List of Pfizer’s 1,290+ Known Adverse Side Effects for Vaxx
Mar 19, 2022 14:28:07 GMT -5
Post by OmegaMan on Mar 19, 2022 14:28:07 GMT -5
Here is The FDA’s List of Pfizer’s 1,290+ Known Adverse Side Effects for Its Experimental COVID19 “Vaccine”
BY STEVE MACDONALD / 7 MARCH 2022
What do NHJournal, SeacoastCurrent.com, InDepthNH.org, The NHBulletin, WMUR, The Union Leader, and likely every other print “newspaper” in the Granite State have in common? All the COVID Vaccine reporting has been favorable and supportive.
I could not find any “articles” that suggested these were anything but safe. But we know that’s not true. We know it from our own reporting. We’ve published both peer-reviewed and first print research. Interviews with actual experts. Hundreds of articles and scores of links to news reports, scientific research, and interviews.
Yesterday I asked if that was the result of more than just plain old bias.
Money from the Feds was laundered through the states to push pro-COVID-vaccine ads. It has also been intimated that this was not the only money that was changing hands. We wanted to know who received Fed dollars and if there might be other inducements that encouraged local and national media to stay away from negative reporting on the experimental Jab.
Is the absence of such reports damning?
The Jab has been an endless opportunity for human interest stories and investigative journalism, but where are these stories? Where is the balanced reporting or curiosity? What happened to “protecting the public interest” from abuses of government?
People were driven out of their jobs for refusing an experimental treatment we have known for some time has serious side-effects including death.
To be clear, we have not provided or received conclusive evidence that the NH media was bought off but anecdotal evidence is another matter.
They all appear guilty by omission. Why did they ignore these stories when it is clear they could have been the only media (outside of sites like this) sharing that research and expert commentary?
I’m not complaining. We’ve gotten tons of traffic as a result of their indifference but why are they still toeing that line?
Last week the FDA released a batch of clinical trial documents they did not want the public to see (Local PDF here). That’s a story.
In that cache is a list of known side effects from the experimental mRNA “vaccines.” Another story, maybe dozens of them if curious reporters went out and found people who got the Jab and experienced any of these side effects. All 1294 known potential side effects.
Continued at link
BY STEVE MACDONALD / 7 MARCH 2022
What do NHJournal, SeacoastCurrent.com, InDepthNH.org, The NHBulletin, WMUR, The Union Leader, and likely every other print “newspaper” in the Granite State have in common? All the COVID Vaccine reporting has been favorable and supportive.
I could not find any “articles” that suggested these were anything but safe. But we know that’s not true. We know it from our own reporting. We’ve published both peer-reviewed and first print research. Interviews with actual experts. Hundreds of articles and scores of links to news reports, scientific research, and interviews.
Yesterday I asked if that was the result of more than just plain old bias.
Money from the Feds was laundered through the states to push pro-COVID-vaccine ads. It has also been intimated that this was not the only money that was changing hands. We wanted to know who received Fed dollars and if there might be other inducements that encouraged local and national media to stay away from negative reporting on the experimental Jab.
Is the absence of such reports damning?
The Jab has been an endless opportunity for human interest stories and investigative journalism, but where are these stories? Where is the balanced reporting or curiosity? What happened to “protecting the public interest” from abuses of government?
People were driven out of their jobs for refusing an experimental treatment we have known for some time has serious side-effects including death.
To be clear, we have not provided or received conclusive evidence that the NH media was bought off but anecdotal evidence is another matter.
They all appear guilty by omission. Why did they ignore these stories when it is clear they could have been the only media (outside of sites like this) sharing that research and expert commentary?
I’m not complaining. We’ve gotten tons of traffic as a result of their indifference but why are they still toeing that line?
Last week the FDA released a batch of clinical trial documents they did not want the public to see (Local PDF here). That’s a story.
In that cache is a list of known side effects from the experimental mRNA “vaccines.” Another story, maybe dozens of them if curious reporters went out and found people who got the Jab and experienced any of these side effects. All 1294 known potential side effects.
Continued at link