Don’t be afraid to read and carefully consider the Old Testament as well as the New.
The more you read the word, the more it will settle in your mind. Eventually, connections will be made that you had not previously considered. From there, it is then good to study and see if your connections are valid. We can, at times, make faulty connections that need to be corrected. But this is a lifelong process.
Be sure to just keep reading the word and contemplating what God is telling us in this most wonderful treasure. Information about the King of the Universe is being conveyed. Bask in its riches all the days of your life.
Lord God, in Christ Jesus, there is liberty from the penalty of the law. Instead of condemnation, in Him, there is grace, mercy, and eternal salvation. The story of Scripture is Your story as You work out the redemption of humanity through the Person of Jesus Christ. Thank You, O God, for Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.
|
|
|
|
Post by PrisonerOfHope on Sept 7, 2024 23:01:04 GMT -5
Daily Bible Verse, Matthew 3:14
Saturday, September 7th, 2024
And John tried to prevent Him, saying, “I need to be baptized by You, and are You coming to me?” Matthew 3:14
“And John, he thoroughly hindered Him, saying, ‘I, I have need by You to be immersed, and You, You come unto me?’” (CG).
The previous verse noted that Jesus came from Galilee upon the Jordan to be immersed by John. Now, John’s surprised reaction to this is noted, beginning with, “And John, he thoroughly hinders Him.”
The word is found only here in the New Testament, diakóluó. It is derived from dia, through, and kóluó, to hinder. Thus, it signifies to thoroughly hinder. John was completely adamant that this was the wrong thing to do. The verb, being imperfect, gives the sense of something continuing in the past rather than an event.
As such, John realized that Jesus’ life was already one of living properly before the Lord. This doesn’t mean that he knew Jesus was the Messiah. John 1 dispels that notion –
“And John bore witness, saying, ‘I saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove, and He remained upon Him. 33 I did not know Him, but He who sent me to baptize with water said to me, “Upon whom you see the Spirit descending, and remaining on Him, this is He who baptizes with the Holy Spirit.” 34 And I have seen and testified that this is the Son of God.’” John 1:32-34
Rather, at this point, it might be like an associate pastor calling for people in the church to come forward and return their lives wholly to the Lord. When he does this, the lead pastor comes forward. The associate pastor might then say, “How can this be? I have observed him, and he is the epitome of piety.” That is seen in the next words where he was “saying, ‘I, I have need by You to be immersed.’”
John recognized Jesus’ life as one that was lived in a godly and upright manner. Being cousins, he probably saw this many times at annual festivals or other times when the extended family gathered. Because of this, he understood that Jesus had a greater right to immerse him than he had to immerse Jesus. And yet, he continues with, “and You, You come unto me?”
John, despite being the prophet of the Lord, realized his unworthiness. He was just a man, born of Adam and thus with sin. Within this great body of humanity, one can recognize greater or lesser piety and righteousness in others. When we see someone obviously more attuned to God and His ways, we do not have to consider them as the Messiah. Rather, we understand that the person’s life is one that is simply closer to God than ours is.
Such an understanding concerning Jesus by John fully explains the seeming conflict between this account and that of John. It was not until Jesus is actually baptized that John will realize why his cousin was such a godly person all along.
Life application: Paul says in Romans 3 –
“There is none righteous, no, not one;
11 There is none who understands;
There is none who seeks after God.
12 They have all turned aside;
They have together become unprofitable;
There is none who does good, no, not one.”
13 “Their throat is an open tomb;
With their tongues they have practiced deceit”;
“The poison of asps is under their lips”;
14 “Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness.”
15 “Their feet are swift to shed blood;
16 Destruction and misery are in their ways;
17 And the way of peace they have not known.”
18 “There is no fear of God before their eyes.” Romans 3:10-18
It has been noted in previous commentaries that the terms “good,” “righteous,” etc. are applied to people in the New Testament. Paul cites the psalms, specifically Psalm 14 and Psalm 53, where David applies those words to a person who says that there is no God. It cannot be an all-encompassing statement concerning every person because it says this in 2 Samuel 18 –
“Then the watchman saw another man running, and the watchman called to the gatekeeper and said, ‘There is another man, running alone!’
And the king said, ‘He also brings news.’
27 So the watchman said, ‘I think the running of the first is like the running of Ahimaaz the son of Zadok.’
And the king said, ‘He is a good man, and comes with good news.’” 2 Samuel 18:26, 27
Therefore, it would be contradictory for David to say this particular man is good, and then make an all-encompassing statement about nobody being good everyone in the psalms. And such, he did not do. His words about there being none good must be taken in the context of the surrounding thoughts. Likewise, Paul did not rip the words of David out of their context to make an all-encompassing thought either.
Instead, words are used to convey meaning. Words such as good, righteous, just, etc. are used comparatively in Scripture. Ultimately, there is none “good” in relation to God. However, in comparison to others, we can and do make value judgments based on goodness, even if our standard of judging is biased or skewed.
John saw Jesus and knew that He was more righteous than he. Until God revealed to Him why this was so, he was just making a comparative analysis of his life in relation to that of his cousin. However, once he baptized Jesus, he came to realize the full scope of the goodness of who Jesus truly is.
For each of us, we must decide who we will trust to restore us to God. If we are trusting in ourselves and the things we do, we will never find that restoration. But when we behold and receive the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, our restoration will be realized. Be sure to choose wisely. Choose Jesus. He is truly the epitome of good because He is the God/Man.
Lord God Almighty, when we see the world around us, we observe people who each have their own flaws and failings. We may recognize goodness in them, but there is always something lacking because we are all sons of Adam, born of fallen fathers. But when we behold Jesus, we behold the Son of God. He alone is perfectly good in His being. May we not fail to come to Him for our reconciliation and restoration. Thank You, O God, for Jesus! Amen.
|
|
|
|
Post by PrisonerOfHope on Sept 8, 2024 19:57:04 GMT -5
Daily Bible Verse, Matthew 3:15
Sunday, September 8th, 2024
But Jesus answered and said to him, “Permit it to be so now, for thus it is fitting for us to fulfill all righteousness.” Then he allowed Him. Matthew 3:15
“And Jesus, having answered, said unto him, ‘Permit now, for thus it is fitting for us to fulfill all righteousness.’ Then he permits Him.” (CG).
In the previous verse, John had tried to prevent Jesus from being immersed by him and said that rather he needed a baptism from Jesus. However, Matthew next records, “And Jesus, having answered, said unto him, ‘Permit now.’”
The Greek bears emphasis on the word “now.” The moment is being highlighted and set aside as an important point upon which John was to comply. Things would be different as time continued to unfold, but the immediate time bore its own particular significance and need. John’s immersion was one of reconsideration. People were asked to change their minds about their position before God. Jesus did not need to do this.
As the people were immersed, they confessed their sins. Jesus did not need to do this. John, having observed Jesus’ life, knew this. But yet, He had come to be baptized, saying, “for thus it is fitting for us to fulfill all righteousness.”
Notice the plural word “us.” This was not something laid solely upon John, nor was it something that only pertained to Jesus. There is a sense of corporate need.
Where was it that the Jews normally went to confess their sins? They went to the temple, taking along a sacrifice as mandated by the law. Who did they go to? They went to the priests who ministered the law before God. The system was designed for this by God, and it was brought forth through the hand of Moses.
Along with any individual confessions of sin, there were various sacrifices each day, month, and annually. On the Day of Atonement, all the people were to refrain from work and to afflict their souls. There is nothing in the law that says, “When the Messiah comes, He will be exempt from the statutes, rules, and ordinances of this law.”
John was called as a prophet, but he was also called to have the people turn from their wicked ways and redirect their lives. Rote observance of the rituals of the temple did not change the inner man. However, they were required by law and the people were to submit to them. These were all ministered by the priests. John was of the priestly class, being a son of Zechariah.
If Jesus was required to observe the rituals of the law, and if God had called John to supplement those rituals with the people’s inward reconsideration of their ways along with an outward demonstration of that reconsideration, meaning immersion, then it was right for Jesus to submit to this ordinance as well.
On the Day of Atonement, He had no need for atonement, but being born under the law, He had a need to observe the day accordingly. With John’s immersion, the same need existed to fulfill all righteousness, meaning those things which God had ordained.
A true prophet of God under the law called forth the will of God in accordance with the law. Jesus understood this and He has informed John that He acknowledges John’s authority and position, including his status as a priest who administers before God in relation to the sins of the people, even if they had not committed a particular sin or any sin at all.
To understand this more fully, Leviticus 4:13 begins the section of corporate guilt by the congregation –
“Now if the whole congregation of Israel sins unintentionally, and the thing is hidden from the eyes of the assembly, and they have done something against any of the commandments of the Lord in anything which should not be done, and are guilty.” Leviticus 4:13
Israel was a corporate body as well as a nation of individuals. Jesus could not disassociate Himself from the nation’s corporate guilt just because He was the Messiah. All righteousness demanded that Jesus enter into John’s baptism regardless of His personal state before God.
As for the word prepó, translated as “fitting,” HELPS Word Studies defines it, saying it “refers to acting appropriately in a particular situation, i.e. as it is seemly to God and therefore ‘conspicuous amongst others; hence eminent, distinguished. . . seemly fit.’”
Jesus is identifying Himself as a person of Israel, born under the law and who was required to observe the law, just as any other Israelite was required to do. Whether John fully grasped everything Jesus’ words meant or not, it next says, “Then he permits Him.”
John submitted to Jesus’ submission. Thus, as a member of the priestly class of the law and also the prophet called to return Israel to the right road before God, his immersion included conducting that rite on the One who Created Him, gave Moses the law, and who would fulfill that same law. Astonishing.
Life application: Jesus. All hail the name of Jesus!
Heavenly Father, we come today to hail the great and exalted name of Jesus Christ our Lord. Hallelujah and Amen.
|
|
|
|
Post by PrisonerOfHope on Sept 9, 2024 23:07:50 GMT -5
Daily Bible Verse, Matthew 3:16
Monday, September 9th, 2024
When He had been baptized, Jesus came up immediately from the water; and behold, the heavens were opened to Him, and He saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove and alighting upon Him. Matthew 3:16
“And having been immersed, Jesus immediately ascended from the water. And behold! The heavens – they were opened to Him, and He saw the Spirit of God descending as a dove and coming upon Him” (CG).
Jesus just explained to John that His being immersed was fitting for them to fulfill all righteousness. With that, John immersed him. Next, it says, “And having been immersed, Jesus immediately ascended from the water.”
The words, like in Acts 8:38, 39 are almost immaturely argued over. Some adamantly state that the words “ascended from the water” refer to Jesus’ ascending from the act of immersion, arising out of the water. Others argue that it is speaking of ascending out of the river itself and that John could have simply sprinkled Jesus. In other words, “Jesus descended from the banks of the Jordan, stood in front of John who then sprinkled Him, and then Jesus ascended to the banks of the Jordan.”
The reason for this type of argumentation is to either “prove” or “disprove” one’s preferred method of what today is known as “baptism.” The argument, however, ignores the fundamental point of baptism. It also ignores the original meaning of the word. The purpose of baptism was a symbolic thorough cleansing from one’s past life. Only immersion provides the proper symbolism.
The meaning of baptizó is “to immerse.” Sprinkling fits neither the purpose nor the meaning. The Greek word rhantizó, used four times in Hebrews, signifies “to sprinkle.” The cognate noun rhantismos, which signifies “a sprinkling,” is used in Hebrews and 1 Peter 1:2.
Jesus went to John who was immersing in the Jordan. John immersed Jesus. From there He then either ascended out of the immersion or out of the Jordan, “And behold! The heavens – they were opened to Him.”
There is debate about who “Him” is referring to, John or Jesus. The reason for this is that in John 1, it says –
“And John bore witness, saying, ‘I saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove, and He remained upon Him. 33 I did not know Him, but He who sent me to baptize with water said to me, “Upon whom you see the Spirit descending, and remaining on Him, this is He who baptizes with the Holy Spirit.”’ 34 And I have seen and testified that this is the Son of God.” John 1:32-34
Thus, it is possible it is referring to John who is then the one to confirm Jesus as the Messiah. However, Jesus is the nearest antecedent in the account –
“And having been immersed, Jesus immediately ascended from the water. And behold! The heavens – they were opened to Him.”
Unless there is a compelling reason to change the referent, it is best to assume the nearest antecedent continues to be the subject. John’s having seen the same manifestation of the Spirit doesn’t change anything. It simply means that they both saw the same event. Understanding this, and most likely continuing to speak of Jesus, it says, “and He saw the Spirit of God descending as a dove.”
This does not mean that the Holy Spirit took on an actual form, as if He was incarnate. Rather, this is a manifestation of the Spirit through the creation. Just as God elsewhere is said to display His voice as thunder, creation is used to display the effects of God. As for the descent “as a dove,” that could mean “in the form” of a dove, or “in the manner” of a dove. The former is correct based on Luke 3 –
“When all the people were baptized, it came to pass that Jesus also was baptized; and while He prayed, the heaven was opened. 22 And the Holy Spirit descended in bodily form like a dove upon Him, and a voice came from heaven which said, ‘You are My beloved Son; in You I am well pleased.’” Luke 3:21, 22
Concerning the significance of the dove, innumerable claims are made. One is that the dove represents the Holy Spirit. This is, of course, based upon the account of Jesus’ baptism and, possibly, a misapplication of the words of Genesis 1:2 where the Spirit “brooded” over the face of the waters. However, one would have to assume the dove is specifically being referred to. Others see the dove as a symbol of Israel. Thus, this is signifying that Jesus is the true fulfillment of what Israel signifies. The uses of the dove in the Old Testament do not appear to bear that out.
The Greek word is peristera. It can refer to a dove or pigeon. It doesn’t tell us much, especially because what the word is derived from is unknown. Rather, the symbolism must be based upon the many uses of the yonah, or dove, in the Old Testament. This would include the man Yonah, or Jonah.
The word yonah is probably derived from the same as yayin, wine. Thus, there will be a great deal of similarity to be drawn from the two, something that is too long for this commentary. A possible root, or at least a cognate word, is yanah, a word that generally signifies doing wrong to someone. In Leviticus 19:33 we read this –
“And if a stranger dwells with you in your land, you shall not mistreat [yanah] him.”
This then stands in opposition to the phrase, “Love him as you love yourself,” in the next verse of Leviticus. As noted, a word closely associated to yonah is yayin, or wine. That gives the sense of effervescence. Thus, by implication, intoxication.
Taking these thoughts and considering them in relation to the various uses of the dove throughout the Old Testament, the dove’s symbolism can be summed up with the words, “mourning love.”
When the Holy Spirit descended upon Christ, it was certainly with the thought of mourning in mind. He was about to begin His earthly ministry, one which would be fraught with sadness, pain, punishment, and death. And yet, there is the absolute love of God being expressed in and through the incarnation of Jesus Christ. This is the general idea of what is being conveyed as the Holy Spirit was descending as a dove “and coming upon Him.”
The moment of the beginning of Christ’s earthly ministry is realized in this. Unlike an inanimate object that follows a single, directed path, Christ Jesus is set to wander about in His humanity. And yet, He will remain on the set path of following God’s will as He chooses to reject the temptations of human existence and to be perfectly obedient to the will of His Father in heaven. His moral compass will never deviate from this ideal perfection of the human will.
Life application: Although immersion has already been reviewed, the commentary above gives additional information to help solidify the notion that sprinkling is not what is intended when the Lord commands baptism in Matthew 28. Rather, if a person is sprinkled, that is not a baptism, it is a rhantism.
If Jesus wanted His people rhantized, He would have said so. But He commanded that they be baptized. Words have meaning. To change the meaning of a word from its original context is to form a pretext.
When we use the word repent, it should be used in the biblical context of “to change the mind.” Now that the word has evolved in English to mean “actively turn from sin,” it no longer means what the Bible originally intended. Rather, one is to reconsider the path he is on. Actively turning from sin may be a healthy result of reconsideration, but that is not what reconsideration means.
Using the word baptize no longer carries the original meaning as it once did. Thus, saying immerse is far preferable to get the sense. Be aware of the evolving nature of languages. In understanding how they change, you can properly modify your thinking about what the Bible is saying, and your doctrine will be more properly aligned with what God intended all along.
Heavenly Father, thank You for the safeguarding of the original languages in which the Bible was first presented to Your people. Even thousands of years later, we can know what was originally intended in words that are no longer even used because we have all of that stored up information. And thank You for those who have carefully protected this knowledge throughout the ages. Praises to You, O God, for this precious and unchanging word. Amen.
|
|
|
|
Post by PrisonerOfHope on Sept 11, 2024 1:07:12 GMT -5
Daily Bible Verse, Matthew 3:17
Tuesday, September 10th, 2024
And suddenly a voice came from heaven, saying, “This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.” Matthew 3:17
“And behold! A voice out of the heavens, saying, ‘This is My Son – the Beloved in whom I approved’” (CG).
In the previous verse, after being immersed, Jesus came up from the water. When He did, He saw the Spirit of God descending and coming upon Him. The narrative now continues with, “And behold! A voice out of the heavens.”
This is the first of three times that a voice comes in this manner. The other two instances are at the Transfiguration and again during Jesus’ week of Passion –
“While he was still speaking, behold, a bright cloud overshadowed them; and suddenly a voice came out of the cloud, saying, ‘This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased. Hear Him!’” Matthew 17:5
“Now My soul is troubled, and what shall I say? ‘Father, save Me from this hour’? But for this purpose I came to this hour. 28 ‘Father, glorify Your name.’
Then a voice came from heaven, saying, ‘I have both glorified it and will glorify it again.’
29 Therefore the people who stood by and heard it said that it had thundered. Others said, ‘An angel has spoken to Him.’” John 12:27-29
As for the plural, heavens, it is a common Hebrew expression that is found throughout Scripture, even from Genesis 1:1. God is in His heaven. Man is on earth with the skies, the heavens, above him. In this case God’s voice thus extends from the heavenly realm through to the earthly realm, summed up in the term “heavens.” Of the words of the Father, He was “saying, ‘This is My Son.’”
The issue of sonship in Scripture can be complex. The word can mean one naturally generated from another, as when a father begets a son. It can mean someone adopted as a son, such as Israel is declared to be in Exodus 4:22 –
“Then you shall say to Pharaoh, ‘Thus says the Lord: “Israel is My son, My firstborn.”’”
A son can also be a descriptor, such as, “He is the son of a fool.” It would mean that he is like a fool, not that his mother or father was literally a fool. The term son can also mean a person in a relational aspect regardless of actual family ties, such as when Paul says, “To Timothy, a true son in the faith” (1 Timothy 1:2). And so forth.
In this case, the Father is proclaiming that Jesus is His Son in a literal sense. Matthew 1:18 has already said that Jesus was conceived of the Holy Spirit. He has no human Father. As God the Father has proclaimed Jesus is His Son, it would be hard to come to any other conclusion than that He literally means Jesus is begotten of Him.
In the case of Exodus 4:22, it is clear that Israel is a nation and a group of people. Thus, the term “son” is to be taken metaphorically. There is nothing to assume that God is speaking in metaphor here. With that stated, He continues with, “the Beloved.”
The word is agapétos, beloved. The word is consistently used in the gospels to refer to Jesus. So strong is this connection that Cambridge notes, “In late Greek it is nearly interchangeable with ‘only-begotten.’” There is a filial bond that is being expressed in these words, calling out for the reader to understand the intimate connection between the two.
Having said that, the same word immediately takes on a new tone in the epistles where it is used again and again when referring to the relation that is established between God and saved believers and between believers in Christ. For example –
“Therefore be imitators of God as dear [agapétos] children.” Ephesians 5:1
“Therefore, my beloved [agapétos], as you have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.” Philippians 2:12
Lastly, the voice from the heavens declares, “in whom I approved.” It is a compound word eudokeó, signifying “good or well” and “to think.” Thus, it signifies to approve of something. Strong’s says it especially signifies to approbate, meaning a formal or legal approval or agreement to something.
In this case, God has formally sent forth His Son to accomplish the redemption of man. Jesus is the chosen instrument to overcome the works of the Devil and to restore man to Himself. When the work is accomplished, it will be a formal, legal matter that is once and for all time resolved.
Life application: Although the words in this verse, when united with other verses seen so far, don’t prove the Trinity, they certainly allude to it. As noted, in Matthew 1:18, it said that Mary was with Child of the Holy Spirit, who is God.
As things reproduce after their own kind, it is understood that Jesus is thus God and Man. Here in verse 3:17, it is seen that Jesus is the Son of the Father. The voice is not the same manifestation as that of the Spirit because the Spirit descended upon Jesus and yet the voice is from the heavens.
In other words, the text is showing us a distinction between the three, and yet they are each God. As there is One God and God is One (Romans 3:30 and Galatians 3:20), then either the Bible is a confused book that is giving us a faulty presentation of God or there is a Godhead and within that Godhead there are three distinct Persons that comprise the One God.
The Bible doesn’t provide any other options. Explanations conjured up by cults that deviate from this recognizable presentation of God have various reasons for doing so. However, their presentations do not properly align with what is clearly seen in Scripture.
Whether you have a full understanding of the Trinity or not, it is important to recognize that this is what the Bible reveals. We do not need to understand something in its entirety to believe it. Faith involves accepting what we know to be true even if we do not fully grasp it. Have faith in the doctrine of the Trinity. It is how God has presented Himself to us because it is how God is.
Heavenly Father, we will certainly be searching out Your goodness and Your being for eternity. No matter how long we look to You, there will always be something new revealed to us. Thank You for Jesus who has made this possible. We have restoration through Him. Now eternity in Your presence is assured. Thank You, O God. Amen.
|
|
|
|
Post by PrisonerOfHope on Sept 11, 2024 22:53:13 GMT -5
Daily Bible Verse, Matthew 4:1
Wednesday, September 11th, 2024
Then Jesus was led up by the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted by the devil. Matthew 4:1
“Then Jesus, He was led up into the desolate by the Spirit to be tested by the Traducer” (CG).
Matthew 4 begins with the temptation of Christ. However, this is not to be disassociated from what was just presented, as evidenced by the beginning word “then.” Jesus left Galilee, His home of many years to be baptized by John. This was to fulfill all righteousness.
The law set forth precepts to be followed. That included following the words of God’s prophets who spoke on His behalf. This can be inferred from the words of Deuteronomy where false prophets were to be ignored. If this is so, then true prophets were to be acknowledged and heeded.
Jesus came to heed the call of the prophet. In His baptism, the Holy Spirit came upon Him and the voice from the heavens acknowledged that Jesus was His Son and that He stood approved of God. With that divine approbation acknowledged, Jesus now begins His ministry.
However, as judgment begins at the house of God, Jesus’ ministry begins with a time of testing. That is what is now seen at the opening of Matthew 4 where it says, “Then Jesus, He was led up into the desolate.”
As seen in Chapter 3, the word describing the area is an adjective, even if it expresses a noun. To retain the form of an adjective, “desolate” rather than “wilderness” is used. Regardless, in Scripture, such an area is considered a place of testing as well as one that can (and should) result in a closeness to God.
Without the distractions of the world of man, one can more fully commune with his Creator and contemplate his position and purpose before God. This leading was “by the Spirit.” Mark’s gospel uses a more forceful term, saying Jesus was essentially driven by the Spirit into the desolate.
This area of Judea is especially barren, and walking through it, even for a day, is challenging for the mind and body. The testing Jesus was to endure would be great, and His reliance on God would be absolutely paramount. This was because He was “to be tested.”
The word is peirazó from peira; to test (objectively). HELPS Word Studies says, “‘The word means either test or tempt’ (WP, 1, 348). Context alone determines which sense is intended, or if both apply simultaneously.”
Almost all translations say “tempted.” Only the SLT uses “tried.” There is temptation involved in this testing, but this is a test or a trial more than anything else. The temptation will come after an extended period of fasting.
Thus, the entire time is to be considered, not merely the temptations at the end of it, even if the point of waiting is to lure Jesus with temptations. This translation is more likely because of what it says in Luke 4:13 –
“Now when the devil had ended every temptation, he departed from Him until an opportune time.”
The time is one of looking for a weakness that can later be exploited. It was just said by the voice from heaven that Jesus is the One “in whom I approved.” He is now being tested in this capacity, just as Adam was tested concerning obeying his Creator in the garden. As for Jesus, this period of testing is set to be conducted “by the Traducer.”
The word is an adjective, diabolos, devilish. However, being preceded by the definite article, a noun form becomes necessary to make a separation between its uses without the article. Vincent’s Word Studies says –
“The word means calumniator, slanderer. It is sometimes applied to men, as to Judas (John 6:70); in 1 Timothy 3:11 (slanderers); and in 2 Timothy 3:3, and Titus 2:3 (false accusers). In such cases never with the article. The Devil, Satan, the god of this world (ὁ διάβολος [ho diabolos]), is always with the article and never plural. This should be distinguished from another word, also wrongly rendered devil in the A. V. – δαίμων [diamon], and its more common neuter form δαιμόνιον [diamonin], both of which should be translated demon, meaning the unclean spirits which possessed men, and were cast out by Christ and his apostles.”
As for the translation, the use of “devil” is almost universal. But that is a transliteration. As noted, the word is not a name. Rather, it has a meaning. Vincent’s says “calumniator” or “slanderer.” Strong’s says, “a traducer.” Traduce means “to expose to shame or blame by means of falsehood and misrepresentation.”
The difference between slander and traduce is that traduce stresses the resulting humiliation and distress of a victim. This is closer to the role of the devil. As noted, being an adjective, a literal translation would be “the devilish,” but to set this entity apart from others who may be devilish, using a capitalized noun appears to give the best sense – the Traducer.
Life application: There are times when following the herd mentality is seen in translations. There may be only one translation that deviates from what every other translation says. It may be that this is an entirely wrong translation, but it may be that following the herd was the easiest path to take for all the others.
Be careful not to accept a translation just because it is different, but be sure not to reject it for this reason as well. See if a commentary exists that may give a clue as to why there are differences. In the end, you will only get out of your time in God’s word what you put into it.
Enjoy what He has given, revel in the detail, and consider each passage as to how it fits into the surrounding context. This word is a sacred treasure passed on to us as it flowed forth from the mind of God. Rejoice in it! And above all, rejoice in the One who has given it to us. God – Father, Son, and Holy Spirit – has blessed us with this word. Thank You, O God, for it!
Yes, Lord God, we are grateful to You for Your kind hand of blessing. You have created us, redeemed us, and have given us Your word to understand how it all came about. Thank You, above all, for Jesus, the Subject of this precious word. Hallelujah and Amen.
|
|
|
|
Post by PrisonerOfHope on Sept 13, 2024 1:14:16 GMT -5
Daily Bible Verse, Matthew 4:2
Thursday, September 12th, 2024
And when He had fasted forty days and forty nights, afterward He was hungry. Matthew 4:2
“And, having fasted forty days and forty nights, afterward He hungered” (CG).
In the previous verse, it noted that Jesus was led by the Spirit into the desolate where He was to be tested by the Traducer. Next, it says, “And, having fasted.”
The word is nésteuó, to fast or abstain from food. Strong’s adds in a note that such a fast is connected to religion. In other words, it is a period of self-denial to meet a set religious purpose. This word concerning fasting is mentioned eighteen times in the gospels, speaking to Israel under the law. It is almost mentioned twice in Acts 13 –
“Now in the church that was at Antioch there were certain prophets and teachers: Barnabas, Simeon who was called Niger, Lucius of Cyrene, Manaen who had been brought up with Herod the tetrarch, and Saul. 2 As they ministered to the Lord and fasted [nésteuó], the Holy Spirit said, “Now separate to Me Barnabas and Saul for the work to which I have called them.” 3 Then, having fasted [nésteuó] and prayed, and laid hands on them, they sent them away.” Acts 13:1-3
This same word, nésteuó, is also used in some manuscripts in 1 Corinthians 7:5. Of this Spirit-led but self-imposed fast, it next says that it was for “forty days and forty nights.”
The words are drawn in parallel to two accounts from the Old Testament. The first is when Moses fasted for this period on two separate occasions, found in Exodus 24:18 & again in 34:28. These periods are repeated in Deuteronomy 9:9-18. The second is at the time of Elijah in 1 Kings 19:8 as the prophet went to Horeb, the same location where Moses had twice fasted while receiving the law.
It is not uncommon to read that the number forty here is a round number. Unlike the number 10, which is at times used idiomatically to signify an indeterminate period or set of events, there is nothing to suggest this with the period now being set forth. The narrative indicates forty days and forty nights is the amount of time Jesus fasted. Stating both days and nights highlights this. This is especially so because it was not forty days where He broke His fast each evening, but an entire cycle of time inclusive of both days and nights.
In the parallel account in Luke, it notes that Jesus’ testing was throughout this entire period. There it says, “days forty being tested by the devil.” Therefore, what this appears to mean is that the fasting itself was a part of the testing. In both accounts, only after it notes that He was hungry is the active trial by the devil then noted.
Jesus was led by the Spirit into this time of testing, the entire time of which is a testing by the devil. Because of this, one can see the logical reason why translating the word peirazó from the previous verse as “test” rather than “tempt” is preferred. God does not tempt anyone to sin (James 1:13 – where the same word peirazó is used, but obviously with a different intended meaning). Jesus was tested during His Spirit-led time, and we likewise are tested in our lives at times.
Therefore, even if the devil tempted Jesus after His fasting, the entire period is better described as one of testing, not temptation. As for Jesus’ time of forty days and forty nights, it next says, “afterward He hungered.”
Such a fast would certainly lead to this state. But it was during this time of fasting that the miraculous nature of Christ and His being sustained by God is truly placed on prominent display. A human cannot normally exist without food and water for even a much shorter time. Without food, yes, but water is absolutely necessary to sustain us. However, God was miraculously sustaining Moses and Elijah, and He likely did this through Jesus as well.
As Moses is reflective of the law and Elijah is reflective of the prophets, each requiring God’s miraculous hand to sustain them, we are seeing Jesus, the fulfillment of the law and the prophets, being sustained by the power of God in Christ to carry Him through what the law and prophets anticipated.
Life application: It is a common question for people to ask if fasting is required for believers. The answer must be, “No.” Though it is referred to in Scripture, and even though Jesus speaks of it as something that was commonly done, His words were to Israel, under the law. As such, those verses cannot be considered prescriptive for the church.
Likewise, in Acts, fasting is mentioned, but Acts is a descriptive account of what was occurring. It prescribes nothing. On the other hand, in the epistles – from where we are to derive our doctrine on such matters – fasting is never explicitly directed. It is mentioned once in 1 Corinthians 7:5 (in some manuscripts), but it is not a prescription. Rather, it is an allowance.
The other two times fasting is mentioned are in 2 Corinthians 6:5 and 11:27. Both are involuntary fasts. Paul was forced to fast because of a lack of food. Other than these three references, fasting is never addressed, and it is certainly not prescribed. As this is true, any fast you conduct – for whatever reason – is between you and the Lord, between you and your doctor, or between you and your spouse (as indicated in some manuscripts of 1 Corinthians 7:5).
If fasting is something that interests you, study up on it. A water diet, meaning a diet that consists of only drinking water for a set amount of time, is something that has benefitted many. The longest recorded water fast was by Angus Barbieri (1939 – 7 September 1990). He was a Scottish man who fasted for 382 days, from June 1965 to July 1966. He went from an immensely overweight and unhealthy person to a slimmed-down, healthy person in this manner. His fast, and many others, can be seen on YouTube or through general internet searches.
Study up on fasting, but: 1) It is not required according to a proper study of the New Testament. 2) It should never be mandated by a Christian leader. 3) If it is mandated by someone, you should consider not fellowshipping with that person any longer as this may lead to a form of tyrannical authoritarian leadership. 4) You will have to give up bacon. In the end, the pluses and minuses must be personally weighed.
Lord God, may our doctrine be set based on what Your word prescribes when taken in the proper context of what is being said. Help us to not get caught up in strange teachings that have nothing to do with a close and personal relationship with You. Instead, may we hold fast to Your word and be sound in our thinking in all ways. Amen.
|
|
|
|
Post by PrisonerOfHope on Sept 14, 2024 1:57:10 GMT -5
Daily Bible Verse, Matthew 4:3
Friday, September 13th, 2024
Now when the tempter came to Him, he said, “If You are the Son of God, command that these stones become bread.” Matthew 4:3
“And having come, the one tempting, he said to Him, ‘If Son – you are – of God, speak, that these stones – they might become bread’” (CG).
The previous verse noted that after forty days and forty nights of fasting, Jesus was hungry. Because of that weakened state, it next says, “And having come, the one tempting.”
The idea of “having come,” is one of nearness. The tempter came near to Jesus, but this does not mean he came physically. The Lord would speak to the prophets of old so that they audibly heard Him, but there was no physical presence. Likewise, Peter says this –
“Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil walks about like a roaring lion, seeking whom he may devour. 9 Resist him, steadfast in the faith, knowing that the same sufferings are experienced by your brotherhood in the world.” 1 Peter 5:8, 9
There is nothing to suggest that the tempter appears to people in a visible form. Rather, a spiritual battle is what believers are engaged in. As for the word “tempter,” it is the same word just used in verse 4:1, peirazó. At that time, it was translated as “test,” rather than tempt.
Jesus went through an extended period of testing which now culminates in being tempted by the tempter. As noted, HELPS Word Studies says, “Context alone determines which sense is intended, or if both apply simultaneously.”
Jesus will be tempted in three ways that practically mirror what happened with Adam in the Garden of Eden. That begins with the words, “he said to Him, ‘If Son – you are – of God.’”
The word Son is in the emphatic position, and thus, the temptation is based on that premise. As for the word “if,” the Greek word is ei. It does not suggest any doubt. Rather, the words presume that Jesus is the Son of God. It would be like someone saying to a very strong person, “If you are so strong, why don’t you use your strength in this case?”
The tempter fully realizes that Jesus is the Son of God and is working out his temptation based on that premise. And so, he continues with the words, “speak, that these stones – they might become bread.”
Here, the word stones is plural. In Luke 4, it is singular – this stone. It may be that the words were first stated in general. Look around you at all these stones (the area is a very rocky place). With that, the tempter may have focused on a single stone that looked exceedingly like a loaf of bread, highlighting the temptation and tempting Jesus even further, “This one! Look at how tasty it could be… go ahead and command it!”
As for the temptation, in the garden, the devil said to the woman, “For God knows that in the day you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil” (Genesis 3:5). The tempter knows that Jesus is like God because He is the Son of God, and so instead of tempting Him with becoming like God, He tempts Him with what God can do.
However, this is testing of Jesus’ humanity, not His deity. In other words, it says in Hebrews –
“Seeing then that we have a great High Priest who has passed through the heavens, Jesus the Son of God, let us hold fast our confession. 15 For we do not have a High Priest who cannot sympathize with our weaknesses, but was in all points tempted as we are, yet without sin. 16 Let us therefore come boldly to the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy and find grace to help in time of need.” Hebrews 4:14-16
The devil gained possession of the rights to mankind by causing man to sin. If Jesus the Man were to prevail over the tempter and to also fulfill God’s law as a Man, that right would be restored to Him. If Jesus, however, were to rely on His deity to overcome the works of the devil, there would be no transfer of rights.
The story of Ruth gives detailed insights into this transfer of rights between people. Sin is what necessitated Jesus’ incarnation. His state as a Man who can regain the right to humanity is what is under consideration.
The age-old question of “Could Jesus sin?” is what is brought into focus here. This is known as the doctrine of impeccability. The tempter obviously felt He could. The account of Jesus’ life, however, bears out that He did not.
Going back to Matthew 3:17, the voice from the heavens audibly proclaimed that Jesus is God’s Son of whom God had approved. Looking around at all of the stones in His extreme hunger, it would have been an enormous temptation to appease Himself by using His divine power to satisfy His human needs. But it would have marred the entire purpose of His incarnation.
Therefore, He resisted the temptation, as will be seen in the coming verse.
Life application: Jesus prevailed over the temptation before Him. In our faith in Jesus, we are brought into a state of salvation because we transfer our headship from Adam to Him. The authority the devil possesses over humanity is broken through our faith. However, our trials do not end. In fact, they often become more pronounced –
“For, in fact, we told you before when we were with you that we would suffer tribulation, just as it happened, and you know. 5 For this reason, when I could no longer endure it, I sent to know your faith, lest by some means the tempter had tempted you, and our labor might be in vain.” 1 Thessalonians 3:4, 5
The devil understands our new position in Christ, and he wants nothing more than to disarm our power in Him. The power we are given is our faith. And our faith leads us to share with others the faith we possess. Paul continues –
“But now that Timothy has come to us from you, and brought us good news of your faith and love, and that you always have good remembrance of us, greatly desiring to see us, as we also to see you— 7 therefore, brethren, in all our affliction and distress we were comforted concerning you by your faith. 8 For now we live, if you stand fast in the Lord.” 1 Thessalonians 3:6-8
If our faith is weakened, then our testimony is weakened. When that happens, we are no longer telling others about Jesus, and souls that could be transferred from Adam to Jesus will never hear the gospel. The devil did not want Jesus to prevail because he hates humanity and wants nothing more than for it to be eternally condemned. However, Jesus prevailed, and His offer stands for all people to receive. But this is only going to come about by people of faith telling others the good news.
Let us hold fast, remain strong in the faith, and rely wholly on the strength of the good news of Jesus Christ to carry us through our lives as we continue to boldly proclaim what we know – for the salvation of others and to the glory of God.
Lord God Almighty, give us the strength, wisdom, and endurance to continue in our faith all of our days so that we will boldly and effectively tell others about the goodness of God in Christ. May it be so, to Your glory. Amen.
|
|
|
|
Post by PrisonerOfHope on Sept 14, 2024 23:32:30 GMT -5
Daily Bible Verse, Matthew 4:4
Saturday, September 14th, 2024
But He answered and said, “It is written, ‘Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God.’” Matthew 4:4
“And having answered, He said, ‘It has been written, “Not upon mere bread – the man – he shall live, but upon every word coming out through God’s mouth”’” (CG).
In the previous verse, the tempter tried to prompt Jesus to command that the stones become bread. Now, in response to that, we read, “And having answered, He said, ‘It has been written.’”
Jesus defaults to the word of God. The tempter tried to get Jesus to lose His footing and slip up, but in order to remain on firm ground, He simply went to the book of Deuteronomy. He will do this in all three temptations.
The words in the Greek are in the perfect tense. It was written and what is written is authoritative and binding. It is of note that the very first words recorded as coming from His mouth after the initiation of His ministry through the rite of baptism rests on the absolute authority of Scripture. The words are written, they are unchanging, and they are obligatory.
The book of Deuteronomy comes at the end of the forty years of Israel wandering in the wilderness as they prepared to enter into Canaan through the Jordan River that would be cut off for them to cross over.
Likewise, citing the word by Jesus comes at the end of His forty days of testing in the wilderness in preparation for His ministry, which will culminate in His death, symbolized by the cutting off of the Jordan.
Jesus doesn’t argue with Satan. He doesn’t respond to the statement “If you are the Son of God,” nor does He say that He was appointed by a voice from heaven, as if it gave Him the authority to do certain things. Instead, He cites Scripture beginning with the words “Not upon mere bread – the man – he shall live.”
Jesus is citing Deuteronomy 8:3. The NKJV translates it loosely, but it is still understandable –
“So He humbled you, allowed you to hunger, and fed you with manna which you did not know nor did your fathers know, that He might make you know that man shall not live by bread alone; but man lives by every word that proceeds from the mouth of the Lord.” Deuteronomy 8:3
The translation from the Greek is not that far from the Hebrew, which says, “not upon the bread to separation [meaning alone] lives the man.” In this, there are two articles that should be considered, “the man,” and “the bread.” The Lord is teaching “the man,” meaning the Adam in every man, that he shall not live on “the bread” alone.
In providing the manna, the Lord was showing that what He spoke is what comes to pass. To eat, then, isn’t what ultimately sustains a person. That which has come to pass – meaning anything that we see, feel, eat, smell, and so on – came to pass because the Lord spoke it into existence.
The manna is a demonstration of this. It never existed, nobody ever knew of it, and yet it appeared. As it came at the command of God, just as the universe came at His command, then the truth is that man lives not by bread that is a result of the command, but from the spoken word (the command) itself. And that command is next explained by the words, “but upon every word coming out through God’s mouth.”
Again, the Hebrew reads, “for upon all outgoing of mouth Yehovah lives the man.” What the Lord speaks (the outgoing of His mouth) is what sustains the man.
Israel had the manna, and yet they continued to complain against the Lord. Jesus, understanding that the manna only existed because the word caused it to exist, conveyed to the tempter that the bread was only a part of God’s proclamation.
For Him to command the stones to become bread in order to satisfy His personal hunger would be to not rely on all that proceeds from the mouth of God. But later, we will see that the manna was only a shadowy type of Christ Himself – the Word of God –
“And Jesus said to them, ‘I am the bread of life. He who comes to Me shall never hunger, and he who believes in Me shall never thirst.’” John 6:35
As Christ is the Word of God, He is everything that is needed to have life. The bread of the world can sustain life, but it cannot make man live. God, who gave the manna in the wilderness, showed that He can sustain a man apart from the common food of man. As He can do this, then He can make man live. How does the man live? He lives through Christ.
Jesus doesn’t normally cite a lot of Scripture to the people in His ministry as recorded in the gospels. Rather, He says things like, “I say unto you.” However, because He is establishing His state as a Man totally dependent on the Father, He defaults His words to Scripture when responding to the tempter.
His life would be lived wholly in accord with the word of God while at the same time conveying new information to the people who would follow Him.
Life application: Jesus has fulfilled the Law and the Prophets, meaning the entirety of the Old Testament law which came with the promise of life for the man who would keep them. That is seen in Leviticus –
“You shall therefore keep My statutes and My judgments, which if a man does, he shall live by them: I am the Lord.” Leviticus 18:5
Because Jesus fulfilled the law perfectly, life is found in Him. Now, when we put our trust in His completed work, that life is imparted to us. It is no longer a consideration that we must fulfill the law. Rather, it is fulfilled, and it is now set aside in Christ. Our work is not found in Moses. Instead, Jesus says, “This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He sent” (John 6:29).
God directs us to Jesus, not to the law. He asks us to trust Him, not self. Be sure to get this right. An eternity of difference for the human soul is tied up in where we will trust. Come to Christ and be freed from the burden of the law!
Lord God, we are so thankful to You for the giving of Christ Jesus. He has done what no man could do. He has fulfilled the law and introduced a New Covenant where we are saved by grace through faith. Thank You, O God, for Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.
|
|
