Roman Catholic Pagan Heresy -- "Eating Jesus"
Sept 6, 2018 1:00:40 GMT -5
Post by PurplePuppy on Sept 6, 2018 1:00:40 GMT -5
Title: Roman Catholic Pagan Heresy -- "Eating Jesus"
Subtitle: When you understand how pagan and thoroughly heretical the Catholic Eucharist really is, then you will know enough to be alarmed by the rush of Evangelical Christians to embrace Rome. You also will understand that Rome's consistent purpose since Martin Luther has been to win the Protestant "brethren" back to the Vatican.
The New World Order is coming! Are you ready? Once you understand what this New World Order really is, and how it is being gradually implemented, you will be able to see it progressing in your daily news!!
Learn how to protect yourself, your loved ones!
Stand by for insights so startling you will never look at the news the same way again.
Evangelicals and Catholics have been secretly collaborating ever since May, 1994, when they issued a Concordat with Rome. In their 1994 Concordat With Rome - Evangelicals and Catholics Together -- Protestant leaders stated that Catholics and Christians are "brothers and sisters in Christ" and that our theology is essentially so identical that we should stop trying to convert Catholics to Jesus Christ! We invite you to read this infamous document: "Evangelicals & Catholics Together: The Christian Mission in the Third Millennium", May, 1994.
It has been 10 years almost exactly since this Concordat was signed. Since then, too many Evangelical churches have taught or implied that there is no essential difference between Catholicism and Biblical Christianity. Now, "The Passion" comes out and is driving Evangelicals toward Roman Catholic theology. As we have stated before, this movie seems designed to bring Evangelicals to the worship altar of Rome while bringing wayward Catholics back to the fold. Considering the latter goal, when a wayward Catholic sees this movie -- so rich and powerful in Traditional Catholic dogma -- and hears Evangelical leaders say that the movie is consistent with the Bible, they will conclude that the Catholic Church is the one true Church after all, and will return.
Now, too many Evangelical Christian leaders are edging toward the Eucharist, which is Rome's pagan counterfeit of the true sacrament, the Biblical Communion -- just as our new book, "Another Jesus" makes it quite plain. In order to appreciate the horror of this latest movement of apostasy within Evangelical Christian ranks, let us examine the Eucharist from the perspective of a former Roman Catholic, Becky Sexton.
HOW TO EAT "JESUS" ACCORDING TO ROME
Mrs. Sexton begins her dissertation at the right place, i.e., calling the Catholic practice of Transubstantiation "savage". Indeed, it is, for it comes from the Satanic Babylonian Mysteries Religion. Please allow us to precisely define this term. "Transubstantiation" is that Catholic/Babylonian doctrine which states that at the time of the Eucharist, the bread literally becomes the body of Jesus Christ, and the wine literally becomes His blood. Thus, Catholics eat their daily sacrificed savior, just as the pagans eat their daily sacrifice.
Few doctrines are more spurious than Transubstantiation. Now, let us see how Mrs. Sexton shows how ridiculous and how pagan this doctrine truly is.
"The savage commonly believes that by eating the flesh of an animal or man he acquires not only the physical, but even the moral and intellectual qualities which were characteristic of an animal or man; so when the creature is deemed divine, our simple savage naturally expects to absorb a portion of its divinity along with its material substance. It may be well to illustrate by instances this common faith in the acquisition of virtues of vices of many kinds through the medium of animal food, even when there is no pretence that the viands consist of the body or blood of a Jesus. The doctrine forms part of the widely ramified system of sympathetic or homeopathic magic" ("The New Golden Bough", Frazer and Gaster, 465).
There have been many questions concerning the meaning of John 6:53-55:
"Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you. Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day. For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed."
Catholicism, like their pagan predecessors, take a somewhat literal interpretation, while Christianity understand the words Jesus spoke "they are spirit, and they are life". Now when I say that Catholicism takes a "somewhat literal interpretation", I mean, that whereas they boast that they keep the "literal", they do more than that, they add to what Jesus really said as well as take away from what He said.
Jesus clearly states that "except ye EAT the flesh, AND DRINK his blood, ye have no life in you". Yet, the Catholic hierarchy decided that there was no need to drink the cup because the bread already contained the "blood" along with the "soul and divinity". Rome took away the cup which takes away the "shed blood" and replaces it with blood "pulsating through the body". How then, is Rome taking a "literal interpretation"? Jesus said, "AND DRINK HIS BLOOD".
Amazingly enough, Rome's own popes disputed over this matter. Pope Gelasius I (492-496), in a letter addressed to some bishops said:
"We have ascertained that certain persons having received a portion of the sacred body alone abstain from partaking of the chalice of the sacred blood. Let such persons...either receive the sacrament in its entirety, or be repelled from the entire sacrament, because a division of one and the same mystery cannot take place without great sacrilege."
Since we were never given the cup, there was no need to instruct us on how to drink "Jesus". But there has always been very strict Catholic rules governing the eating of the communion host. Roman Catholic priest, Rev. George Searle, in his book, "How To Become A Catholic", pg.83-85, gives instructions on how to "eat Jesus" properly. Since Rome teaches that the communion host is really and truly the "body, blood, soul and divinity of Jesus Christ", I have added "[Jesus]" whenever Searle speaks of the host so one can better understand just exactly what Roman Catholicism is saying!
"It is very difficult for the priest to give Communion [Jesus] to people holding their mouths shut without striking it [Jesus] against their teeth, in which case it is very probable that it [Jesus] may be broken, or at any rate that some particle of it [Jesus] may be knocked off. Don't follow their bad example then, but hold your mouth wide open, and your tongue well out; then the priest can lay the Communion [Jesus] on it without fear, and without danger of accident. When it [Jesus] is laid on your tongue, withdraw your tongue immediately, and then close your mouth, being careful not to do so till the tongue is inside; then swallow it [Jesus] as soon as possible. It [Jesus] must not be allowed to melt in the mouth; if it [Jesus] does, you do not receive the Sacrament [Jesus] at all. If, however it [Jesus] should adhere to the roof of the mouth, so that it [Jesus] cannot immediately be swallowed, do not be disturbed, but loosen it [Jesus] with your tongue; you will pretty certainly be able to do this before it [Jesus] is all dissolved. Do not on any account, touch it [Jesus] with your fingers. And take care not to CHEW it [Jesus], or even touch it [Jesus] with your teeth. Having swallowed it [Jesus] you have now received; and now is the time, more than any other, for fervent prayer, when the Real Presence of our Lord is with you.This Real Presence only remains while the Blessed Sacrament [Jesus] still continues undestroyed, which will only be for a few minutes at most, for it [Jesus] will usually be acted on more quickly by the stomach than by the mouth; but even after it [Jesus] has passed away, prayer and thanksgiving for what has been received should be continued for some time...if possible, for as much as a quarter of an hour."
The "never changing Catholic church" now teaches her subjects to "chew Jesus" and you are now permitted to hold "Jesus" in your hand. When I was in the Catholic Church, we were forbidden to eat "Jesus" unless we had fasted from midnight on. Now you can "eat Jesus" one half hour after you have eaten a full course meal. Seems that the Catholic church is losing respect for her wafer Jesus.
Praise Jesus that we truly understand what He meant, because He gave us His Word. Had the average Catholic read all of John 6, they would have read this verse:
"Then said they unto him, Lord, evermore give us this bread. And Jesus said unto them, I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst." John 6:34-35
Cometh = "never hunger"
Believeth = "never thirst"
Thus the reason why Jesus said: "It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life." John 6:63
You can either go to Jesus and believe on Him and have eternal life as Christ said, "he that eateth of this bread shall live for ever", or you can eat the Roman Catholic man-made bread that one may eat and still eternally die.
Rebecca Sexton
Transubstantiation Is Witchcraft
The Catholic Priest Is Taught That He Can Command Jesus From Heaven And On To The Sacrificial Alter
But, there is more horror to this story of the Eucharist, whose principle doctrine is Transubstantiation! This doctrine is actual witchcraft, as even discerning Catholic priests will admit! When Roman Catholic doctrine states that Jesus Christ must obey the priest and come down from Heaven to go on the altar, this doctrine is identical to Witchcraft!
Once again, we have conclusive proof, within Roman Catholic doctrine, that Roman Catholicism is identical -- repeat, identical -- with Witchcraft. In this instance, the Catholic teaching regarding the power of the priest over supernatural forces (Jesus Christ) is identical to the Witchcraft teaching regarding the power the witch has over supernatural forces [demons]. In both cases, the supernatural being is FORCED to do that which they do not want to do, i.e., to serve the human who has control over him.
In other words, the Catholic priest is just a witch dressed in different clothes!
Let us first examine Roman Catholic belief. Once again, we are quoting from Roman Catholic sources. The first source to be quoted is from St. Thomas, reprinted in the Catholic book, "Faith of Millions", John O'Brien, Ph.D., LL.D., 268-269, "nihil obstat" by Rev. T. E. Dillon-Censor Librorum and "imprimatur" by John Francis Noll, D.D. -Bishop of Fort Wayne.
" Power of Consecrating: The supreme power of the priestly office is the power of consecrating. 'No act is greater,' says St. Thomas, 'than the consecration of the body of Christ.' In this essential phase of the sacred ministry, the power of the priest is not surpassed by that of the bishop, the archbishop, the cardinal or the pope. Indeed it is equal to that of Jesus Christ. For in this role the priest speaks with the voice and the authority of God Himself. WHEN THE PRIEST PRONOUNCES THE TREMENDOUS WORDS OF CONSECRATION, HE REACHES UP INTO HEAVENS, BRINGS CHRIST DOWN FROM HIS THRONE, AND PLACES HIM UPON OUR ALTAR TO BE OFFERED UP AGAIN AS THE VICTIM FOR THE SINS OF MAN."
"It is a power greater than that of monarchs and emperors: it is greater than that of saints and angels, greater than that of Seraphim and Cherubim. Indeed it is greater even than the power of the Virgin Mary. For, while the Blessed Virgin was the human agency by which Christ became incarnate a single time, THE PRIEST BRINGS CHRIST DOWN FROM HEAVEN, AND RENDERS HIM PRESENT ON OUR ALTAR AS THE ETERNAL VICTIM FOR THE SINS OF MAN - NOT ONCE BUT A THOUSAND TIMES! THE PRIEST SPEAKS AND LO! CHRIST THE ETERNAL AND OMNIPOTENT GOD, BOWS HIS HEAD IN HUMBLE OBEDIENCE TO THE PRIEST'S COMMAND."
"Of what sublime dignity is the office of the Christian priest who is thus privileged to act as the ambassador and the vicegerent of Christ on earth! He continues the essential ministry of Christ; he teaches the faithful with the authority of Christ, he pardons the penitent sinner with the power of Christ, he offers up again the same sacrifice of adoration and atonement which Christ offered on Calvary. No wonder that the name which spiritual writers are especially found of applying to the priest is that of 'alter Christus.' FOR THE PRIEST IS AND SHOULD BE ANOTHER CHRIST" (Faith of Millions, John O'Brien, Ph.D., LL.D., 268-269)("nihil obstat" by Rev. T. E. Dillon-Censor Librorum and "imprimatur" by John Francis Noll, D.D. -Bishop of Fort Wayne). Emphasis added.
No greater abomination is possible than the statement, above, detailing the Roman Catholic doctrine concerning the supposed power of the priest during Mass or Communion. We wish to point out that this belief is identical to the belief of a witch!!
Full article is continued at link
Subtitle: When you understand how pagan and thoroughly heretical the Catholic Eucharist really is, then you will know enough to be alarmed by the rush of Evangelical Christians to embrace Rome. You also will understand that Rome's consistent purpose since Martin Luther has been to win the Protestant "brethren" back to the Vatican.
The New World Order is coming! Are you ready? Once you understand what this New World Order really is, and how it is being gradually implemented, you will be able to see it progressing in your daily news!!
Learn how to protect yourself, your loved ones!
Stand by for insights so startling you will never look at the news the same way again.
Evangelicals and Catholics have been secretly collaborating ever since May, 1994, when they issued a Concordat with Rome. In their 1994 Concordat With Rome - Evangelicals and Catholics Together -- Protestant leaders stated that Catholics and Christians are "brothers and sisters in Christ" and that our theology is essentially so identical that we should stop trying to convert Catholics to Jesus Christ! We invite you to read this infamous document: "Evangelicals & Catholics Together: The Christian Mission in the Third Millennium", May, 1994.
It has been 10 years almost exactly since this Concordat was signed. Since then, too many Evangelical churches have taught or implied that there is no essential difference between Catholicism and Biblical Christianity. Now, "The Passion" comes out and is driving Evangelicals toward Roman Catholic theology. As we have stated before, this movie seems designed to bring Evangelicals to the worship altar of Rome while bringing wayward Catholics back to the fold. Considering the latter goal, when a wayward Catholic sees this movie -- so rich and powerful in Traditional Catholic dogma -- and hears Evangelical leaders say that the movie is consistent with the Bible, they will conclude that the Catholic Church is the one true Church after all, and will return.
Now, too many Evangelical Christian leaders are edging toward the Eucharist, which is Rome's pagan counterfeit of the true sacrament, the Biblical Communion -- just as our new book, "Another Jesus" makes it quite plain. In order to appreciate the horror of this latest movement of apostasy within Evangelical Christian ranks, let us examine the Eucharist from the perspective of a former Roman Catholic, Becky Sexton.
HOW TO EAT "JESUS" ACCORDING TO ROME
Mrs. Sexton begins her dissertation at the right place, i.e., calling the Catholic practice of Transubstantiation "savage". Indeed, it is, for it comes from the Satanic Babylonian Mysteries Religion. Please allow us to precisely define this term. "Transubstantiation" is that Catholic/Babylonian doctrine which states that at the time of the Eucharist, the bread literally becomes the body of Jesus Christ, and the wine literally becomes His blood. Thus, Catholics eat their daily sacrificed savior, just as the pagans eat their daily sacrifice.
Few doctrines are more spurious than Transubstantiation. Now, let us see how Mrs. Sexton shows how ridiculous and how pagan this doctrine truly is.
"The savage commonly believes that by eating the flesh of an animal or man he acquires not only the physical, but even the moral and intellectual qualities which were characteristic of an animal or man; so when the creature is deemed divine, our simple savage naturally expects to absorb a portion of its divinity along with its material substance. It may be well to illustrate by instances this common faith in the acquisition of virtues of vices of many kinds through the medium of animal food, even when there is no pretence that the viands consist of the body or blood of a Jesus. The doctrine forms part of the widely ramified system of sympathetic or homeopathic magic" ("The New Golden Bough", Frazer and Gaster, 465).
There have been many questions concerning the meaning of John 6:53-55:
"Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you. Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day. For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed."
Catholicism, like their pagan predecessors, take a somewhat literal interpretation, while Christianity understand the words Jesus spoke "they are spirit, and they are life". Now when I say that Catholicism takes a "somewhat literal interpretation", I mean, that whereas they boast that they keep the "literal", they do more than that, they add to what Jesus really said as well as take away from what He said.
Jesus clearly states that "except ye EAT the flesh, AND DRINK his blood, ye have no life in you". Yet, the Catholic hierarchy decided that there was no need to drink the cup because the bread already contained the "blood" along with the "soul and divinity". Rome took away the cup which takes away the "shed blood" and replaces it with blood "pulsating through the body". How then, is Rome taking a "literal interpretation"? Jesus said, "AND DRINK HIS BLOOD".
Amazingly enough, Rome's own popes disputed over this matter. Pope Gelasius I (492-496), in a letter addressed to some bishops said:
"We have ascertained that certain persons having received a portion of the sacred body alone abstain from partaking of the chalice of the sacred blood. Let such persons...either receive the sacrament in its entirety, or be repelled from the entire sacrament, because a division of one and the same mystery cannot take place without great sacrilege."
Since we were never given the cup, there was no need to instruct us on how to drink "Jesus". But there has always been very strict Catholic rules governing the eating of the communion host. Roman Catholic priest, Rev. George Searle, in his book, "How To Become A Catholic", pg.83-85, gives instructions on how to "eat Jesus" properly. Since Rome teaches that the communion host is really and truly the "body, blood, soul and divinity of Jesus Christ", I have added "[Jesus]" whenever Searle speaks of the host so one can better understand just exactly what Roman Catholicism is saying!
"It is very difficult for the priest to give Communion [Jesus] to people holding their mouths shut without striking it [Jesus] against their teeth, in which case it is very probable that it [Jesus] may be broken, or at any rate that some particle of it [Jesus] may be knocked off. Don't follow their bad example then, but hold your mouth wide open, and your tongue well out; then the priest can lay the Communion [Jesus] on it without fear, and without danger of accident. When it [Jesus] is laid on your tongue, withdraw your tongue immediately, and then close your mouth, being careful not to do so till the tongue is inside; then swallow it [Jesus] as soon as possible. It [Jesus] must not be allowed to melt in the mouth; if it [Jesus] does, you do not receive the Sacrament [Jesus] at all. If, however it [Jesus] should adhere to the roof of the mouth, so that it [Jesus] cannot immediately be swallowed, do not be disturbed, but loosen it [Jesus] with your tongue; you will pretty certainly be able to do this before it [Jesus] is all dissolved. Do not on any account, touch it [Jesus] with your fingers. And take care not to CHEW it [Jesus], or even touch it [Jesus] with your teeth. Having swallowed it [Jesus] you have now received; and now is the time, more than any other, for fervent prayer, when the Real Presence of our Lord is with you.This Real Presence only remains while the Blessed Sacrament [Jesus] still continues undestroyed, which will only be for a few minutes at most, for it [Jesus] will usually be acted on more quickly by the stomach than by the mouth; but even after it [Jesus] has passed away, prayer and thanksgiving for what has been received should be continued for some time...if possible, for as much as a quarter of an hour."
The "never changing Catholic church" now teaches her subjects to "chew Jesus" and you are now permitted to hold "Jesus" in your hand. When I was in the Catholic Church, we were forbidden to eat "Jesus" unless we had fasted from midnight on. Now you can "eat Jesus" one half hour after you have eaten a full course meal. Seems that the Catholic church is losing respect for her wafer Jesus.
Praise Jesus that we truly understand what He meant, because He gave us His Word. Had the average Catholic read all of John 6, they would have read this verse:
"Then said they unto him, Lord, evermore give us this bread. And Jesus said unto them, I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst." John 6:34-35
Cometh = "never hunger"
Believeth = "never thirst"
Thus the reason why Jesus said: "It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life." John 6:63
You can either go to Jesus and believe on Him and have eternal life as Christ said, "he that eateth of this bread shall live for ever", or you can eat the Roman Catholic man-made bread that one may eat and still eternally die.
Rebecca Sexton
Transubstantiation Is Witchcraft
The Catholic Priest Is Taught That He Can Command Jesus From Heaven And On To The Sacrificial Alter
But, there is more horror to this story of the Eucharist, whose principle doctrine is Transubstantiation! This doctrine is actual witchcraft, as even discerning Catholic priests will admit! When Roman Catholic doctrine states that Jesus Christ must obey the priest and come down from Heaven to go on the altar, this doctrine is identical to Witchcraft!
Once again, we have conclusive proof, within Roman Catholic doctrine, that Roman Catholicism is identical -- repeat, identical -- with Witchcraft. In this instance, the Catholic teaching regarding the power of the priest over supernatural forces (Jesus Christ) is identical to the Witchcraft teaching regarding the power the witch has over supernatural forces [demons]. In both cases, the supernatural being is FORCED to do that which they do not want to do, i.e., to serve the human who has control over him.
In other words, the Catholic priest is just a witch dressed in different clothes!
Let us first examine Roman Catholic belief. Once again, we are quoting from Roman Catholic sources. The first source to be quoted is from St. Thomas, reprinted in the Catholic book, "Faith of Millions", John O'Brien, Ph.D., LL.D., 268-269, "nihil obstat" by Rev. T. E. Dillon-Censor Librorum and "imprimatur" by John Francis Noll, D.D. -Bishop of Fort Wayne.
" Power of Consecrating: The supreme power of the priestly office is the power of consecrating. 'No act is greater,' says St. Thomas, 'than the consecration of the body of Christ.' In this essential phase of the sacred ministry, the power of the priest is not surpassed by that of the bishop, the archbishop, the cardinal or the pope. Indeed it is equal to that of Jesus Christ. For in this role the priest speaks with the voice and the authority of God Himself. WHEN THE PRIEST PRONOUNCES THE TREMENDOUS WORDS OF CONSECRATION, HE REACHES UP INTO HEAVENS, BRINGS CHRIST DOWN FROM HIS THRONE, AND PLACES HIM UPON OUR ALTAR TO BE OFFERED UP AGAIN AS THE VICTIM FOR THE SINS OF MAN."
"It is a power greater than that of monarchs and emperors: it is greater than that of saints and angels, greater than that of Seraphim and Cherubim. Indeed it is greater even than the power of the Virgin Mary. For, while the Blessed Virgin was the human agency by which Christ became incarnate a single time, THE PRIEST BRINGS CHRIST DOWN FROM HEAVEN, AND RENDERS HIM PRESENT ON OUR ALTAR AS THE ETERNAL VICTIM FOR THE SINS OF MAN - NOT ONCE BUT A THOUSAND TIMES! THE PRIEST SPEAKS AND LO! CHRIST THE ETERNAL AND OMNIPOTENT GOD, BOWS HIS HEAD IN HUMBLE OBEDIENCE TO THE PRIEST'S COMMAND."
"Of what sublime dignity is the office of the Christian priest who is thus privileged to act as the ambassador and the vicegerent of Christ on earth! He continues the essential ministry of Christ; he teaches the faithful with the authority of Christ, he pardons the penitent sinner with the power of Christ, he offers up again the same sacrifice of adoration and atonement which Christ offered on Calvary. No wonder that the name which spiritual writers are especially found of applying to the priest is that of 'alter Christus.' FOR THE PRIEST IS AND SHOULD BE ANOTHER CHRIST" (Faith of Millions, John O'Brien, Ph.D., LL.D., 268-269)("nihil obstat" by Rev. T. E. Dillon-Censor Librorum and "imprimatur" by John Francis Noll, D.D. -Bishop of Fort Wayne). Emphasis added.
No greater abomination is possible than the statement, above, detailing the Roman Catholic doctrine concerning the supposed power of the priest during Mass or Communion. We wish to point out that this belief is identical to the belief of a witch!!
Full article is continued at link
