Disease X: The Next Scamdemic!

[schwartzie]

I'm starting to hear quite a bit about the so-called "Disease X" - they have no idea of what it will be, but they're working on a vaccine for it. Right - because they care about our health!  🙄 Might as well pin the thread now, because I'm sure we'll be seeing a whole lot more about it in the coming days and weeks - if we're still here! 


WEF: WHO Calls on World Leaders to Surrender Powers to UN to Fight ‘Disease X’

Frank Bergman
January 19, 2024 - 12:56 pm


The head of the World Health Organization (WHO) has called on global leaders to surrender their nations’ “pandemic” powers to the United Nations (UN) so that the unelected bureaucratic agency can supposedly fight so-called “Disease X.”



WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus made the call while speaking at the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) annual summit in Davos, Switzerland this week.



While addressing world leaders, corporate elites, and globalist powermongers, Tedros urged the governments of sovereign nations to sign the WHO’s “Global Pandemic Treaty.”



However, as Slay News has reported, the treaty has major implications surrounding speech, surveillance, and digital vaccine passports.



The WHO’s proposed Pandemic Treaty and the amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) give the globalist organization sweeping new powers that override the laws of sovereign nations.



Democrat President Joe Biden’s administration has confirmed that it is committed to surrendering America’s pandemic authority to the WHO in the “legally binding” accord.



In a press release last February, the Biden admin publicly affirmed the U.S. federal government’s commitment to the agreement.



The accord will give the Chinese Communist Party-linked WHO, the UN’s “health” agency, ultimate control over U.S. pandemic policies such as lockdowns, censorship, masking, vaccine mandates, and public surveillance.



The treaty will award the WHO with sweeping global powers if passed and will give the United Nations agency the authority to declare and manage the pandemic emergency policies of once-sovereign nations, as Slay News has previously reported.



Once a health emergency is declared by the World Health Organization, every signatory, including the United States, must submit to the authority of the WHO.



This includes caving to the WHO on treatments, lockdowns, vaccine mandates, and government surveillance.



Although the “Pandemic Treaty” suggests that it is meant to tackle virus outbreaks, the amendments have continued to expand its reach.



The definition of “pandemic,” according to the WHO, now includes “climate change.”


The treaty gives the WHO ultimate control over individual nations to declare an “emergency” and then dictate the response.



Should the WHO declare an “emergency” over “global warming,” the UN “health” agency would be able to override the laws of sovereign nations to enforce “climate lockdowns.”



During a speech at the WEF summit in Davos, WHO Chief Tedros emphasized the importance of international cooperation under a single global authority.



He pointed out the potential obstacles posed by an overemphasis on national interests.



Tedros took part in a session titled “Disease X” at the forum where he underscored what he believes to be the critical importance of being more prepared for potential future pandemics.



Tedros backed the adoption of the WHO Pandemic Treaty, viewing it as a necessary tool for enhancing our understanding of such diseases.



Addressing the Davos audience, Tedros stated, “This is about a common enemy.



“Without a shared response, we will face the same problem as Covid.”



He identified “Disease X” as a placeholder term that could be used to encompass yet unknown diseases and reiterated the importance of continued research and development for treatments.



Earlier this week, the WHO worked with the WEF to advocate for the implementation of the Global Pandemic Treaty.



The treaty, backed by the European Union (EU), aims to strengthen global resilience to future pandemics and already has plans to introduce a digital vaccine passport by this Spring.



With a deadline of May 2024, the WHO, along with support from the EU, is working toward a binding agreement among the United Nations member states to facilitate global participation.



Tedros remarked, “The importance of a legally binding instrument cannot be overstated: it will be our collective legacy for future generations.”



The pressure from Tedros comes as concerns mount that the WHO’s parent agency, the United Nations, is trying to position itself as an unelected single-world government.



The UN is preparing to massively expand its powers and is planning to unveil proposals for the unprecedented expansion of its influence during the upcoming “Summit of the Future” conference in 2024.



The summit seeks to unveil plans for meeting the WEF’s “Agenda 2030” goals.



Included in the proposals are policies that would grant the organization an “emergency platform” during “global crisis” events.



Such “crises” would be determined by the UN itself and “emergencies” would be declared by the agency.



Should a global “emergency” be declared by the UN, it would enable the agency to deploy “emergency powers” to meet “climate change” goals or enforce restrictions during, or even before, pandemics.



UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has been preparing a proposal to tackle so-called “future pandemic risk” – rather than waiting for an actual pandemic.



Under the plan, the UN would be able to exercise its sweeping powers if it claims it is acting to prevent something from happening.



To prevent a “major climatic event,” the UN could block the public from buying meat and dairy products with their digital dollars to stop “global warming.”



Elsewhere in the UN’s proposal are calls for mandatory globalized “digital IDs” linked to individuals’ bank accounts that are supposedly designed to help meet the “sustainability goals” of “Net Zero.”



As Slay News previously reported, Guterres demands in the “Our Common Agenda” report that all individuals under the UN’s control would have a digital ID that is linked to their bank account.



With the eventual rollout of “digital cash,” or Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), authorities would be able to monitor and control the spending of citizens in cashless societies.



Those whose spending indicates that they pose a “risk” of contributing toward a “major climactic event” could be swiftly punished.



link

[ExquisiteGerbil]

The Globalists' New Weapon

BY TYLER DURDEN

MONDAY, JAN 22, 2024 - 11:40 PM

Authored by Robert Malone via The Brownstone Institute,



On the heels of Davos (World Economic Forum) week, the MSM hysterical propaganda push from the globalists regarding “Disease X” is in full swing.


Just take a gander at a few of the Corporate Mockingbird Media headlines...





Almost every major news outlet in the world has run black propaganda pieces about Disease X. Why do I write black propaganda – because the “experts” aren’t actually named, the peer-reviewed papers supporting the thesis of “a deadly pathogen causing 20 times more deaths than COVID-19” or “killing 20 times more people than COVID-19” or “killing 50 million people” are non-existent. Yet these narratives are all headline news in mainstream media.



This is just another exercise in globalized messaging to support the WHO (World Economic Forum) and WEF-pushed narrative that governments must pour billions into the largest transnational corporations in the world to “cure” a non-existent disease.



What isn’t black propaganda but rather grey propaganda is that this fearporn is being pushed by the WEF and the WHO. WHO officials are most of the featured speakers and panelists on “Disease X” at the Davos meeting this week. From the WEF website:



World leaders are set to discuss preparation for the next pandemic at the World Economic Forum in Davos…



Officials from across the globe will be heading to the annual meeting in Switzerland, with the risk posed by what’s known as Disease X one of the key items on the agenda.



The meeting will address new warnings from the World Health Organisation (WHO) that the unidentified disease could kill 20 times more people than the coronavirus pandemic.



The big push from the WHO and the WEF is that “Disease X” will be zoonotic. That money to surveil every speck of land in the world is the path forward to stopping “Disease X.” What a coincidence that the brand new CIA/intelligence agency designated to run the National Counterproliferation and Biosecurity Center to surveil pathogens intends to do just that. And that this happens to be intended to run in parallel with the CIA mission to surveil the world for other (nefarious?) purposes.



According to the WHO, Disease X is all about One Health solutions. The World Health organization describes One Health as the following:



Government officials, researchers and workers across sectors at the local, national, regional and global levels should implement joint responses to health threats. This includes developing shared databases and surveillance across different sectors, and identifying new solutions that address the root causes and links between risks and impacts.



Basically One Health gives public health officials total control and surveillance across AI, the internet, agriculture, climate change, public health, medical systems, ecological sites, urban, and rural areas. It can encompass just about anything. It also values animal and plant life as equal to human life. The WHO goes on:



investigating the impact of human activity on the environment and wildlife habitats, and how this drives disease threats. Critical areas include food production and distribution, urbanization and infrastructure development, international travel and trade, activities that lead to biodiversity loss and climate change, and those that put increased pressure on the natural resource base – all of which can lead to the emergence of zoonotic diseases.



We have seen this playbook before…

The International Journal of Arts of Social Science published the paper titled: “The World Economic Forum, “The Lancet,” and COVID-19 Knowledge Gatekeeping.” That paper is seminal in understanding just how corrupting the WEF as well as the WHO have become to scientific journals, scientists, universities, and media (fact-checkers).







Abstract:



The study investigated the links that the World Economic Forum has established with organizations and persons linked to the Lancet article titled Statement in support of the scientists, public health professionals, and medical professionals of China combatting COVID-19. Guided by the Gatekeeping Theory, appended by the Political Economy of Knowledge Theory, the study implemented an integrative literature review (textual synthesis).



Relevant online pieces of literature were sampled through a snowballing technique using the Google search engine platform to elucidate on the funding and ownership of the Lancet, and the 27 authors of the said article and their affiliations with higher learning institutions vis-à-vis their connections with the World Economic Forum to highlight their implications to gatekeeping and COVID-19 knowledge production in journal publications, particularly that of the Lancet.



Results revealed that the WEF has penetrated all knowledge institutions that benefit from the natural COVID-19 virus origins hypothesis and the silencing of contrarian hypotheses, including the lab-leak narrative. A model of the WEF knowledge production complex against the lab-leak hypothesis was presented to visually represent the influence of the WEF on scientific journal gatekeeping in the context of the Lancet.



This is the paper being discussed:







The latter was the scientific paper that stopped the “spread” of “misinformation” that Cvoid-19 could have originated from a lab. This paper was crucial in shutting down “lab-leak” investigations at the WHO and in the US. In fact, the WHO Report published on February 2021 on the origins of the virus concluded that the lab-leak hypothesis was “Extremely unlikely.” They later scuttled a second investigation, because WHO officials claimed China was uncooperative – while never even admitting that the US may have had a significant role in both funding and directing the Wuhan laboratory research program.



Back to that original 2020 Lancet paper, the 27 WEF affiliated authors included both Peter Daszak and Jeremy Farrar (Chief Scientist at the World Health Organization since 2023. He was previously the director of The Wellcome Trust from 2013 to 2023).



From the 2020 Lancet paper:



The rapid, open, and transparent sharing of data on this outbreak is now being threatened by rumours and misinformation around its origins. We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin.



What Brian Bantugan, the author of “The World Economic Forum, ‘The Lancet’, and COVID-19 Knowledge Gatekeeping” discovered is shocking. The publishers, the authors, the affiliated universities, the NGOs, and the funding sources – are almost all directly linked to the WEF. They all continued to suppress information about the lab leak through out the pandemic. He writes:



Through content analysis, by way of a matrix of analysis, the study established the connections that exist between The Lancet and the WEF. The study argued through the Gatekeeping and Political Economy of Knowledge Production that the connections found between The Lancet and the WEF suggest likely collusion that led to the marginalization of the lab leak origin narrative as early as February 2020 and a network of disinformation within established but invisible networks of knowledge production.



Furthermore, scientific journals used what is called “gatekeeping” to withhold information.



According to author Brian Bantugan:



The term “gatekeeping” was coined by Kurt Lewin to refer to a process of blocking “unwanted or useless things by using a gate” (communicationtheory.org, n.d., para. 2). The theory asserts that “(t)he Gatekeeper decides what information should move to group or individual and what information should not” (para. 3). According to Shoemaker and Vos (2009), gatekeeping is the “… process (that) determines not only which information is selected, but also what the content and nature of messages… will be” (para. 1). Initially, it was used to describe the process of news production in mass media involving “selecting, writing, editing, positioning, scheduling, repeating, and otherwise massaging information to become news” (Vos & Reese, 2009, in Omlette à la Chantal, 2021).



First off, the Lancet is owned by Elsevier which is owned by the WEF partner RELX Group. This fact, by the way, is not transparent on the Lancet website.



But it gets worse.



Some examples of this effort were Elsevier Novel Coronavirus Information Center, Center, the Wiley COVID-19 Resources and News portal, the Springer Nature COVID-19 resources centre, and the Frontiers Coronoravirus Knowledge Hub (Matias-Guiu, 2020). Elsevier is owned by WEF partner RELX Group. John Wiley & Sons published Schwab‟s Stakeholder Capitalism (WEF, 2022). Springer Nature is owned by WEF partner Holtzbrinck Publishing Group. Frontiers was founded by WEF-affiliated Henry Markram (WEF, 2022).



So, all of these publishers have direct ties to the WEF… and yet they have been the gatekeepers of what got published during Covid-19. Including publishing the original animal origins paper.



<Of note, Frontiers in Pharmacology (founded by WEF-affiliated Henry Markram) was the publication that back-tracked on publishing any early treatment for Covid-19 studies. I was editor of the special edition for early treatment. When this happened, I and the other four senior editors all resigned.>



But the paper goes on to document that almost all of the 27 Lancet authors and their universities have strong affiliations to the WEF. The details of those relations are laid in a series of tables, which can be found here. But the paper goes on:



The fact that the authors of the controversial article in The Lancet are all quite involved with high- profile organizations like the UN-FAO, WHO, and the USAID reveals much about why they decided to support the actions that led to the immediate “conspiratorialization” of other hypotheses on the virus origins, and mass immunizations they heavily promoted not long after the lockdowns were in place all over the world.



Assuming that the UN-FAO, WHO, and the USAID operate within a seamless system, embodied by the One Health approach they championed years before the pandemic happened, it would not be difficult to think that the editorial processes linked to and supported by their system will work towards their and the WEF’s benefit and advantage.



The data show that the WEF is part of the micro and macro environments that shape editorial gatekeeping. There is a playing field biased towards their system and only ideas that promote their system will have a chance to be heard. That the lab-leak hypothesis is silenced is what the article of the 27 authors may have likely aimed to ensure. Figure 1 below shows the network supporting the natural origins hypothesis of COVID-19.



Figure 1 below, based on the data above <tables found in the article>, shows the complex relationships on which the WEF has firmly established itself. Through the influence of the WHO and UN-FAO, WEF is not only shaping WEF- affiliated higher education institutions but also those that look up them as models.



However, recent developments have shown that it is not only the Lancet that was rendered questionable by its decision to privilege the work of the 27 authors affiliated with WEF-linked universities, resulting in the marginalization of competing but equally valid theories on the origin of the Covid-19 virus, but also NatureMedicine (Campbell, 2022) which is also under an organization affiliated with the WEF.



Clearly, gatekeeping in scientific journals is seen here as equally vulnerable to the influence of the political and economic elite, like the rest of mainstream and social media. Given that leaked and redacted documents linking Fauci to some of the authors in the controversial Lancet article have emerged (showing that some of the authors were communicating directly with him before the article was published) (Peak Prosperity, 2022), and the web of relationships in Figure 1, it is not surprising that the controversial article was released in no time. “Scientific” gatekeeping and “truth” -making seems to be favoring the interest of the WEF, above all







Put together with the data in Tables 2 and 3, one can infer that the WEF has penetrated all the institutions that shape the minds of people, through their policies and programs.



The top executive editors of the Lancet, its owners, and funding agencies aside, the WEF has undeniably positioned itself to influence future leaders, policymakers, and knowledge gatekeepers like the Lancet, especially those in prestigious schools that can only be accessed by the privileged and the wealthy. It is not difficult to think that the interest of the WEF would be top-of-mind among the students and graduates of such universities compared to the multitude who have no interest in the workings of the WEF at all.



Right now, Disease X and One Health are being propagandized in the mainstream media as being the solution to save the world from a massive die-off` – this propaganda is being driven by the WEF in collaboration with the WHO. The EcoHealth Alliance is also at the forefront of the One Health initiative and has collected millions of dollars for their research projects into One Health. The Davos meeting is being used to prop up support for the WHO Pandemic treaty that removes national sovereignty over public health by promoting.



The WEF and the WHO envision solutions to the imaginary “Disease X” that involve more loss of freedoms. They want control over food systems, more money, more censorship, more surveillance, control over the climate change agenda – all in the name of public health. But even worse, they want all this codified in a document that turns over national sovereignty to the WHO.



The WEF and the WHO know that One Health and the pandemic agreement are their best pathways to more world control.



Without ever consulting sovereign nations, the WHO has placed the global “rights in nature” movement on par or above humans. This is why the One Health model must be rejected.



Listen below to The World Economic Forum’s 2024 Discussion “Preparing For Disease X” as Dr. Tedros Ghebreyesus, the WHO Director General, speaks about the Pandemic Agreement:



To have better preparedness and to address disease X we have Pandemic Agreement. The Pandemic Agreement can bring all the experience and all the challenges we have faced all in one…This is a common global interest and very narrow national interest should not come in the way. Of course, national interest is natural but it is NARROW national interest that can be difficult and affecting the negotiations as we speak…



Dr. Tedros, Davos 2024






This is the face of the enemy.



This particular embodiment of enemy comes in the form of the WEF and the WHO.



They now control the buttons for the mainstream media, the fact-checkers, academic institutions, the publishers of the scientific journals, and heads of state.



The list of who they own or have bought off is almost endless.



The fight in front of us is vast. Now is not the time to give up.

link

[ExquisiteGerbil]

WHO: Those Failing to Comply with NWO Will Be Killed by ‘Disease X’

Hunter Fielding
January 29, 2024


The head of the World Health Organization (WHO) has warned sovereign nations that those states that refuse to comply with the globalists’ “New Order” will pay the price when so-called “Disease X” is unleashed on the public.



According to WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the “New World Order” will be ushered in when states sign the United Nations “health” agency’s “Pandemic Treaty.”



By signing the treaty, countries will enable the United Nations (UN) and WHO be establish an unelected single world government.



Under the condition of the treaty, nations will need to surrender their powers to the UN for the sake of the “New Order.”



The WHO is now demanding that all member states sign the treaty in order to be “protected” from “Disease X.”



Those who fail to comply will be signing a death warrant for their citizens, Tedros warns.



Steve Watson and Professor Michel Chossudovsky expounded on this conspiracy in a Jan. 25 piece published by the Center for Research on Globalization.



They quoted a piece by Forbes about Disease X, which is used by medical tyrants to “encourage the development of countermeasures, including vaccines and tests, to deploy in the case of a future outbreak.”



According to the article, the WHO convened a group of more than 300 scientists in November 2022 to study Disease X.



This disease, caused by an “unknown pathogen that could cause a serious international epidemic,” reportedly has a mortality rate “20 times that of [the Wuhan coronavirus] (COVID-19).”



During the globalist World Economic Forum’s (WEF) meeting at Davos, Switzerland, Tedros stressed that governments must prepare for the outbreak of Disease X.



Nevertheless, the WHO head admitted that the momentum for this preparation “had been slowed down by entrenched positions and a torrent of fake news, lies and conspiracy theories.”



However, according to Watson and Chossudovsky, this supposed preparation isn’t for the hypothetical Disease X – but for the globalists’ bigger designs through the Pandemic Treaty.



Under this treaty, the entire eight billion people in the world would see their data being digitized and tied to the digital ID and central bank digital currency.


“Three hundred scientists to study something which is unknown and hypothetical?” the two wrote.



“The media propaganda buzz, quoting ‘scientific opinion,’ is [that] ‘Disease X is 20 times more dangerous than COVID-19’.



“A renewed 24/7 fear campaign has been launched, reporting on an alleged new wave of COVID-19 deaths while totally ignoring the tide of excess mortality resulting from the COVID-19 ‘vaccine.'”



According to the two, the idea of Disease X was first developed by a WHO expert committee made up of virologists and disease experts between 2017 and 2018.



It was subsequently envisaged in two events in May 2018 and October 2019.



The two events were held under the auspices of the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security (JHCHS), with the support of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF).



The WHO expert committee met in Geneva in early 2018, categorizing Disease X as a “global threat.”



This was reinforced during a May 2018 tabletop simulation held in Washington, D.C. titled “Parainfluenza Clade X.”



According to the event’s description, “the scenario begins with an outbreak of novel parainfluenza virus that is moderately contagious and moderately lethal, and for which there are no effective medical countermeasures.”



Later, the idea of Disease X reared its head once more during the “Event 201” tabletop simulation.



The event, held in October 2019 at a New York City hotel, simulated the outbreak of a deadly coronavirus pandemic.



This outbreak became partly true five months later in March 2020, when the WHO declared the COVID-19 pandemic.



“I fully expect that we will be confronted by a fast-moving pandemic,” said Dr. Mike Ryan, executive director of the WHO’s Health Emergencies Program.



Even Microsoft founder Bill Gates, who shares close ties with Tedros, warned of the same.



The technocrat stressed that while the risks of severe disease from COVID-19 “have dramatically reduced,” another pandemic “is all but certain.”

link

[ExquisiteGerbil]

Globalists Plan to Leak Deadly ‘Disease X’ This Year to Install Single World Government

Hunter Fielding
January 25, 2024


Unelected globalists are plotting to release their so-called “Disease X” this year as part of a plan to install a single world government by 2025, experts are warning.



Led by the World Economic Forum (WEF), Bill Gates, the World Health Organization (WHO), and the United Nations (UN), globalists are preparing to unleash a deadly pandemic on humanity to seize control of sovereign nations.



Currently, the UN and its “health” agency the WHO are aligning themselves as the new global authority.



The move will be the culmination of decades of planning by the UN to install itself as an unelected single world government.



The plan to unleash a deadly pandemic has two main objectives:



Massively reduce the global population of “useless humans.”

Create justification to establish a single world government.

The WHO’s pandemic treaty is the gateway to a global, top-down totalitarian regime, a one-world government.



The reason we can be sure there will be additional pandemics, whether manufactured using either fear and hype alone or an actual bioweapon created for this very purpose, is because the takeover plan, aka The Great Reset, is based on the premise that we need global biosecurity surveillance and centralized response.



A new contagion will likely be born in 2024 to complete the global takeover by next year, and the corporate media are already preparing us for it



January 15-19, 2024, global leaders met at the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) Davos summit where the key topic of discussion was “Preparing for Disease X,” a hypothetical new pandemic predicted to kill 20 times more people than COVID-19



In August 2023, a new vaccine research facility was set up in Wiltshire, England, to begin work on a vaccine against the unknown “Disease X”

The U.S. Congress introduced the “Disease X Act of 2023” (H.R.3832) in June 2023.



The bill calls for the establishment of a BARDA program to develop “medical countermeasures for viral threats with pandemic potential.”



The bill was referred to the Subcommittee on Health in early June 2023 but has not yet been passed.






The COVID-19 pandemic allowed for an unprecedented shift in power and wealth distribution across the world and, as predicted, it was not to be a one-off event.



As reported by the Mirror:



“The World Health Organization (WHO) has warned of a potential Disease X since 2017, a term indicating an unknown pathogen that could cause a serious international epidemic …



“Public speakers at the ‘Preparing for Disease X’ event next Wednesday [January 17, 2024] include Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the WHO, Brazilian minister of health Nisia Trindade Lima, and Michel Demaré, chair of the board at AstraZeneca.



“In their first post-pandemic meeting held in November 2022, the WHO brought over 300 scientists to consider which of over 25 virus families and bacteria could potentially create another pandemic.



“The list the team came up with included: the Ebola virus, the Marburg virus disease, Covid-19, SARS, and the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV).



“Others included lassa fever, nipah and henipaviral diseases, zift Valley fever, and zika — as well as the unknown pathogen that would cause ‘Disease X.’”



Alexis Baden-Mayer, Esq., political director for the Organic Consumers Association, did some digging into the participants of this WEF event, and the two things they all have in common are 1) dumping the AstraZeneca COVID shot on the developing world (primarily India and Brazil) after rich countries rejected it due to its admitted blood clotting risk, and 2) pushing for the implementation of medical AI systems that will eliminate doctors along with patient choice and privacy.



Practice Runs or Responsible Planning?

In a January 11, 2024, tweet, Fox News analyst and former assistant secretary for public affairs for the U.S. Treasury Department, Monica Crowley, wrote:



“From the same people who brought you COVID-19 now comes Disease X: Next week in Davos, the unelected globalists at the World Economic Forum will hold a panel on a future pandemic 20x deadlier than COVID …



“Just in time for the election, a new contagion to allow them to implement a new WHO treaty, lockdown again, restrict free speech, and destroy more freedoms.



“Sound far-fetched? So did what happened in 2020. When your enemies tell you what they’re planning and what they’re planning FOR, believe them. And get ready.”



Dr. Stuart Ray, vice chair of medicine for data integrity and analytics at Johns Hopkins’ Department of Medicine, dismissed such warnings, telling Fortune magazine5 that “Coordination of public health response is not a conspiracy, it’s simply responsible planning.”



I’d be willing to believe him if it wasn’t for a now-obvious trend: Whatever the globalists claim will happen actually does happen at a remarkable frequency, and their prognostic capabilities become easier to explain when you consider that most lethal pandemics have been caused by manmade viruses, the products of gain-of-function research.



It’s pretty easy to predict a new viral outbreak if you have said virus waiting in the wings.



With that in mind, recent research from China certainly raises concern, to say the least.



According to a January 3, 2024, preprint,6 a SARS-CoV-2-related pangolin coronavirus — described as a “cell culture-adapted mutant” called GX_P2V that was first cultured in 2017 — was found to kill 100% of the humanized mice (ACE2-transgenic mice) infected with it.



The primary cause of death was brain inflammation.



According to the authors, “this is the first report showing that a SARS-CoV-2-related pangolin coronavirus can cause 100% mortality in hACE2 mice, suggesting a risk for GX_P2V to spill over into humans.”



However, if this virus mutated as a result of passing through cell cultures, then it’s not likely to emerge in the wild. It’s another unnatural lab creation, so rather than saying it may spill over from pangolins to humans, it would be more accurate to admit that it may pose a (rather serious) risk to humans were a lab escape to occur.



COVID Dress Rehearsals

In 2017, the Johns Hopkins Center of Health Security held a coronavirus pandemic simulation called the SPARS Pandemic 2025-2028 scenario.8 Importantly, the exercise stressed “communication dilemmas concerning medical countermeasures that could plausibly emerge” in a pandemic scenario.



Then, in October 2019, less than three months before the COVID-19 outbreak, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in collaboration with Johns Hopkins and the World Economic Forum hosted Event 201.



The name itself suggests it may have been a continuation of the SPARS Pandemic exercise.



College courses are numbered based on their prerequisites.



A 101 course does not require any prior knowledge whereas 201 courses require prior familiarity with the topic at hand.



As in the SPARS Pandemic scenario, Event 201 involved an outbreak of a highly infectious coronavirus, and the primary (if not sole) focus of the exercise was, again, how to control information and keep “misinformation” in check, not how to effectively discover and share remedies.



Social media censorship played a prominent role in the Event 201 plan, and in the real-world events of 2020 through the present, accurate information about vaccine development, production and injury has indeed been effectively suppressed around the world, thanks to social media companies and Google’s censoring of opposing viewpoints.



In March 2021, an outbreak of “an unusual strain of monkeypox virus” was simulated.9 In late July the following year, the WHO director-general declared that a multi-country outbreak of monkeypox constituted a public health emergency of international concern,10 against his own advisory group.



Bill Gates Plans for New Catastrophic Contagion



‘Catastrophic Contagion’ Exercise

Considering both of these simulations, SPARS (Event 101?) and Event 201, foreshadowed what eventually occurred in real life during COVID, when Gates hosts yet another pandemic exercise, it’s worth paying attention to the details.



October 23, 2022, Gates, Johns Hopkins, and the WHO cohosted “a global challenge exercise” dubbed “Catastrophic Contagion,” involving a fictional pathogen called “severe epidemic enterovirus respiratory syndrome 2025” (SEERS-25).



Enterovirus D6813 is typically associated with cold and flu-like illness in infants, children and teens.



In rare cases, it’s also been known to cause viral meningitis and acute flaccid myelitis, a neurological condition resulting in muscle weakness and loss of reflexes in one or more extremities.



Enteroviruses A71 and A6 are known to cause hand, foot and mouth disease,14 while poliovirus, the prototypical enterovirus, causes polio (poliomyelitis), a potentially life-threatening type of paralysis that primarily affects children under age 5.



So, the virus they modeled in this simulation appears to be something similar to enterovirus D68, but worse.



Vaccine Drug Trials Begin for Deadly Nipah Virus

One known virus that bears some resemblance to the fictional SEERS-25 is the Nipah virus.



This virus has a kill rate of about 75%,15 and survivors oftentimes face long-term neurological issues stemming from the infection. Nipah is also said to affect children to a greater degree than adults.



Incidentally, human trials for a vaccine against the deadly Nipah virus were recently launched.



Volunteers received their first shots in early January 2024.



The experimental injection uses the same viral vector technology used to produce AstraZeneca’s COVID shot.



The trial is reportedly being carried out by the University of Oxford in an undisclosed area where Nipah is actively infecting victims. (India seems to be indicated, as an outbreak in Kerala killed two people and hospitalized three in September 2023.)



The disease is thought to spread via interaction with infected animals such as goats, pigs, cats and horses.



It may also spread via tainted blood products and food. Symptoms can emerge anywhere from a few days after exposure to as long as 45 days.



Initial symptoms include fever, headache and respiratory illness, which can rapidly progress to encephalitis (brain swelling), seizures and coma within just a couple of days.



According to the WHO, pigs are known to be “highly contagious” during the incubation period, and it’s possible that humans may be as well, although that has yet to be confirmed.



Training African Leaders to Go Along with the Narrative

Tellingly, the Catastrophic Contagion exercise focused on getting leadership in African countries involved and trained in following the script. African nations went “off script” more often than others during the COVID pandemic, and didn’t follow in the footsteps of developed nations when it came to pushing the jabs.



As a result, vaccine makers now face the problem of having a huge control group, as the COVID jab uptake on the African continent was only 6%,19 yet it fared far better than developed nations in terms of COVID-19 infections and related deaths.



The Catastrophic Contagion exercise predicts SEERS-25 will kill 20 million people worldwide, including 15 million children, and many who survive the infection will be left with paralysis and/or brain damage.



In other words, the “cue” given is that the next pandemic may target children rather than the elderly, as was the case with COVID-19.



Vaccine Against Unknown ‘X’ Pathogen Is Already in the Works.



In August 2023, a new vaccine research facility was set up in Wiltshire, England, fully staffed with more 200 scientists, to begin work on a vaccine against the unknown “Disease X.”



As reported by Metro:



“It took 362 days to develop the Covid-19 vaccine. But the Vaccine Development and Evaluation Centre team wants to reduce that time to 100 days.



“Scientists at the facility will develop a range of prototype vaccines and tests.



“The new lab is a part of a global effort to respond to global health threats. The UK and other G7 countries signed up to the ‘100 Days Mission’ in 2021.



“The government has invested £65 million into the lab.



“Professor Dame Jenny Harries, the head of the UK Health Security Agency, said the new facility would ‘ensure that we prepare so that if we have a new Disease X, a new pathogen, we have as much of that work in advance as possible.’”



In the U.S., Congress also introduced the “Disease X Act of 2023” (H.R.383222) back in June 2023.



The bill calls for the establishment of a BARDA program to develop “medical countermeasures for viral threats with pandemic potential.”



The bill was referred to the Subcommittee on Health in early June 2023 but has not yet been passed.



The Disease X Act amends a section of the Public Health Service Act with two new clauses that call for “the identification and development of platform manufacturing technologies needed for advanced development and manufacturing of medical countermeasures for viral families which have significant potential to cause a pandemic,” and “advanced research and development of flexible medical countermeasures against priority respiratory virus families and other respiratory viral pathogens with a significant potential to cause a pandemic, with both pathogen-specific and pathogen-agnostic approaches …”



Needless to say, since it’s impossible to customize vaccines using the conventional method of growing viruses in eggs or some other cell media in 100 days, it seems inevitable that all these efforts are about the expansion of gene-based technologies.



This, despite the fact that the mRNA technology used for the COVID jabs has proven to be disastrous from a safety standpoint, and ineffective to boot.



Why Manufactured Pandemics Will Continue

At this point, it’s quite clear that “biosecurity” is the chosen means by which the globalist cabal intends to seize power over the world.



The WHO is working on securing sole power over pandemic response globally through its international pandemic treaty which, if implemented, will eradicate the sovereignty of all member nations.



The WHO’s pandemic treaty is the gateway to a global, top-down totalitarian regime, a one-world government.



Ultimately, the WHO intends to dictate all health care. But to secure that power, they will need more pandemics.



COVID-19 alone was not enough to get everyone onboard with a centralized pandemic response unit, and they probably knew that from the start.



So, the reason we can be sure there will be additional pandemics, whether manufactured using either fear and hype alone or an actual bioweapon created for this very purpose, is because the takeover plan, aka The Great Reset, is based on the premise that we need global biosecurity surveillance and centralized response.



Biosecurity, in turn, is the justification for an international vaccine passport, which the G20 has signed on to, and that passport will also be your digital identification.



That digital ID, then, will be tied to your social credit score, personal carbon footprint tracker, medical records, educational records, work records, social media presence, purchase records, your bank accounts and a programmable central bank digital currency (CBDC).



Once all these pieces are fully connected, you’ll be in a digital prison, and the ruling cabal — whether officially a one world government by then or not — will have total control over your life from cradle to grave.



We’re Already Suffering Under a Pseudo-One World Government

We actually already have a pseudo-one world government, in the form of Bill Gates’ nongovernmental organizations (NGOs).



They are making health care decisions that should be left to individual nations and/or states, and they’re making decisions that will line their own pockets, regardless of what happens to the public health-wise.



They coordinate and synchronize pandemic communication during simulated practice runs, and then, when the real-world situation emerges that fits the bill, the preplanned script is played out more or less verbatim.



Between the G20 declaration to implement an international vaccine passport under the auspice of the WHO, and the WHO’s pandemic treaty, everything is lined up to take control of the next pandemic, and in so doing, further securing the foundation for a one world government.



As discussed in my 2021 article, “COVID-19 Dress Rehearsals and Proof of the Plan,” the pandemic measures rolled out for COVID-19 were the culmination of decades of careful planning to radically and permanently alter the governance and social structures of the world.



The medical system has been used in the past to drive forward a New World Order agenda — now rebranded as “The Great Reset” — and it’s now being used to implement the final stages of that longstanding plan. COVID-19 was a real-world practice run, and showed just how effectively a pandemic can be used to shift the balance of power, and strip the global population of its wealth and individual freedoms.



So, there’s no doubt in my mind that additional pandemics will be declared, because they’re the means to the globalists’ ends.



To prevent this global coup, we need everyone to speak and share the truth to the point that you’re able.



Only then will our voices outnumber the voices of the propaganda machine.



Notes  (Hotlinks at link)


1, 21 Metro January 15, 2024

2, 3 Mirror January 13, 2024

4 Twitter/X Monica Crowley January 11, 2024

5 Fortune January 12, 2024

6 ResearchGate January 2024 DOI: 10.1101/2024.01.03.574008

7 MSN January 15, 2024

8 SPARS Pandemic Scenario

9 NTI Paper November 2021

10 UN News July 23, 2022

11 Catastrophic Contagion

12 Catastrophic Contagion Videos

13 CDC Enterovirus D68

14 CDC Enteroviruses

15 Forbes September 15, 2023

16 Intractable & Rare Diseases Research February 2019; 8(1): 1-8

17 Forbes January 11, 2024

18 BBC September 14, 2023

19 First Post November 19, 2021

20 Yahoo News November 19, 2021

22 HR 3832 The Disease X Act of 2023

SHARE

[schwartzie]

Bill Gates Pushes ‘Needle-Free Vaccines’ for ‘Pandemic 2’

Frank Bergman
February 11, 2024 - 12:59 pm


Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates is pushing a new form of vaccine that bypasses the need for injections as he warns the public must begin preparing for the coming “pandemic 2.”



Gates has come up with a new design for vaccines that involves placing “a little patch” on a person’s skin.



In a recent appearance on CNBC TV18 in India, Gates was asked about the future of vaccine manufacturing.



Gates excitedly revealed that new needle-free vaccines are now being developed using advancements in healthcare technology.



“We make sure, for all these vaccines, that there’s enough capacity, that there’s competition so the prices keep going down,” Gates said.



“And we will have new vaccines.



“We’ll have a TB [tuberculosis] vaccine, malaria vaccine, HIV vaccine.”



Gates then shifted his attention to Covid mRNA vaccines and how he believes they could be delivered more effectively.



He explained that for the “next pandemic,” we “need to make them have longer duration, more coverage.”



“And we’re going to change, instead of using a needle, to use a little patch,” Gates added about the newly envisioned technology.



However, Gates’s new vaccines do little to address the health risks associated with Covid mRNA shots.



While Gates’s new method will deliver the Covid vaccines without needles, they still use the mRNA technology used in the current Big Pharma shots.



At one point, Gates actually used the term “Pandemic 2” to describe another future Covid-like event.


Gates revealed that he and his partners are already preparing to capitalize on “the next pandemic” with their latest biotechnological developments.



WATCH:

The push from Gates comes as governments, health officials, unelected bureaucrats, and globalist elites have been scrambling for more efficient ways to mass vaccinate the public.



As Slay News reported last year, a group of leading American scientists has unveiled a new “Air Vax” which uses airborne aerosols to deliver mRNA vaccines straight into people’s lungs.



The new system was developed by researchers at Yale University.



The scientists developed the “Air Vax” to combat vaccine hesitancy as the new method bypasses the need for injections as it can be pumped into the air and used to vaccinate large crowds of people at once via the air they are breathing.



The mRNA in “Air Vax” is encapsulated into polymer nanoparticles, according to reports.



Following a study on mice, the results led researchers to declare that this “new method of delivery could radically change the way people are vaccinated.”



Air Vax can get the job done without a needle and syringe, allowing for greater vaccine coverage.



Scientists say the method will help the government to deliver vaccines for Covid and other viruses to people in remote areas of the world.



It will also overcome low vaccination rates among those who don’t want to get the injections.



The method could be used to pump the Air Vax out of planes to deliver mRNA nanoparticles and spike proteins to the populations of entire cities.



This technique would allow for the mass vaccination of the public without having to individually inject each and every person after getting their consent.



Meanwhile, Gates has also been busy developing plans to seize control of the global food supply.



In the future, Gates also wants to strip farmers of being able to grow their own food.



At the recent COP28 meeting of elitist globalists, Gates unveiled a strategy involving the use of “innovation to absolutely solve that problem.”



 link

[Shoshanna]

Here We Go: WHO Chief Tedros Ghebreyesus Warns of Inevitable ‘Disease X’ Pandemic — ‘A Matter of When, Not If’ (VIDEO)

By Jim Hᴏft
Feb. 18, 2024 8:40 pm=


World Health Organization (WHO) Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus spoke candidly about the “not-if-but-when” reality of a new pandemic, which he refers to as ‘Disease X.’



During his address in Dubai during the World Government Summit, Tedros claimed that despite the current focus on COVID-19, the concept of ‘Disease X’ has been part of the global health conversation for years, representing the unknown pathogen that could cause a future pandemic.



“History teaches us that the next pandemic is a matter of when, not if,” Tedros said. “It may be caused by an influenza virus, a new coronavirus, or it may be caused by a new pathogen we don’t even know about yet, or what we call disease X.”



The term ‘Disease X’ first appeared in WHO documents in 2018 as a placeholder for an unknown pathogen that could cause a serious international epidemic. Interestingly, Dr. Tedros pointed out that COVID-19 itself was a form of ‘Disease X,’ a previously unknown virus that triggered a global crisis.



“But there will be another disease X or a disease Y or a disease Z,” he added.



WATCH:

Last month, The World Economic Forum (WEF), headed by Klaus Schwab, convened global leaders to brace for an imminent threat referred to as “Disease X”.



The world’s most exclusive club of doom and gloom is predicting a pandemic 20 times more deadly than COVID-19.



According to the WEF’s official statement, the looming threat of ‘Disease X’ has been cast into the spotlight by none other than the World Health Organization (WHO).



And surprisingly, so-called experts are now working on a vaccine for a virus that doesn’t exist yet.



The BBC reported that the UK Health Security Agency is “scanning the horizon for threats and starting work on vaccines, just in case.”



Critics are raising concerns, suggesting that the move to work on a vaccine for ‘Disease X’ smacks of a script where the vaccine dictates the emergence of the virus, rather than the other way around.



WATCH:

Last year, Tony Blair, a former prime minister of the United Kingdom, advocated for the development of “national digital infrastructure” to facilitate the distribution of new vaccines and to determine who is vaccinated or who is not for future pandemics.



“You need to know who’s been vaccinated and who hasn’t been,” said Blair at the WEF summit. “Some of the vaccines that will come on down the line will be multiple. There will be multiple shots. So you’ve got to have reasons to do with healthcare more generally. But certainly, for a pandemic or for vaccines, you’ve got to have a proper digital infrastructure. And many countries don’t have that and most countries don’t have that.”



According to Blair, the introduction of these new vaccines highlights the need for countries to invest in “national digital infrastructure.”



“We should be helping countries to develop a national digital infrastructure, which they will need with these new vaccines,” he said.



“And then finally, it’s also about showing people and showing the political leadership that you can make a positive difference to your healthcare system by adopting these measures because they’ve got an impact beyond any particular disease or pandemic,” he continued.



link