Muslim Brat Demands Nestle ‘Give In’ To Her
Feb 3, 2016 23:21:12 GMT -5
Post by PurplePuppy on Feb 3, 2016 23:21:12 GMT -5
People - especially Muslims - have such a sense of entitlement these days it's disgusting...
Muslim Brat Demands Nestle ‘Give In’ To Her, Their Response Is Priceless
Posted on February 1, 2016 by Amanda Shea
When a glutenous Muslim woman didn’t get her way, she started throwing her weight around, targeting one of the world’s largest candy makers. But unlike so manycowardly companies before them, Nestle isn’t backing down, and they had a priceless response for the entitled brat. She didn’t like what they had to say, so now she’s really trying to make them pay.
Saima Ahmad had an experience with her favorite confection, KitKat bars, that she said left her traumatized with a bad taste in her mouth for what was once her favorite treat. Getting her massive candy fix, she had skipped a modest single pack of the bars, going right for the eight pack instead. But rather than consuming a hefty dose of calories, she was overcome by what she found truly offensive about this lot of chocolate.
The 20-year-old student at Kings College, London claimed that the signature crispy wafer was missing from each of her eight bars of chocolate. But rather than passing it off as a simple production defect for that particular pack, she’s using the ridiculous situation to make a disgusting point, and Nestlé isn’t having any part of her stupid issue.
Ahmad feels like she has legal ground to make the company pay for years to come, citing a legal precedent from the 1930s, the Metro reported. “They go about advertising the unique concept of KitKat, but I’m so disappointed by what I have purchased,” she whined, before demanding much more than an apology, which she’s also mad about not getting.
As part of her vindication for being robbed of that crunchy wafer she wanted, she’s insisting that Nestle provides her with a lifetime supply of the bars. Her demand is more than just wanting to over-indulge on chocolate and entitlement, she said it’s also so she can act as “quality control” for the company. “They should definitely give in to me,” she declared. “I’m hoping my demand will go higher than the customer service platform,” but that’s where her complaint has been stopped in its tracks.
All of her emails and nagging calls to customer service to complain have been ignored, because truthfully, who cares what a greedy woman has to say, when she could save herself the time and effort and go pick up another pack of KitKats. Nestle seems to feel this way, by essentially flipping her a silent middle finger and not pandering to her chocolate crusade.
Ahmad or anyone who thinks she has a case needs to be smacked with reality — they are entitled to nothing. The best case customer service scenario she can expect is a coupon for another free eight pack or reimbursement of what she paid for the chocolate bars. However, to demand a lifetime supply and not give up the fight until they “give in,” should negate anything she could have gotten as gratis for her inconvenience.
link
Muslim Brat Demands Nestle ‘Give In’ To Her, Their Response Is Priceless
Posted on February 1, 2016 by Amanda Shea
When a glutenous Muslim woman didn’t get her way, she started throwing her weight around, targeting one of the world’s largest candy makers. But unlike so manycowardly companies before them, Nestle isn’t backing down, and they had a priceless response for the entitled brat. She didn’t like what they had to say, so now she’s really trying to make them pay.
Saima Ahmad had an experience with her favorite confection, KitKat bars, that she said left her traumatized with a bad taste in her mouth for what was once her favorite treat. Getting her massive candy fix, she had skipped a modest single pack of the bars, going right for the eight pack instead. But rather than consuming a hefty dose of calories, she was overcome by what she found truly offensive about this lot of chocolate.
The 20-year-old student at Kings College, London claimed that the signature crispy wafer was missing from each of her eight bars of chocolate. But rather than passing it off as a simple production defect for that particular pack, she’s using the ridiculous situation to make a disgusting point, and Nestlé isn’t having any part of her stupid issue.
Ahmad feels like she has legal ground to make the company pay for years to come, citing a legal precedent from the 1930s, the Metro reported. “They go about advertising the unique concept of KitKat, but I’m so disappointed by what I have purchased,” she whined, before demanding much more than an apology, which she’s also mad about not getting.
As part of her vindication for being robbed of that crunchy wafer she wanted, she’s insisting that Nestle provides her with a lifetime supply of the bars. Her demand is more than just wanting to over-indulge on chocolate and entitlement, she said it’s also so she can act as “quality control” for the company. “They should definitely give in to me,” she declared. “I’m hoping my demand will go higher than the customer service platform,” but that’s where her complaint has been stopped in its tracks.
All of her emails and nagging calls to customer service to complain have been ignored, because truthfully, who cares what a greedy woman has to say, when she could save herself the time and effort and go pick up another pack of KitKats. Nestle seems to feel this way, by essentially flipping her a silent middle finger and not pandering to her chocolate crusade.
Ahmad or anyone who thinks she has a case needs to be smacked with reality — they are entitled to nothing. The best case customer service scenario she can expect is a coupon for another free eight pack or reimbursement of what she paid for the chocolate bars. However, to demand a lifetime supply and not give up the fight until they “give in,” should negate anything she could have gotten as gratis for her inconvenience.
link
