Charitable Deduction Contribution At Risk
Dec 13, 2012 20:51:59 GMT -5
Post by PrisonerOfHope on Dec 13, 2012 20:51:59 GMT -5
Well, maybe this will get the churches to drop their 501(3)c status and revert to being churches that actually preach the gospel, and not muzzled pawns of the government.
As for "reducing the deficit," here's a fact for you: The current US debt is more than twice the value of all the gold ever mined throughout human history.
White House, nonprofit groups battle over charitable deductions
By Jerry Markon and Peter Wallsten, Thursday, December 13, 11:06 AM
The White House and the nation’s most prominent charities are embroiled in a tense behind-the-scenes debate over President Obama’s push to scale back the nearly century-old tax deduction on donations that the charities say is crucial for their financial health.
In a series of recent meetings and calls, top White House aides have pressed nonprofit groups to line up behind the president’s plan for reducing the federal deficit and averting the year-end “fiscal cliff,” according to people familiar with the talks.
2112
Comments
Weigh In
Corrections?
Personal Post
Gallery
FISCAL CLIFF TALKS: Republicans who have moved away from Grover Norquist’s pledge: The anti-tax advocate’s pledge has held a strong grip over Washington in the past, but some lawmakers are shying away. Here’s what they’ve said.
More from PostPolitics
What Susan Rice's decision means
What Susan Rice's decision means
Chris Cillizza 4:08 PM ET
THE FIX | The writing had been on the wall regarding the difficulty of a Rice nomination for weeks.
Women senators: If we were in charge, we’d have solved the fiscal cliff by now
Women senators: If we were in charge, we’d have solved the fiscal cliff by now
Diana Reese 8:18 AM ET
SHE THE PEOPLE | That’s what Sen. Susan Collins told Diane Sawyer in an interviewTuesday.
Latinos didn't cost Romney the election
Latinos didn't cost Romney the election
Aaron Blake 1:33 PM ET
THE FIX | Romney would have had to carry a majority of their vote — basically unthinkable for the GOP.
In part, the White House is seeking to win the support of nonprofit groups for Obama’s central demand that income tax rates rise for upper-end taxpayers. There are early signs that several charities, whose boards often include the wealthy, are willing to endorse this change.
But the White House is also looking to limit the charitable deduction for high-income earners, and that has prompted frustration and resistance, with leaders of major nonprofit organizations, such as the United Way, the American Red Cross and Lutheran Services in America, closing ranks in opposing any change to the deduction.
“It’s all castor oil,” said Diana Aviv, president of Independent Sector, an umbrella group representing many nonprofits. “And the members of the nonprofit sector I represent don’t want any part of it. It’s a medicine we’re not willing to drink.”
The dispute is the latest in a long-standing struggle over the popular tax provision, which allows people to deduct charitable donations from their taxable income. The battle is playing out at the highest levels of government and in the corridors of K Street.
Since Obama first proposed to lower the deduction in 2009, more than 60 nonprofit groups have spent at least $21 million lobbying Congress and the White House to preserve it, lobbying records show. Although nonprofit officials characterize the effort as grass roots, including a recent “Lobby Day” during which the groups’ staffers donated their time and descended on Capitol Hill, at least 25 organizations have hired Washington area lobbying firms.
The lobbying by some of the biggest players in the philanthropy world has intensified in recent weeks amid spreading concern over whether the charitable deduction could be affected by a deal to avoid the automatic spending cuts and tax increases set to kick in Jan. 1. Nonprofit group leaders say lowering or eliminating the deduction would reduce giving by wealthy donors. Studies have shown that people would donate less if the deduction were reduced, but estimates of the effect vary widely.
“It would be devastating,” said Jatrice Martel Gaiter, executive vice president for external affairs at Volunteers of America, which has paid Patton Boggs — Washington’s most lucrative lobby shop — nearly $200,000 to lobby on the charitable deduction and other issues in the past year. “Of course people want to say they are giving out of the goodness of their hearts, and of course they are, but the tax deduction makes our hearts larger and our goodness even better.”
Story continues at link:
www.washingtonpost.com/politics/white-house-nonprofit-groups-battle-over-charitable-deductions/2012/12/13/80e67400-43f2-11e2-9648-a2c323a991d6_story.html
As for "reducing the deficit," here's a fact for you: The current US debt is more than twice the value of all the gold ever mined throughout human history.
White House, nonprofit groups battle over charitable deductions
By Jerry Markon and Peter Wallsten, Thursday, December 13, 11:06 AM
The White House and the nation’s most prominent charities are embroiled in a tense behind-the-scenes debate over President Obama’s push to scale back the nearly century-old tax deduction on donations that the charities say is crucial for their financial health.
In a series of recent meetings and calls, top White House aides have pressed nonprofit groups to line up behind the president’s plan for reducing the federal deficit and averting the year-end “fiscal cliff,” according to people familiar with the talks.
2112
Comments
Weigh In
Corrections?
Personal Post
Gallery
FISCAL CLIFF TALKS: Republicans who have moved away from Grover Norquist’s pledge: The anti-tax advocate’s pledge has held a strong grip over Washington in the past, but some lawmakers are shying away. Here’s what they’ve said.
More from PostPolitics
What Susan Rice's decision means
What Susan Rice's decision means
Chris Cillizza 4:08 PM ET
THE FIX | The writing had been on the wall regarding the difficulty of a Rice nomination for weeks.
Women senators: If we were in charge, we’d have solved the fiscal cliff by now
Women senators: If we were in charge, we’d have solved the fiscal cliff by now
Diana Reese 8:18 AM ET
SHE THE PEOPLE | That’s what Sen. Susan Collins told Diane Sawyer in an interviewTuesday.
Latinos didn't cost Romney the election
Latinos didn't cost Romney the election
Aaron Blake 1:33 PM ET
THE FIX | Romney would have had to carry a majority of their vote — basically unthinkable for the GOP.
In part, the White House is seeking to win the support of nonprofit groups for Obama’s central demand that income tax rates rise for upper-end taxpayers. There are early signs that several charities, whose boards often include the wealthy, are willing to endorse this change.
But the White House is also looking to limit the charitable deduction for high-income earners, and that has prompted frustration and resistance, with leaders of major nonprofit organizations, such as the United Way, the American Red Cross and Lutheran Services in America, closing ranks in opposing any change to the deduction.
“It’s all castor oil,” said Diana Aviv, president of Independent Sector, an umbrella group representing many nonprofits. “And the members of the nonprofit sector I represent don’t want any part of it. It’s a medicine we’re not willing to drink.”
The dispute is the latest in a long-standing struggle over the popular tax provision, which allows people to deduct charitable donations from their taxable income. The battle is playing out at the highest levels of government and in the corridors of K Street.
Since Obama first proposed to lower the deduction in 2009, more than 60 nonprofit groups have spent at least $21 million lobbying Congress and the White House to preserve it, lobbying records show. Although nonprofit officials characterize the effort as grass roots, including a recent “Lobby Day” during which the groups’ staffers donated their time and descended on Capitol Hill, at least 25 organizations have hired Washington area lobbying firms.
The lobbying by some of the biggest players in the philanthropy world has intensified in recent weeks amid spreading concern over whether the charitable deduction could be affected by a deal to avoid the automatic spending cuts and tax increases set to kick in Jan. 1. Nonprofit group leaders say lowering or eliminating the deduction would reduce giving by wealthy donors. Studies have shown that people would donate less if the deduction were reduced, but estimates of the effect vary widely.
“It would be devastating,” said Jatrice Martel Gaiter, executive vice president for external affairs at Volunteers of America, which has paid Patton Boggs — Washington’s most lucrative lobby shop — nearly $200,000 to lobby on the charitable deduction and other issues in the past year. “Of course people want to say they are giving out of the goodness of their hearts, and of course they are, but the tax deduction makes our hearts larger and our goodness even better.”
Story continues at link:
www.washingtonpost.com/politics/white-house-nonprofit-groups-battle-over-charitable-deductions/2012/12/13/80e67400-43f2-11e2-9648-a2c323a991d6_story.html
