The Covid Scamdemic and Resulting Fallout

[schwartzie]

Pro-Vax Doctor Blows Whistle: ‘Biggest Crime in History of Medicine’

Frank Bergman

June 1, 2024 - 12:54 pm

In a major U-turn, a prominent pro-vaccine doctor has blown the whistle and raised the alarm about the deadly consequences of being injected with Covid mRNA shots.

Annette Bosworth, also known as “Dr. Boz,” has released an explosive video statement to warn the public about “the biggest crime in the history of medicine.”

In the bombshell live-streamed video, the pro-vaccine doctor expresses deep regret that she “had all of the people I love vaccinated.”

Dr. Boz highlights a study exposing the harm caused by Covid mRNA injections.

She continues by warning that health officials, scientists, and doctors who claim the mRNA vaccines are “safe” should not be trusted.

The doctor also warns that information highlighting the dangers of the injections is being covered up and censored.

“How long is it going to take before the world would trust, that I will trust what they’re telling me,” she said.

“Then what was my part in it, how could I have been a little more…again I had all of my kids vaccinated, I had all the people I love vaccinated.

“And when you look back and say ‘dang, look at what it did,’ especially the kids…

“Anyway…I say that to you to say, this information is out there.

“I don’t know how long this report will be there.”

WATCH:

Elsewhere in the video, Bosworth admits that she faced constant pushback from the public when she told them the vaccines were “safe.”

She revealed that her viewers would comment about how she was wrong to tell people the vaccine is safe because growing numbers were being injured or killed by the shots.

The doctor said she was forced to review her position due to the soaring cases of vaccine side effects.

FULL VIDEO:



The study referenced by Dr. Boz chronicles the massive harm from the Covid shots.

In the “Abstract” section of the study’s paper, the researchers wrote:

“Re-analysis of the Pfizer trial data identified statistically significant increases in serious adverse events (SAEs) in the vaccine group.

“Numerous SAEs were identified following the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), including death, cancer, cardiac events, and various autoimmune, hematological, reproductive, and neurological disorders.

“Furthermore, these products never underwent adequate safety and toxicological testing in accordance with previously established scientific standards.

“Among the other major topics addressed in this narrative review are the published analyses of serious harms to humans, quality control issues and process-related impurities, mechanisms underlying adverse events (AEs), the immunologic basis for vaccine inefficacy, and concerning mortality trends based on the registrational trial data.”

During a recent interview with Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson, world-renowned cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough also raised the alarm about the injections.

McCullough explains that people around the world are now beginning to realize that they made a “giant personal health mistake” by being injected with the Covid mRNA shots.

“Understanding what’s happening is slow,” McCullough explains.

“It’s very very psychological.

“I think once people take the vaccines they just can’t psychologically handle the idea that it could’ve been a giant personal health mistake.

“And most people who took the vaccines, they’ll tell you…they’ll say, ‘I don’t want to talk about it.’

“That means psychologically they can’t handle it.”

WATCH:

Dr. Boz is not the only vaccine expert to do a complete reversal on the Covid mRNA injections, however.

As Slay News reported, renowned immunologist Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, Bill Gates’s former vaccine advisor, is now raising the alarm about the long-term harm caused by the shots.

Dr. Bossche warns that a coming “wave of morbidity” and “mortality” among the Covid mRNA vaccinated will trigger a “completely unprecedented” plunge in the global population.

Bossche predicts that the death toll will be “up to 30-40% in highly vaccinated countries.”

“It is very very clear that when this starts, our hospitals will collapse,” he warns.

“And that means the chaos in all kinds of layers of society — financial, economic, social, you name it — will be complete.”

“This will be something that will be reported in history for many many generations to come,” he noted.

As Slay News reported earlier, Professor Dolores Cahill, a world-renowned immunology expert, has also issued a similar warning.

Cahill, who has over 25 years of expertise in high-throughput protein array, antibody array, proteomics technology development, and automation, issued an explosive warning to the public that everyone who has been vaccinated with Covid mRNA shots “will die within 3 to 5 years, even if they have had only one injection.”

link

[schwartzie]

Covid Shots Are SOLE Cause of Soaring Child Heart Failure, Top Study Confirms

Frank Bergman

June 2, 2024 - 12:54 pm

A major new study has just confirmed that Covid mRNA shots are the sole cause of the soaring cases of heart failure among children.

As Slay News has been reporting, cases of cardiac-related deaths and heart failure such as myocarditis and pericarditis have been soaring around the world since the Covid injections were rolled out to the public in early 2021.

Myocarditis and pericarditis are inflammatory conditions of the heart and are generally considered to be rare, especially among children.

Severe cases can lead to serious complications and even death.

Both conditions are known side effects of the Covid mRNA shots.

In response, health officials and the corporate media have been pushing the claim that the COVID-19 virus, and not the shots, is behind the phenomenon.

However, a new large-scale study from renowned scientists at the prestigious University of Oxford has just confirmed that myocarditis and pericarditis only appear in children and adolescents after Covid vaccination and not after infection from the virus.

The new study looked at the official government data of more than 1 million English children and adolescents aged between five and 11 and 12 and 15.

The study compared vaccinated and unvaccinated subjects.

The researchers also took into account the number of doses of vaccine received.

In detailing their findings, the researchers wrote:

“All myocarditis and pericarditis events during the study period occurred in vaccinated individuals.”

The study also noted that hospitalization related to COVID-19 was extremely rare among children and adolescents.

Additionally, there were no deaths from the virus recorded among the entire subject population.

The English data show that myocarditis and pericarditis were only recorded in vaccinated children and adolescents.

Other studies have claimed that myocarditis risk is higher after infection with the virus.

Adolescents had a significantly higher risk of contracting the conditions than children.

The vast majority of myocarditis and pericarditis cases occurred after the first dose of the vaccine, the study found.

Over half of the adolescents who suffered from the conditions visited the hospital as a result.

This news follows another recent study, from some of America’s most well-respected researchers, that found that Covid shots were responsible for for soaring sudden deaths around the world.

As Slay News reported, the case study was conducted by Harvard Medical School and chronicled soaring cases of fatal cerebral ischemia over the past three years.

Cerebral ischemia is a form of deadly brain damage triggered by insufficient blood flow to the brain.

The Harvard researchers found that Moderna’s Covid mRNA injections specifically caused the recent spike in the fatal disorder.

Leading experts have been responding to the explosive study by raising the alarm about the mRNA vaccines.

The Harvard study is the latest in a long line of studies linking the shots to sudden death and potentially fatal side effects.

In response to the Harvard study, Dr. John Campbell – a top British oncologist, immunologist, and immunotherapy expert, published a video breaking down the results.

“This could not be a more serious report,” Campbell warns.

Dr. Peter McCullough also discussed this case study on his Substack.

“We are becoming accustomed to unexpected death after COVID-19 among young persons who have taken one or more injections of the COVID-19 vaccine,” McCullough said.

“It is important to realize that not all deaths after vaccination are cardiac.”

Slay News recently reported on the bombshell admission from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that the Covid mRNA sots have killed hundreds of thousands of American children and young people.

The explosive admission was uncovered in a secret CDC report showing that a staggering half a million American children and young adults have been killed by Covid shots.

The CDC report has revealed that almost 500,000 Americans aged between 0 and 44 years old died from the dangerous side effects of the Covid mRNA injections.

The recorded deaths occurred between the start of the public rollout of the shots in early 2021 and October 9, 2022.

However, due to the timeline of the data, the already shocking figures do not include deaths recorded over the past year and a half.

link

[schwartzie]

Hospital Insider Testifies: COVID-19 Numbers Were Faked

Frank Bergman

June 2, 2024 - 12:23 pm

A hospital worker has provided testimony to allege that official numbers for COVID-19 cases during the pandemic were faked.

During the pandemic, the corporate media spread fear among the general public by promoting reports that hospitals were overwhelmed due to soaring cases of COVID-19.

This fearmongering was used to pressure people to accept lockdowns, masking, vaccines, and other restrictions on freedom.

However, growing reports have since emerged to suggest that the number of cases of COVID-19 had been fabricated to support this fear-pushing agenda.

In Scotland, an official inquiry is underway that has been exposing major corruption in the official narrative regarding the pandemic.

During the Scottish Covid-19 Inquiry, a witness has just testified that the hospital he works in was only “half full” at the “peak” of the Covid pandemic.

However, at the same time, while the United Kingdom was in full lockdown, the hospital was reporting that it was overwhelmed with the number of Covid cases.

Yet, according to Neil Craig’s testimony at the Scottish Covid Inquiry, the hospital experienced nothing unusual.

In April 2020, Covid patients were being admitted to the hospital but it was still not anywhere near as busy as on a normal pre-pandemic day, Craig told the hearing.

Craig, who has worked as a hospital porter at Glasgow Royal Infirmary for 25 years, told the hearing that he and his colleagues were not catching Covid, despite media reports.

He said workers felt it was their duty to continue working despite the fear that was being pushed about the virus in the media.

“They thought that the workload was going to be higher so we were all there,” he told the Inquiry.

“And we could be there as long as we wanted to be really because people weren’t sure if you were going to be needed.

“But it turned out they weren’t really needed.”

He explained that there was a significant fall in the amount of work that porters had to do.

“We didn’t have the capacity [high numbers of patients] in the hospital,” he said.

“Obviously, a lot of patients they discharged out of the hospital, either to home or care homes or other places [and] they didn’t schedule elective surgeries.

“So, the workload was definitely not as bad”

In his written testimony, Craig said that the medical block was less than half-full.

He was asked what he meant by the “medical block.”

“Medical block would be like your everyday general medicine patient,” he explained.

“We’re used to being at full capacity most days.

“But then you’d go into the wards and they were like half empty, half full, whatever you look at it.”

So, as he stated in his written testimony, people were still going to work but a long period could pass before a porter was asked to do a job.

“Because the amount of workload was near the same and because we had probably, that was the best time we were staffed in the hospital because people felt it was their duty to go to work and work through it,” he told the Inquiry.

“And we had lots of free downtime”

From sometime in April 2020, admissions to the hospital of Covid patients increased.

“Gradually the workload would increase but it still wouldn’t be anywhere near as a normal day [pre-Covid] because you’ve not got elective surgeries on, you’ve not got clinic appointments,” he said.

“So, you’ve only got people that need to be, seriously need to be, in a hospital and emergency fears.”

According to Craig’s testimony, the fearmongering numbers of Covid patients and reports of overwhelmed hospitals had been faked.

WATCH:

Craig’s testimony is not the first to suggest that data was faked during the pandemic.

As Slay News reported, several whistleblowers have provided explosive testimony during the Scottish inquiry.

Multiple witnesses revealed that hospitals were euthanizing patients during the pandemic and blaming their deaths on Covid.

The patients were reportedly given a lethal drug combination before their deaths were listed under “COVID-19” in an apparent effort to boost the number of fatalities from the virus.

link

[Midnight]

Fauci Admits He Made Up Tyrannical COVID Guidelines Including Child Masking and Social Distancing — Were Based on Mere Assumptions, Not Science

By Jim Hᴏft
Jun. 2, 2024 6:00 pm


Dr. Anthony Fauci, the former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, has admitted that some of the most stringent COVID-19 guidelines, including social distancing and child masking, were not rooted in concrete scientific evidence.



This admission came during a comprehensive interview with the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic earlier this year, details of which were released ahead of Dr. Fauci’s scheduled testimony on Monday.

According to a transcript released by Republicans, during the January interviews, Dr. Fauci disclosed that the widely enforced “6 feet apart” social distancing guideline “sort of just appeared” and was not based on any data.



This guideline had significant repercussions, leading to the closure of schools and small businesses nationwide. Ironically, however, Fauci permitted the George Floyd protests and riots to wreak havoc across the country.



Below is Dr. Fauci’s transcribed interview via the COVID Select Subcommittee:



SOCIAL DISTANCING: The “6 feet apart” social distancing recommendation forced on Americans by federal health officials was arbitrary and not based on science.



Majority Counsel: “Do you recall when discussions regarding, kind of, the at least a 6 foot threshold began?”

Dr. Fauci: “The 6 foot in the school?”

Majority Counsel: “Six foot overall. I mean, 6-foot was applied at businesses—”

Dr. Fauci: “Yeah.”

Majority Counsel: “—it was applied in schools, it was applied here. At least how the messaging was applied was that 6-foot distancing was the distance that needed to be—“

Dr. Fauci: “You know, I don’t recall. It sort of just appeared. I don’t recall, like, a discussion of whether it should be 5 or 6 or whatever. It was just that 6 foot is—”

Majority Counsel: “Did you see any studies that supported 6 feet?”

Dr. Fauci: “I was not aware of studies that in fact, that would be a very difficult study to do.”



Francis Collins, the former director of the National Insitute of Health, admitted in a closed-door interview earlier this year that he did not see any scientific evidence that social distancing was a proven method of containing the virus.



The controversy extends beyond social distancing. During the pandemic, Americans were subjected to strict mask mandates, with penalties imposed on those who did not comply. These mandates covered everyone – from adults entering businesses to children in schools. Now, it appears these directives were also issued without a solid foundation in science.



When questioned about the evidence supporting the masking of children, Dr. Fauci’s memory was unclear.



Below is Dr. Fauci’s transcribed interview via the COVID Select Subcommittee:



MASKING: Dr. Fauci testified that he did not recall any supporting evidence for masking children. Concerningly, mask-wearing has been associated with learning loss and severe speech development issues in America’s children.



Majority Counsel: “Do you recall reviewing any studies or data supporting masking for children?”

Dr. Fauci: “You know, I might have, Mitch, but I don’t recall specifically that I did. I might have.”

Majority Counsel: “Since the — there’s been a lot of studies that have come out since the pandemic started, but specifically on this there have been significant on kind of like the learning loss and speech and development issues that have been associated with particularly young children wearing masks while they’re growing up. They can’t see their teacher talk and can’t learn how to form words. Have you followed any of those studies?”

Dr. Fauci: “No. But I believe that there are a lot of conflicting studies too, that there are those that say, yes, there is an impact, and there are those that say there’s not. I still think that’s up in the air.”



You can read the key takeaways in the new memo here.



So there you have it. Time and time again, those of us, including The Gateway Pundit, who questioned every aspect of the COVID pandemic, from the lockdown regimes and mask mandates all the way through to vaccines and potential treatments, have been proven correct.



U.S. Senator Rand Paul (R-KY), Ranking Member of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, joined Maria Bartiromo to discuss Fauci’s upcoming hearing on Monday.



Earlier this month, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) finally admitted to funding gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the site of the COVID-19 pandemic.



This admission directly contradicts previous statements made under oath by Dr. Anthony Fauci,



“Fauci lied. He committed a felony. It’s clear there was a massive cover-up from the beginning,” Sen. Paul wrote.



WATCH:

link

[schwartzie]

Top Study Directly Links Covid Shots to Global Excess Deaths

Frank Bergman

June 4, 2024 - 12:54 pm

A major new peer-reviewed study into the “unprecedented” global excess deaths figures has concluded that Covid mRNA shots are directly responsible.

The large-scale study analyzed the mortality data from 47 individual countries and was published in the world-renowned British Medical Journal (BMJ).

The scientists concluded that the Covid mRNA injections are to blame for the soaring excess deaths seen around the world since the pandemic.

Researchers from The Netherlands analyzed data from 47 Western countries and discovered there had been more than three million excess deaths since 2020.

They found that the trend continued despite the rollout of vaccines and containment measures which were meant to protect the public from COVID-19.

They said the “unprecedented” figures “raised serious concerns.”

They are now calling on governments to fully investigate the role of vaccines in the mass deaths of humans on a global scale.

Writing in the BMJ Public Health, the authors from Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, said:

“Although COVID-19 vaccines were provided to guard civilians from suffering morbidity and mortality by the COVID-19 virus, suspected adverse events have been documented as well.

“Both medical professionals and citizens have reported serious injuries and deaths following vaccination to various official databases in the Western World.”

They added: “During the pandemic, it was emphasised by politicians and the media on a daily basis that every COVID-19 death mattered and every life deserved protection through containment measures and COVID-19 vaccines.

“In the aftermath of the pandemic, the same moral should apply.”

The study found that across Europe, the U.S., and Australia there had been more than one million excess deaths in 2020, at the height of the pandemic.

However, this figure increased after the pandemic.

The study found that, after the injections were rolled out for public use, 1.2 million excess deaths were recorded in 2021 and 800,000 in 2022.

They warned that side effects linked to the Covid vaccine had included ischaemic stroke, acute coronary syndrome and brain hemorrhage, cardiovascular diseases, coagulation, hemorrhages, gastrointestinal events, and blood clotting.

German researchers have pointed out that the onset of excess mortality in early 2021 in the country coincided with the rollout of vaccines.

The research team said this “warranted further investigation.”

However, more recent data regarding side effects has remained hidden from the public, they noted.

Countries are keeping their own individual databases of harms, which rely on self-reporting by the public and doctors, the experts warned.

The discussion section of the study is particularly damning for both the vaccines and “containment” measures.

The scientists note that deaths were highest when these were both in operation.

In addition, the scientists suggest that deaths were often listed as being caused by Covid without considering other factors such as vaccines.

“Autopsies to confirm actual death causes are seldom done,” they warn.

The study also found that the largest increase in excess deaths was caused by heart failure.

As Slay News has reported, Covid shots have been linked to cardiac-related deaths by multiple studies and leading experts.

It is a crisp summary of the current state of knowledge on post-pandemic excess deaths and is worth reading in full.

An extended excerpt follows:

This study explored the excess all-cause mortality in 47 countries of the Western World from 2020 until 2022.

The overall number of excess deaths was 3,098,456. Excess mortality was registered in 87% of countries in 2020, in 89% of countries in 2021, and in 91% of countries in 2022.

During 2020, which was marked by the COVID-19 pandemic and the onset of mitigation measures, 1,033,122 excess deaths (P-score 11.4%) were to be regretted.

A recent analysis of seroprevalence studies in this prevaccination era illustrates that the Infection Fatality Rate estimates in non-elderly populations were even lower than prior calculations suggested.

At a global level, the prevaccination Infection Fatality Rate was 0.03% for people aged <60 years and 0.07% for people aged <70 years.

For children aged 0-19 years, the Infection Fatality Rate was set at 0.0003%.

This implies that children are rarely harmed by the COVID-19 virus.

During 2021, when not only containment measures but also COVID-19 vaccines were used to tackle virus spread and infection, the highest number of excess deaths was recorded: 1,256,942 excess deaths (P-score 13.8%). Scientific consensus regarding the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions in reducing viral transmission is currently lacking.

During 2022, when most mitigation measures were negated and COVID-19 vaccines were sustained, preliminary available data counted 808,392 excess deaths (P-score 8.8%).

The percentage difference between the documented and projected number of deaths was highest in 28% of countries during 2020, in 46% of countries during 2021, and in 26% of countries during 2022.

This insight into the overall all-cause excess mortality since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic is an important first step for future health crisis policy decision-making.

The next step concerns distinguishing between the various potential contributors to excess mortality, including COVID-19 infection, indirect effects of containment measures and COVID-19 vaccination programmes.

Differentiating between the various causes is challenging. National mortality registries not only vary in quality and thoroughness but may also not accurately document the cause of death.

The usage of different models to investigate cause-specific excess mortality within certain countries or subregions during variable phases of the pandemic complicates elaborate cross-country comparative analysis.

Not all countries provide mortality reports categorised per age group. Also testing policies for COVID-19 infection differ between countries.

Interpretation of a positive COVID-19 test can be intricate.

Consensus is lacking in the medical community regarding when a deceased infected with COVID-19 should be registered as a COVID-19 death.

Indirect effects of containment measures have likely altered the scale and nature of disease burden for numerous causes of death since the pandemic.

However, deaths caused by restricted healthcare utilisation and socioeconomic turmoil are difficult to prove.

A study assessing excess mortality in the USA observed a substantial increase in excess mortality attributed to non-Covid causes during the first two years of the pandemic.

The highest number of excess deaths was caused by heart disease, 6% above baseline during both years.

Diabetes mortality was 17% over baseline during the first year and 13% above it during the second year.

Alzheimer’s disease mortality was 19% higher in year 1 and 15% higher in year 2.

In terms of percentage, large increases were recorded for alcohol-related fatalities (28% over baseline during the first year and 33% during the second year) and drug-related fatalities (33% above baseline in year 1 and 54% in year 2).

Previous research confirmed profound under-reporting of adverse events, including deaths, after immunisation.

Consensus is also lacking in the medical community regarding concerns that mRNA vaccines might cause more harm than initially forecasted.

French studies suggest that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are gene therapy products requiring long-term stringent adverse events monitoring.

Although the desired immunisation through vaccination occurs in immune cells, some studies report a broad biodistribution and persistence of mRNA in many organs for weeks.

Batch-dependent heterogeneity in the toxicity of mRNA vaccines was found in Denmark.

Simultaneous onset of excess mortality and COVID-19 vaccination in Germany provides a safety signal warranting further investigation.

Despite these concerns, clinical trial data required to further investigate these associations are not shared with the public.

Autopsies to confirm actual death causes are seldom done.

Governments may be unable to release their death data with detailed stratification by cause, although this information could help indicate whether COVID-19 infection, indirect effects of containment measures, COVID-19 vaccines or other overlooked factors play an underpinning role.

This absence of detailed cause-of-death data for certain Western nations derives from the time-consuming procedure involved, which entails assembling death certificates, coding diagnoses and adjudicating the underlying origin of death.

Consequently, some nations with restricted resources assigned to this procedure may encounter delays in rendering prompt and punctual cause-of-death data.

This situation existed even prior to the outbreak of the pandemic.

A critical challenge in excess mortality research is choosing an appropriate statistical method for calculating the projected baseline of expected deaths to which the observed deaths are compared.

Although the analyses and estimates in general are similar, the method can vary, for instance, per length of the investigated period, nature of available data, scale of geographic area, inclusion or exclusion of past influenza outbreaks, accounting for changes in population ageing and size and modelling trend over years or not.

Our analysis of excess mortality using the linear regression model of Karlinsky and Kobak varies thus to some extent from previous attempts to estimate excess deaths… [discussion of some studies on excess deaths] …

Although all the above-mentioned studies used more elaborate statistical approaches for estimating baseline mortality, Karlinsky and Kobak argue that their method is a trade-off between suppleness and chasteness.

It is the simplest method to captivate seasonal fluctuation and annual trends and more transparent than extensive approaches. …

In the conclusion of the study, the scientists issued a plea to governments around the world to act on the findings.

“In conclusion, excess mortality has remained high in the Western World for three consecutive years, despite the implementation of COVID-19 containment measures and COVID-19 vaccines,” the researchers write.

“This is unprecedented and raises serious concerns.

“During the pandemic, it was emphasized by politicians and the media on a daily basis that every COVID-19 death mattered and every life deserved protection through containment measures and COVID-19 vaccines.

“In the aftermath of the pandemic, the same moral should apply.

“Every death needs to be acknowledged and accounted for, irrespective of its origin.

“Transparency towards potential lethal drivers is warranted.

“Cause-specific mortality data therefore need to be made available to allow more detailed, direct, and robust analyses to determine the underlying contributors.

“Postmortem examinations need to be facilitated to allot the exact reason for death.

“Government leaders and policymakers need to thoroughly investigate underlying causes of persistent excess mortality and evaluate their health crisis policies.”

link

[schwartzie]

Covid Death Rates Double Among Vaxxed, Top Study Shows

Frank Bergman

June 5, 2024 - 12:54 pm

A major peer-reviewed study has revealed that deaths from COVID-19 soared among those who received mRNA shots to supposedly protect them from the virus.

A team of top researchers from Ohio State University found that death rates doubled among the vaxxed when compared to those who were unvaccinated.

According to the study, published in the renowned Frontiers Journal, patients who were hospitalized with COVID-19 were twice as likely to die if they had received an mRNA injection.

The team of leading scientists, immunologists, and oncologists, includes:

Bindu Adhikari
Joseph S. Bednash
Jeffrey C. Horowitz
Mark P. Rubinstein
Anastasia N. Vlasova

In the “Results” section of the study, the researchers wrote:

“Among COVID-19 patients, mortality rate was significantly higher among Vax vs. NVax patients (p=0.002).

“The Charlson’s Comorbidity Index score (CCI) was also significantly higher among Vax vs. NVax COVID-19 patients.

“However, the mortality risk remained significantly higher (p=0.02) when we compared COVID-19 Vax vs. NVax patients with similar CCI score, suggesting that additional factors may increase risk of mortality.”

The study was based on data from Covid patients who were hospitalized between May 2020 and November 2022.

“Interestingly, mortality among Vax patients in this cohort was 70% compared with 37% in the NVax group, and overall survival rate was ~2 times higher in the NVax patients,” the researchers note in the study’s paper.

According to the researchers, the more doses of Covid mRNA shots the patients were injected with, the higher the likelihood it was that they would die.

In the “Discussion” section of the study’s paper, the researchers note:

“Of special relevance to our data, Piotr Rzymski et al. reported that (9) among subgroups of Vax hospitalized patients (representing 1% of all hospitalized), mortality rates increased with additional vaccine doses and increased post-vaccination time.”

In addition, the study found that hospitals were routinely listing deaths among the vaccinated as being unvaccinated.

This discovery provides further evidence to support previous reporting regarding widespread efforts to mislead the public about Covid death rates.

As Slay News reported last month, a separate new study from London, England has uncovered evidence from official government data showing that deaths among people vaccinated for Covid have been recorded as being unvaccinated.

The move apparently sought to make the Covid mRNA injections appear “safe” while also stoking fear among the unvaccinated by showing a false spike in deaths of people who purportedly hadn’t received the shots.

The alarming discovery was found in the database of the UK government’s Office for National Statistics (ONS) for mortality rates in 2021.

Initially, the official figures suggested a large spike in deaths among those who had not received Covid mRNA injections.

These figures appeared to support the narrative that people were more likely to die by not taking the “safe and effective” shots.

However, researchers discovered that the vaccination status of the dead had been altered.

The study of the UK government data uncovered systematic miscategorizations of vaccination status.

This evidence has emerged amid mounting allegations that doctors and hospitals were under significant pressure to inflate the figures for “Covid deaths.”

As Slay News reported, several whistleblowers have provided explosive testimony during an official inquiry, revealing that hospitals were euthanizing patients during the pandemic and blaming their deaths on Covid.

The patients were reportedly given a lethal drug combination before their deaths were listed under “COVID-19” in an apparent effort to boost the number of fatalities from the virus.

The bombshell testimonies were provided during the ongoing Scottish COVID-19 Inquiry.

The witnesses specifically testified that elderly patients were being unnecessarily administered end-of-life protocols.

However, the issue wasn’t just limited to Scotland, as Slay News previously reported.

A damning report emerged in February that sent shockwaves around the world after an investigation into the high numbers of “Covid deaths” during the pandemic uncovered evidence that tens of thousands of elderly people were actually murdered to boost the mortality rates.

The official UK government data produced for the report indicated that people across England were also being euthanized using a fatal injection of midazolam.

The cause of their deaths was then listed as “Covid,” indicating that the virus was killing far more elderly people than it was.

The widespread and persistent efforts to kill patients and amplify Covid death figures in the UK suggest a possible systemic policy to promote mRNA shots on a global level.

link

[schwartzie]

Scientist Blows Whistle on Cover-Up of Study Showing Covid Shots Cause Cancer

Frank Bergman

June 5, 2024 - 12:23 pm

Two scientists published a peer-reviewed study in 2021 showing that Covid mRNA shots cause cancer but their findings were covered up over fears it would fuel so-called “ant-vaccine propaganda.”

One of the Sweden-based scientists has blown the whistle to reveal that their bombshell findings were shut down by officials at the universities they worked for.

Newly unsealed emails have also backed up the allegations, revealing the peer-reviewed study was shut down and hidden from the public.

The study was conducted in October 2021 by Dr. Hui Jiang of Stockholm University and Dr. Ya-Fang Mei of Umeå University.

The paper for the study, titled “SARS-CoV-2 Spike Impairs DNA Damage Repair and Inhibits V(D)J Recombination In Vitro,” was published in the peer-reviewed journal MDPI Viruses.

The scientists found that the spike protein from the Covid mRNA injections impairs DNA repair mechanisms, causing cancers to develop and rapidly spread.

However, shortly after the peer-reviewed study was published, the lead author, Dr. Hui Jiang was forced to retract the paper by officials at Stockholm University.

Newly published emails from university officials now call into question the motives behind the retraction.

They show vague reasons cited in the retraction request.

The emails also reveal another scientist was outraged over the “social relevance” of the study, complaining that it was “hacked by anti-vaccinationists.”

Independent journalist Rebekah Barnett has pointed out that three days before an investigation into Jiang and Mei’s paper began on November 5, 2021, medical educator ‎Dr. Mobeen Syed, known as “Dr. Been,” posted to YouTube a video about the implications of Jiang and Mei’s paper for cancer development.

The video has since garnered over 1.4 million views.

“Any cell that has spike protein in it, if it needs its DNA repaired… then spike protein can reduce the DNA repair,” Been explained.

link

[schwartzie]

Study Finds Country’s ‘Unprecedented’ Deaths Caused by Covid Shots

Frank Bergman

June 6, 2024 - 12:54 pm

Yet another damning study has confirmed that Covid mRNA shots are the “unambiguous” cause of an “unprecedented” surge in excess deaths.

Top British and American scientists from the University of Liverpool and Harvard University teamed up with researchers in Cyprus to analyze the island nation’s “substantial, statistically significant,” increase in mortality from all causes in late 2021 and early 2022.

The peer-reviewed study was published in the renowned Journal of Community Medicine & Public Health.

Cyprus suffered a huge spike in excess deaths following the full public rollout of the Covid mRNA injections in early 2021.

At the height of the pandemic, nearly 75% of the Cyprus population was deemed vaccinated for Covid.

During the third and fourth quarters of 2021, total deaths in Cyprus increased by 34.1% and 11.8% respectively.

Total deaths continued to surge the following year, increasing by 30.7% during the first quarter of 2022.

Cyprus began its Covid shot rollout in December 2020, prioritizing vulnerable citizens.

In early 2021, the country expanded its vaccination program to the rest of the population.

The peaks in monthly vaccination rates occurred in May 2021 and December 2021.

Those months were followed by “unprecedented” spikes in the country’s mortality rates, the study found.

“We concluded that excess mortality occurs at unprecedented levels in Cyprus,” the researchers wrote.

“Our findings raise serious concerns regarding the potential impact of the vaccination campaign and other causes on mortality.”

Based on the association they identified, the scientists said:

“A detailed cause-specific investigation of such a significant excess number of deaths is warranted to explore the potential factors leading to this concerning and unexplained increase in population mortality.”

The researchers analyzed official government mortality data from 2016-2022, as reported by the Cyprus Ministry of Health to the European Statistical Office, or Eurostat.

They also analyzed weekly data from the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control regarding Covid vaccinations and related deaths collected during the pandemic.

Using that data, they determined average all-cause mortality rates and excess deaths over time, deaths reported from COVID-19, and the total number of Covid mRNA injections administered for Cyprus by age group.

The team first compared excess deaths before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

They then examined how those numbers related to the vaccine rollout.

In response to the study’s findings, Denis Rancourt, Ph.D., an all-cause mortality researcher and former physics professor at the University of Ottawa in Canada, said:

“There’s clearly a temporal association here between vaccines and excess all-cause mortality.

“This association is robust, it’s unambiguous, it’s clear, it’s in the data itself.”

Rancourt’s team of scientists at the Canada-based Correlation Research in the Public Interest has also conducted several studies on the same subject.

These studies also found strong associations between vaccine rollouts and excess mortality.

He said the mortality rates and the association with the vaccine reported in the Cyprus study are similar to what his team found in their own analysis of Cyprus, which is part of a larger study not yet published.

Epidemiologists use all-cause mortality — a measure of the total number of deaths from all causes in a given time frame for a given population — as the most reliable data for detecting and characterizing events causing death and evaluating the population-level effect of deaths from any cause.

As Slay News has reported, data showing the official cause of death has repeatedly been found to be unreliable and even completely fabricated.

Vaccines are rarely listed as a cause of death and whistleblowers have testified that deaths among the vaccinated are often listed as “unvaccinated” to mislead the public about the safety of the shots.

Excess death, or excess mortality, refers to the number of deaths from all causes during a crisis above and beyond what would be expected under “normal” conditions.

Excess mortality is a “more comprehensive measure” of the impact of the pandemic on mortality than the confirmed COVID-19 deaths because it captures deaths from other causes.

This data includes deaths from causes such as vaccines, treatment protocols, or other factors that are attributable to the “overall COVID-19 crisis,” the study’s authors wrote.

“COVID-19 death data is notoriously not reliable,” Rancourt agreed.

Research also shows that the trends identified in Cyprus are consistent with broader regional and global trends, the authors said.

Across the EU, the authors wrote, excess deaths increased in 2020 and continued through 2023, albeit at variable rates.

Cyprus, they noted, was one of the EU member states with the highest excess mortality — in 2022 it had the highest excess mortality rate in Europe, reaching 26.4%.

This was consistent with findings worldwide. For example, a study found the U.S. experienced substantial excess mortality during the pandemic.

Additionally, the authors’ previously published research showed a substantial increase in mortality in Cyprus in 2021 compared to 2020, even when excluding deaths reported to be caused by COVID-19.

For their current study, the authors calculated the average all-cause mortality using pre-pandemic data from 2016-2019 and assessed how mortality deviated from that level.

Before 2020, they found very little excess mortality.

They found two peaks in vaccination across Cyprus’s population of 904,705 people.

In May 2021, when the first peak happened, 42% of the population was vaccinated.

In December 2021 at the second peak, 71% of the population was vaccinated.

They found that after each vaccination peak, there was a higher rate of excess deaths, which was more severe after the second peak.

They also noted that excess deaths remained low during the period between the start of the pandemic in Cyprus and the start of the vaccination campaign, only beginning to climb substantially after the vaccine was introduced.

Overall, Cyrus suffered approximately 3,000 excess deaths in 2021-2022.

Rancourt said there were a few interesting things in the data that the authors didn’t highlight.

Cyprus typically has higher mortality in the winter and low in the summer, he said.

“It’s unheard of to have a high mortality in the summer,” Rancourt explains.

“But in 2021, just after the main first wave of vaccination rollout, after a large number of vaccine doses had been given, there was a very large summer peak in excess mortality.”

The researchers warn that the data they analyzed for the study highlights “the concerns that the vaccination campaign may have contributed to this worldwide observed excess mortality.”

Many researchers have identified links between the toxicity of vaccine batches and adverse events, they noted.

Rancourt and his team have linked the vaccine rollouts to unprecedented peaks in all-cause mortality in a study of 17 countries.

link

They are currently completing a study of 125 countries which will be concluded and published soon.

[schwartzie]

WHO Demands Governments Get ‘More Aggressive’ with ‘Anti-Vaxxers’ as Deaths Surge Among Vaxxed

Frank Bergman

June 6, 2024 - 12:23 pm

The World Health Organization (WHO) has issued a warning to United Nations (UN) member states that governments must “be more aggressive” in cracking down on “anti-vaxxers.”

The warning was issued by WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus during a talk titled “Celebrating 50 years of immunization progress.”

During his speech, Dr. Tedros said:

“You know the serious challenge that’s posed by anti-vaxxers, and I think we need to strategize to really push back.

“I think it’s time to be more aggressive in pushing back on anti-vaxxers,” he declared.

“I think they used Covid as an opportunity, and you know all the havoc they are creating.”

The WHO has previously attacked people opposed to the Covid mRNA shots.

As Slay News previously reported, the globalist “health” organization baselessly smeared critics of the experimental injections as a “major killing force.”

In addition, the WHO also attempted to link concerns about the shots to the “far-right.”
-
In his talk, Tedros addressed the supposed achievements of vaccines in general and childhood vaccination in particular.

However, he conveniently failed to mention the role of improved nutrition and sanitation in reducing child and maternal mortality.

“More than 14 million children in 2022 did not receive a single dose of vaccine; working together with partners like GAVI [the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization] and UNICEF, we aim to halve that number by 2030,” the WHO chief said.

Ghebreyesus praised GAVI’s role “in supporting access to vaccines around the world” and called on people to donate to its “replenishment letter” program.

Both GAVI and the WHO receive hundreds of millions of dollars in funding from the Gates Foundation every year.

The WHO and Tedros completely disregard overwhelming evidence that the experimental COVID injections have caused millions of deaths and serious injuries.

Experts, scientists, doctors, top politicians, and even media outlets are now beginning to raise the alarm about the injections.

As Slay News reported last week, a former top Japanese government minister has just issued a public apology for soaring deaths among the vaxxed.

The apology was made by Kazuhiro Haraguchi, a former Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications in Japan who currently serves as a member of the House of Representatives.

Haraguchi made a heartfelt statement during a speech at a major protest against the World Health Organization (WHO) on Friday.

“I apologize to all of you,” Haraguchi told the massive crowd.

“So many have died, and they shouldn’t have.”

Haraguchi has previously revealed that he developed turbo cancer after receiving a Covid injection.

Meanwhile, the warning about “anti-vaxxers” from the WHO comes as global deaths continue to surge among the Covid-vaccinated.

Slay News reported earlier this week that a major new peer-reviewed study found that the mRNA injections are responsible for soaring excess deaths recorded around the world.

The study analyzed the “unprecedented” global excess deaths figures has concluded that Covid mRNA shots are directly responsible.

The large-scale study examined the mortality data from 47 individual countries and was published in the world-renowned British Medical Journal (BMJ).

The scientists concluded that the Covid mRNA injections are to blame for the soaring excess deaths seen around the world since the pandemic.

Researchers from The Netherlands analyzed data from 47 Western countries and discovered there had been more than three million excess deaths since 2020.

They found that most of those deaths were linked to the rollout of vaccines and containment measures which were meant to protect the public from COVID-19.

The scientists said the “unprecedented” figures “raised serious concerns.”

They are now calling on governments to fully investigate the role of vaccines in the mass deaths of humans on a global scale.

link

[schwartzie]

Researchers Drop Bombshell: Covid Shots Killed 35 Million

Frank Bergman

June 7, 2024 - 12:54 pm

Researchers have sounded the alarm over their chilling new findings after uncovering evidence showing that Covid mRNA shots have caused the deaths of 35 million people around the world.

As Slay News reported earlier, a bombshell peer-reviewed study was recently published in the prestigious British Medical Journal by a group of world-renowned researchers in Amsterdam, Netherlands.

The researchers, led by Dr. Saskia Mostert of the Pediatric Oncology Department at Emma Children’s Hospital in Amsterdam, looked at excess death data in 47 Western countries for the years 2020, 2021, and 2022.

They found that there were over three million excess deaths in total.

The highest number of excess deaths was recorded in 2021 at 1,256,942.

That was the year that countries around the world introduced Covid mRNA injections for public use and imposed restrictions such as lockdowns, social distancing, and mask mandates.

“Although COVID-19 vaccines were provided to guard civilians from suffering morbidity and mortality by the COVID-19 virus, suspected adverse events have been documented as well,” wrote the researchers.

“Both medical professionals and citizens have reported serious injuries and deaths following vaccination to various official databases in the Western World.”

They also referenced an analysis of the phase III randomized clinical trial for Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine.

The trial showed that vaccinated participants were 36% more likely to suffer a serious adverse event.

Aside from one article in the UK’s Telegraph, the explosive Dutch study has not been reported by any corporate news outlets.

The Telegraph article is titled: “Covid vaccines may have helped fuel rise in excess deaths.”

“Researchers from The Netherlands analyzed data from 47 Western countries and discovered there had been more than three million excess deaths since 2020, with the trend continuing despite the rollout of vaccines and containment measures,” the report states.

“They said the ‘unprecedented’ figures ‘raised serious concerns’ and called on governments to fully investigate the underlying causes, including possible vaccine harms.”

The researchers raised concerns that governments and corporate media outlets are ignoring vaccine deaths despite giving round-the-clock coverage to alleged “Covid deaths” during the pandemic.

“During the pandemic, it was emphasized by politicians and the media on a daily basis that every COVID-19 death mattered and every life deserved protection through containment measures and COVID-19 vaccines,” the researchers wrote in the study’s paper.

“In the aftermath of the pandemic, the same morale should apply.
JOIN THE FIGHT - DONATE TO SLAY NEWS TODAY!

“Every death needs to be acknowledged and accounted for, irrespective of its origin.”

While the findings from the Dutch study are already alarming, a separate researcher has conducted an initial analysis of the data and made a disturbing about the global death toll from the mRNA injections.

Vaccine injury data auditor and investigative reporter “Welcome the Eagle” has attempted to extrapolate the Dutch researchers’ findings to the rest of the world.

The Dutch researchers analyzed excess death data in 47 Western countries and found three million excess deaths.

Welcome the Eagle expanded on this by including data from the remaining 188 countries.

According to his analysis of the data, a minimum of approximately 25.8 million people were killed by Covid shots worldwide.

However, he warns that the actual total of global Covid vax deaths is likely to be much higher at a stomach-churning 35 million.

Previous studies have called for investigations into the reports of soaring Covid vaccine deaths.

In 2022, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) study, for example, discovered a 25% surge in cardiac events among young, healthy Israelis in 2021.

The findings further showed that the increase was entirely associated with the Covid mRNA shots.

Last year, German researchers published a peer-reviewed study in which they observed that “both excess mortality and the number of stillbirths increased with increased vaccinations.”

They “strongly recommended” investigations into the “unknown side effects of the COVID-19 vaccines.”

Nevertheless, investigations into Covid vaccine deaths have not been conducted by any public health authorities.

This fact seemed to bother the Dutch researchers, who wrote:

During the pandemic, it was emphasised by politicians and the media on a daily basis that every COVID-19 death mattered and every life deserved protection through containment measures and COVID-19 vaccines.

In the aftermath of the pandemic, the same morale should apply.

Every death needs to be acknowledged and accounted for, irrespective of its origin.

Public pressure has been mounting on governments to properly investigate Covid shot-induced injuries and deaths happening in their countries.

In March, a bipartisan group of British lawmakers wrote a letter to UK Health Secretary Victoria Atkins.

They asked her to disclose any data supporting the government’s claim that there is no link between the shots and excess deaths.

“If those data do indeed exist, please share them; if thorough investigations have already ruled out such a link, please share the relevant reports,” read the letter.

“There is no place here for blind faith.”

Britain’s National Health Service (NHS) has been bewildered as to why premature deaths from cardiac events among Brits under 75.

In the UK, deaths among the under 75s have been declining steadily for almost sixty years.

However, deaths in this younger age bracket have been skyrocketing since the Covid shots were rolled out in early 2021, marking a clear trend reversal.

link

[schwartzie]

Vaccine Injuries Soared 800% Among Canadian Military after Covid Shot Rollout

Frank Bergman

June 7, 2024 - 12:23 pm

Vaccine injuries soared by a whopping 800% among members of the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) after the government rolled out Covid mRNA shots, leaked documents have revealed.

The documents, which were obtained by media outlet LifeSiteNews, show only 14 Canadian military members experienced a vaccine injury in 2020.

However, during the first year of the Covid injection rollout, 2021, 128 military personnel were injured by vaccines.

In 2022, the number of those injured by the shots soared to 223.

Notably, the CAF rate of vaccine injuries is higher than the general population of Canada.

“According to the documents, the CAF’s vaccine injury rate is higher than Health Canada’s average,” the report notes.

“Health Canada has recorded a total of 58,712 vaccine injuries from the Covid shots, or one in every 1,789 doses”

“However, the CAF’s 2021 numbers show that 128 out of 162,190, or 1 out of 1,267, doses resulted in an injury.

“In 2022, the number was even higher at 223 out of 63,962 doses, or 1 out of 287 doses.”

The majority of the vaccine injuries were caused by the Moderna mRNA injection.

The injuries reported by the CAF included heart problems, paralysis, and reproductive harm.

The types of injuries have been seen all around the world among the vaxxed, however.

As Slay News reported earlier, a new study found that “unprecedented numbers of global excess deaths have been caused by the injections.

Top British and American scientists from the University of Liverpool and Harvard University teamed up with researchers in Cyprus to analyze the island nation’s “substantial, statistically significant,” increase in mortality from all causes in late 2021 and early 2022.

The peer-reviewed study was published in the renowned Journal of Community Medicine & Public Health.

Cyprus suffered a huge spike in excess deaths following the full public rollout of the Covid mRNA injections in early 2021.

At the height of the pandemic, nearly 75% of the Cyprus population was deemed vaccinated for Covid.

“We concluded that excess mortality occurs at unprecedented levels in Cyprus,” the researchers warn.

“Our findings raise serious concerns regarding the potential impact of the vaccination campaign and other causes on mortality.”

Across the EU, the authors wrote, excess deaths increased in 2020 and continued through 2023, albeit at variable rates.

Cyprus, they noted, was one of the EU member states with the highest excess mortality.

In 2022, Cyprus had the highest excess mortality rate in Europe, reaching 26.4%.

This was consistent with findings worldwide.

For example, a study found the U.S. experienced substantial excess mortality during the pandemic.

Additionally, the authors’ previously published research showed a substantial increase in mortality in Cyprus in 2021 compared to 2020, even when excluding deaths reported to be caused by COVID-19.

The researchers warn that the data they analyzed for the study highlights “the concerns that the vaccination campaign may have contributed to this worldwide observed excess mortality.”

link

[schwartzie]

Renowned Expert: Covid Shots Are ‘Weapons of Mass Destruction’

Frank Bergman
June 8, 2024 - 12:54 pm


A world-renowned professor who drafted America’s laws on bioweapons has signed a sworn affidavit asserting that Covid mRNA shots are “weapons of mass destruction.”



Dr. Francis Boyle is a Harvard-educated law professor who drafted the 1989 Biological Weapons and Antiterrorism Act.



The landmark legislation passed both houses of Congress unanimously.



It was signed into law by President George H. W. Bush on May 22, 1990.



Dr. Boyle has now provided a signed affidavit stating that Covid mRNA injections violate the law he wrote.



Boyle asserts that “COVID-19 injections,” “COVID-19 nanoparticle injections,” and “mRNA nanoparticle injections” are bioweapons and weapons of mass destruction.



He notes that the Covid shots violate Biological Weapons 18 USC § 175; Weapons and Firearms § 790.166 Fla. Stat. (2023).



Dr. Boyle provided this affidavit in a Florida case involving an “Emergency Petition for a Writ of Mandamus.”



The case seeks to compel Governor Ron DeSantis to prohibit the distribution of Covid mRNA injections in the state of Florida, as Slay News previously reported.


It also seeks to compel Attorney General Ashley Moody to confiscate the vials.



According to reporting from Dr. Joseph Sansone, the original Emergency Petition for a Writ of Mandamus was filed on March 3rd, 2024, in the Florida Supreme Court.



It was then transferred to the Circuit Court in Leon County on March 20th, 2024.



On April 9th, 2024, the Circuit Court dismissed the case.


The case is now in the appeals court.



The Appellate Brief was filed on Memorial Day, May 27th, 2024.



The pleadings assert that the distribution of Covid mRNA shots violates the following laws:



Biological Weapons 18 USC § 175

Weapons and Firearms § 790.166 Fla. Stat. (2023)

Federal Crime of Treason 18 USC § 2381

Treason § 876.32 Fla. Stat. (2023)

Domestic Terrorism, 18 USC § 2331

Terrorism § 775.30 Fla. Stat. (2023)

Murder § 782.04 (1)(a) Fla. Stat. (2023) and Genocide 18 USC §1091

Florida Drugs and Cosmetic Act § 499.005 (2) Fla. Stat. (2023)

Fraud § 817.034 Fla Stat. (2023)

Accessory After the Fact § 777.03 Fla. Stat. (2023)

Florida Medical Consent Law § 766.103 Fla Stat. (2023)

Dr. Boyle’s affidavit is below:




As Sansone notes, Dr. Boyle is considered one of the world’s leading legal experts on biological weapons.



His sworn affidavit adds to the already tremendous body of evidence provided in the writ of mandamus.



Affidavits stating that the injections are biological and technological weapons were also provided by med-legal advisor and biotech analyst Karen Kingston.



Kingston researched the evidence made in the “Facts of the Case” section of the Mandamus and from Ana Mihalcea, M.D., PhD.



Dr. Mihalcea’s research is included in the Mandamus.



Mihalcea is one of the world’s leading researchers into the effects of self-replicating nanotechnology in the blood of injected as well as the effects in the blood of the uninjected as a result of shedding.



The affidavit from Boyle comes amid a growing number of experts who are coming forward to raise the alarm about the Covid mRNA injections.



The Covid shots are known to increase lethality after repeated doses.



In addition, the mRNA injections increase Covid infection rates and result in turbo cancers, reproductive destruction, miscarriages, and autoimmune disorders, as well as deadly headaches, seizures, strokes, blood clots, and heart failure.



Massive population studies have also found that, in addition to a multitude of serious ailments, the injections contain hundreds of times the allowable levels of DNA contamination, leading to mutagenic effects.



As Slay News reported, Professor Dr. Dolores Cahill is among the world-leading experts to issue warnings to the public.



Prof. Cahill, a world-renowned immunology expert, warns that everyone who has been vaccinated with Covid mRNA shots “will die within 3 to 5 years, even if they have had only one injection.”



Cahill has over 25 years of expertise in high-throughput protein array, antibody array, proteomics technology development, and automation.



Additionally, billionaire Bill Gates’s former vaccine advisor recently blew the whistle on a coming “wave” of “unprecedented deaths” among the vaxxed, as Slay News reported.



Former Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation scientist and immunology expert Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche warns that countries around the world will soon experience a “completely unprecedented” population plunge.



Bossche predicts that the death toll will be “up to 30-40% in highly vaccinated countries.”



“What we will see is something completely, completely unprecedented in terms of the magnitude of the wave of morbidity and unfortunately mortality that we will see,” he said.



In a separate whistleblowing statement, Bossche warned the public that a “massive tsunami” of “chaos” and “death” is about to decimate the global Covid mRNA-vaccinated population.



Bossche warned that a “huge, huge wave” of illness and deaths among those vaccinated for Covid is now “imminent.”



The top scientist says this “massive tsunami” will collapse hospitals and cause financial, economic, and social “chaos.”



“What I am predicting is a massive, massive tsunami” of illness and death among highly-vaccinated populations with compromised immune systems, Bossche said.



“We will have to build a completely new world…” Bossche added.



“It is very very clear that when this starts, our hospitals will collapse.



“And that means the chaos in all kinds of layers of society — financial, economic, social, you name it — will be complete.”



“This will be something that will be reported in history for many many generations to come,” he noted.

link

[schwartzie]

America Facing Worst Heart Failure Crisis in History, Experts Warn

Frank Bergman
June 8, 2024 - 12:23 pm


Experts are warning that America is facing a trillion-dollar-per-year heart failure crisis as cardiac-related deaths and illness continue to soar.



As Slay News has reported, heart failure and related deaths have surged over the last three years.



Cases of myocarditis and pericarditis have been soaring around the world since the Covid injections were rolled out to the public in early 2021.



Myocarditis and pericarditis are inflammatory conditions of the heart and are generally considered to be rare, especially among children.



However, a recent bombshell study has confirmed that Covid mRNA shots are the sole cause of the soaring cases of heart failure among children.



Severe cases of myocarditis and pericarditis can lead to serious complications and even death.



Both conditions are known side effects of the Covid mRNA shots and heart failure is now surging in vaccinated children and young adults.



Experts are now warning that the heart failure crisis is only going to get worse over the next few years.



A large collaborative of researchers sponsored by the American Heart Association (AHA) investigated to better understand the economic burden of cardiovascular disease and stroke over the coming decades.


The study was published in the renowned peer-reviewed journal Circulation.



They launched the investigative study after a well-designed quantitative assessment could inform policy, health system, and community-level interventions for prevention and treatment using nationally representative health, economic, and demographic data to project healthcare costs attributable to key cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia) and conditions (coronary heart disease, stroke, heart failure, atrial fibrillation) through 2050.



To estimate productivity losses from morbidity and premature mortality due to cardiovascular conditions, the researchers employed the human capital approach.



The outcome of the study is alarming, to say the least.

The economic burden associated with cardiovascular risk factors as well as overt cardiovascular disease across America will substantially increase in the forthcoming decades, the researchers warn.



The study asserts development and deployment of cost-effective programs and policies to promote cardiovascular health are urgently needed to rein in costs and to equitably enhance population health.



These outcomes echo similar recent claims from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.



The Gates Foundation argues that social determinants of health are causing heart failure cases to surge.



JOIN THE FIGHT - DONATE TO SLAY NEWS TODAY!

The Microsoft co-founder’s organization insists that changes to socioeconomic status, lifestyle, diet, lack of exercise, etc. are required to relieve the burden of the crisis.



Already, cardiovascular sickness is the leading cause of death for Americans.



In 2024, the United States will likely have 931,578 cardiovascular-related deaths.



This figure is a slight increase from 2023.



The age-adjusted death rate for cardiovascular disease (CVD) also increased to 233.3 per 100,000, which is a 4% increase from 2020



The AHA study found that one in 3 American adults received care for a cardiovascular risk factor or condition in 2020.



When adjusting to inflation (2022 US dollars), the authors forecast the healthcare costs associated with cardiovascular risk factors to triple between 2020 and 2050, from $400 billion to $1344 billion.



Annual health costs, the researchers estimate, will quadruple when factoring in the worsening cardiovascular dynamics, from $393 billion to $1490 billion.



Not surprisingly, the authors’ model simulates a 54% loss of productivity from $234 billion to $361 billion.



The researchers also identified which cardiovascular conditions will wreak the most havoc on society.



Stroke represents the largest absolute increase in costs.



Large relative increases among the Asian American population (497%) and Hispanic American population (489%) reflect the projected increases in the size of these populations.



In the face of the crisis, health officials and the corporate media have been pushing the claim that the COVID-19 virus, and not the mRNA shots, is behind the phenomenon.



However, a new large-scale study from renowned scientists at the prestigious University of Oxford has just confirmed that myocarditis and pericarditis only appear in children and adolescents after Covid vaccination and not after infection from the virus.



This news follows another recent study, from some of America’s most well-respected researchers, that found that Covid shots were responsible for soaring sudden deaths around the world.



As Slay News reported, the case study was conducted by Harvard Medical School and chronicled soaring cases of fatal cerebral ischemia over the past three years.



Cerebral ischemia is a form of deadly brain damage triggered by insufficient blood flow to the brain.



The Harvard researchers found that Moderna’s Covid mRNA injections specifically caused the recent spike in the fatal disorder.



Slay News recently reported on the bombshell admission from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that the Covid mRNA sots have killed hundreds of thousands of American children and young people.



The explosive admission was uncovered in a secret CDC report showing that a staggering half a million American children and young adults have been killed by Covid shots.



The CDC report has revealed that almost 500,000 Americans aged between 0 and 44 years old died from the dangerous side effects of the Covid mRNA injections.



The recorded deaths occurred between the start of the public rollout of the shots in early 2021 and October 9, 2022.



However, due to the timeline of the data, the already shocking figures do not include deaths recorded over the past year and a half.



link

[J.J.Gibbs]

It Leaked From A US-Backed Lab
SUNDAY, JUN 09, 2024 - 03:10 PM

Authored by Jeffrey Tucker via The Epoch Times,



For The New York Times, which started this whole fiasco dating from Feb. 27, 2020, with a podcast designed to drum up disease panic, it’s been a drip, drip, drip of truthiness ever since.



A fortnight ago, the paper finally decided to report on vaccine injury from shots that vast majorities never needed and that stop neither infection nor transmission. And now, as of June 3, we have as decisive an article as one can imagine that shows that “a laboratory accident is the most parsimonious explanation of how the pandemic began.”



“Whether the pandemic started on a lab bench or in a market stall, it is undeniable that U.S. federal funding helped to build an unprecedented collection of SARS-like viruses at the Wuhan institute, as well as contributing to research that enhanced them,” the article reads.



“Advocates and funders of the institute’s research, including Dr. Fauci, should cooperate with the investigation to help identify and close the loopholes that allowed such dangerous work to occur. The world must not continue to bear the intolerable risks of research with the potential to cause pandemics.”



The author is scientist Alina Chan of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. For purposes of documentation, let’s go through the points she makes.



1. The SARS-like virus that caused the pandemic emerged in Wuhan, Hubei Province, the Chinese city where the world’s foremost research lab for SARS-like viruses is located.



2. The year before the outbreak, the Wuhan Institute, working with U.S. partners, had proposed creating viruses with SARS‑CoV‑2’s defining feature.



3. The Wuhan lab pursued this type of work under low biosafety conditions that could not have contained an airborne virus as infectious as SARS‑CoV‑2.



4. The hypothesis that COVID-19 came from an animal at the Huanan Seafood Market in Wuhan is not supported by strong evidence.



5. Key evidence that would be expected if the virus had emerged from the wildlife trade is still missing.



Keep in mind that people saying exactly this from the very outset of the crisis were censored by social media at the behest of government agencies. Media personalities ridiculed this view. It was called a wild conspiracy theory, unworthy of any respectable and responsible person. This went on for three years, with brutal results. People lost large channels and social media followers and accounts. This ruined whole livelihoods.







Now, here we are four years later, and we have the paper of record willing to admit that it was true all along.



Yes, it is infuriating.



Why does this matter? Because it is the turning point in the history of modern civilization. All the top public health officials had suspicions of this from the very outset. We know this from their own writings.



Instead of opening a clear and open investigation, they pursued a different path: Deny the leak, roll out the supposed antidote (vaccine), use experimental technology, and lock down the world’s population to stop the spread so that the vaccine would get the credit for ending the pandemic.



That’s the summary of what happened, based on my four years of research into this. In other words, to deflect blame, these people hatched an audacious plot to wreck rights and liberties the world over, in a futile attempt to prohibit natural exposure from ending the pathogenic wave (as always happened before). Instead, they would use the crisis to shove through approval of a technology that had never before received regulatory approval.



This explains the disparagement of natural immunity, the absence of seroprevalence tests, the removal of repurposed generics from the market that could have helped people, the rise of censorship of any dissident scientists, and the complete absence of any serious research into early spread in the last quarter of 2019. It’s quite simply an astonishing plot of immense importance to the whole of the world, all stemming from an attempt to cover up a lab leak.



That’s why the topic is important. This is not just a technical point. It is the first chapter of a wild and seemingly fictional novel of apocalyptic implications. The House subcommittee now investigating the public health response is barely scratching the surface in public, but behind the scenes, there is plenty of knowledge among investigators that there is much more going on.



Here’s the key point. The national media does not want this discussed. The agencies don’t want this investigated. The tech companies that censored people all along do not want this considered. The Democrats certainly don’t want this subject pursued. Many Republicans don’t want to examine this in any detail.



There is only one force at work that is pushing any of this forward, and that is public opinion, which, in turn, is fed by the handful of writers, researchers, scientists, moms, and many other grassroots people who correctly refuse to let this go.



This is the only reason these hearings are happening. It is the only path to getting the truth.



Of this, I’m thoroughly convinced. If we think the American people have already lost trust in public health and government, we haven’t seen anything yet. Once the whole story is out in the open, and we are headed in this direction, we’ll see a collapse without precedent.



The timeline is going far too slowly. There is no excuse for why we are only getting clarity on the basics fully four years later. Meanwhile, there is absolutely no basis for approving any more funding for these agencies or biodefense research and no basis for approving any new treaties or agreements from the World Health Organization (WHO).



Let’s not forget that it was the WHO that pushed hard for the world to copy the Chinese Communist Party in its crazy virus-control methods of violating human rights on a scale that should never have been tolerated in the West. And yet based on that advice, the United States, the UK, the European Union, and nearly every nation in the world adopted these policies, in contradiction to all laws and human rights.



Out of nowhere, our Constitution and Bill of Rights were overridden by bureaucracies about which most Americans knew absolutely nothing.



It boggles the mind that this happened, and we are still paying an egregious price in terms of inflation, learning loss, excess death, collapse of public health, expansion of government, pervasive censorship, and much more.



It felt like martial law at the time, and it is not clear that this ever went away. We absolutely must know the truth. More than that, we need to repudiate every bit of the COVID-19 response, including the mandates to get a vaccine that was, in fact, never proven to be safe or effective.



So yes, it matters that this virus likely leaked from a U.S.-funded lab. That was the beginning of the story. There is much more to it.

link

[schwartzie]

Covid mRNA Shots Are NOT Vaccines, Appeals Court Rules

Frank Bergman
June 9, 2024 - 12:54 pm


The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has just dropped a bomb on the Covid mass vaccination agenda.



The appeals court delivered a seismic ruling on the nature of the Covid mRNA injections.



The decision could reshape public health policy across the nation.



The ruling was delivered during a contentious case involving the Health Freedom Defense Fund and other plaintiffs versus the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD).



While ruling on the case, the court has declared that COVID-19 mRNA injections do not qualify as vaccines under traditional medical definitions.



The case revolved around the LAUSD’s COVID-19 vaccination policy.



The policy required all employees to be fully vaccinated against Covid by a specified deadline.



The plaintiffs argued that the district’s vaccine mandate infringed upon their fundamental right to refuse medical treatment.



They argue that the mRNA shots do not prevent the transmission of Covid but merely mitigate symptoms for the recipient, at best.


The court’s opinion was written by Circuit Judge R. Nelson and supported by Judge Collins.



The judges assert that the mRNA shots, marketed as vaccines, do not effectively prevent the transmission of COVID-19.



In the opinion, the judges note that the injections do nothing more than merely reduce symptoms in those who contract the virus.



Therefore, the injections cannot be labeled as vaccines.


This crucial distinction undermines the foundational premise of the vaccine mandates enforced by various governmental and educational institutions, as the Gateway Pundit notes.



Judge Nelson pointed out that the mandate was inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s century-old ruling in Jacobson v. Massachusetts.



The case upheld the state’s right to enforce smallpox vaccinations due to their proven effectiveness in preventing disease spread.



In contrast, the Covid mRNA shots do not offer such public health benefits.


Therefore, they fail the criteria established by Jacobson.



The ruling points out that traditional vaccines are designed to provide immunity and prevent transmission.



This is not conclusively proven in the case of Covid mRNA injections.



In addition, the Covid mRNA shots have been linked to widespread injuries and mass deaths.



The Gateway Pundit previously reported that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) had modified the definition of “vaccine” to include the mRNA shots.



Here’s the definition the CDC used on 26 August 2021:



Vaccine– “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease.”

Vaccination– “the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.”

Rather than admit the Covid shots are not working as advertised, the CDC took a page out of Orwell’s “1984.”



The taxpayer-funded agency opted for a new spin on the language instead.



The CDC’s current definition is:



Vaccine– “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.”

As Slay News previously reported, Pfizer’s President of International Developed Markets Janine Small admitted during an October 2022 EU hearing that the vaccine had never been tested on its ability to prevent transmission.



This bombshell admission was contrary to what was previously advertised.



Government health officials and the media pressured the public into taking the injections by arguing that they had a responsibility to protect others.



In a concurring opinion, Judge Collins highlighted that compulsory medical treatments for individual health benefits infringe upon the fundamental right to refuse such treatments.



This perspective aligns with the constitutional principles protecting personal liberty against unwarranted governmental intrusions.



link

[schwartzie]

Covid Injections Caused Epilepsy & Appendicitis to Surge in Children, Top Study Finds

Frank Bergman
June 9, 2024 - 12:23 pm


A team of eminent scientists has concluded that surges in epilepsy and appendicitis in children were caused by Covid mRNA shots.



According to a new study, children who received the AstraZeneca or Pfizer-BioNTech Covid injections faced an elevated risk of epilepsy and appendicitis.



The researchers also found that Pfizer recipients were more likely to suffer from demyelinating disease or heart inflammation.



The study was led by Dr. Julia Hippisley-Cox, a world-renowned professor of clinical epidemiology at the University of Oxford’s Nuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences.



The paper for the peer-reviewed study was published in the prestigious Nature Medical Journal.



Dr. Julia Hippisley-Cox and her team of researchers obtained data from a national database on Covid vaccination, mortality, hospital admissions, and COVID-19 infections.



They wanted to look at the link between Covid shots from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Moderna with 12 outcomes, including the heart inflammation condition called myocarditis.



Myocarditis is an inflammation of the heart muscle that restricts the body’s ability to pump blood.



It can lead to cardiac arrest, strokes, blood clots, and sudden death.


The population of nearly 5.2 million included 1.8 million children aged 5 to 11 and 3.3 million children aged 12 to 17.



The official UK government data sets examined were through August 7, 2022.



In the primary analysis, researchers found 12- to 17-year-olds who received Pfizer’s vaccine were at increased risk of myocarditis.



They saw an additional three cases per million versus the expected rate after the first dose and an additional five cases per million after a second dose.


The data also revealed hospitalization with epilepsy increased, with an additional 12 cases per million after a second dose.



Females in the age group also faced an increased risk of demyelinating disease after receiving a second dose of the vaccine.



Researchers also identified a “substantially increased risk of hospitalization with epilepsy” among females after receipt of a first dose of AstraZeneca’s shot.



They found 813 more hospitalizations with epilepsy than expected per million doses.


An elevated risk of appendicitis was identified after a second dose of the vaccine, with 512 excess events per million doses.



While no excess events were found among Moderna recipients, the study lacked the power to detect statistically significant issues.



This was due to few children in the UK receiving Moderna’s vaccine.



Further, no elevated risks of the 12 issues were found among 5- to 11-year-olds.



A secondary analysis, involving matching some of the vaccine recipients to unvaccinated children, confirmed an increased risk among 12- to 17-year-olds of hospitalization with epilepsy following Pfizer vaccination.



They found an elevated risk of severe allergic shock and appendicitis in the age group following the Pfizer vaccination.



No increased risks of any outcome were identified among minor Moderna or AstraZeneca recipients.



However, among a group of 18- to 24-year-olds studied, elevated risks of a number of conditions were found.



Those conditions include myocarditis, immune or idiopathic thrombocytopenia, epilepsy, and acute pancreatitis.



The study was funded by the U.S. National Institute for Health (NIH) and the Care Research School for Primary Care Research.



Multiple authors declared conflicts of interest, including funding from Moderna and AstraZeneca.



Limitations included reliance on hospital admission codes and death certificates.



The authors said that their findings “support a favorable safety profile of COVID-19 vaccination using mRNA vaccines in children and young people aged 5-17 years.”



The Pfizer and Moderna shots utilize messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) technology.



The authors cited in part how they found unvaccinated children faced increased risks of some of the outcomes, including multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children.



Udi Qimron, a professor at Tel Aviv University’s Department of Clinical Microbiology and Immunology, argues that the authors wrongly downplayed the risks associated with the vaccines.



“It’s not surprising to learn that some of the study’s authors have financial ties to Moderna and AstraZeneca and/or have served on various UK and Scottish Government COVID-19 advisory groups,” Qimron said in a statement responding to the study.



“One author was even a member of AstraZeneca’s Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Taskforce and the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation.



“The conflict of interest in this case is significant.”



“It is concerning that respected scientific platforms are being used to cover up mistakes and wrongdoing, particularly the coercion and immense societal pressure to vaccinate young children,” he added.



“This should never have been done.



“It is disheartening to see scientific journals collaborating with such practices, which undermines public trust in scientific research, especially when it involves the health and safety of children.”

link

[schwartzie]

Multiple Studies Confirm Covid Shots Cause Cancer

Frank Bergman
June 10, 2024 - 12:54 pm


Oncologists around the world are continuing the raise the alarm as a growing number of new studies confirm that Covid mRNA shots cause cancer.



Two more new studies have just added to the swelling body of evidence showing that the injections trigger the rapid development and spread of cancer.



According to a report from Infowars, one study revealed that the spike protein from Covid mRNA shots elicits gene-interrupting activity.



This, in turn, inhibits a crucial protein that is used for tumor suppression.



This gene-interrupting causes the cancer cells to flourish.



This is particularly alarming, considering that the mRNA and viral vector Covid vaccines cause the body to produce the spike protein as the primary mechanism of their function.



In the “Discussion” section of the study, the researchers note:



“…we identified the SARS-CoV-2 spike S2 subunit as a COVID-19 virus factor that interrupts p53 binding to MDM2 in cancer cells and demonstrated the suppressive effect of SARS-CoV-2 spike S2 on p53 signaling in cancer cells.



“Correlated to the inhibition of p53 signaling, the short-term expression of spike S2 caused an altered DNA damage response through altered levels of γ-H2AX after DNA damage in cells, altered sensing in the damage response to cisplatin Importantly, the p53-dependent DNA damage induction of growth arrest and apoptotic targets p21(WAF1) and TRAIL Death Receptor DR5 was significantly attenuated under different experimental conditions with spike S2 and this was associated with greater cell viability in the presence of spike S2 and chemotherapy treatment.


“As loss of p53 function is a known driver of cancer development and confers chemo-resistance, our study provides insight into cellular mechanisms by which SARS-CoV-2 spike S2 may be involved in reducing barriers to tumorigenesis during and post-SARS-CoV-2 infections.”



The report notes that a second study found that Covid mRNA injections also interfere with the immune system, leading to cancer.



In the “Abstract” section of the study, the researchers note:



“…it has been discovered that the mRNA vaccines inhibit essential immunological pathways, thus impairing early interferon signaling.


“Within the framework of COVID-19 vaccination, this inhibition ensures an appropriate spike protein synthesis and a reduced immune activation.”



“Evidence is provided that adding 100 % of N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ) to the mRNA vaccine in a melanoma model stimulated cancer growth and metastasis, while non-modified mRNA vaccines induced opposite results, thus suggesting that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines could aid cancer development.”



Separately, oncology Professor Angus Dalgleish discussed multiple mechanisms the Covid shots instigate which cause cancer.



He mentioned the suppression of T cell responses, increased PD-L1, contamination of plasmid DNA with SV40 enhancer sequence and IgG4 class switch.


Slay News recently reported on a scientist who exposed a coverup of previous studies that indicated the Covid shots cause cancer.



Two scientists published a peer-reviewed study in 2021 showing that Covid mRNA shots cause cancer but their findings were covered up over fears it would fuel so-called “ant-vaccine propaganda.”



One of the Sweden-based scientists has blown the whistle to reveal that their bombshell findings were shut down by officials at the universities they worked for.



Newly unsealed emails have also backed up the allegations, revealing the peer-reviewed study was shut down and hidden from the public.



One leading expert, ‎Dr. Mobeen Syed, estimates that, because of the paper’s retraction, “some 20%-30% of the population were deprived of access to information” that would have led to their refusing the Covid injections “even in the presence of vaccine mandates due to the potential carcinogenicity risk.”



“A further 20% of the population may have declined the product purely based on the existence of this risk.



“It could therefore be reasonably estimated that up to half of the excess cancers, as reported in the ABS provisional mortality reports… might have been prevented had appropriate due diligence and pharmacovigilance been applied,” Syed wrote.



Apparently, the soaring cancers among the Covid vaccinated are not bad news for everyone, however.



As Slay News previously reported, pharmaceutical giant Pfizer is anticipating huge profits from treating the surging cancer cases.



According to Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, skyrocketing cancer cases present an opportunity to make “blockbuster” profits.



Celebrating these new opportunities, Bourla gloated to shareholders that cancer “is our new Covid.”



Meanwhile, a major breakthrough in oncology was recently announced by one of the world’s leading cancer experts.



As Slay News reported, ivermectin, the wonder drug which was demonized after it was found to help Covid patients, has emerged as a groundbreaking treatment for cancer.



World-renowned American surgical oncologist Dr. Kathleen Ruddy announced that the miracle drug has been used to save the lives of terminally ill patients.



Dr. Ruddy revealed that the so-called “horse dewormer,” which posed a threat to the sales of Covid vaccines during the pandemic, has stunned doctors by triggering dramatic recoveries in those suffering late-stage cancer.



Ruddy said the drug was tried on three patients who had exhausted all other cancer treatments.



She revealed that the patients went from their deathbeds to making a full recovery and being completely cancer-free in under a year after taking ivermectin.



Amazingly, Ruddy said every late-stage cancer patient who has tried ivermectin has made a full recovery that left doctors stunned.



She noted that the probably of the patients recovering coincidentally while taking ivermectin was “zero”

“It’s like winning the lottery on the first three tickets you ever buy,” she explained.

link



READ MORE – Renowned Oncologist Drops Bombshell: Ivermectin Cures Cancer

[schwartzie]

Excess Deaths Surged Among Covid-Vaccinated Elderly Patients, Investigation Finds

Frank Bergman
June 12, 2024 - 12:27 pm


A team of researchers has conducted an investigation into the suspiciously large number of excess deaths among elderly patients who had been vaccinated with Covid mRNA shots.



Dr. Matthias Hoben at the University of Alberta as well as at York University, School of Health Policy and Management, led the study.



Hoden and colleagues conducted a population-based, retrospective cohort study involving residents living in both Assisted Living (AL) and Nursing Homes (NH) facilities in Canada.



They examined facilities operated or contracted with the Alberta Provincial Healthcare system to provide publicly funded care in that part of Canada from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2021.



They sought to investigate links between a major surge in excess deaths and the Covid injections, which were rolled out for public use in early 2021.



A significant and growing congregate care option for vulnerable older adults designed to reduce the use of nursing homes, assisted living was less of a focus during the pandemic.



In fact, according to Hoben and his team, only a few US studies examine assisted living facilities.



As part of Hoden’s new study, the researchers sought to assess excess mortality among AL and NH residents with and without dementia or significant cognitive impairment in Alberta, Canada, during the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic.



They compared the data to the excess deaths for 3 years before.



PATRIOTS ARE FIGHTING THE WAR ON FOOD BY STOCKING UP ON REAL ALL-AMERICAN BEEF!

- Get 15% off today with promo code: CLEANCOWS -

The results were just published in the Journal of the American Medical Directors.



In this study, the authors find excess mortality within both AL and NH facilities and suggest a need to focus on infection prevention and control measures across all forms of congregate housing for vulnerable older adults.



A group that’s even more vulnerable during a pandemic: residents with dementia in particular.



In this population-based cohort study, the authors employ the use of sophisticated statistical methods to address what has been a notable knowledge gap: the difference in excess mortality between nursing home (NH) and assisted living (AL) residents overall as well as by dementia/cognitive impairment status.


This is the first evidence beyond a U.S.-based study demonstrating AL residents were affected by excess mortality during the pandemic as severely as (or even more than) NH residents.



According to a Health Canada report, 2021 involved a widespread vaccination program—part of the national countermeasure deployment in response to the national public health emergency in that country.



78% of the Alberta population are classified as fully vaccinated against COVID-19.



And importantly, literature suggests Albertans were mostly in favor of Covid vaccine passports.


As of today, 82.1% of doses delivered to Alberta have been administered, with the majority of vaccinated receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA injection.



Additionally, the vast majority of the elderly were fully vaccinated.



As reported in the Journal of American Medical Directors, Dr. Hoben and his team found a higher incidence of excess mortality in assisted living facilities versus nursing homes.



The authors find weekly peaks in excess deaths coincided with the Covid mRNA vaccine rollout.



Mortality rates were also higher among those with diagnosed dementia or significant cognitive impairment in both assisted living facilities and nursing homes.



The data from this study clearly exhibits a notable spike in excess deaths at the beginning of pandemic wave 4 (September–October 2021).



However, by this time, the elderly population residing in assisted living facilities and nursing homes were universally vaccinated.



The study’s authors found that excess deaths surged far higher among the vaccinated than they ever did during the peak wave of the pandemic before vaccines were released.



According to the study, the mRNA shots killed more than COVID-19 itself, even among the most vulnerable citizens.



The researchers are now calling for access to datasets covering 2022 and 2023 to determine if excess mortality in assisted living facilities and nursing homes extended beyond late 2021.



link

[schwartzie]

Top Analyst Exposes Cover-Up of Mass Deaths Among Vaxxed Children

Frank Bergman
June 13, 2024 - 12:54 pm


A leading data analyst has raised the alarm after uncovering evidence exposing a major cover-up of mass deaths of children who received Covid mRNA shots.



Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) analyst Albert Benavides has blown the whistle after realizing that U.S. government data massively underreports the number of children who died from the injections.



VAERS is the national vaccine safety monitoring system that accepts reports of adverse events after vaccination.



The system is controlled by Democrat President Joe Biden’s Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).



VAERS allows doctors, nurses, healthcare providers, health officials, and vaccine manufacturers to report adverse events that occur following vaccination.



Many VAERS reports list “age unknown” for people who were injured or died following a Covid mRNA injection.



After a deeper investigation into the data, Benavides found that report summaries often reveal the victim’s age.



However, VAERS doesn’t update the reports to reflect this.



When Benavides updated the data with the correct age information, the number of child death reports after Covid shots skyrocketed to alarming levels.


Among the causes of death listed in reports submitted to VAERS for Covid-vaccinated children were fetal deaths and miscarriages, sudden cardiac arrest, sudden death, and suicides.



However, these reports do not count toward the total number of child deaths listed in the official U.S. government data because the victims’ ages are officially listed as “unknown,” according to Benavides.



Benavides reviewed the data for his website, VAERSAware.com.



He provided links to many of these “unknown age” child death reports on his site.


As of May 31, VAERS data lists 197 child deaths following Covid mRNA vaccination.



However, Benavides warns:



“There are approximately 418 properly documented deaths in children below age 18.



“There are an additional approximate 120 kid deaths where the summary narrative states ‘child, infant, neonate, baby.’”



Benavides identified these “unknown age” reports using an algorithm and “manual intervention.”



Benavides said his findings indicate “the current total is about 538” child deaths.



He said undercounting is not unusual for VAERS, however.



The data expert notes that his research shows that “30% of all COVID-19 reports in VAERS have an ‘unknown age.’”



“There seems to be at least one hidden kid death in every VAERS update,” Benavides said.



A 2011 Harvard report found that less than 1% of all adverse events are reported to VAERS.



When the number of unreported child deaths is taken into consideration, the mortality rate soars to shocking levels.



Alarmingly, Benavides said child deaths appear to be concealed at a higher than average rate compared to reports of adult deaths.



According to a paper by Benavides and evolutionary biologist Herve Seligmann, Ph.D., child reports have more missing ages in the VAERS age field by proportion or percentage compared to older cohorts.



“Seligmann analyzed the missing age fields with properly documented summary narratives and has quantified that the younger age cohorts have a higher propensity for missing age than the adults,” Benavides said.



However, Benavides believes that the issues in the data could not be an oversight and argues that the deaths were “hidden” as part of a cover-up.



“These missing ages do not seem organic, especially for the children,” he warns.



Benavides added that they are, “dare I say, hidden.”



Benavides suggested Biden’s CDC and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which administrate VAERS, are obfuscating the true death figures for vaccinated children.



“If the age is properly documented in the summary narrative, why wouldn’t a managerial decision be made to ethically update an empty age field and correct the submitter’s oversight?” Benavides said.



“It is my expert opinion as a former HMO claims auditor, proper age may have been populated in the age field upon submission, but in the minutiae of the adjudication process, the age field data element was deleted or disappeared.”



This news comes after a major new study has just confirmed that Covid mRNA shots are the sole cause of the soaring cases of heart failure among children.



Cases of cardiac-related deaths and heart failure such as myocarditis and pericarditis have been soaring around the world since the Covid injections were rolled out to the public in early 2021.



Myocarditis and pericarditis are inflammatory conditions of the heart and are generally considered to be rare, especially among children.



Severe cases can lead to serious complications and even death.



Both conditions are known side effects of the Covid mRNA shots.



In response, health officials and the corporate media have been pushing the claim that the COVID-19 virus, and not the shots, is behind the phenomenon.



However, a new large-scale study from renowned scientists at the prestigious University of Oxford has just confirmed that myocarditis and pericarditis only appear in children and adolescents after Covid vaccination and not after infection from the virus.



As Slay News reported, the new study looked at the official government data of more than 1 million English children and adolescents aged between five and 11 and 12 and 15.



The study compared vaccinated and unvaccinated subjects.



The researchers also took into account the number of doses of vaccine received.



In detailing their findings, the researchers wrote:



“All myocarditis and pericarditis events during the study period occurred in vaccinated individuals.”



The study also noted that hospitalization related to COVID-19 was extremely rare among children and adolescents.



Additionally, there were no deaths from the virus recorded among the entire subject population.



link

[schwartzie]

Covid Shots Destroyed Fertility of Young Men, Study Finds

Frank Bergman
June 14, 2024 - 12:23 pm


A disturbing new study has revealed that Covid mRNA shots have caused widespread harm to fertility rates in young men.



The study, conducted by leading researchers in Denmark, analyzed semen samples from 7,000 men aged 18 to 45 years old.



The researchers note that roughly half of the participants were aged 18 to 24.



During the study, the researchers examined the quality of semen in potential donors in Denmark between 2017 and 2022.



Just over two-thirds of the men in the trial were not accepted as donors; their sperm parameters were measured only once.



1839 men were accepted as donors, and their semen was tested up to eight times throughout the study period.



This enabled the researchers to track individual donors over the years to ensure that trends were not simply the result of outliers but expressed a general decline across the board.



What the study found is that semen volume, sperm concentration, and total sperm count did not change significantly over the years monitored.



However, both motile sperm concentration and total motile sperm count (TMSC) decreased significantly among those accepted and rejected as donors.


The decline in motile sperm (sperm capable of independent movement) greatly concerned the researchers.



In the study’s paper, they stressed that this, “has potential implications for human fertility, because sperm motility is correlated with the probability of conception.”



The study revealed that motile sperm concentration dropped by 16 percent, and TMSC by 22 percent, among the entire donor pool, and by 17 percent and 21 percent among those accepted as donors.



However, the drop was only seen between 2019 and 2022, the final three years of the study.


Furthermore, the declines were also seen within the categories of sperm (which are graded from A to D with regard to their motility).



The researchers commented that this suggested “a general decline in motility and not simply a decline in the concentration of one type of sperm.”



In fact, the concentration of grade-a sperm declined even more sharply than the average across the study, by 30 percent between 2019 and 2022 in all donor candidates.



Looking at those donors who made at least eight donations between 2019 and 2022, 425 donors saw their parameters improve during those years, whereas 587 saw their parameters worsen.



Throughout the study, the years 2020, 2021, and 2022 are cited as those during which changes for the worse were seen.



However, the years 2017 to 2019 and 2020 to 2022 were grouped together, meaning the spike in the final three years didn’t necessarily begin in 2020.



The researchers sought to examine what happened between 2020 and 2022 that could impact male fertility in such a way.



They note that the Covid pandemic must be considered and suggest:



Such a sharp decline in sperm motility to occur over a relatively short length of time suggests that external factors were likely to have played a role.



In this context, we note that the observed decline in sperm motility roughly corresponds to the onset of the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic.



However, they then note that the COVID-19 virus itself is not a likely culprit.



They note that no samples were taken from men with Covid symptoms or a diagnosis.



So, they tentatively conclude that lifestyle changes brought on by lockdowns could have played a role:



We should be mindful that many other aspects of life also altered around this time.



For example, widespread lockdowns may have led to changes in working patterns, diet, and levels of physical activity.



Several studies have shown that each of these factors can impact sperm motility…



However, men (and women) have been becoming more sedentary, with worsening diets, for many years.



The study’s authors actually stress that:



… despite popular media often reporting that semen quality in humans has declined in recent decades, the question is still very much unresolved.



They cite various studies showing that in general, over the past decades, the situation has not changed significantly, despite concerns about “climate change,” microplastics, and other factors.



However, the researchers are unable to link climate change, lockdowns, COVID-19, or any of the other suggestions to their observations.



While the study lumps 2017-2019 together, and then 2020-2022 together, the data were actually gathered and sorted according to year.



Yet, this only becomes apparent while observing the study’s graphs and tables.



What the study doesn’t mention is that 2019 was something of an anomaly.



Compared with 2018, the figures for 2020 don’t represent a significant drop.



However, from 2021 onward, the motility counts plummet significantly.



In fact, the drop from 2021 to 2022 among accepted donors (that is, the healthier members of the study), is quite dramatic.



The results here are less clear-cut, but it’s noteworthy that there is little sign of any recovery as time passes.



Alarmingly, the data shows that things are getting steadily worse.



In the study’s graphs, Figure 6 tracks individual donors who made eight or more donations throughout the period.



A and B represent one person each:







C and D show each individual donor as a trajectory:







From D it seems quite clear that men were doing worse from 2021 onward.



The authors of this study cite many other interesting studies in this area from past years.



However, one they fail to cite is the Gat study that was published toward the end of 2021.



The Gat study is of particular interest as it also found alarming changes in motility which were closely correlated to the Covid mRNA injections.



Unlike other studies that attempted to debunk a correlation, the Gat study was a (relatively) long-term study.



The researchers followed trial participants for over 150 days, unlike other studies which stopped after just two months or less.



Gat and colleagues concluded, using average figures, that “most” people’s key sperm parameters were more-or-less back to normal by half a year after the shots.



However, their data revealed that a significant subset of men were actually doing very badly even six months after their last dose.



Things were still getting worse when the trial stopped.



Now we have another study out of Denmark showing similar results, as can be seen in images C and D from Figure 6 — some men are doing better, and a few are doing much better.



But many more are doing much worse.



The researchers warn that the fertility of young men is being destroyed as their sperm quality declines dramatically.



Over 80 percent of Danish citizens were injected with the Covid shots.



The nation vaccinated the public with an average of 2.24 doses per person.



The figure means that of those who were injected, a large number also had at least one booster shot.



The authors of this latest study are now calling for a full investigation into the decline in fertility parameters in light of their findings.



link

[schwartzie]

Renowned Pathologist Raises Alarm over ‘Runaway Turbo Cancers’ Among Vaxxed

Frank Bergman
June 14, 2024 - 12:54 pm


A world-renowned pathologist has raised the alarm over soaring numbers of “sudden deaths,” cases of “autoimmune disease,” and “runaway turbo cancers” he’s seeing among those vaccinated with Covid mRNA shots.



Dr. Ryan Cole spoke out to warn the public that cases of turbo cancer among the Covid-vaxxed are going to continue rising for many years to come.



In a new interview, he revealed that the injections and the spike protein they produce and destroying the human body from the inside out.



Specifically, he says the shots are breaking down the immune system and allowing deadly diseases to develop and spread in ways that have never been seen before.



“The biggest problem we’re going to be fighting for a long time is chronic autoimmune disease,” he reveals.



“These [Covid mRNA] injections were contaminated with DNA,” Cole explains.



“They were made with a synthetic RNA.



“And they weren’t just making spike proteins, they were Frankenstein proteins as well.



“When the immune system is exposed to proteins that it’s not supposed to see, then it starts to go haywire.


“So certainly we’ve seen some excess sudden death, and we’ve seen death from all causes, increased around the world, after the rollout of these genetic injections that were never a vaccine.



“They were experimental genetic injections,” the celebrated pathologist notes.



“And so [we’ll see] a lot of autoimmune disease for a long time and decreased fertility rates.



“We’re already seeing [this] in many countries around the world.


“And what I noted early on was we were seeing a lot of runaway turbo cancers.



“We’re going to continue to see that, sadly.”



WATCH:

FULL VIDEO:



Pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole on Unsettled Covid-19 Crimes

As he noted in the interview, Dr. Cole has been raising the alarm about turbo cancers since 2021, shortly after the Covid shots were rolled out for public use.



The Boise, Idaho doctor has found an increase in rapidly developing and spreading cancers among patients who had received the Covid mRNA shots.



On March 18, 2021, Dr. Cole reported to the public, in a video produced by the Idaho state government’s “Capitol Clarity” project, that he is seeing a massive “uptick” in various autoimmune diseases and cancers in patients who have been injected with the shots.



“Since January 1, in the laboratory, I’m seeing a 20 times increase of endometrial cancers over what I see on an annual basis,” reported Cole in the video clip shared on X.



“I’m not exaggerating at all because I look at my numbers year over year, I’m like ‘Gosh, I’ve never seen this many endometrial cancers before’,” he continued.



Explaining his findings at the March 18 event, Cole told Idahoans that the vaccines seem to be causing serious autoimmune issues, in a way he described as a “reverse HIV” response.



Cole explained that two types of cells are required for adequate immune system function: “Helper T-cells,” also called “CD4 cells,” and “killer T-cells,” often known as “CD8 cells.”



According to Cole, in patients with HIV, there is a massive suppression of “helper T-cells” which cause immune system functions to plummet, and leave the patient susceptible to a variety of illnesses.



Similarly, Cole describes, “post-vaccine, what we are seeing is a drop in your killer T-cells, in your CD8 cells,”



“And what do CD8 cells do? They keep all other viruses in check,” he continued.



Much like HIV causes immune system disruption by suppressing CD4 “helper” cells, the same thing happens when CD8 “killer” cells are suppressed.



In Dr. Cole’s expert view, this is what seems to be the case with the COVID-19 jabs.



Cole goes on to state that as a result of this vaccine-induced “killer T-cell” suppression, he is seeing an “uptick” of not only endometrial cancer, but also melanomas, as well as herpes, shingles, mono, and a “huge uptick” in HPV when “looking at the cervical biopsies of women.”



As Slay News has reported, a growing number of studies have now linked increased cancer cases to the Covid mRNA shots.



Two new studies have just been published showing links between the deadly disease and the injections.



The two recent studies both confirm Cole’s warnings and spike proteins and damaged autoimmune symptoms triggering turbo cancers in the vaxxed.



link

[schwartzie]

Healthcare Officials Told Not to Resuscitate Elderly Covid Patients, Whistleblower Testifies

Frank Bergman
June 15, 2024 - 12:23 pm


Healthcare officials were told not to resuscitate elderly Covid patients during the pandemic, according to a shocking whistleblower testimony.



Paramedics and emergency medical technicians (EMTs) were told not to “try too hard” to resuscitate over 70 years old.



However, the whistleblower says health officials were planning to lower the age to 50 in order to meet the “demand.”



The order appears to have been an effort to boost the number of deaths attributed to COVID-19 during the pandemic.



At the time, health officials and corporate media outlets promoted reports of alleged mass deaths from the virus, claiming that hospitals were “overwhelmed.”



However, these claims were never supported with real evidence and hospital workers have since claimed that they were no busier than normal.



During the ongoing Scottish COVID-19 Inquiry, several whistleblowers have testified that Covid death figures were faked.



Some have even testified that hospitals were killing patients and listing their deaths as being caused by Covid in order to boost the numbers.



Medical commentator John Campbell, Ph.D., analyzed the testimony of a Scottish paramedic who provided a whistleblowing testimony during the inquiry.


A clinical adviser paramedic, Robert Pollock, told the Scottish COVID-19 Inquiry that healthcare workers received a letter stating they “would be given full support” if they allowed Covid patients over the age of 70 to die without resuscitating them.



Scottish health officials in March 2020 told paramedics they would be fully supported if they did not “try too hard” to resuscitate patients over the age of 70, Pollock testified.



After analyzing the testimony, Dr. Campbell said:



“We’re talking about people not being resuscitated after a particular age, which of course is patent ageism.”



Pollock, who worked as a frontline paramedic during the pandemic, delivered the testimony and provided a sworn affidavit to the Scottish COVID-19 Inquiry.



The inquiry heard testimony from government officials and ordinary citizens over a span of more than 50 days.



It investigated failures in Scotland’s pandemic response — including how hospitals administered dangerous end-of-life protocols, including pressuring patients to sign DNR (do not resuscitate) orders.



According to Pollock’s signed written statement:



“Scottish Ambulance Service employees received a letter by email on Thursday 26 March 2020 from the Health and Care Professions Council which stipulated to every registrant that they realised there would be difficult decisions to be made by healthcare professionals, but they would be given full support to make decisions [without] normal protocols.”



According to Pollock, this practice is known as the “toe tagging” of patients based on their age.



He said they were ordered to “‘not try too hard to resuscitate them’ over a certain age.”



Pollock expanded on these claims in his testimony before the inquiry.



“My recollection is absolutely clear,” he said.



“There was discussions around the age grouping for toe-tagging, for want of a better word.



‘People … over a certain age now, your normal attempts at resuscitation would be minimized.”



According to Pollock, these instructions came even though “there is no age limit in Scotland for resuscitation of a patient.”



“This was very frightening for workers who have family members in that age group and it caused a lot of concern and anxiety for people who were used to doing their best to preserve life,” Pollock wrote.



“The process of resuscitation has evolved, and we have a high success rate.



“This did not go down well with members.”



“Staff morale was severely affected, as they were trained to preserve life, they were paid lifesavers but at the time, they were told to do the complete opposite,” he added.



“This terrified staff that they might have to do this against their normal training and their normal desire to help.



“This was not a process that anyone welcomed.”



Pollock said there were “rumors” within the Scottish Ambulance Services “that the government had a plan to reduce the age group to those over 50s if Covid levels reached their expected peak and the plan for over 70s did not result in a significant enough drop in medical demand.”



Pollock said such a plan had been “absolutely in discussion.”



Campbell, who holds a Ph.D. in nursing, analyzed Pollock’s statement and testimony.



“This was not a process that anyone welcomed,” Campbell repeated.



“The people that sent out these emails, what was their thinking?



“What was their thinking based on, and what was the rationale for what they were doing?”



In his testimony, Pollock also implied that these orders had been issued to the Scottish Ambulance Service from above.



“They weren’t decision-making on their own,” he said.



“It sounds to me like some decisions were made far too quickly, almost,” Campbell said.



He added that Pollock’s testimony raises questions that require further investigation.



“We need more information,” Campbell said.



“We need to do qualitative research on this and then get quantitative figures out of it because Mr. Pollock said he didn’t know how many people that’s affected.



“But that information could well be derived.”



Campbell suggested similar policies were likely implemented in other countries.



However, the lack of a similar public inquiry in most countries means the information might never be revealed publicly.



“This is an excellent inquiry and the counselors on it, the lawyers on it, are asking sensitive questions and getting information from ordinary people,” Campbell said.



“People’s ordinary experience, not high-powered politicians, just people that experienced things and often suffered during the pandemic time.”



“It’s a pity other countries aren’t doing the same,” he added.



WATCH:






link

[schwartzie]

Scientists Raise Alarm over Shocking ‘Death Signal’ Linked to Covid Shots
Frank Bergman
June 16, 2024 - 12:54 pm


A multi-center team of celebrated medical scientists has raised the alarm after discovering that Covid mRNA shots are responsible for a shocking “excess death signal” behind the global surge in mortality rates.

The peer-reviewed study was published in the prestigious Vaccines Journal and conducted by renowned Taiwanese scientists specializing in clinical pathology, infectious diseases, and tropical medicine.

Their systematic investigation into severe adverse events post-Covid mRNA injection raises significant concerns about the current mass vaccination policy.

Specifically, the team’s discovery of an “excess death signal” has sent shockwaves through the scientific community.

Ying-Fei Yang, and Sher Singh, both with National Taiwan University and colleagues center their investigation on Taiwan’s vaccine administration and adverse event reporting.

This data was then compared to global statistics.

Tapping into and leveraging data from Taiwan’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and global vaccination data, the authors study vaccine safety and the public health implications of vaccination strategies from local and global perspectives.

Pointing out the island nation of Taiwan’s “proactive approach, resulting in high vaccination rates,” the authors suggest a good opportunity for a case study for the monitoring and management of vaccine-related adverse events.

The comparative analysis reveals that safety monitoring remains critical for maintaining public trust.

In the study’s paper, the scientists raise substantial concerns about surging deaths among the vaccinated, particularly among the elderly.

They note that the surging deaths are revealed in the Taiwan Food and Drug Administration’s VAERS.

The researchers found that excess deaths surged after the deployment of COVID-19 countermeasures.

Both providing insights into the safety profiles of various COVID-19 vaccines while also supporting more investigation into the implications of adverse event reporting rates for vaccine policy and public health strategies, the study’s authors point to a disturbing reality: a surge in excess death after the mass vaccination campaign was completed.

The authors pepper the study’s paper with concerning language about the safety of the Covid shots.

As of February 23, 2023, Taiwan’s Central Epidemic Command Center (CECC) reported that 94% of the population had received at least one dose of a Covid shot.

In addition, 76.3% received a “booster” shot and 23% had been injected with a third dose.

In the “Public Health Outcomes and Concerns” section of the study, Ying-Fei Yang, Sher Singh, and colleagues report on the estimated cumulative excess deaths per 100,000 people in Taiwan.

They found that excess deaths surged after the vaccines were rolled out to the public and not before, suggesting the injections were far more dangerous than the virus they were supposed to protect against.

The authors report that “after 26 September 2022, the estimated excess deaths in Taiwan” skyrocketed.

Raising a concern, the authors found that “the slope of cumulative excess death of Taiwan increased suddenly after 31 March 2022.”

By early 2022, the pandemic was over but the global mass vaccination campaign was still in full swing.

Reporting that Taiwan FDA’s adverse event data represents only the “reported” cases of deaths, they acknowledge that the repository cannot be conclusive on the reasons for the higher excess deaths observed after March 31, 2022.

The researchers continue:

“Whether the mutation of the virus and/or the policy implementation is causative should be further explored.”

Here policy implementation could imply vaccination policy given that’s a key topic of this paper.

In fact, acknowledging the potential risk associated with the vaccines and associated policies they articulate:

“To mitigate the risk from the perspective of the vaccine program, development of evidence-based recommendations is key to enhancing the safety and efficacy of vaccines.”

Clearly the authors are concerned about both excess deaths and serious adverse event-related deaths and Covid shots.

They continue:

“Such recommendations could extend to improving surveillance systems to better capture adverse events, which is crucial for the timely detection and response to potential vaccine-related issues.”

Again, calling for “enhanced surveillance” the authors point out that not only would this support “immediate risk management, but also contribute to the long-term goal of strengthening vaccine safety systems.”

They continue by warning pressuring the public into taking experimental vaccines can have devastating consequences and call on governments to investigate such tactics.

“This understanding becomes the foundation upon which individuals can make informed decisions regarding their health and vaccination choices,” they argue.

“Furthermore, it is critical to recognize and address demographic-specific responses to vaccines.

“The young and elderly populations may react differently to vaccines, necessitating adjustments in vaccination strategies and post-vaccination monitoring for these groups.”

They conclude policy frameworks should be more refined ensuring “rigorous post-vaccination monitoring, especially in age groups or populations that have reported higher incidences of adverse reactions.”

Of course, the rate of elderly deaths as reported in the vaccine adverse event reporting system was substantially higher.


link

[schwartzie]

Elite Scientists Link Sudden Cardiac Deaths to mRNA Shots

Frank Bergman
June 17, 2024 - 12:53 pm


An elite team of Japanese scientists has just uncovered a smoking gun after conducting a major study on the autopsies of people who have recently suffered sudden cardiac deaths.



The trio of heavy-hitting physician-scientists running the Shiga University of Medical Science, Department of Legal Medicine in Japan found that Covid mRNA shots were responsible for the deaths of those they examined.



The scientists, led by Associate Professor Mami Nakamura, MD, PhD, analyzed the deaths of 1,513 people who had died after the first or second SARS-CoV-2 vaccination program from February 2021 to February 2022.



The team of researchers, which also includes Dr. Marin Takaso, MD, PhD and Professor Masahito Hitosugi, MD, PhD, published their explosive findings in the peer-reviewed Journal of Japanese Society of Occupational and Disaster Medicine Vol. 71 No. 6.



The scientists warn that their findings show that the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW) failed to adequately explain the causal relationship between these deaths and vaccination, thus “leading to vaccine hesitancy and distrust of the ministry.”



The Japanese team analyzed deaths between May 21 to March 2022 and found that cardiac deaths spiked after people received Pfizer’s mRNA injection.



“A comparison of the deaths reported in association with the different vaccines reveals the rate of death reported after the use of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is orders of magnitude higher,” they note in the study’s paper.



The authors raise multiple points, including that the lack of detailed analyses by the Japanese MHLF leads to fear, uncertainty doubt, and vaccine hesitancy.



They report this because it appears to show that governments are covering up deaths that may be linked to the vaccines.


However, these highly respected medical professionals demonstrate a high likelihood of direct mRNA vaccine-induced cardiac-related deaths.



Published in the peer-reviewed Journal of Japanese Society of Occupational and Disaster Medicine Vol. 71 No. 6, the trio of respected medical researchers reports on the autopsy results for 15 deaths occurring within one week after receiving the first or second SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in Shiga Prefecture, situated to the east of Kyoto, on the island of Honshu.



The Prefecture has a population of 1.4 million.



Reporting that eleven cases were vaccinated with the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2/Comirnaty) and three with the Moderna (mRNA-1273/Spikevax) product, the authors note that one case number’s vaccine brand is not known.


The authors report that four of the cases after studying the autopsies revealed no “morphological changes which were presumed to be sudden cardiac deaths.”



Three cases involved “intracranial hemorrhage and infectious disease.”



Another three cases clearly presented “morphological changes that caused sudden cardiac death.”



Other causes of death included one case of cancer and another one linked to trauma.



Importantly, the Shiga University of Medical Science found that with seven cases, “symptoms of the disease that caused death preceded vaccination.”



And they report with certainty that two of the mortality cases “were basically caused by factors other than vaccination.”



In the case of number 1, “the 60-year-old man who died within 24 hours of his first vaccination,” the scientists found,



“Even though less than a day had elapsed from the time of death to its discovery, the body was highly decomposed.”



Diagnosing the cause of death of this 60-year-old deceased man, the authors find, “The cause of death was diagnosed as non-clostridial gas gangrene.”



This is a rare necrotizing entity often linked with an underlying disease, such as diabetes, and has a high mortality rate.”



Case two is a 48-year-old man who died 4 hours after his first vaccination.



The authors find “characteristic histopathologic findings of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy were observed at autopsy.”



Among the deaths reported by Japan’s Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, “it is possible that a causal relationship to vaccination can be excluded with adequate investigation, as in these 2 cases,” the scientists note.



“However, the autopsy rate in Japan is quite low.



“Therefore, physicians involved in diagnosing death should rethink the process for death diagnosis and the death investigation system itself.”



The scientists continue by examining sudden cardiac deaths shortly after Covid shots.



The team identifies myocarditis and pericarditis as known complications of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in young males, and thrombosis and thrombocytopenia have also been suggested to have an association with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.



Although Klein et al. reported that the risk of hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke does not rise within 21 days after vaccination, there have also been reports of hypertension occurring after vaccination.



The highly respected team therefore declares:



“Thus, it is undeniable that intracranial hemorrhages and cardiac sudden deaths are caused by vaccination-induced hypertension.”



The authors disclose in the journal the performance of 17 autopsies, including two persons who died more than one week after vaccination.



The number of autopsies appears to cover a large proportion of the post-vaccination deaths in Shiga Prefecture.



The authors feel confident that they were able to diagnose the 15 cases reported in this study as “adequately diagnosed at autopsy and provide important data for discussing the causal relationship between disease and the vaccines.”



However, “99% of the 1,513 deaths reported by MHLW, the association with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was deemed ‘un-assessable’ because the diagnosis of the cause of death was considered debatable due to insufficient investigation.



The authors note subpar autopsy and postmortem analysis in Japan.



With only 128 cases (7.02%) and postmortem computed tomography performed in just 22%, they do dismiss a couple of the cases they know were highly likely not to be related to the vaccine.



The problem: “The death investigation system in Japan, with its low autopsy rate and inadequate diagnosis of the cause of death, hinders proper understanding of vaccination.”



Given the public health nature of vaccination, Nakamura, Hitosugi, and Takaso declare that for the “public to properly understand vaccines, it is important to investigate adverse events including any cause of death in people who have recently been vaccinated.”



The authors mean here that these deaths should not be systematically ignored as is the case in America.



The Japanese Society of Legal Medicine issued a statement in July 2022, that autopsy of post-vaccination sudden death is strongly recommended



The study from Japan comes as another team of scientists in Taiwan has just raised the alarm after discovering that Covid mRNA shots are responsible for a shocking “excess death signal” behind the global surge in mortality rates.



As Slay News reported, the peer-reviewed study was published in the prestigious Vaccines Journal and conducted by renowned Taiwanese scientists specializing in clinical pathology, infectious diseases, and tropical medicine.



Their systematic investigation into severe adverse events post-Covid mRNA injection raises significant concerns about the current mass vaccination policy.



Specifically, the team’s discovery of an “excess death signal” has sent shockwaves through the scientific community.



They found that excess deaths surged after the vaccines were rolled out to the public and not before, suggesting the injections were far more dangerous than the virus they were supposed to protect against.


link

[schwartzie]

Major Study: Covid Shots Trigger Psychiatric Adverse Events

Frank Bergman
June 17, 2024 - 12:23 pm


A large-scale study of two million vaccinated people has uncovered evidence that Covid mRNA shots trigger psychiatric adverse events.



The peer-reviewed study was conducted by top Korean scientists and published in the world-renowned Nature Journal.



Led by Eun Mi Chu from the School of Medicine Ewha Womans University in Seoul, South Korea, the team of researchers analyzed the data of two million Korean citizens who had received at least one dose of a Covid mRNA shot.



The study looked into serious adverse events (AEs) of a psychiatric nature linked to COVID-19 vaccination.



The researchers noted that, while evidence associated with an increased risk of psychiatric manifestations does exist after viral infections including COVID-19, such incidence–psychiatric adverse events (AEs) post COVID-19 vaccination as documented in various studies and reports is less clear.



Enter this study, an investigation probing for psychiatric AEs after COVID-19 vaccination from a large population-based cohort in Seoul, South Korea.



The researchers employed statistical tools such as hazard ratios in a population of over 2 million Koreans to determine COVID-19 vaccination is associated with several psychiatric events.



This is an observational study not designed to prove causation.



The team used real-world official government data in the Korean National Health Insurance Service (KNHIS) claims database starting January 1, 2021.


The study investigators recruited 50% of this Seoul-resident population randomly selected.



The vast majority of Korean adults were vaccinated against COVID-19.



Multiple vaccines were used in Korea with the majority of doses being represented by the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine.



The study population included a total of 2,027,353 participants from the KNHIS claims database.


They were divided into two groups according to COVID-19 vaccination.



Mi Chun and co-authors assessed the cumulative incidences per 10,000 of psychiatric AEs in one week, two weeks, one month, and three months post-COVID-19 vaccination.



The authors measured hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% Confidence interval (Cis) of psychiatric AEs for the vaccinated population.



Importantly, the South Korean investigators report the “cumulative incidence of depression, anxiety, dissociative, stress-related, and somatoform disorders, sleep disorders, and sexual disorders at three months following COVID-19 vaccination were higher in the vaccination group than no vaccination group.”



JOIN THE FIGHT - DONATE TO SLAY NEWS TODAY!

The serious conditions of “schizophrenia and bipolar disorders showed lower cumulative incidence in the vaccination group than in the non-vaccinated group.”



The authors report, “Depression (HR [95% CI] = 1.683 [1.520–1.863]), anxiety, dissociative, stress-related, and somatoform disorders (HR [95% CI] = 1.439 [1.322–1.568]), and sleep disorders (HR [95% CI] = 1.934 [1.738–2.152]) showed increased risks after COVID-19 vaccination, whereas the risks of schizophrenia (HR [95% CI] = 0.231 [0.164–0.326]) and bipolar disorder (HR [95% CI] = 0.672 [0.470–0.962]).”



The outcomes of this study reveal:



“COVID-19 vaccination increased the risks of depression, anxiety, dissociative, stress-related, and somatoform disorders, and sleep disorders while reducing the risk of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.”



The authors suggest providers be cognizant to proceed with caution when vaccinating vulnerable people vulnerable to psychiatric AEs.



The authors conclude with an alarming statement:



“Our findings suggested that the relationship between COVID-19 vaccination and mental illness may be underestimated along with the complexity of its impact on mental health.



“Thus, close observation and special caution are necessary for administering additional COVID-19 vaccinations to populations vulnerable to psychiatric AE.”



link