Patriotism Grounds For Taking Your Children
Jan 8, 2012 21:01:58 GMT -5
Post by PrisonerOfHope on Jan 8, 2012 21:01:58 GMT -5
Apparently, in Amerika, an alleged abuser is a more fit parent than a Patriot trying to defend the Constitution. Stacy Lynne lives in Colorado and did her best to educate the state's citizens about the dangers of Agenda 21 and the United Nations.
"From the report produced by the United Nations Conference on Human Settlements, which was the predecessor to Agenda 21: “Land…cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice…. Public control of land use is therefore indispensable….”
Our Constitution explicitly protects our private property rights. No wonder President Clinton signed it into law without consent from Congress. In fact, those who drafted the plan considered it to be so toxic that they warned proponents not to use the term Agenda 21.
“Participating in a UN advocated planning process would very likely bring out many of the conspiracy- fixated groups and individuals in our society,” said J. Gary Lawrence, adviser to President Clinton’s Council on Sustainable Development. “This segment of our society who fear ‘one-world government’ and a UN invasion of the United States through which our individual freedom would be stripped away would actively work to defeat any elected official who joined ‘the conspiracy’ by undertaking [Agenda 21]. So we call our process something else, such as comprehensive planning, growth management or smart growth.”
Rather than defend against the disinformation campaign used to prop up Agenda 21, we must read the document and instead demand why the UN thinks it has any business subjugating the world under its authority when their record is full of epic corruption and humiliating failures. (Source)
The real goal is to pack Americans into close quarters like sardines and deprive them of any property rights. The Agenda states that land ownership by private citizens leads to social injustice. This is Marxism in all of its glory:
"Marx has also given his idea about the elimination of private property. He says that private property is the cause of exploitation and the ownership of private property causes class contrast and class conflict. Similarly, he says that private property is the main cause of exploitation because the more we earn the more we want to earn and for more earning exploitation is used. Therefore, Marx says that to avoid class contrast and class conflict, private property should be seized and it should be owned by the state itself." (Source)
The 1% love Communism as it empowers them against the other 99% through the powers of the state. Communist Russia and Communist China both followed Agenda 21. In the words of Alexander Solzhenitsyn, famous Communist dissident:
"As humanism in its development became more and more materialistic, it made itself increasingly accessible to speculation and manipulation at first by socialism and then by communism. So that Karl Marx was able to say in 1844 that "communism is naturalized humanism."
This statement turned out not to be entirely senseless. One does see the same stones in the foundations of a despiritualized humanism and of any type of socialism: endless materialism; freedom from religion and religious responsibility, which under communist regimes reach the stage of anti-religious dictatorship; concentration on social structures with a seemingly scientific approach. (This is typical of the Enlightenment in the Eighteenth Century and of Marxism). Not by coincidence all of communism's meaningless pledges and oaths are about Man, with a capital M, and his earthly happiness. At first glance it seems an ugly parallel: common traits in the thinking and way of life of today's West and today's East? But such is the logic of materialistic development.
The interrelationship is such, too, that the current of materialism which is most to the left always ends up by being stronger, more attractive and victorious, because it is more consistent. Humanism without its Christian heritage cannot resist such competition. We watch this process in the past centuries and especially in the past decades, on a world scale as the situation becomes increasingly dramatic. Liberalism was inevitably displaced by radicalism, radicalism had to surrender to socialism and socialism could never resist communism. The communist regime in the East could stand and grow due to the enthusiastic support from an enormous number of Western intellectuals who felt a kinship and refused to see communism's crimes. When they no longer could do so, they tried to justify them. In our Eastern countries, communism has suffered a complete ideological defeat; it is zero and less than zero. But Western intellectuals still look at it with interest and with empathy, and this is precisely what makes it so immensely difficult for the West to withstand the East." (Source)
The truth of the matter is that people like Stacy Lynne and myself are Communist dissidents. We oppose globalism because it is Humanism, Fascism and Communism all rolled into one. It is the 1% greedily plundering the rest of humanity in the name of high sounding philosophy that can never work, anymore than an inverted pyramid.
Stacy Lynne had her child ripped away from her by a Court that determined that her work against Agenda 21 was a threat to the 1%. The same Court happily turned over this same child to a father who had previously been labelled as abusive and lost custody. A father who reportedly stopped paying child support 2 years ago.
When Satanic Psychopaths define sanity as obedience to their Agenda, and have the power to enforce that agenda by stealing people's children, we have already crossed over into the realm of the underworld. Welcome to Hell.
Video at link:
www.moneyteachers.org/StacyLynne.html
"From the report produced by the United Nations Conference on Human Settlements, which was the predecessor to Agenda 21: “Land…cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice…. Public control of land use is therefore indispensable….”
Our Constitution explicitly protects our private property rights. No wonder President Clinton signed it into law without consent from Congress. In fact, those who drafted the plan considered it to be so toxic that they warned proponents not to use the term Agenda 21.
“Participating in a UN advocated planning process would very likely bring out many of the conspiracy- fixated groups and individuals in our society,” said J. Gary Lawrence, adviser to President Clinton’s Council on Sustainable Development. “This segment of our society who fear ‘one-world government’ and a UN invasion of the United States through which our individual freedom would be stripped away would actively work to defeat any elected official who joined ‘the conspiracy’ by undertaking [Agenda 21]. So we call our process something else, such as comprehensive planning, growth management or smart growth.”
Rather than defend against the disinformation campaign used to prop up Agenda 21, we must read the document and instead demand why the UN thinks it has any business subjugating the world under its authority when their record is full of epic corruption and humiliating failures. (Source)
The real goal is to pack Americans into close quarters like sardines and deprive them of any property rights. The Agenda states that land ownership by private citizens leads to social injustice. This is Marxism in all of its glory:
"Marx has also given his idea about the elimination of private property. He says that private property is the cause of exploitation and the ownership of private property causes class contrast and class conflict. Similarly, he says that private property is the main cause of exploitation because the more we earn the more we want to earn and for more earning exploitation is used. Therefore, Marx says that to avoid class contrast and class conflict, private property should be seized and it should be owned by the state itself." (Source)
The 1% love Communism as it empowers them against the other 99% through the powers of the state. Communist Russia and Communist China both followed Agenda 21. In the words of Alexander Solzhenitsyn, famous Communist dissident:
"As humanism in its development became more and more materialistic, it made itself increasingly accessible to speculation and manipulation at first by socialism and then by communism. So that Karl Marx was able to say in 1844 that "communism is naturalized humanism."
This statement turned out not to be entirely senseless. One does see the same stones in the foundations of a despiritualized humanism and of any type of socialism: endless materialism; freedom from religion and religious responsibility, which under communist regimes reach the stage of anti-religious dictatorship; concentration on social structures with a seemingly scientific approach. (This is typical of the Enlightenment in the Eighteenth Century and of Marxism). Not by coincidence all of communism's meaningless pledges and oaths are about Man, with a capital M, and his earthly happiness. At first glance it seems an ugly parallel: common traits in the thinking and way of life of today's West and today's East? But such is the logic of materialistic development.
The interrelationship is such, too, that the current of materialism which is most to the left always ends up by being stronger, more attractive and victorious, because it is more consistent. Humanism without its Christian heritage cannot resist such competition. We watch this process in the past centuries and especially in the past decades, on a world scale as the situation becomes increasingly dramatic. Liberalism was inevitably displaced by radicalism, radicalism had to surrender to socialism and socialism could never resist communism. The communist regime in the East could stand and grow due to the enthusiastic support from an enormous number of Western intellectuals who felt a kinship and refused to see communism's crimes. When they no longer could do so, they tried to justify them. In our Eastern countries, communism has suffered a complete ideological defeat; it is zero and less than zero. But Western intellectuals still look at it with interest and with empathy, and this is precisely what makes it so immensely difficult for the West to withstand the East." (Source)
The truth of the matter is that people like Stacy Lynne and myself are Communist dissidents. We oppose globalism because it is Humanism, Fascism and Communism all rolled into one. It is the 1% greedily plundering the rest of humanity in the name of high sounding philosophy that can never work, anymore than an inverted pyramid.
Stacy Lynne had her child ripped away from her by a Court that determined that her work against Agenda 21 was a threat to the 1%. The same Court happily turned over this same child to a father who had previously been labelled as abusive and lost custody. A father who reportedly stopped paying child support 2 years ago.
When Satanic Psychopaths define sanity as obedience to their Agenda, and have the power to enforce that agenda by stealing people's children, we have already crossed over into the realm of the underworld. Welcome to Hell.
Video at link:
www.moneyteachers.org/StacyLynne.html
