The Covid Scamdemic and Resulting Fallout

[maybetoday]

IT BEGINS: Kansas Sues Pfizer — State Alleges Company Knew of ‘Serious Adverse Events’ Yet Marketed COVID-19 Vaccine as ‘Safe’

By Jim Hᴏft
Jun. 17, 2024 4:20 pm

Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach announced Monday he is suing pharmaceutical giant Pfizer for misleading Kansas residents about the safety and efficacy of its COVID-19 vaccine.



During a press conference in Topeka, alongside Deputy Attorney General Fran Oleen and Assistant Attorneys General Kaley Schrader and Melanie Jack, Kobach detailed the allegations lodged against Pfizer.



“Pfizer made multiple misleading statements to deceive the public about its vaccine at a time when Americans needed the truth,” said Kobach.



The complaint, lodged today in Thomas County District Court, accuses Pfizer of misleading Kansans about the vaccines’ risks, including potential harm to pregnant women and the risk of myocarditis. The suit further alleges that Pfizer falsely claimed its vaccine was effective against COVID variants, despite evidence to the contrary.



Pfizer is also accused of suggesting its vaccine prevented COVID-19 transmission despite admitting it had not studied whether its vaccine halted transmission.



The State of Kansas outlines several specific allegations in its lawsuit:



1. Pfizer misled the public that it had a “safe and effective” COVID-19 vaccine.



2. Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was safe even though it knew its COVID-19 vaccine was connected to serious adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis, failed pregnancies, and deaths. Pfizer concealed this critical safety information from the public.



3. Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was effective even though it knew its COVID19 vaccine waned over time and did not protect against COVID-19 variants. Pfizer concealed this critical effectiveness information from the public.



4. Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine would prevent transmission of COVID-19 even though it knew it never studied the effect of its vaccine on transmission of COVID-19.



5. To keep the public from learning the truth, Pfizer worked to censor speech on social media that questioned Pfizer’s claims about its COVID-19 vaccine.



6. Pfizer’s misrepresentations of a “safe and effective” vaccine resulted in record company revenue of approximately $75 billion from COVID-19 vaccine sales in just two years.



7. Pfizer’s actions and statements relating to its COVID-19 vaccine violated previous consent judgments with the State of Kansas.



8. Pfizer’s actions and statements relating to its COVID-19 vaccine violated the Kansas Consumer Protection Act, K.S.A. 50-623 et seq., regardless of whether any individual consumer ultimately received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.



9. Pfizer must be held accountable for falsely representing the benefits of its COVID19 vaccine while concealing and suppressing the truth about its vaccine’s safety risks, waning effectiveness, and inability to prevent transmission.



You can read the complaint here.



WATCH:

The Gateway Pundit previously reported that in a case involving the Health Freedom Defense Fund and other plaintiffs versus the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD), the court acknowledged the plaintiffs’ claim that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines do not meet the traditional definition of vaccines because they do not prevent the spread of the virus but only mitigate symptoms.



In its decision, the 9th Circuit highlighted that the district court had misapplied the precedent set by Jacobson v. Massachusetts, which upheld mandatory smallpox vaccinations due to their effectiveness in preventing disease spread. The court noted that the plaintiffs’ claims, taken as true at this stage, suggest that the COVID-19 vaccines do not effectively “prevent the spread” of COVID-19, thereby warranting further consideration of their allegations.

link

[schwartzie]

Top Investigator: ’80 to 90% of Covid Deaths Are Fraud’

Frank Bergman
June 18, 2024 - 12:54 pm



An eminent investigative author has warned that the vast majority of deaths attributed to COVID-19 in official government figures have been faked.



John Beaudoin, Sr., the author of the exposé books “The Real CDC” and “The CDC Memorandum,” has conducted a major study into government data regarding deaths.



Beaudoin revealed that he has now analyzed the death certificates of 1.4 million Americans, which he says “represents 5% of the U.S. population.”



According to Beaudoin’s investigations, “80 to 90 percent of the Covid deaths” he’s examined “are fraud.”



He reveals that the vast majority of people who have COVID-19 listed as their cause of death actually died from “drug overdoses and car accidents” in addition to old and sick people who were “mistreated by hospitals.”



Beaudoin revealed his findings during a bombshell with Dr. Randy Bock, MD.



“Covid, as I’ve proven in my book and in ‘The CDC Memorandum,’ a second publication, 80 to 90 percent of the Covid deaths are fraud,” Beaudoin states.



“They were drug overdoses and car accidents and car accidents.



“And they were a bunch of old people dying out of neglect and being mistreated by hospitals.

“They weren’t given antibiotics when they had a bacterial infection in their lungs.



“These things all combined through a coercion of doctors from the American Board of Internal Medicine, Family Medicine, Pediatrics, the state licensing boards, the federation of state medical boards, the NIH, FDA, CDC, all said the same thing: ‘You will use this protocol or we’re going to suspend your license.’



“And you can find that on the web,” Beaudoin notes.



“the letter is still there.


“It’s a joint statement by the CEOs of the American Board of Internal Medicine and the other two I mentioned.



“So with regard to all of the hospital protocols, I call it murder,” Beaudoin declares.



“Because, at some level, somebody knew what they were doing.



“More than half a million people killed by hospital protocols,” he explains.



“Another half a million killed by what they call a ‘vaccine.’



“I have all the data,” Beaudoin reveals.



“I can show it.



“I now have 1.4 million unredacted, non-redacted death certificates that represent 5 percent of the U.S. population.



“It’s the biggest study, the biggest database ever in anything Covid.”



WATCH:

Hospitals have long been accused of profiting from each “Covid death” they process.



In 2020, then-Minnesota State Senator Scott Jensen, a Republican, raised the alarm over financial incentives linked to Covid death reporting.



During an appearance on Fox News with Laura Ingram, Jensen, who is also a doctor, revealed a very disturbing piece of information.



Dr. Jensen says the American Medical Association has been “encouraging” doctors to overcount Covid deaths across the country.



Jensen received a 7-page document that showed him how to fill out a death certificate as a “COVID-19 diagnosis” even when there isn’t a lab test confirming the diagnosis.



“Right now Medicare is determining that if you have a COVID-19 admission to the hospital you get $13,000,” Jensen said.



“If that COVID-19 patient goes on a ventilator you get $39,000, three times as much.



“Nobody can tell me after 35 years in the world of medicine that sometimes those kinds of things impact what we do.”



In addition, Democrat President Joe Biden’s Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) added a 20% bonus on the entire hospital bill if doctors administered Remdesivir.



Remdesivir, an alleged Covid treatment injection, is a drug so toxic it earned the infamous nickname, “Run Death Is Near.”

link

[schwartzie]

Expert: Covid Shots Are Bioweapons, Not Vaccines

Frank Bergman
June 19, 2024 - 12:23 pm



Celebrated virology expert Dr. David Martin has warned the public that Covid mRNA shots are, in fact, bioweapons, and not “vaccines” as they’ve been led to believe.



In a new interview, Dr. Martin explains why the injections do not qualify as traditional vaccines.



Alarmingly, Martin revealed that the mRNA shots cause the body to trigger a deadly “scheduled toxin” that will cause serious injuries and possible death long after the injection was received.



Martin listed several points regarding the Covid shots that expose their true nature.



Pfizer BioNTech and Moderna both knew the injections were not vaccines and explicitly described mRNA as an experimental gene therapy in their SEC filings, Martin explains.



In addition, coronavirus fragments were described as “bio-warfare enabling technology” during a 2005 DARPA conference, the doctor notes.



According to 7 CFR Part 331, the spike protein associated with any modification of coronavirus is classified as a biological weapon.



And finally, the injections instruct the human body to manufacture a scheduled toxin in the form of the spike protein, he warns.



WATCH:

Dr. Martin was responding to the recent court ruling that determined that Cobid shots are not vaccines.



As Slay News reported, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s decision could reshape public health policy across the nation.



The ruling was delivered during a contentious case involving the Health Freedom Defense Fund and other plaintiffs versus the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD).



While ruling on the case, the court has declared that COVID-19 mRNA injections do not qualify as vaccines under traditional medical definitions.


The case revolved around the LAUSD’s COVID-19 vaccination policy.



The policy required all employees to be fully vaccinated against Covid by a specified deadline.



The plaintiffs argued that the district’s vaccine mandate infringed upon their fundamental right to refuse medical treatment.



They argue that the mRNA shots do not prevent the transmission of Covid but merely mitigate symptoms for the recipient, at best.



The court’s opinion was written by Circuit Judge R. Nelson and supported by Judge Collins.



The judges assert that the mRNA shots, marketed as vaccines, do not effectively prevent the transmission of COVID-19.



In the opinion, the judges note that the injections do nothing more than merely reduce symptoms in those who contract the virus.



Therefore, the injections cannot be labeled as vaccines.



Judge Nelson pointed out that the mandate was inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s century-old ruling in Jacobson v. Massachusetts.



The case upheld the state’s right to enforce smallpox vaccinations due to their proven effectiveness in preventing disease spread.



In contrast, the Covid mRNA shots do not offer such public health benefits.



Therefore, they fail the criteria established by Jacobson.



The ruling points out that traditional vaccines are designed to provide immunity and prevent transmission.



This is not conclusively proven in the case of Covid mRNA injections.



In addition, the Covid mRNA shots have been linked to widespread injuries and mass deaths.



As Slay News previously reported, Pfizer’s President of International Developed Markets Janine Small admitted during an October 2022 EU hearing that the vaccine had never been tested on its ability to prevent transmission.



This bombshell admission was contrary to what was previously advertised.



Government health officials and the media pressured the public into taking the injections by arguing that they had a responsibility to protect others.



In a concurring opinion, Judge Collins highlighted that compulsory medical treatments for individual health benefits infringe upon the fundamental right to refuse such treatments.



This perspective aligns with the constitutional principles protecting personal liberty against unwarranted governmental intrusions.

link

[schwartzie]

Democrats Shut Down Investigation into Maine’s Surging Excess Deaths

Frank Bergman
June 20, 2024 - 12:23 pm



Democrats in Maine have stepped in and shut down an investigation by Republican lawmakers into the state’s spike in excess deaths.



Republican State Rep. Heidi Sampson (R-Alfred) is raising the alarm over Maine’s surging excess deaths.



Sampson warns that the state has suffered an alarming “silent epidemic.”



She revealed that data shows that excess deaths are now 18% higher than they were in 2020.



Specifically, the state has seen a surge in sudden deaths among young and middle-aged adults with no known previous illness.



However, Sampson revealed that the state’s Democrat lawmakers “shrugged their shoulders” when she proposed investigating the deaths.



Alarmingly, she warns that Democrats have stymied her effort to investigate the issue.



After growing increasingly concerned about the soaring excess since the pandemic, Sampson tried to bring the issue to the Maine House of Representatives in March.



Sampson compiled Maine’s all-cause mortality data for 2015-2022.


The data was analyzed by a statistician.



The lawmaker warned her colleagues that Maine has suffered an 18% increase in excess deaths among 25- to 64-year-olds since 2020.



She also cited the CEO of the One America insurance company, J. Scott Davison.



Sampson said Davison “publicly disclosed that during the third and fourth quarter of 2021, death in people of working age 18 to 64 was 40% higher than it was before the pandemic.”


She went on to describe the recent emergence of the now-common phenomenon of “sudden death syndrome.”



Examples of sudden deaths include death by heart attack, stroke, meningitis, brain aneurysm, pulmonary embolism, anaphylaxis, and asthma.



“You will find hundreds, even thousands, of examples,” she told her colleagues in the state House.



“A few years ago, this was unheard of.



“Sudden death syndrome (SDS)” is a “silent epidemic” that demands immediate attention and investigation, she asserted.



“SDS is an umbrella term. It includes biologically based scenarios describing [the] quick onset of unexpected mortality without prior signs of illness. I’ll repeat: without prior signs of illness,” Sampson said.



“Autopsies may be non-conclusive due to the lack of obvious abnormalities. They may also be non-conclusive because we may not be asking the right questions.”



“If there is even a chance this data is correct, we have the moral obligation to our children to investigate,” she said.



“This data represents a flashing red light.”



WATCH:

REEL: "Maine House DENIES Request to Investigate Excess Deaths in Working-Age Adults"


In a new interview, Sampson described the surge in excess deaths as “earthshaking.”



“This data was compiled by actuaries who are the mathematical experts insurance companies rely upon,” she told the Defender.



“A 40% increase in deaths is literally earthshaking.



“Even a 10% increase in excess deaths would have been a 1-in-200-year event.”



Sampson presented her findings to her colleagues at the state House and urged Maine lawmakers to back investigations into the issue.



However, she said Democrats moved to block Sampson’s efforts to investigate the deaths.



“The Democrats could not reject this order fast enough,” she added.



She said two Democrats, both doctors, approached her after her speech demanding to know where she got the data.



They then proceeded to insist that the increased deaths were due to suicides.



“They just shrugged their shoulders,” Sampson said.



“We shut the whole damn state down for 6%,” she said of the lockdowns during the Covid pandemic.



“What are we doing with almost 18%?



“As a mother and a grandmother, this entire issue deeply concerns me.



“I want my children and their children to have long, healthy lives.



“We need to get to the bottom of this.”



Sampson has also raised critical questions about the safety of Covid mRNA shots which were misleadingly pushed onto the public as “vaccines.”



She also warned against the growing influence of unelected international organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO).



“The data are in — it is not safe and effective,” she said.



“And until the federal government removes the liability shield from the vaccine manufacturers, the COVID-19 shot must be removed from the Maine market.”



But she told the Defender that “she once again faced resistance from her colleagues.”



She described the response from Democrats as “tense and uncomfortable.”



Her Democrat colleagues also shot down her order to nullify WHO’s now-failed pandemic treaty authority that surrenders state’s rights to the United Nations “health” agency in the event of a future pandemic or “climate emergency.”



“It was heart-sickening to watch my colleagues on the other side of the aisle rapidly stand, object, and vote against this motion,” Sampson wrote in April.



“All I can say is now they are responsible for the information they have heard,” she said.



“It is on the record.”

 link

[schwartzie]

Top Cardiologist Drops Bombshell: Covid Shots Caused 112,000% Spike in Brain Clots

Frank Bergman
June 20, 2024 - 12:55 pm



One of the world’s most revered cardiologists has just raised the alarm after uncovering bombshell data showing that Covid mRNA shots have caused a staggering 112,000% increase in brain clots.



A newly-published study by a team of experts, led by American cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough, analyzed all reports of cerebral thromboembolism over the past 34 years.



According to Johns Hopkins Medicine, cerebral thromboembolism occurs when a blood clot forms in the brain’s venous sinuses.



This prevents blood from draining out of the brain.



This chain of events is part of a stroke that can damage the brain and central nervous system and cause sudden death.



It is a known side effect of Covid mRNA shots.



The study by Doctors McCullough, Kirstin Cosgrove, James Thorp, and Claire Rogers examined data on reports of cerebral thromboembolism following Covid shots submitted to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).



They analyzed all reports from January 1990 through December 2023.



The study found 5,137 cases reported in the three years the Covid mRNA injections have been available.


However, in the entire 34 years of data, there have only been 52 reports of cerebral thromboembolism associated with influenza vaccines.



According to this data, there is an 1120 times increase in cerebral thromboembolism for Covid injections compared to flu shots per time.



This makes for a whopping 111,795% increase.



For all other vaccines, aside from flu shots, there were 282 reports of cerebral thromboembolism linked to vaccines over the past 34 years.


This makes the risk 207 times greater from the new shots compared to other vaccines, or a 20,600% spike.



When compared with all other vaccines combined, Covid shots caused a 17,334% spike in cerebral thromboembolism per time.



“There is an alarming breach in the safety signal threshold concerning cerebral thrombosis AEs [adverse events] after COVID-19 vaccines compared to that of the influenza vaccines and even when compared to that of all other vaccines,” the authors conclude.



“An immediate global moratorium on the use of COVID-19 vaccines is necessary with an absolute contraindication in women of reproductive age.”



McCullough, a widely-published cardiologist, added on his personal Substack that the report “did not capture the level of permanent neurologic devastation and disability suffered by these patients.



“I can tell you that the rates must be very high given the extensive nature of the blood clots reported,” he explains.



“These data among others strongly support removing all COVID-19 vaccines and boosters from the market.



“No one should be put at risk for a serious stroke with any vaccine.”



A large body of evidence has linked Covid mRNA shots to several deadly diseases and sudden deaths.



Among it, VAERS reports 37,647 deaths, 216,757 hospitalizations, 21,741 heart attacks, and 28,445 myocarditis and pericarditis cases as of May 31, among other ailments.



CDC researchers have recognized a “high verification rate of reports of myocarditis to VAERS after mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination.”



This has led to the conclusion that “under-reporting is more likely” than over-reporting.



As Slay News previously reported, a major analysis of 99 million people across eight countries was published in February in the prestigious peer-reviewed journal Vaccine.



The study, the largest analysis to date, “observed significantly higher risks of myocarditis following the first, second and third doses” of mRNA-based Covid injections.



The researchers also warned of an increased risk of “pericarditis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis,” and other “potential safety signals that require further investigation.”



In April, the CDC was forced to release by court order 780,000 previously undisclosed reports of serious adverse reactions.



Meanwhile, a study from elite scientists in Japan found “statistically significant increases” in cancer deaths after third doses of mRNA-based COVID-19 injections, and offered several theories for a causal link.



In Florida, a grand jury impaneled by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis is currently investigating the manufacture and rollout of the Covid shots.



In February, the panel released its first interim report on the underlying justification for the mass vaccination agenda.



The report determined that lockdowns did more harm than good, that masks were ineffective at stopping Covid transmission, and that the virus was “statistically almost harmless” to children and most adults.



The panel also warned that it is “highly likely” that hospitals’ Covid patients and deaths numbers were inflated to ramp up fears and promote the “vaccines.”



The grand jury’s report on the shots themselves is highly anticipated.



On Monday, Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach announced a lawsuit against pharmaceutical giant Pfizer over “multiple misleading statements” about the health risks and ineffectiveness of its Covid mRNA shots.



Kobach accuses the pharmaceutical giant of violating the Kansas Consumer Protection Act.


link

[schwartzie]

Government Whistleblower: Covid Shots Were Planned 20 Years in Advance

Frank Bergman
June 22, 2024 - 12:54 pm



A government contractor has blown the whistle to reveal that Covid mRNA shots didn’t just suddenly appear in response to the pandemic but they had, in fact, been in the making for two decades.



During a bombshell new interview, the whistleblower, Dr. David Martin, exposes the detailed planning of the Covid mRNA shots.



While working as a U.S. government contractor, Martin says he witnessed decades of criminal preparations, years before Covid emerged in 2020.



Speaking with Infowars’ Alex Jones, Martin outlines the government’s long-term plot to develop and release the Covid virus.



Martin reveals that globalists had the pandemic planned decades in advance.



The entire exercise over the last four and half years was wilfully misleading the population into taking something through coercion that would not have otherwise ever been accepted.



“Since 2002, there has not been a coronavirus; there has been an engineered pathogen,” Dr. David Martin said.



“Engineered by Ralph Baric at the University of Carolina Chapel Hill where, in 2002, he patented the’ infectious, replication defective, clone of coronavirus’.”



“The ‘coronavirus’ that has been branded to be part of covid-19, does not exist.
“What does exist is a pathogen modelled off of properties of what was once upon a time isolated as coronavirus,” he explained.



“Properties that increased its pathogenicity [and] increased its toxicity but … decreased its transmissibility …



“In 2002 it was patented to be non-transmissable.”



Essentially, coronavirus has been man-made since 2002 and has not been a pathogen of nature.


“We have a commercially interested group of sociopaths who want to make money while killing people,” Dr. Martin said.



“That’s the bottom line,” he asserts.



On Wednesday, Martin joined Alex Jones to explain where the biological weapon called SARS-CoV-2 originated.



He also exposes the globalists behind it, the criminal counts against the perpetrators and much more.



Since 1966, coronavirus has been in play as a biological weapon agent, Martin reveals.



Most people first heard about coronavirus in 2019 when COVID-19 was first discovered in China.



However, “the fact of the matter is it has been around since 1966 as a biological weapon,” Dr. Martin said.



In 1990, Pfizer filed the first patent for a coronavirus vaccine.



In 1999, Ralph Baric’s modification and manipulation programme took what used to be a respiratory and gastrointestinal bug and turned it into something that would cause cardiomyopathy in rabbits.



This gave rise to a patent that was filed in 2002 for an infectious, replication defective, clone of coronavirus.



In 2014, the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill was authorised to waive the gain-of-function moratorium.



The pathogen they were working on at the time was the Wuhan Institute of Virology virus 1 (“WIV-1”) spike protein, Dr. Martin said.



In 2016, scientists said WIV-1 was poised for human emergence.



“In 2018/2019, the United States government reclaimed the patent from the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill,” Martin explains.



“The Department of Health and Human Services at the National Institutes of Health took the UNC-Chapel Hill patent on an infectious, replication defective coronavirus and reclaimed title and interest to it.”



“Four months later, in April of 2019, Moderna amended four patent applications in which they made the following statement: ‘After an accidental or intentional release of a lethal respiratory pathogen’ … ‘Release’.



“Does that sound like a leak? Does that sound like ‘accidental’? No.”



Although they won’t use the word “lethal,” they knew on 18 September 2019 they were going to release a deadly respiratory pathogen.



“They knew it was deadly,” Martin said.



“They knew it was going to kill people.”



On 18 September 2019, they said that by 20 September 2020, the world would accept a universal vaccine.



As Dr. Martin notes, “they said, they would do so in response … ‘to an accidental or deliberate release of a lethal respiratory pathogen’.”



“They” had been planning these mandatory injections since 2015.



Martin goes on to expose who “they” are:



“The masterplan [to vaccinate the world] was done by none other than the Wellcome Trust, NIAID Anthony Fauci, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (specifically Dr. Chris Elias), Dr. Gao from the CDC of the People’s Republic of China and a whole host of others who sit on what is called the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board,” Dr. Martin said.



“To advance the social and commercial interests of sociopaths that wanted to kill human beings for the sake of their agenda, they decided to unleash a lethal respiratory pathogen on the population so the population would be bamboozled into taking an mRNA shot which would permanently, permanently alter their human condition.”



In November 2019, Ralph Baric sent a genetic sequence to the Vaccine Research Centre at the US National Institutes of Health (“NIH”).



“[The sequence] was not for ‘the coronavirus’ and it was not for ‘the coronavirus vaccine’, it was for the mRNA that was used to instruct the human body to make a scheduled pathogen,” Dr. Martin said.



“What they did is, they said, ‘We’re going to inject into the arms of billions of people the instructions to turn each individual into a bioweapons factory’ …



“Every single person that took the shot became the manufacturer of a synthetic spike protein associated with the coronavirus model.



“The difference between this and everything that’s been done before is really simple.



“In the case of mRNA, there are two distinctions that are absolutely unique to the covid pandemic.



“Number 1, we are actually creating the mechanism to instruct the body to manufacture a toxin …



“Number 2, the response is actually a ‘hopeful’ response that failed to consider two very critical things: the lipid nanoparticle in which the shot is delivered actually is also a toxin … and then the worst part about it is that we introduced a thing called pseudouridine.”



Pseudouridine was published in 2018 to be a pro-cancer agent.



What this means is that “it shuts down the body’s response to how we recognise tumours and suppress tumours,” Dr. Martin explained.



Pseudouridine has been included in mRNA injections to stabilise the mRNA so it stays in the human body longer to achieve its effect, he said.



SARS-CoV-2 wasn’t a virus from China, Dr. Martin emphasised.



“No one wants to admit that the United States government is actually funding these programmes and laundering these programmes through the universities in very important electoral locations around the world.”



In American states where universities are running biological weapons programmes, none of the politicians are admitting what’s happening in their states.



“It is [ ] false … for a congressman or a senator to continually perpetrate a lie in Congress about the Wuhan virus and was it a lab leak and was it this or that,” Martin said.



“It’s equally problematic for an elected official to lie in Congress as it is for a Supreme Court justice … to lie about the pathology associated with coronavirus … as equally problematic for Fauci to lie and say he didn’t do gain-of-function moratorium.”



“The master plan is simple.” Dr. Martin said.



“Three-quarters of the world’s population are unnecessary and need to be shoved off the planet …



“This is World War III, that’s not hyperbole, it just comes in a different form.”



But we’re winning the war, he said.



“They were going to kill us and most of us didn’t bend the knee.



“Remember that a third of the people fell for it, a third of the people were coerced and a third of the people said no.”



“Not only did they blow up their strategy of how they were going to take over the world but they destroyed the mechanism whereby they were going to do it.”



Martin continues by making a prediction regarding what may come next.



“What they’re going to do, is to do what’s already in play right now – which is they’re going to try to increase the electoral version of the hijack that happened in 2016 and again in 2020,” he said.



“We’re going to see a massive amount of voter fraud in the form of early voting, electronic voting, illegal immigrant voting, we’re going to have every version of corruption as we come into November [US elections].”



“In the next 6 to 9 months, which is when we’re going to watch a whole bunch of desperation happen, what I would highly advise … get used to using cash and make sure you have a lot of it on hand.



“Why? Because [then] your behaviour will not be modifiable if electronic participation in the economy is under [their] control.”



For example, if they try to take the banking system down to enforce central bank digital currencies (CBDC) or other behaviour modification technologies.



But what people need to understand, Dr. Martin said, is that they’ve played all of their hand; they’re out of bullets.



“They wanted to make sure we got vaccine passports,” he said.



“They wanted to make sure that the World Health Organization came along and suspended all of our civil liberties for the rest of time.



“They wanted to do a number of things and what happened was the World Economic Forum failed.



“Klaus Schwab got tired and now he’s stepping down.



“The actors know that they failed.”



“We know that the entire establishment – whether it’s the World Economic Forum, whether it’s the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, whether it’s Open Philanthropy and Dustin Moskovitz – we know that all of these organisations thought that they could bamboozle all of us.



“They thought that by putting fact-checkers on every post we’d stop sharing posts.



“They thought by cancelling people that we wouldn’t actually listen to people’s voices.



“They thought by making sure we never showed up on mainstream media that nobody would ever hear our voices.



“But [for them] the bad news is … we continue to do it.



“We the people have the power.



“We have the power actually to change the trajectory that we’re on.



“We have the power to make sure that the people who actually acted with impunity no longer can do that.”



WATCH:

 

link

[Midnight]

Explosive Study Once Removed by Lancet within 24 Hours, Now Peer-Reviewed and Public: Reveals 74% of Deaths Directly Linked to COVID-19 Shot

By Jim Hᴏft
Jun. 23, 2024 7:45 am

A previously censored paper from The Lancet has now undergone peer review and is available online.



The study, titled “A Systematic Review of Autopsy Findings in Deaths After COVID-19 Vaccination,” analyzed 325 autopsy cases and found that a staggering 73.9% of deaths were either directly due to or significantly contributed to by the COVID-19 vaccination.



The paper’s lead author, Dr. Nicolas Hulscher, faced significant opposition in bringing these findings to light. After initially being downloaded over 100,000 times, The Lancet removed the paper within 24 hours, according to Dr. William Makis.



According to The Daily Sceptic, the reason given at the time was, “This preprint has been removed by Preprints with the Lancet because the study’s conclusions are not supported by the study methodology.”



The news outlet added:



“Without further detail from the Preprints with the Lancet staff who removed the paper it is hard to know what substance the claim that the conclusions are not supported by the methodology really has. A number of the authors of the paper are at the top of their fields so it is hard to imagine that the methodology of their review was really so poor that it warranted removal at initial screening rather than being subject to full critical appraisal. It smacks instead of raw censorship of a paper that failed to toe the official line. Keep in mind that the CDC has not yet acknowledged a single death being caused by the Covid mRNA vaccines. Autopsy evidence demonstrating otherwise is clearly not what the U.S. public health establishment wants to hear.”



In a post on X Friday, Dr. William Makis shared the exciting news.



“BREAKING NEWS: Our LANCET CENSORED Paper is now peer reviewed and available online!” Makis wrote on X.



“Incredible perseverence [sic] by first author Nicolas Hulscher who didn’t give up after LANCET pulled our paper within 24 hours after 100,000s of downloads for no legitimate reason. Big pharma put the squeeze on The Lancet but has failed to stop us.”



“Our paper was delayed by one year, and those actions of CENSORSHIP and CANCELLATION led to many deaths that could have been prevented. This paper could be a game changer,” Makis added.



According to the study:

Methods



We searched PubMed and ScienceDirect for all published autopsy and necropsy reports relating to COVID-19 vaccination up until May 18th, 2023. All autopsy and necropsy studies that included COVID-19 vaccination as an antecedent exposure were included.



Because the state of knowledge has advanced since the time of the original publications, three physicians independently reviewed each case and adjudicated whether or not COVID-19 vaccination was the direct cause or contributed significantly to death.



Results



We initially identified 678 studies and, after screening for our inclusion criteria, included 44 papers that contained 325 autopsy cases and one necropsy case. The mean age of death was 70.4 years.



The most implicated organ system among cases was the cardiovascular (49%), followed by hematological (17%), respiratory (11%), and multiple organ systems (7%). Three or more organ systems were affected in 21 cases.



The mean time from vaccination to death was 14.3 days. Most deaths occurred within a week from last vaccine administration.



A total of 240 deaths (73.9%) were independently adjudicated as directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination, of which the primary causes of death include sudden cardiac death (35%), pulmonary embolism (12.5%), myocardial infarction (12%), VITT (7.9%), myocarditis (7.1%), multisystem inflammatory syndrome (4.6%), and cerebral hemorrhage (3.8%).



According to the VAERS COVID Adverse Event Reports that track all of the COVID-reported vaccine deaths and complications, 37,647 people have died from the COVID-19 vaccine – as of May 31, 2024.



These are the vaccine-related deaths that were reported.





Source: VAERS COVID Adverse Event Reports



Source: VAERS COVID Adverse Event Reports

And still, doctors are pushing the vaccine on their patients! The money must be very, very good!



Vigilant Fox shared this clip by Jimmy Dore in this explosive report:



Another COVID “conspiracy theory” becomes reality as a bombshell study CENSORED by The Lancet has now been peer-reviewed.



What were they trying to hide, you ask?



Lots and lots of vaccine deaths.



After analyzing 325 COVID vaccine autopsy cases, the now peer-reviewed study found that “a total of 240 deaths, which is 73.9%, were independently adjudicated as DIRECTLY DUE to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination.”

link

[maybetoday]

Four Other States to Launch Massive Lawsuits Against Pfizer, Accusing the Pharma Giant of Deceiving the Public About COVID Vaccine Safety and Efficacy

By Jim Hᴏft
Jun. 24, 2024 6:20 pm


Four additional states will follow Kansas’s lead by filing large-scale lawsuits against pharmaceutical giant Pfizer. These states allege that the company misled the public regarding the safety and efficacy of its COVID-19 vaccine.



Last week, Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach announced that he is suing pharmaceutical giant Pfizer for misleading Kansas residents about the safety and efficacy of its COVID-19 vaccine.



During a press conference in Topeka, alongside Deputy Attorney General Fran Oleen and Assistant Attorneys General Kaley Schrader and Melanie Jack, Kobach detailed the allegations lodged against Pfizer.



“Kansas is filing a civil suit against the Pfizer Corporation under the Kansas Consumer Protection Act, seeking enhanced civil monetary penalties, damages, and injunctive relief for misleading and deceptive statements made in marketing its COVID-19 vaccine. Pfizer also violated previous consent judgments with the state of Kansas, in which Pfizer promised never to use deceptive information to market their products,” said Kobach.



The complaint, lodged today in Thomas County District Court, accuses Pfizer of misleading Kansans about the vaccines’ risks, including potential harm to pregnant women and the risk of myocarditis. The suit further alleges that Pfizer falsely claimed its vaccine was effective against COVID variants, despite evidence to the contrary.



The State of Kansas outlines several specific allegations in its lawsuit:



1. Pfizer misled the public that it had a “safe and effective” COVID-19 vaccine.



2. Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was safe even though it knew its COVID-19 vaccine was connected to serious adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis, failed pregnancies, and deaths. Pfizer concealed this critical safety information from the public.



3. Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was effective even though it knew its COVID19 vaccine waned over time and did not protect against COVID-19 variants. Pfizer concealed this critical effectiveness information from the public.



4. Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine would prevent transmission of COVID-19 even though it knew it never studied the effect of its vaccine on transmission of COVID-19.



5. To keep the public from learning the truth, Pfizer worked to censor speech on social media that questioned Pfizer’s claims about its COVID-19 vaccine.



6. Pfizer’s misrepresentations of a “safe and effective” vaccine resulted in record company revenue of approximately $75 billion from COVID-19 vaccine sales in just two years.



7. Pfizer’s actions and statements relating to its COVID-19 vaccine violated previous consent judgments with the State of Kansas.



8. Pfizer’s actions and statements relating to its COVID-19 vaccine violated the Kansas Consumer Protection Act, K.S.A. 50-623 et seq., regardless of whether any individual consumer ultimately received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.



9. Pfizer must be held accountable for falsely representing the benefits of its COVID19 vaccine while concealing and suppressing the truth about its vaccine’s safety risks, waning effectiveness, and inability to prevent transmission.



During the conference, Kobach mentioned that Kansas is among the first five states to file a lawsuit against the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer.



“Kansas’s case is the first of a multi-state collaboration, with Kansas being the first of five states to file suit,” Kobach said during the press conference.



When a reporter asked about the number of damages that could be in this lawsuit and whether they are seeking a jury trial or a bench trial, Kobach said, “The damages depend. I think ultimately, when you’re talking about five states, then you’re talking about much greater numbers of people than the 2.9 million or so that live in Kansas. I hesitate to offer a prediction, because we don’t seek a certain number. It’s ultimately going to be the judgment of the court in that case. We have not yet made a determination whether to seek bench or jury.”



It remains unclear which states will join Kansas, but during the press conference, Kobach revealed that Idaho will be one of the four other states involved.



“Some of them have said they want to announce it on their own. Idaho is one of the other states who said that we may let you know,” Kobach said.



It can be recalled Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has initiated legal action against pharmaceutical giant Pfizer, Inc., citing allegations of deceptive practices related to the company’s COVID-19 vaccine.



The lawsuit asserts that Pfizer engaged in misrepresenting the vaccine’s efficacy, particularly challenging the claim of 95% effectiveness, and accuses the company of trying to stifle public debate on the matter.



Attorney General Paxton accuses Pfizer of violating the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act through “false, deceptive, and misleading acts and practices.”



The lawsuit highlights the company’s claims that the vaccine has a 95% efficacy rate against COVID-19 infection, stating that this was based on “relative risk reduction” in Pfizer’s initial short-term clinical trial results.



It is argued that this figure is a misleading statistic that should not be used to unduly influence consumer choice, especially since the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has indicated that long-term vaccine protection could not accurately be predicted at that point.



Furthermore, the lawsuit alleges that Pfizer misrepresented the durability of the vaccine’s protection and failed to disclose information that contradicted its claims. Additionally, it is claimed that Pfizer did not measure whether the vaccine prevents transmission but still promoted it as necessary to protect others.



As the vaccine’s efficacy came under scrutiny, Pfizer is accused of taking aggressive
measures to suppress critics and silence truth-tellers, who the company labeled as “criminals” spreading “misinformation,” according to the lawsuit.

link

[schwartzie]

Scientists Raise Alarm over Surging Neurological Deaths Among Young People

Frank Bergman
June 25, 2024 - 12:54 pm



A group of scientists is raising the alarm after a disturbing new study revealed a huge surge in deaths among young people suffering from neurological diseases.



The researchers found evidence of a dramatic spike in neurological deaths among people aged 15-44 that started in 2021 and continued surging through 2023.



The preprint study, which relies on extensive data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), analyzed neurological disease-related mortality across various age groups from 2000 to 2023.



The researchers found that official government data shows a disturbing increase in deaths from neurological diseases, both as the primary cause and among multiple contributing factors, over the past three years.



The study, conducted by leading data scientists at Phinance Technologies, reveals that an uptick in mortality rates is particularly significant among younger adults.



The scientists warn that the surging deaths could have profound implications for the nation’s public health policies, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.



After identifying the spike in deaths, the researchers continued their investigation in an effort to identify the cause of the mortality surge.



Perhaps most concerning, the study found an increase in neurological complications following COVID-19 vaccinations, including conditions such as Guillain-Barré syndrome and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis.



Leading the team at Phinance Technologies is world-renowned data analyst Ed Dowd.


Responding to the results of the study, Dowd asserted that the data has a “very high statistical significance.”



“The results show a clear break from the prior historical trend in death rates from neurological diseases,” Down noted in a post on X.

Phinance Technologies’ data scientists Carlos Alegria and Yuri Nunes conducted a deep dive looking at neurological disease-related mortality across various age groups from 2000 to 2023.


Their study distinguishes between deaths where neurological conditions were the underlying cause (UC) and instances where these diseases were listed among multiple causes (MC) on death certificates.



They then compared death rates against a baseline to identify excess deaths.



Key findings from the study include:



A notable rise in excess mortality from neurological diseases was reported as the underlying cause of death among individuals aged 15 to 44, with increases of 4.4% in 2020, 10.0% in 2021, 9.9% in 2022, and 8.1% in 2023.

Excess deaths from neurological conditions as part of multiple causes tracked overall mortality rises and were significant even after removing deaths where COVID-19 was also reported.

As Phinance notes:



“The strength of the statistical significance of the excess deaths from neurological diseases was very high, being considered extreme events, indicating a clear change from the prior 2010-2019 trend.”



The intersection of the COVID-19 pandemic with the rise in neurological disease deaths adds layers of complexity to the analysis.



Those complexities include the notion that various medical interventions and societal disruptions might have exacerbated underlying neurological vulnerabilities.



Notably, the study points to an increased risk of developing severe neurological conditions following Covid mRNA injections.



Specific vaccines are also linked to higher risks of serious ailments such as the aforementioned Guillain-Barré syndrome, the researchers note.



Perhaps most alarming is the impact on younger individuals, particularly those who had received Covid mRNA shots.



Those aged 15-44, typically considered in the prime of life, suffered a huge increase in neurological disease-related deaths after receiving the injections.



This raises serious questions about potential factors that are disproportionately affecting younger populations.



The authors conclude:



How can we explain the excess UC deaths from neurological diseases in 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023?



In 2020, this could be explained by deaths from health effects related to the pandemic management measures such lockdowns and lack of medical care, or other related factors such as stress, less exercise, worse food habits, or from under-diagnosed COVID-19 itself, or related side effects.



The acceleration in excess death rates from neurological diseases in 2021, 2022 and 2023 is more difficult to explain due to COVID-19 on its own.



Given the case studies of neurological adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination cited in the literature, one possible factor could be adverse effects of the COVID-19 vaccines.



The implications of these findings extend far beyond the immediate health of the young adult population, however.



The study poses serious questions about the readiness of the U.S. healthcare system to handle a potential influx of neurological health needs.



The scientists are urging governments to make sweeping changes in public health policy to cope with the surge.



There is a clear call for investigations into the factors driving this surge in neurological deaths, they note.



The disturbing findings from the Phinance study after another recent study found that Covid mRNA shots have triggered a spike in deaths caused by blood clots in the brain.



As Slay News reported, one of the world’s most revered cardiologists has just raised the alarm after uncovering bombshell data showing that Covid mRNA shots have caused a staggering 112,000% increase in brain clots.



A newly-published study by a team of experts, led by American cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough, analyzed all reports of cerebral thromboembolism over the past 34 years.



According to Johns Hopkins Medicine, cerebral thromboembolism occurs when a blood clot forms in the brain’s venous sinuses.



It is a known side effect of Covid mRNA shots.



In addition, a separate study also confirmed that Covid shots cause brain damage.



A team of top researchers in South Korea analyzed the electronic health records of 4.3 million individuals in Seoul.



The study concluded that Covid mRNA injections cause brain damage and trigger multiple issues with cognition.



The study revealed that those who had received mRNA injections experienced the following:



• A 68% rise in depression



• A 44% surge in anxiety and related disorders



• A 93.4% increase in sleep disorders


link


• A staggering 138% jump in mild cognitive impairment



• A 23% rise in Alzheimer’s disease

[OmegaMan]

Kansas Uncovers Evidence Exposing Pfizer’s ‘Clear Effort to Conceal & Mislead’ about Side Effects of Covid Shots

Frank Bergman
June 26, 2024 - 10:49 am



Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach has announced that investigators have uncovered evidence that pharmaceutical giant Pfizer “knew of multiple side effects” related to its Covid mRNA shots.



Kobach revealed that his office obtained the “information” during a press conference.



“Pfizer knew of multiple side effects…and did not disclose,” Kobach said.



“And in some ways, made statements that were contrary.



“It’s more than just a failure to say that there are side effects.



“They made statements saying there are no side effects in particular cases, when in fact they knew there were side effects and they had data indicating those side effects.”



WATCH:

The news comes after Kobach recently filed a lawsuit against Pfizer for “misleading” the public about the safety of its Covid mRNA shots by masking the “serious adverse events.”


As Slay News reported last week, according to the 179-page lawsuit filed last Monday by Kobach, Pzizer marketed the shot as “safe” despite knowing the injections could cause serious illness and death.



The lawsuit, filed in the District Court of Thomas County, alleges that “Pfizer misled the public that it had a ‘safe and effective’ COVID-19 vaccine.”



During a press conference last Monday, Kobach told reporters:



“Pfizer made multiple misleading statements to deceive the public about its vaccine at a time when Americans needed the truth.”

The Kansas AG added that Pfizer’s “misrepresentations” resulted in “record company revenue” of approximately $75 billion in just two years.



The State of Kansas outlines several specific allegations in its lawsuit:



1. Pfizer misled the public that it had a ‘safe and effective’ COVID-19 vaccine.



2. Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was safe even though it knew its COVID-19 vaccine was connected to serious adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis, failed pregnancies, and deaths. Pfizer concealed this critical safety information from the public.



3. Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was effective even though it knew its COVID-19 vaccine waned over time and did not protect against COVID-19 variants. Pfizer concealed this critical effectiveness information from the public.



4. Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine would prevent transmission of COVID-19 even though it knew it never studied the effect of its vaccine on transmission of COVID-19.



5. To keep the public from learning the truth, Pfizer worked to censor speech on social media that questioned Pfizer’s claims about its COVID-19 vaccine.



6. Pfizer’s misrepresentations of a ‘safe and effective’ vaccine resulted in record company revenue of approximately $75 billion from COVID-19 vaccine sales in just two years.



7. Pfizer’s actions and statements relating to its COVID-19 vaccine violated previous consent judgments with the State of Kansas.



8. Pfizer’s actions and statements relating to its COVID-19 vaccine violated the Kansas Consumer Protection Act, K.S.A. 50-623 et seq., regardless of whether any individual consumer ultimately received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.



9. Pfizer must be held accountable for falsely representing the benefits of its COVID-19 vaccine while concealing and suppressing the truth about its vaccine’s safety risks, waning effectiveness, and inability to prevent transmission.



Meanwhile, four other states have now followed Kansas’s lead.



The five states now suing Pfizer over the Covid mRNA injections are:



Kansas

Texas

Mississippi

Louisiana

Utah

All states allege that the pharmaceutical company misled the public about the safety and efficacy of its Covid shots.



The lawsuits claim that Pfizer made false or misleading statements regarding the safety and effectiveness of the injections.



These deceptions potentially violate public trust and legal standards, the lawsuits note.
 

link

[schwartzie]

Australian Government Has Been Hiding Deadly Covid Shot Side Effects since 2021

Frank Bergman
June 28, 2024 - 12:23 pm



The Australian government discovered in 2021 that Covid mRNA shots carried a high risk of causing deadly side effects but officials chose to keep the information hidden from the public, bombshell new documents have revealed.



In early 2021, Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) became aware that mRNA lipid nanoparticles from Covid injections would spread to vital organs.



The TGA is Australia’s equivalent of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).



The agency found traces of the mRNA lipid nanoparticles in the brain, liver, and ovaries of those who had received the shots.



Newly revealed documents reveal that the TGA was aware during the initial Covid shot rollout that mRNA lipid nanoparticles could travel to critical organs.



However, the agency decided to hide the discovery from the public over fears that informing citizens of the risks would promote vaccine hesitancy.



This information was obtained via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request and exposed by a British researcher.



The data, made public by a whistleblower, shows that a TGA report published in January 2021 admitted that vaccine particles do not remain at the injection site as claimed by government health officials around the world.



Instead, the particles disperse throughout the body.

This disclosure raises questions about the decision-making process behind the approval and distribution of the experimental mRNA shots.



According to the TGA report, lipid nanoparticles were found in plasma and various organs such as the liver, adrenal glands, spleen, and ovaries in rats that were administered the Pfizer shot.



These findings were part of the “Nonclinical Evaluation of BNT162b2 [mRNA] COVID-19 vaccine (COMIRNATY)” study.



The study tracked the distribution of these particles in the body.


As Slay News has reported, the spread of these nanoparticles around the body has been linked to soaring cases of autoimmune disease, turbo cancers, and other serious illnesses and deaths.



In addition, vaccination expert Dr. John Campbell expressed significant concern about the implications for female reproductive health.



Responding to the findings in Australia, Dr. Campbell warns:



“Of course, the ovaries store and mature the ovum (female reproductive cells), so I’m not gonna pretend I’m not a little concerned about this.



“I’m more than a little concerned actually.”



WATCH:

Another alarming section of the report highlighted a “slow but significant distribution of lipid nanoparticles from the site of injection with major uptake into the liver.”



Dr. Campbell explained:



“That means the mRNA could go into the vascular endothelial cells in the liver into the hepatocytes themselves, produce the spike protein, that will be expressed, and there will be an inflammatory reaction against that spike protein in the liver.”



“This is not what we were told,” Dr. Campbell emphasized.



He continued by questioning how Australian health authorities could have known this in 2021 and still approved the shots for public use.



“How could the Australian health authorities know this back in 2021 and still approve this vaccine?” he questioned.



The distribution of mRNA lipid nanoparticles was observed in multiple body locations, including the eyes, heart, pituitary gland, and pancreas.



This extensive spread raises further concerns about the potential long-term effects of the vaccine.



“Given that this was known, why were the vaccines given authorization when they were?” Dr. Campbell asked.



Campbell concluded his report with a call for more transparency and accountability in the approval process of the vaccines.


link

[schwartzie]

Bombshell Study Directly Links Covid Shots to Sudden Deaths Surge

Frank Bergman
June 29, 2024 - 12:54 pm



A group of renowned researchers has just published a bombshell study that proves a direct correlation between Covid mRNA shots and surging numbers of sudden deaths seen around the world.



The study was conducted by Christof Kuhbandner, PhD, Professor of Psychology at the University of Regensburg in Bavaria Germany, and mathematician Prof. Matthias Reitzner at Osnabrück University, a public research university located in the city of Osnabrück in Lower Saxony.



In their study, the top scientists identified a direct correlation between surging excess mortality in Germany and Covid mRNA injections.



The esteemed authors of the study are now raising the alarm about the devastating side effects of the shots and calling for governments to launch full investigations into their explosive findings.



The pre-print paper for the study is titled “Differential Increases in Excess Mortality in the German Federal States During the COVID-19 Pandemic.”



The German academic researchers initially sought to analyze the influence of COVID-19 on mortality in the sixteen German federal states.



However, they found during the analysis that the Covid “vaccines” themselves are causing the surge in sudden deaths, and not the virus.



As part of the study, the pair estimated the burden of the COVID-19 pandemic separately for each federal state by calculating state-specific excess mortalities for the three pandemic years:



04/2020-03/2021

04/2021-03/2022

04/2022-03/2023

They continued by exploring several key state-specific quantities to determine the extent to which these covary with the excess mortality.


Among the explored quantities are aspects related to the pandemic (strength of measures, COVID-19 infections, and vaccination rates) and aspects unrelated to the pandemic, such as mean age, gross domestic product, poverty rates, and proportions of people in need of care.



Estimating excess mortality, Kuhbandner and Reitzner on a state-by-state basis compared the observed number of all-cause deaths with the number of statistically expected all-cause deaths.



The duo makes use of German life tables and longevity trends, state-specific population tables, and state factors as a means of estimating the expected number of deaths.



The results yield for each federal state separate estimates for the expected number of all-cause deaths had there been no pandemic


The German scientists found a range of excess mortality by the federal state during the COVID-19 pandemic years.



Across all German federal states, excess mortality was small in the first pandemic year.



However, the figure increased in the second and soared significantly in the third pandemic year.



This is despite the introduction of near-universal vaccination across German society.



Excess death increases varied substantially across the federal states.



Regarding the covariations with the explored state-specific quantities, the authors call our attention to two correlation patterns.



“In the first two years of the pandemic, but not in the third, there was a strong correlation between excess mortality and the number of reported COVID deaths, suggesting that the differences in excess mortality observed earlier in the pandemic are due to differences in the levels of exposure to COVID-19,” they write in the study’s paper.



Kuhbandner and Reitzner educate that “this cannot explain the increase of excess mortality in the second and third pandemic years because the number of COVID-19 deaths decreased instead of increased in almost all federal states.”



Raising alarm, the authors emphasize that “ the increase in excess mortality, an increasingly strong positive correlation with the vaccination rate of a federal state is observed, which reaches a value of r = 0.85 in the third pandemic year, indicating that excess mortality increased the stronger the higher the vaccination rate in a federal state was.



“An analysis of stillbirths showed exactly the same pattern.



“No other systematic correlation pattern was observed.”







Using what the authors describe as a “state-of-the-art method of actuarial science to estimate excess mortality in the federal states of Germany in the three pandemic years (04/2020 to 03/2023)” they find that the estimated excess mortality showed substantial variance across the federal states.



After an exploratory analysis covering several key state-specific quantities, the German authors reveal that only two quantities evidence a robust correlational relationship with the observed excess mortality: COVID-19 deaths and the COVID-19 vaccination rate.



Importantly, excess mortality in the first and second pandemic years strongly correlated with the reported number of deaths and infections; and in the second and third pandemic years, “an increasingly stronger relationship between excess mortality and the vaccination rate was observed.”



This observation, “contrary to what would be expected with an effective vaccination” points to positive instead of negative correlations.



Or put simply; “the more vaccinations were administered in a federal state, the greater the increase in excess mortality.”



The authors articulate that the specific correlational finding synchronizes with previous correlational findings in the temporal domain.



The study proves that excess mortality was highest during the months with a high number of vaccinations.



The scientists conclude that the soaring excess mortality occurring both in regions and in time windows in which many vaccinations took place provides direct correlational evidence that the vaccinations had a negative effect instead of a positive effect.



Unfortunately, the present findings support other referenced concerns about Covid mRNA injections.

link

[Berean]

Kiss my grits, CDC! 


CDC Recommends New COVID-19 Vaccines For Nearly All Americans


SATURDAY, JUN 29, 2024 - 03:10 PM

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times 


The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on June 27 recommended forthcoming COVID-19 vaccines for virtually all Americans.



“CDC recommends everyone ages 6 months and older receive an updated 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccine to protect against the potentially serious outcomes of COVID-19 this fall and winter whether or not they have ever previously been vaccinated with a COVID-19 vaccine,” the agency said in a statement.



The COVID-19 vaccines now available, which are also broadly recommended, target the XBB.1.5 strain. But observational data indicate they provide short-lived protection against COVID-19 infection and hospitalization.



U.S. Food and Drug Administration officials, acting on advice from their advisers, recently directed vaccine manufacturers to produce COVID-19 vaccines with updated formulations.



Updated vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna will target the KP.2 variant, while an updated shot from Novavax will target the JN.1 variant.



The updated formulations are expected to be available in September.



CDC advisers earlier Thursday unanimously advised the CDC to recommend the forthcoming vaccines to virtually all Americans, even though no clinical efficacy or safety data are available for them.



Data from animal testing suggest that the vaccines trigger higher levels of antibodies than the shots currently available, manufacturers said previously.



CDC advisers considered a risk-based recommendation that would only say certain groups receive one of the vaccines but ultimately opted for what is known as a universal recommendation.



Dr. Jamie Loehr, one of the members, said before the vote that the cost-effectiveness of vaccinating young people, who are generally at little risk from COVID-19, had him leaning towards a risk-based approach. He changed his mind, though, after listening to a presentation from a CDC researcher.



Dr. Denise Jamieson, another member, said that members should not “get too caught up in cost-effectiveness currently.” She said, “If we compare it to other vaccine-preventable diseases it seems like a really good investment.”



Each dose of a new shot could cost up to $130, according to estimates presented during the meeting.



Pooled effectiveness estimates from studies of the currently available vaccines, which target the XBB strain, and the last slate of shots, which were bivalent, found that effectiveness against hospitalization due to COVID-19 was below 50 percent, the original threshold laid out by regulators.



Researchers with the CDC and other institutions have also found the protection wanes over time, one reason U.S. officials have turned the COVID-19 vaccine model into a once-a-year update similar to the influenza vaccination program.



Many Americans took the original COVID-19 vaccines but most have opted against receiving the newer shots. As of May 11, just 14.4 percent of children and 22.5 percent of adults have received one of the currently available COVID-19 vaccines, according to CDC surveys, which also found that many doctors have stopped recommending the shots because they’re focused on promoting other vaccines and worry recommending COVID-19 vaccination could increase hesitancy among patients to receiving the other vaccines.



Experts said in Thursday’s meeting that the message needs to be that people need another shot.



“We have to keep saying that over and over and over again—you need this year’s vaccine to be protected against this year’s strain of the virus,” Carol Hayes, who represents the American College of Nurse-Midwives as a liaison to the CDC panel, said during the session.



The CDC estimated that up to 116,000 hospitalizations from COVID-19 will be prevented over the next year with universal vaccine recommendations, assuming an initial 75 percent effectiveness against hospitalization.



The effectiveness was projected in certain scenarios to drop to 50 percent after three months, the CDC said.



The KP.2 strain is the dominant strain in the United States as of May 25, according to CDC data. The closely related KP.3 strain, and the JN.1 variant, are also causing a number of cases.



Modeling through June 22 projects the rise of a new strain called LB.1.



A spokesperson for the CDC told The Epoch Times recently that LB.1 “has the potential to infect some people more easily based on a single deletion in a spike protein“ but ”there is currently no evidence that LB.1 causes more severe disease.”


link

[schwartzie]

Top Scientists Confirm Covid Shots Cause Heart Attacks in Children

Frank Bergman
June 30, 2024 - 12:54 pm



A comprehensive study by leading pediatric scientists has confirmed that the devastating surge in heart failure among children is caused by Covid mRNA shots.



The peer-reviewed study, published in the prestigious journal Med, was conducted by scientists at the University of Hong Kong.



The team, led by Dr. Hing Wai Tsang, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, the University of Hong Kong, uncovered evidence to confirm that Natural Killer (NK) cell activation by Covid mRNA injections causes the pathogenesis of acute myocarditis.



Myocarditis is an inflammation of the heart muscle that restricts the body’s ability to pump blood.



The inflammation causes strokes, and cardiac arrest, and can ultimately cause sudden death.



The study concludes that Covid mRNA shots massively increase the risk of myocarditis among children and young people, especially males.



Generating more potential evidence as to the mechanism behind myocarditis in younger people and children, the study’s co-lead scientist Patrick Ip, a specialist pediatrician at the University of Hong Kong, collected and analyzed samples from 60 adolescents with vaccine-related myocarditis.



These samples include pro-inflammatory cytokines, cardiac troponin T, genotyping, and immunophenotyping of the corresponding activation subsets of NK cells, monocytes, and T cells.



The findings were compared with samples from 10 vaccinated individuals without myocarditis and 10 healthy controls.


The study team investigated the previously rare, but now very common, vaccine-related acute myocarditis.



The researchers reveal that they now have a far clearer understanding of precise mechanisms based on their hypothesis that natural killer (NK) cells play a central role in its pathogenesis.



In the study’s paper, Drs Hing Wai Tsang and Patrick Ip report from this sample-based study that physically “high levels of serum cytokines pivotal for NK cells, including interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interferon α2 (IFN-α2), IL-12, and IFN-γ, were observed in post-vaccination patients with myocarditis, who also had a high percentage of CD57+ NK cells in the blood, which in turn correlated positively with elevated levels of cardiac troponin T.”



“Genotypically, killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) KIR2DL5B(−)/KIR2DS3(+)/KIR2DS5(−)/KIR2DS4del(+) was a risk haplotype, in addition to single-nucleotide polymorphisms related to the NK cell-specific expression quantitative trait loci DNAM-1 and FuT11, which also correlated with cardiac troponin T levels in post-vaccination patients with myocarditis.”


In a previous epidemiology study, the authors found a significant increase in the risk of acute myocarditis with rapid onset (median only 2 days) following vaccination with Pfizer’s mRNA-based vaccine (BNT162b2).



The risk was particularly elevated among male adolescents, especially after the second dose.



The Hong Kong-based physician specialists and scientists observed very high levels of serum cytokines pivotal for NK cells in post-vaccination patients with myocarditis.



In children and young people, an abundance of the CD57+ NK subset, correlating with cardiac troponin T levels was particularly noticeable in male patients and those individuals receiving their second jab.



An additional risk was associated with groups related to KIR (Killer-cell Immunoglobulin-like Receptor) polymorphism, which refers to the genetic diversity found in the KIR genes, which encode receptors on the surface of natural killer (NK) cells and some T cells.



These receptors play a crucial role in the immune system by regulating the activity of NK cells, which are essential for the body’s defense against infections and cancer.



The polymorphism in KIR genes contributes to the variability in immune responses among individuals. Also, individuals with NK-specific eQTLs.



That is genetic variants that influence the expression levels of genes specifically in natural killer (NK) cells. eQTLs are loci in the genome where variations are associated with changes in gene expression.



These variations can affect how much of a particular protein is produced in a cell, thereby impacting cell function and overall immune response.



The authors write, “The hypothesis that NK cells play a central role in the rapid onset of mRNA-vaccine-induced myocarditis.”



The authors of this study find evidence backing their core hypothesis: NK cells serve a key role in the cause of rapid-onset of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine-induced acute myocarditis in children and young people.



The Hong Kong-based research team now offers world-novel insights into the fundamental immune mechanisms associated with once-rare potentially deadly side effects.



The authors assume the growth in adoption of the use of mRNA vaccines meaning these findings raise implications for “designing improved mRNA vaccines that would have minimal NK activation effects.”



Physicians must be aware of patients who not only have a history of post-vaccination myocarditis but who are also genetically susceptible.



The scientists are now calling on clinicians to be more proactive regarding the use of dangerous mRNA shots.



In addition, they are using close monitoring of all patients who have received a similar mRNA vaccine.



link

[schwartzie]

^{Top Journal Removes Peer-Reviewed Study Linking Covid Shots to Cancer after Facebook 'Fact Check'}

An explosive peer-reviewed study was recently published in a prestigious medical journal which identifies a direct link between Covid mRNA shots and cancer.



By Frank Bergman
July 2, 2024 - 12:23 pm



An explosive peer-reviewed study was recently published in a prestigious medical journal which identifies a direct link between Covid mRNA shots and cancer.



As Slay News reported, the study, published in the Cureus journal, found that the risk of dying from cancer dramatically increased each time a patient received an mRNA injection.



The paper for the study is titled: “Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan.”



The study was conducted by world-renowned Japanese experts specializing in cardiovascular medicine and cancer research.



However, Cureus has now retracted the study after it sent shockwaves through the scientific community.



In a notice on its website, the journal said:



“Upon post-publication review, it has been determined that the correlation between mortality rates and vaccination status cannot be proven with the data presented in this article.”



This invalidated the results, prompting the retraction, the journal claims.



However, the journal only decided to retract the study after it was attacked by one of Facebook’s so-called “fact-checkers.”



Denis Rancourt, Ph.D., all-cause mortality researcher and former physics professor at the University of Ottawa in Canada, blasted the journal over the move.



Rancourt, who also has published in Cureus, slammed the retraction as “baseless” in a post on X.



“Showing data in support of vaccine-induced cancer is not allowed: burn it,” he wrote.



Other scientists also expressed frustration with the retraction.



“Unfortunately, one more scientific study that challenges the established narrative gets retracted,” Panagis Polykretis, Ph.D., a researcher at Italy’s Institute of Applied Physics at the National Research Council said in a statement.



“One more outrageous and unjustified example of censorship takes place!”



The study, published in April, analyzed official Japanese government statistics.



The researchers compared age-adjusted cancer mortality rates during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2022) with pre-pandemic rates.



The researchers found a 2.1% mortality increase in 2021 and a 9.6% increase in 2022.



They determined that age-adjusted death rates for leukemia, breast, pancreatic, and lip/oral/pharyngeal cancers increased significantly in 2022.



The study notes that cancer rates surged after a large portion of the Japanese population had received the third dose of a Covid mRNA shot.



Overall, they found no significant cancer-related excess mortality in 2020.



However, there a 1.1% increase in 2021 after the rollout of the first and second vaccine doses.



This continued to rise to a 2.1% increase in 2022.



Mortality for some cancers increased by as much as 9.7%, according to the study.



The paper also discussed possible mechanisms by which multiple mRNA vaccines could influence cancer rates and called for further research into the issue.



According to John Campbell, Ph.D., who discussed the study on his YouTube show, the findings suggested the vaccines may be accelerating cancer deaths in patients with preexisting tumors.



The paper went through a “rigorous peer review process” before Cureus accepted the paper on April 8, according to Polykretis, who detailed the retraction saga on his Substack.



Less than a month after the paper’s publication, a “fact check” was conducted on the study by one of Facebook’s “fact-checkers.”



However, while the study was flagged as being false, the so-called “fact check” actually targeted a social media post that cited the paper.



The post that was “fact-checked” was a link to a fake news story that cited the study but added false claims to sensationalize it.



Instead of simply reporting on the bombshell findings in the study, the article made false claims that Japan had “declared a national emergency over the explosion of cancer cases across the country caused by the mRNA vaccines.”



This was completely false, however.



The Japanese government took no action in response to the study.



The article also made the false claim that the study linked “increases in aggressive forms of turbo cancers in the country” to Covid shots.



However, the study made no mention of “turbo cancers.”



The Facebook “fact check,” conducted by Reuters used these false claims to assert that the study itself was “false.”



The “fact check” called the analysis “flawed” and stated the paper offered no proof of “turbo cancers” — a claim the study authors don’t make.



It continued by stating the study “assumes without evidence that vaccines are the cause of the cancer death rates they observe.”



It’s important to note that the “fact check” was not written by a doctor or a scientist, despite their attempts to overrule the top Japanese researchers.



So-called “fact-checkers” are almost always failed journalists who are not able to pursue a career in journalism so, instead, resort to attacking others.



Despite the unreliability of the discredited “fact check,” Cureus responded by pulling the study.



On June 12, Graham Parker-Finger, director of publishing for the Cureus Journal of Medical Science, notified the authors about concerns with their paper.



According to Polykretis, Parker-Finger cited the Facebook “fact check.”



An “expression of concern” was posted that same day and about a month later the journal retracted the article.



The article has been viewed over 287,000 times.



Polykretis asked, since when does a scientific journal’s editorial board judge scientific studies “on the basis of a poorly written, not backed by scientific data and not peer-reviewed fact-checking” article?



M. Nathaniel Mead is co-author of the first peer-reviewed paper to provide an extensive analysis of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine trial data and post-injection injuries.



Mead, whose article also was printed and then retracted by Cureus, described this latest retraction as “unfortunate but also quite revealing.”



In a statement, Mead said:



“The Gibo et al. retraction makes it official: Even though Cureus has now published many counter-establishment narrative papers related to adverse events, it is clearly ‘unsafe’ for any authors presenting papers that expose the likely mortality risk of these gene-based prodrugs.



“As you will recall, our comprehensive ‘Lessons Learned’ review and analysis also was heavily focused on the mortality aspect. So that’s where Springer-Nature seems to be drawing the line — after they accept the paper.



“Scientists seeking to publish on mortality-related aspects of the Covid mod mRNA injections obviously need to be extra cautious when considering their publishing options. These weaponized, predatory retractions will likely continue for as long as these products remain on the market.”



Following a backlash over the retraction and allegations of censorship, Parker-Finger responded by issuing a statement that said:



“Concerns were raised following publication, so we undertook a post-publication review, in line with good publishing practice, which led us to conclude that retraction was warranted for the reasons outlined in the retraction note.”



link

[schwartzie]

Top Oncologist Warns Cancers Are Surging in Vaxxed Patients

Frank Bergman
July 3, 2024 - 12:54 pm



An eminent British oncologist has raised the alarm after seeing aggressive deadly cancers surging in his patients after they received Covid mRNA shots.



Professor Angus Dalgleish, a world-renowned figure in the medical world who is credited with the discovery of the CD4 receptor, warns that he’s now seeing cancers more aggressive than ever before in vaccinated patients.



Dalgleish, who now serves as the head of The Institute of Cancer Vaccines and Immunotherapy, said each dose of the mRNA shots appears to make the cancers develop and spread more rapidly.



The professor’s discovery of the CD4 receptor is considered to be one of the biggest breakthroughs in modern medicine as it revealed how HIV was able to invade the body’s cells, causing AIDS.



Dalgleish’s discovery has led to breakthroughs in medicine, allowing scientists to create treatments that block viruses from entering the cells.



Like other leading medical experts, Dalgleish is now sounding the alarm about the long-term side effects he’s seeing from the mRNA injections given to the public to supposedly fight Covid.



Prof. Dalgleish notes that the shots are linked to blood clotting, heart failure, and Guillain-Barre syndrome.



However, his greatest cause for concern is what the oncologist is seeing in his own patients.



He notes that several of his patients had been doing well in their fight against cancer but suffered devastating setbacks after receiving the mRNA injections.


Their cancer came back far worse than before.



“I started to see in my melanoma clinic patients who’d been stable for years, who suddenly came in, relapsed,” he said.



“Sometimes the relapse was quite vicious. I mean, they had very bad disease.



“We had to treat them all over again.”

This shows how tough things got for them after the booster.



Additionally, Prof Angus Dalgleish watched three of his friends get the booster shot because they wanted to travel after being trapped at home for two to three years.



Tragically, all three of them saw their cancer come back.



Even worse, two of them died because the cancer didn’t respond to the treatments that usually work.



This heartbreaking experience is why Dalgleish has now decided to go public, he revealed.



He calls the use of mRNA platform in infectious disease “a gross medical negligence… really, this criminal negligence now, knowing what we do.”



If that’s not a mic drop moment, I don’t know what is.



Dalgleish is echoing the calls from other leading oncologists in calling for a complete stop to using all mRNA gene therapy.



He thinks Covid mRNA injections, especially the “booster” shot, are actually causing more problems than they solve.



Several of the world’s leading oncologists are now calling on global governments to immediately ban Covid mRNA shots over the soaring cases of “turbo cancers” that have been linked to the injections.



As Slay News has reported, a growing number of studies and renowned experts have determined that the jabs have caused the spike in rapidly spreading cancers in the past three years.



Aside from cancers, the Covid mRNA shots have also been linked to skyrocketing sudden deaths and a range of deadly side effects such as blood clots, heart failure, and strokes.



A growing assembly of oncologists and cancer experts is raising serious concerns over the global surge in rapidly developing aggressive cancer cases, often referred to as “turbo cancers.”



Several different forms of cancer have now been found to be quickly spreading among young, healthy people.



Some doctors are reporting that they are diagnosing apparently healthy people with cancer and they are dying within a week.



The unprecedented spread of the disease has led to oncology experts dubbing the phenomenon “turbo cancer.”



The latest expert to join the assembly of oncologists is Dr. Maarten Fornerod.



Dr. Fornerod is the associate professor of Cell Biology and Pediatric Oncology at the Erasmus University Medical Center in Rotterdam, Netherlands.



Fornerod has joined the group of experts to raise the alarm over the scientific links between the turbo cancer surge and mRNA injections.



The group points to a troubling correlation between experimental mRNA gene therapy and the increase in these fast-progressing cancers.



During a new panel discussion between the group of experts, Dr. Fornerod draws attention to a significant paper published on April 8, 2024, as reported by Slay News.



The peer-reviewed study, published in the prestigious Cureus journal, found that the risk of dying from cancer dramatically increased each time a patient received an mRNA injection.



The paper for the study is titled: “Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan.”



The study was conducted by world-renowned Japanese experts specializing in cardiovascular medicine and cancer research.



The study plots cancer mortality against vaccination rounds, with statistically significant excess mortality appearing after the widespread administration of the mRNA injections.



The spike protein triggered by the shots inhibits the activity of tumor suppressor genes, causing cancers to form and rapidly spread, Dalgleish explained during an interview earlier this year.



Additionally, the spike protein interferes with BRCA, which keeps ovarian and breast cancer in check.



The N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ) in itself leads to immune suppression, causing vaccine-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (VAIDS).



Without the immune system working in full force, it creates conditions conducive to turbo cancer growth.



As such, Prof. Dalgleish says:



“You should never use [mRNA shots] in the general population as vaccines because they’re not.”


link


“[Covid shots] should be completely banned!”

[schwartzie]

WHO: Covid Shots Triggered Global Heart Deaths Surge

Frank Bergman
July 4, 2024 - 12:54 pm



Official figures from the World Health Organization’s global database have revealed that Covid mRNA shots triggered a worldwide surge in heart failure and related sudden deaths.



The bombshell data was made public by a team of medical research investigators who were able to unseal and probe the data as part of a major international study.



The research was led by several investigators at Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.



They published the results of the study in the prestigious peer-reviewed Journal of Medical Virology.



The study sought to examine the worldwide burden of vaccine-associated heart failure (pericarditis and myocarditis) and the vaccines associated with these indications.



Pericarditis and myocarditis are both forms of inflammation in the heart that restrict the body’s ability to pump blood.



Both conditions can cause cardiac arrest, strokes, blood clots, and sudden death.



Pericarditis and myocarditis are both known side effects of Covid mRNA injections.



The surge in cases of pericarditis and myocarditis was revealed in data from the United Nations “health” agency WHO.


The researchers were able to unseal information from the database as part of their extensive investigations.



Tapping into and extracting data in the WHO international pharmacovigilance database, the researchers were able to analyze vaccine-associated pericarditis and myocarditis ranging from 1969 to 2023.



The comprehensive study examined a total of 130 million reports.



Calculating global reporting counts, Sooji Lee, Department of Medicine at Kyung Hee University, and colleagues report odds ratios (RORs) as well as information components (ICs).


They sought to identify the cause of surging pericarditis and myocarditis across 156 countries and territories.



The team identified 49 096 reports (male, n = 30 013) of vaccine-associated pericarditis and myocarditis among 73 590 reports of all-cause pericarditis and myocarditis.



Of note, the Korean-led team cites “…a significant increase in reports of vaccine-related cardiac adverse events over time, with a noteworthy surge observed after 2020, attributed to cases of pericarditis associated with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.”



Based on RORs the authors shared the vaccines with the highest incidence of myocarditis and pericarditis in order:






Overall males and older age groups experienced higher rates of cardiovascular-related conditions.



The authors discovered further age distinction, that individuals between the young ages of 12 and 17 years exhibited significant sex disproportion.



In the aggregate, the majority of adverse events were short in duration reported at a median of one day plus a fatality rate of 0.44%.



The authors state:



“Our analysis of global data revealed an increase in pericarditis and myocarditis reports associated with vaccines, particularly live vaccines like smallpox and anthrax, notably in young males.”



However, next to smallpox, the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines led to the most pericarditis and myocarditis.



The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) does accept that pericarditis and myocarditis are known side effects of Covid mRNA injections.



In recent years, the once-rare cases of myocarditis and pericarditis have surged in adolescent and young adult males.



Most frequently, heart failure is triggered within 7 days after receiving the second dose of an mRNA shot.



However, cases have also been observed in females, in other age groups, and after other doses.



Additionally, doctors warn that myocarditis and pericarditis can serve as a ticking timebomb.



The disorders often go undetected and cause deadly cardiac arrests, strokes, or blood clots months, or even years, later.



This study comes after a separate research team recently linked Covid shots to surging heart failure in children.



As Slay News reported, the peer-reviewed study, published in the prestigious journal Med, was conducted by scientists at the University of Hong Kong.



The study likely concludes that Covid mRNA shots massively increase the risk of myocarditis among children and young people, especially males.



link

[schwartzie]

Russell Brand Blasts Corporate Media for Normalizing Heart Failure in Young People

Frank Bergman
July 5, 2024 - 2:04 pm



Britsh comedian Russell Brand has accused the corporate media of pushing to normalize the global crisis of young, healthy people dying suddenly from heart failure.



Brand argues that rather than highlight the fact that the surges in cardiac injuries and related only surged after the Covid mRNA shots were rolled out, the corporate media is attempting to gaslight the public into believing it is completely normal.



During an episode of his “Stay Free” podcast this week, Brand said:



“On legacy media, it’s quite possible to watch a kind of bright breezy, cheerful news item about heart attacks as if it’s like some new trend, as if it’s Pogs or Pokemon Go or something.



“It’s a new sensation, heart disease in young people.”



Brand cited a May 30 segment on NBC’s “Today” show called “A new way of thinking about heart attacks.”



The show reported:



“Doctors say they’re seeing an alarming number of seemingly healthy patients having heart attacks and those patients are getting younger and younger.”



The report noted that “more than 10% of heart attack patients had no known risk factors, such as obesity or smoking.”


According to “Today,” doctors at New York’s Mount Sinai Hospital are “tracking patients to see if they can uncover the new risk factors behind this trend” and “unravel the mystery of young heart attacks.”



The report suggested several risk factors, including the obesity epidemic and “long-smoldering inflammation.”



However, Brand noted that “Today” didn’t suggest what might be causing the inflammation.



“I’ve got an idea,” Brand said.


“Type ‘mRNA,’ ‘spike protein cleavage site,’ ‘DARPA,’ ‘EcoHealth Alliance’ ‘NIH’” (National Institutes of Health) into your laptop or phone search bar.



“Put in there, ‘Wuhan Institute of Virology,’” he advised.



“Put into your search engine, ‘Anthony Fauci,’ put ‘dual-purpose weapons research.’”



Brand continued by mocking efforts by public health authorities and the media to sidestep any connection between increased incidences of heart attacks and the Covid injections.



“We’ve got to get to the bottom of this without ever indicting a major pharmaceutical company,” Brand said.



“In a way, this is hilarious and brilliant, but this is sort of also the way that the legacy media functions, even through innocuous soft power in introducing and normalizing ideas that should be galling and terrifying.”



Brand said some prominent journalists, such as Tucker Carlson, are an exception to this.



However, he noted that these journalists have been “vilified as sort of propagandists and figures of hatred” due to their public criticism of the Covid mRNA shots.



WATCH:







Brand shared excerpts from a speech Carlson delivered in Australia last month.



During the speech, Carlson suggested that a conflict of interest exists between mainstream media and Big Pharma.



The “media should be holding these people to the fire on that [for] the vax injuries and deaths, which are manifold,” Carlson said



“They’re everywhere.”



He noted that one of his children “was injured by a flu vaccine.”



Such incidences of vaccine injuries are “known in the United States,” Carlson said.



However, Americans are “not allowed to sue.”



“We can sue makers of playground equipment totally fine,” Carlson said.



“We can sue anybody for anything. Gun manufacturers.”



Yet, “you cannot sue vaccine manufacturers, and every vaccine causes injuries, every single one.”



According to Carlson, “no one in the media has written a story about it” because “Pfizer is one of the largest advertisers on television in the United States.”



“This is an insurance policy that the drugmakers are buying with the big media companies: ‘We’re your biggest advertiser. Maybe if we have a lot of vax injuries from a brand-new product, you won’t say too much’ — and they don’t,” Carlson said.



“I think that’s completely corrupt and shameful.”



WATCH:

link

[schwartzie]

Covid Shots Caused Surge in Sudden Cardiac Deaths Among Pilots, Study Finds

Frank Bergman
July 5, 2024 - 12:54 pm



A bombshell new study has confirmed that the surge in sudden cardiac-related deaths among pilots over the last three years was caused by Covid mRNA shots.



The study was led by an eminent Board Certified Endocrinologist Dr. Julian Yin Vieira Borges.



Borges, who is also board-certified in medical nutrition research, conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature, international aviation databases, and pilot associations in order to identify the cause of the surge in sudden deaths.



The team of Brazilian researchers analyzed the relevant data involving sudden cardiac death (SCD) among aviation pilots.



The analysis focused on trends in SCD prevalence, risk factors, prevention strategies, and recent findings.



During the study, the team investigated the potential impact of COVID-19, the role of mRNA injections, and important biomarkers to screen for predisposition.



The author of this study bravely raises the reality that the Covid mRNA shots are directly linked to cardiovascular concerns such as myocarditis and SCD.



The study’s paper was uploaded to the preprint medical journal medRxiv.



As Slay News has long reported, SCD threatens flight safety which of course can lead to tragic outcomes.


Sudden cardiac deaths are an ongoing threat to pilots and the leading cause of pilot mortality worldwide.



Dr. Borges investigates the trends in SCD among pilots from a global perspective, analyzing evidence from 2011 to 2023.



The study focuses on the growing impact of SCD as a global crisis and recent findings pointing to a potential rise in incidence, particularly after the rollout of the Covid mRNA shots, which were mandated for most pilots.



According to the study, “The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) has recognized SCD as a significant threat to aviation safety and has called for a global effort to address this issue.”


The ICAO asserts the solution is “robust medical screening, regular health assessments, and the implementation of preventive strategies to mitigate the risk of SCD among pilots.”



Nevertheless, despite such efforts, “SCD remains a persistent concern in the aviation industry.



“Current guidelines and protocols for cardiovascular risk assessment in pilots vary across countries and airlines.



“The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) provides general recommendations for medical examination of pilots, including cardiovascular evaluation.”



However, given the lack of universal adoption, plus a lack of standardization in the scope and frequency of cardiovascular risk assessment the author herein identifies “the need for a comprehensive and evidence-based protocol to mitigate the risk of SCD in pilots.”



According to the systematic review by Dr. Borges, the recent literature suggests a potential increase in SCD incidence among pilots after the COVID-19 pandemic.



The doctor notes that “Cardiovascular complications, increased stress, disruptions in healthcare, and changes in lifestyle” normally lead to an increased risk of cardiac death.



However, it doesn’t explain why SCD surged after the pandemic across the board among pilots.



Looking for biomarker indicators for a high probability of SCD risk, the reviewed literature suggests “biomarkers such as troponin, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) have been identified as potential indicators of increased SCD risk in pilots.”



A leading cause of death worldwide, SCD claims an estimated 17 million lives annually.



In the United States alone, SCD accounts for over 350,000 deaths each year, with a significant proportion occurring in seemingly healthy individuals.



The period from 2011 to 2023 has witnessed a significant shift in the landscape of aviation safety.



The threat of sudden cardiac death (SCD) among pilots is of particular concern for aviation safety.



Recent studies suggest a potential increase in SCD incidence among pilots following the COVID-19 pandemic.



The author raises questions covering the range of scenarios that may contribute to this potential rise in heart failure:



Cardiovascular complications

Increased stress

Disruptions in healthcare (due to COVID-19)

Changes in lifestyle

Importantly, Borges bravely warns about the “role of COVID-19 vaccination in increasing the risk of myocarditis, a condition that can lead to SCD.”



After warning about the link between SCD and Covid injections, the Brazilian doctor calls for investigations into the “vaccination and SCD risk.”



The Brazilian endocrinologist asserts that the Covid mRNA injections are responsible for the surge of sudden cardiac deaths



He notes that the study uncovered evidence that has caused concerns to be “raised about this potential link.”



Yet the author notes that the number of studies investigating this association with Covid shots was limited.



Therefore, he concludes that “further research is needed to confirm these findings and ensure the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in the aviation industry.”



link

[schwartzie]

Doctors Gave Down Syndrome Covid Patients ‘Do Not Resuscitate’ Orders without Consent

Frank Bergman
July 5, 2024 - 12:23 pm



Alarming new evidence has emerged that doctors secretly issued “Do Not Resuscitate” (DNR) orders for Down syndrome patients who tested positive for COVID-19.



The orders with issued with the consent or knowledge of the patients or their families.



The explosive findings were revealed in a press release from Dr. Stephanie Santoro, assistant professor of pediatrics at Harvard Medical School.



According to Santoro’s findings, Down syndrome patients and other disabled people were issued with DNR orders in an apparent effort to boost the numbers of “Covid deaths.”



Previous investigations have found that people with disabilities were at least twice as likely to die during the pandemic if they tested positive for Covid in a hospital.



However, Santoro’s new study reveals that patients with Down syndrome, specifically, were even more likely to die.



Down syndrome patients were increasingly given DNR orders at much higher rates than the able-bodied population.



Santoro, who is also the director of quality improvement research for the Down Syndrome Program at Mass General, and co-author of the new study, said people with Down syndrome and a diagnosis of COVID-19 – or COVID pneumonia – were six times more likely to be given DNRs than similar patients without Down syndrome.



Speaking about her reasoning behind the study, Santoro said:


“It seems like a lifetime ago, but early in the pandemic, extreme steps like rationing ventilators were being discussed.



“In the Down syndrome community, there was a lot of worry, of wanting to protect the rights of people with Down syndrome.”



People with Down syndrome are known to get sicker and need more support when they contract respiratory infections.



Santoro said the research team had to ensure the DNRs weren’t being given merely because the prognosis for someone with Down syndrome was so much poorer.


“We tried to compare some comorbidities – like intubation rates, if they had been in the ICU, or if they had come from acute care – but it didn’t pan out to have a similarly high odds ratio as the diagnosis of Down syndrome,” she said.



“Might people or their families be choosing DNR status when admitted with high acuity, life-threatening disease?



“We also wondered whether the folks with Down syndrome were older or if there was some other intervening covariable that would explain the high odds ratio of DNR status.



“But we couldn’t find anything that explained it.”



Though there are health conditions known to be associated with Down syndrome, medical advancements have been able to address many of them.



“n general, people with Down syndrome are leading healthy, happy, productive lives,” Santoro said.



“I think the DNR status rate should likely be the same as for people without Down syndrome.”



This study is not an anomaly, however.



A major investigation in the United Kingdom likewise found that people with disabilities were being pressured to sign DNRs during the pandemic.



Additionally, the U.S. National Institute for Health (NIH) and Care Excellence also told doctors that they should assess patients with disabilities for “frailty” before deciding whether or not they could be given life-saving treatments.



“[T]he thing that caused me more distress was when the government decided they were going to publish the frailty guidance,” one survey respondent said.



“I looked to see how frail I am and am I going to be offered a ventilator if I need one.



“The reality according to that guidance was no, not necessarily.



“And, then thinking how can I prove my worth to people to make sure I get that treatment if needed.”



link

[schwartzie]

Doctors Warn of ‘Alarming 3000% Increase in Unexplained Child Deaths’

Frank Bergman
July 6, 2024 - 12:54 pm



A group of prominent Canadian medical doctors and scientists has just held a press conference to warn the public about a staggering spike in child deaths.



The doctors issued an emergency warning over an “alarming 3000% increase in unexplained child deaths.”



The press conference featured Dr. Byram Bridle, Dr. William Makis, Darrell Komick, Dr. Chris Shoemaker, Dr. David Speicher, and Dr. Mark Trozzi.



The doctors took questions from reporters about the surge in child deaths which emerged after the Covid mRNA shots rollout started in early 2021.



The presser was held on the morning after the landmark event “An Injection of Truth” in Calgary, Canada.



At the event, a delegation of Canadian medical doctors and scientists presented crucial scientific information.



They then held the press conference to alert the public about their findings.



This event addressed the dramatic increase in unexplained child deaths in Alberta.



Doctors and scientists have been collaborating to find solutions aimed at providing essential knowledge to Albertans and the global community.


This knowledge is vital for making informed decisions regarding the Covid mRNA injections.



WATCH:

The full conference can be viewed HERE.



The news comes amid growing concerns about the devastating impact of the injections on children and young people.


As Slay News reported, a comprehensive study by leading pediatric scientists confirmed that the unprecedented surge in heart failure among children is caused by Covid mRNA shots.



The peer-reviewed study, published in the prestigious journal Med, was conducted by scientists at the University of Hong Kong.



The team, led by Dr. Hing Wai Tsang, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, the University of Hong Kong, uncovered evidence to confirm that Natural Killer (NK) cell activation by Covid mRNA injections causes the pathogenesis of acute myocarditis.



Myocarditis is an inflammation of the heart muscle that restricts the body’s ability to pump blood.



The inflammation causes strokes, and cardiac arrest, and can ultimately cause sudden death.



The study concludes that Covid mRNA shots massively increase the risk of myocarditis among children and young people, especially males.



Meanwhile, a separate group of renowned researchers has just published a bombshell study that proves a direct correlation between Covid mRNA shots and surging numbers of sudden deaths seen around the world.



The study was conducted by Christof Kuhbandner, PhD, Professor of Psychology at the University of Regensburg in Bavaria Germany, and mathematician Prof. Matthias Reitzner at Osnabrück University, a public research university located in the city of Osnabrück in Lower Saxony.



In their study, the top scientists identified a direct correlation between surging excess mortality in Germany and Covid mRNA injections.



The esteemed authors of the study are now raising the alarm about the devastating side effects of the shots and calling for governments to launch full investigations into their explosive findings.



Raising alarm, the authors emphasize:



“The increase in excess mortality, an increasingly strong positive correlation with the vaccination rate of a federal state is observed, which reaches a value of r = 0.85 in the third pandemic year, indicating that excess mortality increased the stronger the higher the vaccination rate in a federal state was.



“An analysis of stillbirths showed exactly the same pattern.



“No other systematic correlation pattern was observed.”

link

[schwartzie]

Hundreds of Doctors & Scientists Sign Bombshell Accord Demanding Ban of Covid mRNA Shots

Frank Bergman
July 6, 2024 - 12:23 pm



Thousands of people, including hundreds of medical doctors and scientists, have signed a bombshell accord calling on governments around the world to ban Covid mRNA shots.



The accord cites serious concerns about the safety and efficacy of the experimental injections.



The Hope Accord has already gained nearly 3,000 signatures after it was released this week.



Over 200 doctors, 300 other healthcare professionals, and more than 100 scientists and academics have now signed the accord.



All of the signature endorsements have been verified to ensure they are from real and qualified professionals.



The statement, which also calls for recognition and support for the vaccine injured, addresses five key priorities:



Immediate suspension of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine products: It says mRNA vaccine products should be suspended immediately due to a growing body of evidence suggesting a link between the vaccine rollout and alarming trends in disability and excess deaths.



A comprehensive re-evaluation of COVID-19 vaccine safety and efficacy: It demands independent investigations to thoroughly reassess the safety and efficacy of all COVID-19 vaccine products, ensuring transparency and full disclosure of data.



Recognition and support for the vaccine injured: The accord stresses the need to acknowledge and support individuals who have suffered vaccine-related injuries, providing them with the necessary medical care and compensation.


Restoration of ethical principles abandoned during the COVID-19 era: It calls for a return to core medical ethics, including informed consent, bodily autonomy, and the protection of children, all of which were compromised in the last few years.



Addressing the root causes of the current predicament: The accord advocates an honest investigation into the factors that led to the current ethical and medical issues, including institutional groupthink, conflicts of interest, and the suppression of scientific debate.



The initiative emerged as a response to the U.K. People’s Vaccine Inquiry.



It started as a statement by members of Doctors for Patients U.K.


Those doctors include GP Dr. Ayiesha Malik, Surgeon Dr. James Royle, and Cardiologist Dr. Dean Patterson.



Emergency physician Dr. Tim Kelly saw the need for a broader international ethical statement.



The call for an official statement from medical professionals drew supportive clinicians from the U.S., Canada, South Africa, and Australia.



In a press release, the organizers said the accord “calls on the medical community and policymakers to reassess the ethical breaches of recent years and ensure future health crises are managed with greater adherence to ethical principles and scientific integrity.”



Healthcare professionals, scientists, and concerned members of the public are invited to join the movement by adding their signatures and support.



Leading cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra has endorsed the statement in a video on X.



WATCH:

Dr. Jordan Peterson has also backed the initiative.



Peterson said that, while he doubts ethics can really be brought back to medicine, “these people are worth supporting.”


The Hope Accord was also explained in more detail by Dr. John Campbell.



WATCH:

Meanwhile, an explosive new study was published this week that uncovered official figures from the World Health Organization’s global database showing that Covid mRNA shots triggered a worldwide surge in heart failure and related sudden deaths.



As Slay News reported, the bombshell data was made public by a team of medical research investigators who were able to unseal and probe the data as part of a major international study.



link

[schwartzie]

Covid-Vaxxed Children 4423% More Likely to Die Than Unvaxxed

Frank Bergman
July 7, 2024 - 12:54 pm



Alarming official government statistics have revealed that children who received Covid mRNA shots are at a massively elevated risk of dying.



The shocking figures were revealed in a UK government report which quietly confirmed that the Covid injections have been killing children at an unprecedented rate.



The admission was buried in an official report compiled using data from the UK government’s Office for National Statistics (ONS).



The data shows that children who received the shots are 4423%/45x more likely to die of any cause than unvaccinated children.



Additionally, vaxxed children are 13,633%/137x more likely to die of COVID-19 than those who didn’t receive an mRNA injection.



The stunning figures were revealed in recently published ONS data regarding deaths by vaccination status in England.



The latest dataset from the ONS is titled “Deaths by Vaccination Status, England, 1 January 2021 to 31 May 2022.”



The official data can be accessed on the ONS website here and downloaded here.



Table 6 of the dataset contains data on deaths involving COVID-19, deaths not involving Covid, and all-cause deaths by age group in England between January 1, 2021, and May 31, 2022.


It also includes the number of deaths among children aged 10 to 14 and teenagers aged 15 to 19 by vaccination status.



However, the ONS fails to provide the death rate per 100,000 person-years among children or teenagers.



The agency has provided this information for all other adult age groups in every other table contained in the dataset.



Unfortunately for the UK government, the ONS has failed to disguise the horrific mortality rates among Covid-vaccinated children.


Nevertheless, the ONS still provides enough information to calculate the mortality rates.



The data from the ONS includes the number of deaths and the number of person-years among each vaccination group.



Therefore, to calculate the mortality rates by vaccination status, dividing each vaccination group’s “person-years” by 100,000 and then dividing the number of deaths among each vaccination group by the answer to the previous equation gives the correct figures.



e.g. Unvaccinated 2,881,265 Person-years / 100,000 = 28.81 Unvaccinated Covid-19 Deaths (9) / 28.81 = 0.3 Deaths per 100,000 person-years



According to the figures provided by the ONS, the following two charts show the mortality rates by vaccination status per 100,000 person-years among children aged 10 to 14 in England for the period January 1, 2021 to May 31, 2022.










The above two charts contain a large amount of information.



However, the most significant findings can be viewed in the following chart:







Regarding COVID-19 deaths, the ONS reveals that the mortality rate among unvaccinated children aged 10 to 14 equates to 0.31.



However, the mortality rate equates to 3.24 per 100,000 person-years for one-dose vaccinated children.



Further, the mortality rate equates to a shocking 41.29 per 100,000 person-years for children who received three doses.



These figures reveal that unvaccinated children are far less likely to die of COVID-19 than children who received a Covid mRNA injection.



Based on Pfizer’s vaccine efficacy formula, this data reveals that the Covid injections are now proving to have negative effectiveness against death among children.



The real-world effectiveness between January 2021 and May 2022 can be seen in the following chart:







Formula: Unvaccinated Death Rate – Vaccinated Death Rate / Unvaccinated Death Rate x 100 = Vaccine Effectiveness against Death


The Covid mRNA injections are proving to have real-world negative effectiveness against death of minus-966.67% among partly vaccinated children.



In addition, the shots have a shocking real-world negative effectiveness against death of minus-13,633.33% among triple vaccinated children.



This is far from the claimed 95% effectiveness against death made by Pfizer, however.



In other words, partly vaccinated children are 11x/966.67% more likely to die of COVID-19 than unvaccinated children.



Triple-vaccinated children are 137.3x/13,633.33% more likely to die of COVID-19 than unvaccinated children.



And unfortunately, there is little improvement when it comes to non-Covid deaths.



Here’s the chart again showing the mortality rates by vaccination status among children in England:







The all-cause death mortality rate equates to 6.39 per 100,000 person-years among unvaccinated children.



The figure is slightly higher at 6.48 among partly vaccinated children.



However, the rate goes from bad to worse following the administration of each injection.



The all-cause death mortality rate equates to 97.28 among double-vaccinated children.



Alarmingly, the figure soars to a shocking 289.02 per 100,000 person-years among triple-vaccinated children.



This means, according to the UK government’s own official data, double-vaccinated children are 1422% / 15.22x more likely to die of any cause than unvaccinated children.



Triple-vaccinated children, meanwhile, are 4423% / 45.23x more likely to die of any cause than unvaccinated children.



Unfortunately, this trend continues among vaccinated teenagers.



According to the figures provided by the ONS, the following two charts show the mortality rates by vaccination status per 100,000 person-years among teenagers aged 15 to 19 in England for the period January 1, 2021, to May 31, 2022:









Again, the above two charts contain a large amount of information.



The most significant findings can be viewed in the following chart:







The disturbing data reveals that triple-vaccinated teenagers are 136% / 2.35x more likely to die of Covid-19 than unvaccinated teenagers.



they are also 38% more likely to die of any cause than unvaccinated teenagers.



The worst figures in terms of all-cause deaths are however among double-vaccinated teenagers.



Official UK government data reveals that double-vaccinated teenagers, with a mortality rate of 36.17 per 100,000 person-years, are 149.3% / 2.5 times more likely to die of any cause than unvaccinated teenagers with a mortality rate of 14.51 per 100,000 person-years.



To summarise, the official UK government figures published by the UK’s Office for National Statistics, prove that Covid mRNA-vaccinated children and teenagers are far more likely to die of both COVID-19 and any other cause than children and teenagers who have never received a shot.



The data proves that “vaccination” is actually worsening the immune response to the alleged virus and increasing the risk of both hospitalization and death.



However, regarding all-cause deaths, Covid mRNA injections are directly killing children.

link

[schwartzie]

Euthanasia Soars Among Covid-Vaccinated

Frank Bergman
July 7, 2024 - 11:49 am



Disturbing new data has revealed that the number of people being killed by euthanasia is soaring among the Covid-vaccinated as many struggle to cope with injuries caused by the mRNA injections.



The news comes amid growing concerns that euthanasia, or “assisted suicide,” is being “mainstreamed,” especially in Canada and “progressive” European nations.



Burdensome citizens are now being killed off by the state in nations that have socialized “healthcare” systems.



All the countries that now have liberal euthanasia laws all followed a similar pattern.



When the laws were first introduced, they were pitched as a last resort for desperate terminally ill patients to give them the option to avoid dying a slow painful death.



However, in recent years, these laws have been increasingly expanded.



Some nations, such as Canada, are now killing physically healthy citizens, adults and children, for a range of minor and recoverable issues such as depression, hearing loss, and even poverty and homelessness.



Taxpayer-funded doctors are increasingly pushing for patients to opt for euthanasia rather than treating them for mental health issues such as depression or suicidal thoughts.



However, this is raising major concerns because a substantial number of people who are suicidal recover eventually.


Nevertheless, euthanasia is a far more cost-effective method of “treating” a patient when compared to treatments such as therapy and antidepressant drugs.



While there is an inherent ability of any human to kill themself, government or medical bodies should be involved when the grounds can be as vague as “depression.”



The second trend is that it seems, millions of people have suffered from vaccine injury from the COVID-19 countermeasures.



In response, governments have started euthanizing people who have been injured by Covid mRNA shots.


These folks have been repeatedly “gaslit” by a medical establishment that neither wants to acknowledge the prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine injury nor to seek or offer ways to help these suffering people feel better.



Now, it is clear that some people have been euthanized for post-vaccine syndrome and that this may become a more regular phenomenon.



In Canada, the number of medically assisted deaths has skyrocketed since the deployment of Covid shots.



Injuries from Covid shots are a global issue, however.



In the United States, it is estimated that up to 2 million Americans are now struggling with material loss of quality of life due to adverse effects associated with Covid mRNA injections.



Meanwhile, vax-pushers will argue that the deaths and injuries caused by the shots are a small price to pay for the “millions of people” that the “vaccines” allegedly “saved.”



Several vaccine-injured people have gone public with their stories before being forced into euthanise due to vaccine injuries.



The Swiss Post Vaccine Syndrome Association (PVS) is a non-profit working on behalf of people injured by COVID-19 vaccines.



PVS’s main concern is to improve the “general living situation” and the health of injured folks.



In the fall of 2023, a woman named Jeanine chose to kill herself via “Exit,” according to PVS.



Jeanine had suffered from severe harm from the Moderna vaccine for two years.



She had been a member of PVS since its founding, and this outlet offered Jeanine’s own testimony:



“I had an exciting job as an IT project manager, I went climbing, biking, and driving a convertible with my girlfriends.



“I enjoyed my life to the fullest.



“Then came Corona. In June 2021, I had the Moderna vaccine injected.



“In the days that followed, I had severe aching limbs and dizziness.



“I could only drag myself to the toilet on all fours.



“But that passed. The bad memory faded. I even believed that I was now particularly well protected from Corona.



“But three months later, the symptoms reappeared.



“I could no longer walk, stand, or speak.



“I was constantly exhausted and no longer myself.



“The family doctor was at a loss. ‘There’s nothing you can do about it,’ she said.



“I sought help from over ten other doctors, including more than half at the University Hospital – also without success.



“Because my symptoms correspond one-to-one to those of Long Covid patients, I had my blood tested for a possible undetected corona disease.



“Result: negative. Twice.



“Those affected by vaccine damage are left alone.



“It is as if one had gone to war against Corona in solidarity and the injured are still left on the battlefield today.



“I would like to see information among doctors about the existence of vaccine damage, a contact point for those affected, and above all, research on this phenomenon that can no longer be denied.”



Jeanine was only 37 years old when she was euthanized over the Covid vaccine injury.



She received the Moderna mRNA product on January 6 and March 6, 2021.



Another group in Switzerland euthanizing Covid shot victims is the Pegasus Association.



In late June of 2023, Evie Magazine published the sad story of model/actress Katerina Pavelek, 41.



Pavelek had received a COVID-19 booster more than a year prior to the article.



After her shot, she was diagnosed with the incurable neurological illness myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS).



ME/CFS is a long-term ailment with a wide variety of symptoms that interfere with daily activities.



Some people are bed-bound with this disease.



Doctors suspected that Pavelek also had respiratory ALS, the neurodegenerative illness that impacts the muscles needed for breathing and swallowing.



On June 1, 2023, she posted about her situation on Instagram.



Pavelek told her followers she was going to kill herself via assisted suicide:



“Hi guys, over the last 10 days I became severely ill again homebound unable to do much,” she wrote.



“My body is too weak to fight this illness and I have no more strength so I made [the] decision to end my life at Pegasus Association in Switzerland.



“I was diagnos[ed] with [an] untreatable chronic neurological illness ME/CFS caused by a booster jab on top of having suspected respiratory ALS.



“This illness made me disabled, unable to work or have social life and unable to enjoy life altogether.



“Breathing has become more and more difficult and painful for me and my lung function has been declining.



“Thank you for all your friendship and support over [the] last year.



“The booster jab I received over year ago destroyed my health, my body, and my life completely.



“There is no other way to end my suffering other than the decision I made.”



Comparing her condition to death, Pavelek wrote, “The process is the same.



“The feelings are the same.



“The only difference is that instead of a loved one dying, it’s like you’ve died.



“Your life, your hopes, your dreams, your plans.



“Who you were and who you wanted to be.



“Everything. All forever changed.”



Lindsey Briones, 36, is a vaccine-injured Floridian who is contemplating assisted suicide as the only way to escape her worsening cardiovascular Covid mRNA injection injury.



A mother and wife, she is aware of a center in Colorado that can help with the end-of-life process.



With crushing medical debt in the hundreds of thousands of dollars, Briones feels a burden to her family and society.



After receiving the Pfizer jab in 2021, she has basically turned into a shell of her former self.



A former adrenaline junkie, now she cannot do anything that excites her, or she might drop dead.



Most others who have a similar condition have already died.



Briones got her only shot of Pfizer’s mRNA on August 27, 2021, at Halifax Health Hospital, Daytona Beach.



Her life was changed forever.



She was required to get the jab for both work and school.



Within several days of receiving the shot, Briones experienced a major anaphylaxis incident, followed by an incredibly high heart rate.



This turned into a full-blown Ventricular Tachycardia (VTAC) with sudden cardiac arrest.



From September 1 through December 15 of 2021, she experienced VTAC and ventricular fibrillation (V-FIG), an irregular heart rhythm that can stop your heart abruptly, several times.



Her doctors are on record connecting these incidents to the vaccine.



They also reported them to the CDC’s VAERS.



While some specialists have worked with her, acknowledging the source, others have treated her like so many other persons injured by the COVID-19 vaccines.



Briones now “walks on eggshells” for fear of heart failure.



She is now in a state called “polymorphic VTAC,” meaning this irregular heartbeat goes in a loop and cycles with different arrhythmias.



This condition involves a malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmia with a changing QRS pattern involving either a termination spontaneously (causing syncope if it lasts more than a few seconds) or a deterioration to ventricular fibrillation (VF), causing cardiac arrest.



She cannot have caffeine, sugar, or any stimulant.



While Lindsey used to be full of life, as mentioned an adrenaline junkie, now any substantial exertion can literally kill her.



She cannot get excited; no amusement or fun is allowed.



Briones also now has a lump in her thyroid, which could be cancer.



She has also been diagnosed with lupus, as well as chronic fatigue syndrome.



Her quality of life is gone, and she feels like a burden on her husband, and family with no purpose left.



While insurance covers most of the bills, she is still deep and deeper in debt given the sheer magnitude of the costs.



She had to get a pacemaker which costs $350,000 every 12 years or so for example, and now teeters on the financial edge.



According to some reports, there have been 44,958 Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) deaths reported in Canada since the introduction of legislation in 2016.



In 2022, 13,241 MAID provisions were reported in Canada, accounting for 4.1% of all deaths in Canada.



This represents a growth rate of 31.2% over 2021.



What’s truly disturbing is the substantial growth in MAID in Canada since the mass COVID-19 vaccination wave which commenced in December 2020 into 2021.



As reported by the Canadian government the number of MAID deaths grew substantially the year of the COVID-19 countermeasure deployment—2021.



Medical Assisted Dying Deaths in Canada:



Year MAID Deaths in Canada

2016 1,018

2017 2,838

2018 4,480

2019 5,661

2020 7,603

2021* 10,064

2022 13,241

*first full year of COVID-19 countermeasure deployment



51% of the total MAID deaths have proceeded in just the two full years since the mass vaccination campaign in Canada.



The sheer number of assisted suicides since the deployment of the mass countermeasures in Canada is striking.

link

[schwartzie]

Covid-Vaxxed Suffer Staggering Loss of Life Expectancy

Frank Bergman
July 8, 2024 - 12:54 pm



People who were “vaccinated” for Covid with mRNA injections have had decades wiped from their life expectancy, a new peer-reviewed study has revealed.



The bombshell study, published in the renowned Swiss medical journal MDPI, has sent shockwaves through the scientific community.



However, the study has further confirmed warnings from leading experts about the long-term impact of the Covid mRNA shots.



The researchers found that the Covid-vaxxed suffered a “statistically significant” loss of life expectancy after two or more doses.



Following a detailed analysis of the study, the McCullough Foundation confirms that those who received two doses of the shots have lost 37% of their life expectancy.



The Foundation, founded by eminent American cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough, reported:



“The subjects vaccinated with two doses lost 37% of life expectancy compared to the unvaccinated population during the follow-up considered.”



Further, the study found so-called “booster” shots are completely “ineffective.”



This is not some “conspiracy theory,” however.


Steve Kirsch, the MIT computer scientist and data expert who founded the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation (VSRF), responded the the explosive study in a new interview.



Kirsch breaks down what this tragic news could mean for young people.



WATCH:

While the results of the study are causing a fresh wave of alarm over Covid mRNA injections, regarding Slay News readers will likely not be so surprised.



As Slay News first reported last year, a separate study found that Covid-vaccinated members of the public have lost an estimated 25 years of their life expectancy.



However, for the previous study, researchers analyzed government data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Cleveland Clinic Data, and insurance company risk assessment data.



The analysis uncovered a disturbing trend showing life spans plummetting in those who had multiple doses of the shots.



The latest Cleveland Clinic Data and the latest U.S. data were analyzed by Josh Stirling, founder of Insurance Collaboration to Save Livess and former #1 ranked Insurance Analyst.



Stirling’s study shows an incredibly disturbing trend.



The damage to health caused by each vaccine dose does not lessen over time as it appears to continue indefinitely.



The data shows that every year, excess deaths are soaring dramatically as all forms of mortality accelerate, despite the level of injections people take going down.



The issue is not isolated to the United States, however, and is impacting nations all around the world.



Recent government data out of Australia shows that the excess deaths in 2022 were 5162% higher than in previous years.



According to the study based on Cleveland’s government data, the average age of a man is around 80 years if he’s unvaxxed.



Yet, the rate of vaxxed deaths is growing in comparison to unvaxxed.



The study found that someone who’s had 4 or 5 shots and is 30 years old today can now expect to live to 55 at the oldest.



However, according to the latest study, based on newer figures, life expectancy may be reducing.



37 percent of an 80-year-old’s life equates to 29.6 years.



This means 30-year-olds who received two or more shots can now expect to live to around 50.

link